Purposefully Triggering Unintended Consequences: the European Commission and the Uncertain Future of the EU-ACP Partnership

References

• Babarinde, O., and Faber, G. eds. 2005. The European Union and Developing Countries: The Cotonou Agreement. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Baert, P. 1991. “Unintended Consequences: A Typology and Examples”. International Sociology 6 (2): 201–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. 2017. Human rights provisions in Economic Partnership Agreements in light of the expiry of the Cotonou Agreement in 2020. European Parliament, Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies.
   Google Scholar
• Bilal, S., and Ramdoo, I. 2016. Sustainability and human rights in EPAs: A comparative analysis between the Caribbean and African EPAs. ECDPM Discussion Paper no. 198. Maastricht, Brussels: European Centre for Development Policy Management.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. 2016. The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European Characteristics. Security Policy Brief no. 75. Brussels: Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt, J., Kejzer, N., Medinilla, A., and De Tollenaere, M. 2016. The future of ACP-EU relations: A political economy analysis. ECDPM Policy and Management Report no. 21. Maastricht, Brussels: European Centre for Development Policy Management.
   Google Scholar
• Burlyuk, O. 2017. The ‘Oops!’ of EU Engagement Abroad: Analyzing Unintended Consequences of EU External Action. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (5): 1009–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. 1982. A Dubious Distinction? An Inquiry into the Value and Use of Merton’s Concepts of Manifest and Latent Function. American Sociological Review 47 (1): 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2007. The European Union and International Development: The Politics of Foreign Aid. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. ed. 2013a. The European Union in Africa: Incoherent policies, asymmetrical partnership, declining relevance? Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2013b. Rethinking ACP-EU relations after Cotonou: tensions, contradictions, prospects. Journal of International Development 5 (5): 742–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2018. Caught between the ACP and the AU: Africa’s relations with the European Union in a post-Cotonou Agreement context. South African Journal of International Affairs 25 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M., and Orbie, J. eds. 2014. The Trade-Development Nexus in the European Union: Differentiation, coherence and norms. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daase, C., and Friesendorf, C. eds. 2010. Rethinking Security Governance: The Problem of Unintended Consequences. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Zwart, F. 2015. Unintended but not Unanticipated Consequences. Theory and Society 44 (3): 283–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickie, M., Gozdecka, D., and Reich, S. eds. Unintended Consequences: The Impact of Migration Law and Policy. Canberra: Australian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrakopoulos, D. 2001. Unintended Consequences: Institutional Autonomy and Executive Discretion in the European Union. Journal of Public Policy 21 (2): 107–31.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 1990. Merton’s Functionalist and the Unintended Consequences of Action. In J. Clark, C. Modgil and S. Modgil, eds. Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Palmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2017a. Recommendation for a Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations on a Partnership Agreement between the European Union and countries of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States. COM(2017) 763 final, 12 December.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2017b. Annex to Recommendation for a Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations on a Partnership Agreement between the European Union and countries of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States. COM(2017) 763 final Annex, 12 December.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (EC and HR). 2015. Towards a new partnership between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries after 2020. JOIN(2015) 33 final, 6 October.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (EC and HR). 2016a. A renewed partnership with the countries of Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific. JOIN(2016) 52 final, 22 November.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (EC and HR). 2016b. Impact assessment accompanying the document A renewed partnership with the countries of Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific. SWD(2016) 380 final, 22 November.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). 2016. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy - Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. June.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. 2005. A Triumph of Realism over Idealism? Cooperation between the European Union and Africa. Journal of European Integration 27 (3): 263–83.
   Google Scholar
• Forwood, G. 2001. The Road to Cotonou: Negotiating a Successor to Lomé. Journal of Common Market Studies 39 (3): 423–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, P. 1971. Manifest and Latent Functions. The Philosophical Quarterly 21 (82): 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, M. 2002. The European Union and the Third World. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hulse, M. 2018. Actorness and trade negotiating outcomes: West Africa and the SADC Group in negotiations for Economic Partnership Agreements. International Relations 32 (1): 39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurt, S. 2003. Co-operation and Coercion? The Cotonou Agreement between the European Union and ACP States and the End of the Lomé Convention. Third World Quarterly 24 (1): 161–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabeen, S. 2016. Do we really care about unintended outcomes? An evaluation of theory and practice. Evaluation and Program Planning 55 (April): 144–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keijzer, N., and Bartels, L. 2017. Assessing the Legal and Political Implications of the Post-Cotonou Negotiations for the Economic Partnership Agreements. DIE Discussion Paper. Bonn: Deutsches Institut fuer Entwicklungspolitik.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, D.-J. and Schulpen, L. 2018. Introduction to the special issue ‘unintended effects of international cooperation’. Evaluation and Program Planning 68 (June): 202–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laferrère, A., and Helly, D. 2016. Four ideas to give Africa its place in the EU Global Strategy. ECDPM Talking Points blog, 5 April.
   Google Scholar
• Matarutse, K.H., and Chipaike, R. 2017. Impediments besetting the negotiations for a comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and East and Southern Africa (2007-2014). South African Journal of International Affairs 24 (3): 355–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. 1936. The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mica, A. 2017. The Unintended Consequences in New Economic Sociology: Why Still Not Taken Seriously? Social Science Information 56 (4): 544–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mica, A. 2018. Sociology as Analysis of the Unintended: From the Problem of Ignorance to the Discovery of the Possible. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Montoute, A., and Virk, K. eds. 2017. The ACP Group and the EU Development Partnership: Beyond the North-South Debate. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nedergaard, P., and Snaith H. 2015. ‘As I Drifted on a River I Could Not Control’: The Unintended Ordoliberal Consequences of the Eurozone Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (5): 1094–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., and Groen, L. 2018. Explaining goal achievement in international negotiations: the EU and the Paris Agreement on climate change. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (5): 708–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C.F., Karlsson, C., and Hjerpe, M. 2017. Assessing the European Union’s global climate change leadership: from Copenhagen to the Paris Agreement. Journal of European Integration 39 (2): 239–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 1996. The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 123–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, A. 2000. The hidden abode: Sociology as analysis of the unexpected. American Sociological Review 65 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K.E. 2017 “A European Union global strategy for a changing world?”. International Politics 54 (4): 503–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, R. 2016. EU environmental policy and diplomacy from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Bonn: University of Bonn, Centre for European Integration Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, C. 2006. The EU, Africa and Economic Partnership Agreements: Unintended Consequences of Policy Leverage. The Journal of Modern African Studies 44 (3): 441–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. 2017. Framing the EU Global Strategy: A Stronger Europe in a Fragile World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., and Anholt, R. 2016. Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s New Leitmotif: Pragmatic, Problematic or Promising? Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 414–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar