The Challenging Paths to Net-Zero Emissions: Insights from the Monitoring of National Policy Mixes

References

• Adam, Christian, Hurka, Steffen, Knill, Christoph, and Steinebach, Yves. 2019. Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, Graeme, Mallett, Alexandra, Burlica, Bozica, Nolan-Poupart, Francis, and Slater, Robert. 2014. Evaluating the Effects of Policy Innovations: Lessons from a Systematic Review of Policies Promoting Low-carbon Technology. Global Environmental Change 29: 444–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boydstun, Amber E., Bevan, Shaun, and Thomas, Herschel F. 2014. The Importance of Attention Diversity and How to Measure It. Policy Studies Journal 42 (2): 173–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgin, Alexander. 2021. Modernization of Environmental Reporting as a Tool to Improve the European Commission’s Regulatory Monitoring Capacity. Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (2): 354–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, Giliberto, and Howlett, Michael. 2009. Introduction: The Determinants of Policy Change: Advancing the Debate. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11 (1): 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, Giliberto, and Howlett, Michael. 2020. The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes. SAGE Open 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, Roxanne, Playford, Christopher J., Gayle, Vernon, and Dibben, Chris. 2016. The Role of Administrative Data in the Big Data Revolution in Social Science Research. Social Science Research 59: 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, Peter. 2019. Quality: From Plato to Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dauwe, Tom, Young, Katrina, Mandl, Nicole, and Jóźwicka, Magdalena. 2019. Overview of Reported National Policies and Measures on Climate Change Mitigation in Europe in 2019. EIONET Report. November. https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-cme/products/etc-cme-reports/etc-cme-report-5-2019-overview-of-reported-national-policies-and-measures-on-climate-change-mitigation-in-europe-in-2019/@@download/file/ETC_CME_Technical_Report_2019_5%20final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, Duncan L., Kern, Florian, and Rogge, Karoline S. 2019. The Co-evolution of Policy Mixes and Socio-technical Systems: Towards a Conceptual Framework of Policy Mix Feedback in Sustainability Transitions. Research Policy 48 (10): 103555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency). 2019a. The European Environment — State and Outlook 2020: Knowledge for Transition to a Sustainable Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2019b. Navigation through the EEA Outputs Related to Climate Policies and Measures Reported in Europe. http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/help/mmr/MMR%20Article%2013%20Navigation%20through%20the%20EEA%20outputs%20on%20climate%20policies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, Peter. 2014. Administrative Data. In Adrian Duşa, Dietrich Nelle, Günter Stock and Gert G. Wagner, eds. Facing the Future: European Research Infrastructures for the Humanities and Social Sciences: 47–60. Berlin: SCIVERO Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• EU Science Hub. 2019. The JRC-EU-TIMES Model. 19 November. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/scientific-tool/jrc-eu-times-model-assessing-long-term-role-energy-technologies.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. The European Green Deal COM(2019) 640 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the Framework for Achieving Climate Neutrality and Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0080&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2021. Legislative Train Schedule: Fit for 55 Package under the European Green Deal. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-european-green-deal/package-fit-for-55.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank. 2006. Evaluating Public Policy. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, Kieron, Uyarra, Elvira, and Laranja, Manuel. 2011. Reconceptualising the ‘Policy Mix’ for Innovation. Research Policy 40 (5): 702–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeff, Peter, and Baur, Nina. 2020. Digital Data, Administrative Data, and Survey Compared. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 45 (3): 244–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, David J. 2018. Statistical Challenges of Administrative and Transaction Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series a (Statistics in Society) 181 (3): 555–605.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, Jean, and Torfing, Jacob. 2016. Innovation. In Christopher Ansell and Jacob Torfing, eds. Handbook on Theories of Governance: 236–44. Cheltenham-Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, Constanze, and Jordan, Andrew J. 2010. Burden Sharing: Distributing Burdens or Sharing Efforts? In Andrew J. Jordan, et al., eds. Climate Change Policy in the European Union: Confronting the Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation?: 83–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildén, Mikael, Jordan, Andrew J., and Rayner, Tim 2014. Climate Policy Innovation: Developing an Evaluation Perspective. Environmental Politics 23 (5): 884–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Michael, and Varone, Frédéric. 2016. The Public Policy Process. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael, and Cashore, Benjamin. 2009. The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11 (1): 33–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael, and Rayner, Jeremy. 2007. Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’. Policy and Society 26 (4): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Sara, Tozer, Laura, and Giest, Sarah. 2019. The Politics of Data-driven Urban Climate Change Mitigation. In Jeroen van der Heijden, Harriet Bulkeley, and Chiara Certomà, eds. Urban Climate Politics: Agency and Empowerment: 116–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurka, Steffen, and Steinebach, Yves. 2020. Legal Instrument Choice in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (2): 278–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvarinen, Joy. 1999. European Community’s Monitoring Mechanism for CO2 and Other Greenhouse Gases: The Kyoto Protocol and Other Recent Developments. Rev. Eur. Comp. & Int’l Envtl. L. 8: 191–7.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Nohrstedt, Daniel, Weible, Christopher M., and Sabatier, Paul A. 2014. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, Evolution, and Ongoing Research. In Paul A. Sabatier and Christopher M. Weible, eds. Theories of the Policy Process, Vol. 3: 183–224. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Andrew J., and Moore, Brendan. 2020. Durable by Design? Policy Feedback in a Changing Climate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Andrew J., and Rayner, Tim. 2010. The Evolution of Climate Policy in the European Union: A Historical Overview. In Andrew J. Jordan, et al., eds. Climate Change Policy in the European Union: Confronting the Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation?: 52–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapteyn, Arie, and Ypma, Jelmer Y. 2007. Measurement Error and Misclassification: A Comparison of Survey and Administrative Data. Journal of Labor Economics 25 (3): 513–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, Florian, and Howlett, Michael. 2009. Implementing Transition Management as Policy Reforms: A Case Study of the Dutch Energy Sector. Policy Sciences 42 (4): 391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, Paula, and Kern, Florian. 2016. Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Support? Innovation Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions. Research Policy 45 (1): 205–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, Christoph, Schulze, Kai, and Tosun, Jale. 2012. Regulatory Policy Outputs and Impacts: Exploring a Complex Relationship. Regulation & Governance 5 (4): 427–44.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, Michèle, Ringel, Marc, and Müller, Rainer. 2020. ‘Harder’ Soft Governance in the European Energy Union. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22 (6): 787–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulovesi, Kati, and Oberthür, Sebastian. 2020. Assessing the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework: Incremental Change toward Radical Transformation? Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 29 (2): 151–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, Mark, Mewhirter, Jack, and Berardo, Ramiro. 2020. The Origins of Conflict in Polycentric Governance Systems. Public Administration Review 80 (2): 222–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckling, Jonas O., and Chung, Gu Yoon. 2009. Sectoral Approaches for a Post-2012 Climate Regime: A Taxonomy. Climate Policy 9 (6): 652–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, Sebastian, and Dupont, Claire. 2021. The European Union’s International Climate Leadership: Towards a Grand Climate Strategy? Journal of European Public Policy 28 (7): 1095–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossenbrink, Jan, Finnsson, Sveinbjoern, Bening, Catharina R., and Hoffmann, Volker H. 2019. Delineating Policy Mixes: Contrasting Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches to the Case of Energy-storage Policy in California. Research Policy 48 (10): 103582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Charles F., Karlsson, Christer, and Hjerpe, Mattias. 2017. Assessing the European Union’s Global Climate Change Leadership: From Copenhagen to the Paris Agreement. Journal of European Integration 39 (2): 239–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, Regine. 2020. Analyse and Rule? A Conceptual Framework for Explaining the Variable Appeals of Ex-ante Evaluation in Policymaking/Ein integrierter Erklärungsansatz für die variable Hinwendung zu ex-ante Evaluierungstools in der Politikgestaltung. Dms–der Moderne Staat–Zeitschrift Für Public Policy, Recht Und Management 13 (1): 124–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Campillo, Xira. 2020. Leadership in the European Union: Climate, Energy and Economy. In Xira Ruiz-Campillo, ed. Transformation of The European Union: The Impact of Climate Change in European Policies: 33–62. World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffrin, André, Sewerin, Sebastian, and Seubert, Sybille. 2015. Toward a Comparative Measure of Climate Policy Output. Policy Studies Journal 43 (2): 257–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Tobias S., and Sewerin, Sebastian. 2019. Measuring the Temporal Dynamics of Policy Mixes: An Empirical Analysis of Renewable Energy Policy Mixes’ Balance and Design Features in Nine Countries. Research Policy 48 (10): 103557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, Jonas J. 2021. The European Green Deal: What Prospects for Governing Climate Change with Policy Monitoring? Politics and Governance 9 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4306.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, Jonas J., Hildén, Mikael, and Jordan, Andrew. J. 2018. The Challenges of Monitoring National Climate Policy: Learning Lessons from the EU. Climate Policy 18 (1): 118–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, Jonas J, and Jordan, Andrew J. 2020. Towards Harder Soft Governance? Monitoring Climate Policy in the EU. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22 (6): 774–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, Jonas J., and Rayner, Timothy. 2019. Monitoring Energy Policy. In Michèle Knodt and Jörg Kemmerzell, eds. Handbook of Energy Governance in Europe. Cham: Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73526-9_43-1.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, Jonas J., Schulze, Kai, Hildén, Mikael, and Jordan, Andrew J. 2019. Policy Monitoring in the EU: The Impact of Institutions, Implementation, and Quality. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60 (4): 719–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze, Kai. 2021. Policy Characteristics, Electoral Cycles, and the Partisan Politics of Climate Change. Global Environmental Politics 21 (2): 44–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, Robert E., and Schwandt, Thomas A. 2006. On Discerning Quality in Evaluation. In Ian Shaw, Jennifer C. Greene, and Melvin M. Mark, eds. The Sage Handbook of Evaluation: 404-18. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, John, Radaelli, Claudio M., Jordan, Andrew, and Jacob, Klaus. 2009. The Policy and Politics of Policy Appraisal: Emerging Trends and New Directions. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (4): 640–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettestad, Jørgen, Eikeland, Per Ove, and Nilsson, Mans. 2012. EU Climate and Energy Policy: A Hesitant Supranational Turn? Global Environmental Politics 12 (2): 67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurzel, Rüdiger, Zito, Anthony, and Jordan, Andrew J. 2019. Smart (and Not-so-smart) Mixes of New Environmental Policy Instruments. In Judith van Erp, Michael Faure, André Nollkaemper, and Niels Philipsen, eds. Smart Mixes for Transboundary Environmental Harm: 69–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xun, Wu, Howlett, Michael, and Ramesh, M. 2017. Policy Capacity and Governance: Assessing Governmental Competences and Capabilities in Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar