Stay awhile in my burrow! Interspecific associations of vertebrates to Indian crested porcupine burrows

REFERENCES

• Agrawal VC, Chakraborty S. 1992. The Indian crested porcupine, Hystrix indica (Kerr). In: Prakash I, Ghosh PK, editors. Rodents in Indian agriculture. Jodhpur (India): Scientific Publishers; p. 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Aiyadurai A, Jhala YV. 2006. Foraging and habitat use by golden jackals (Canis aureus) in the Bhal region, Gujarat, India. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 103:5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Alkon PU, Saltz D. 1985. Patterns of crested porcupine (Hystrix indica) damage to cultivated potatoes. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 14:171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhupathy S. 1987. Occurrence of the bicoloured leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros fulvus) in Rajasthan. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 84:199–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bhupathy S. 1999. Reptile fauna of Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 96:475–477.
   Google Scholar
• Bhupathy S, Haque MH. 1986. Association of rock python (Python molurus) with porcupine (Hystrix indica). J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 83:449–450.
   Google Scholar
• Bhupathy S, Ramesh C, Bahuguna A. 2014. Feeding habits of Indian rock pythons in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, India. Herpetol J. 24:59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton MJ, McAlpine CA, Smith AG, Franklin CE. 2014. The importance of underground shelter resources for reptiles in dryland landscapes: A woma python case study. Austral Ecol. 39:819–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell TM III, Clark TW. 1981. Colony characteristics and vertebrate associates of white-tailed and black-tailed prairie dogs in Wyoming. Am Midl Nat. 105:269–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion HG, Seth SK. 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Nasik (India): Government of India Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark TW, Campbell III TM, Socha DG, Casey DE. 1982. Prairie dog colony attributes and associated vertebrate species. Great Basin Nat. 42:572–582.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming DH. 1975. A field study of the ecology and behaviour of warthog. Salisbury (Rhodesia): The Trustees of the National Museums and Monuments of Rhodesia.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel JC. 1983. The book of Indian reptiles. Bombay (India): Bombay Natural History Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dziadzio MC, Smith LL. 2016. Vertebrate use of gopher tortoise burrows and aprons. Southeast Nat. 15:586–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebensperger LA. 2006. Sociality in New World hystricognath rodents is linked to predators and burrow digging. Behav Ecol. 17:410–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg JF, Kinlaw A. 1999. Introduction to the special issue: ecological significance of open burrow systems. J Arid Environ. 41:123–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grether GF, Peiman KS, Tobias JA, Robinson BW. 2017. Causes and consequences of behavioral interference between species. Trends Ecol Evol. 32:760–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurung KK, Singh R. 1996. Field guide to the mammals of the Indian subcontinent. San Diego (California, USA): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansell MH. 1993. The ecological impact of animal nests and burrows. Funct Ecol. 7:5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins LK, Nicoletto PF. 1992. Kangaroo rat burrows structure the spatial organisation of ground-dwelling animals in a semiarid grassland. J Arid Environ. 23:199–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heard GW, Black D, Robertson P. 2004. Habitat use by the inland carpet python (Morelia spilota metcalfei: Pythonidae): seasonal relationships with habitat structure and prey distribution in a rural landscape. Austral Ecol. 29:446–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede L, Dziminski MA. 2017. Greater bilby burrows: important structures for a range of species in an arid environment. Aust Mammal. 39:227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson DR, Milstrey EG. 1989. The fauna of gopher tortoise burrows. In: Diemer JE, et al., editors. Gopher tortoise relocation symposium proceedings. Tallahassee (FL): Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission; p. 86–98.
   Google Scholar
• Jhala YV, Moehlman PD. 2008. Canis aureus. IUCN Red List Threatened Species. 2008:e.T3744A10054631. Version 2015.2.
   Google Scholar
• Kelt DA. 2011. Comparative ecology of desert small mammals: a selective review of the past 30 years. J Mammal. 92:1158–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AA, Ahmad S, Hussain I, Munir S. 2000. Deterioration impact of Indian crested porcupine, Hystrix indica, on forestry and agricultural systems in Pakistan. Int Biodeter Biodegrad. 45:143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinlaw AL. 1999. A review of burrowing by semi-fossorial vertebrates in arid environments. J Arid Environ. 41:127–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiviat E. 1978. Vertebrate use of muskrat lodges and burrows. Estuaries. 1:196–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk R, Jędrzejewska B, Zalewski A, Jędrzejewski W. 2008. Facilitative interactions between the Eurasian badger (Meles meles), the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), and the invasive raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland. Can J Zool. 86:1389–1396.
   Google Scholar
• Legendre P. 2005. Species associations: the Kendall coefficient of concordance revisited. J Agric Biol Environ Stat. 10:226–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lips KR. 1991. Vertebrates associated with tortoise Gopherus polyphemus burrows in four habitats in South-Central Florida. J Herpetol. 25:477–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur VB, Sivakumar K, Singh B, Anoop KR. 2009. A bibliographical review for identifying research gap areas: Keoladeo Ghana National Park – A world Heritage site. Dehradun (India): Wildlife Institute of India.
   Google Scholar
• McCue MD. 2010. Starvation physiology: reviewing the different strategies animals use to survive a common challenge. Comp Biochem Physiol A: Mol Integr Physiol. 156:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelssohn H, Yom-Tov Y. 1999. Fauna Palaestina – Mammalia of Israel. Jerusalem (Israel): Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith M, Rideout M 2017. Overlap: estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns. R package version 0.2.7. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=overlap
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell HA. 1965. Investigations of the cave atmosphere of a Mexican bat colony. J Mammal. 45:568–577.
   Google Scholar
• Monetti L, Massolo A, Sforzi A, Lovari S. 2005. Site selection and fidelity by crested porcupines for denning. Ethol Ecol Evol. 17:149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori E, Maggini I, Menchetti M. 2013. When quills kill. The defense strategy of the crested porcupine Hystrix cristata L., 1758. Mammalia. 78:229–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori E, Menchetti M, Balestrieri A. 2014. Interspecific den sharing: a study on European badger setts using camera traps. Acta Ethol. 28:121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A. 2015. Record of Spalerosophis atriceps (Fischer, 1885) from Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Reptile Rap ? Newsl South Asian Reptile Netw. 17:22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Kumara HN, Bhupathy S. 2017a. Determinants of occupancy and burrow site selection by Indian crested porcupine in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India. Curr Sci. 112:2440–2448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Kumara HN, Bhupathy S. 2018a. Environmental determinants of activity variation of an overlooked burrowing rodent: the Indian crested porcupine. Mammalia. 82:449–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Kumara HN, Bhupathy S. 2018b. Golden jackal’s underground shelters: natal site selection, seasonal burrowing activity and pup rearing by a cathemeral canid. Mammal Res. 63:325–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Kumara HN, Bhupathy S. 2018c. Sun-basking, a necessity not a leisure: anthropogenic driven disturbance, changing the basking pattern of the vulnerable Indian rock python in Keoladeo National Park, India. Glob Ecol Conserv. 13:e00368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Pilakandy R, Kumara HN, Manchi SS, Bhupathy S. 2017b. Burrow characteristics and its importance in occupancy of burrow dwelling vertebrates in Semiarid area of Keoladeo National Park, Rajasthan, India. J Arid Environ. 141:7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Velankar AD, Kumara HN. 2017c. Invasive Prosopis juliflora replacing the native floral community over three decades: a case study of a World Heritage Site, Keoladeo National Park, India. Biodivers Conserv. 26:2839–2856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil VK, Jhala YV. 2008. Movement patterens and habitat use of golden jackal Canis aureus in Bhal regions of Gujarat. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 105:209–211.
   Google Scholar
• Pigozzi G. 1986. Crested porcupines Hystrix cristata within badger setts Meles meles in the Maremma Natural Park, Central Italy. Saugetierkd Mitt. 33:261–263.
   Google Scholar
• Pope CH. 1937. Snakes alive and how they live. New York: Viking Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pope CH. 1961. The giant snakes: the natural history of the boa constrictor, the Anaconda, and the largest pythons, including comparative facts about other snakes and basic information on reptiles in general. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Pough FH. 1983. Amphibians and reptiles as low-energy systems. In: Aspey WP, Lustick SI, editors. Behavioral energetics: the cost of survival in Vertebrates. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; p. 141–188.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash I. 1997. Ecology of desert mammals. Curr Sci. 72:31–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prater S. 1965. The book of Indian animals. Madras (India): Bombay Natural History Society, Diocesan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prusty BAK, Chandra R, Azeez PA, Sharma LL. 2007. New additions to the ichthyofauna of Keolodeo National Park, A world heritage site in India. Zoos’ Pr J. 22:2848–2852.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2016. An introduction to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. 7th ed. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2019. The list of wetlands of international importance (the Ramsar List). Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Available from: https://www.ramsar.org/document/the-list-of-wetlands-of-international-importance-the-ramsar-list [Accessed 12 Jan 2019].
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Read JL, Carter J, Moseby KM, Greenville A. 2008. Ecological roles of rabbit, bettong and bilby warrens in arid Australia. J Arid Environ. 72:2124–2130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers WA, Panwar HS, Mathur VB. 2002. Wildlife protected areas in India: A review (Executive Summary). Dehradun (India): Wildlife Institute of India.
   Google Scholar
• Roper TJ, Ostler JR, Schmid TK, Christian SF. 2001. Sett use in European badgers Meles meles. Behaviour. 138:173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig ML. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology. 62:327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowcliffe M 2016. Activity: animal activity statistics. R package version 1.1. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=activity
   Google Scholar
• Santos SM, Da Luz Mathias M, Mira AP. 2010. Local coexistence and niche differences between the Lusitanian and Mediterranean pine voles (Microtus lusitanicus and M. duodecimcostatus). Ecol Res. 25:1019–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selva N, Jedrzejewska B, Jedrzejewski W, Wajrak A. 2003. Scavenging on European bison carcasses in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (eastern Poland). Ecoscience. 10:303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw GE, Shebbeare EO, Barker PE. 1939. The snakes of northern Bengal and Sikkim. J Darjeeling Nat Hist Soc. 14:1–97.
   Google Scholar
• Singh A, Mukherjee A, Dookia S, Kumara HN. 2017. An updated account of mammal species and population status of ungulates in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. Curr Sci. 113:103–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder MA, Linhart YB. 1997. Porcupine feeding patterns: selectivity by a generalist herbivore? Can J Zool. 75:2107–2111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé R. 2007. Ecology: scaling laws in the drier. Nature. 449:151–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers M. 1992. The implications of social structure for the conservation and control of a warthog Phacochoerus aethiopicus population in the Andries Vosloo Kudu Reserve, Eastern Cape. Province [M.Sc. Dissertation]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Soni VC, Sudhakar JP, Kumar V. 1995. Studies on the den ecology of the golden jackal Canis aureus in Saurashtra Region of Gujarat State, India. Tigerpaper. 22:27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Stromberg MR. 1978. Subsurface burrow connections and entrance spatial pattern of prairie dogs. Southwest Nat. 23:173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Studier EH, Baca TP. 1968. Atmospheric conditions in artificial rodent burrows. Southwest Nat. 13:401–410.
   Google Scholar
• Taber RD, Sheri AN, Ahmad MS. 1967. Mammals of the Lyallpur region, West Pakistan. J Mammal. 48:392–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr. 31:79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayan VS. 1991. Keoladeo National Park – ecology study: final report (1980-1990). U.S. Fish and wildlife service: ministry of environment and government of India. Mumbai (India): Bombay Natural History Society.
   Google Scholar
• Vleck D. 1979. The energy cost of burrowing by the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. Physiol Zool. 52:122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Weber JN, Hoekstra HE. 2009. The evolution of burrowing behaviour in deer mice (genus Peromyscus). Anim Behav. 77:603–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White AM, Cameron EZ. 2009. Communal nesting is unrelated to burrow availability in the common warthog. Anim Behav. 77:87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodbury AM. 1954. Study of reptile dens. Herpetologica. 10:49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zelová J, Šumbera R, Okrouhlík J, Burda H. 2010. Cost of digging is determined by intrinsic factors rather than by substrate quality in two subterranean rodent species. Physiol Behav. 99:54–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar