Female cuckoo calls elicit vigilance and escape responses from wild free-range chickens

REFERENCES

• Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Åsmul M, Møller AP. 2006. Rapid increase in cuckoo egg matching in a recently parasitized reed warbler population. J Evol Biol. 19(6):1901–1910. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01166.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro T. 2005. Antipredator defences in birds and mammals. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 2003. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chance EP. 1940. The truth about the cuckoo. London: Country Life.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper WE, Blumstein DT. 2014. Novel effects of monitoring predators on costs of fleeing and not fleeing explain flushing early in economic escape theory. Behav Ecol. 25(1):44–52. doi:10.1093/beheco/art083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell W. 2008. Non-lethal effects of predation in birds. Ibis. 150(1):3–17. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD. 1993. Mimicry and the eye of the beholder. Proc R Soc Lond B. 253:203–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalziell AH, Welbergen JA. 2016a. Mimicry for all modalities. Ecol Lett. 19(6):609–619. doi:10.1111/ele.12602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalziell AH, Welbergen JA. 2016b. Elaborate mimetic vocal displays by female superb lyrebirds. Front Ecol Evol. 4:34. doi:10.3389/fevo.2016.00034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin C. 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Davies NB. 2015. Cuckoo: cheating by nature. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Davies NB, Welbergen JA. 2008. Cuckoo–hawk mimicry? An experimental test. Proc R Soc Lond B. 275(1644):1817–1822. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies NB, Welbergen JA. 2009. Social transmission of a host defense against cuckoo parasitism. Science. 324(5932):1318–1320. doi:10.1126/science.1172227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrigh W, Gilbert F, Green P, McGregor P, Grewcock D. 1993. Imperfect mimicry: A pigeon’s perspective. Proc R Soc Lond B. 251:195–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth JW. 1991. Responses of breeding reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus to mounts of sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus, cuckoo Cuculus canorus and jay Garrulus glandarius. Ibis. 133(1):68–74. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04812.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutour M, Lena JP, Lengagne T. 2016. Mobbing behaviour varies according to predator dangerousness and occurrence. Anim Behav. 119:119–124. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelaar P, Wright J. 2006. Potential prey make excellent ornithologists: adaptive, flexible responses towards avian predation threat by Arabian babblers Turdoides squamiceps living at a migratory hotspot. Ibis. 148(4):664–671. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00567.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmunds M. 2000. Why are there good and poor mimics? Biol J Linn Soc. 70(3):459–466. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower T. 2010. Fork-tailed drongos use deceptive mimicked alarm calls to steal food. Proc R Soc Lond B. 278(1711):1548–1555. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower TP, Gribble M, Ridley AR. 2014. Deception by flexible alarm mimicry in an African bird. Science. 344(6183):513–516. doi:10.1126/science.1249723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font E. 2019. Mimicry, camouflage and perceptual exploitation: the evolution of deception in nature. Biosemiotics. 12(1):7–24. doi:10.1007/s12304-018-9339-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujisawa M, Sakai Y, Kuwamura T. 2018. Aggressive mimicry of the cleaner wrasse by Aspidontus taeniatus functions mainly for small blennies. Ethology. 124(6):432–439. doi:10.1111/eth.12743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskett AC. 2011. Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives. Biol Rev. 86(1):33–75. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00134.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentle LK, Gosler AG. 2001. Fat reserves and perceived predation risk in the great tit, Parus major. Proc R Soc Lond B. 268(1466):487–491. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill SA, Bierema AMK. 2013. On the meaning of alarm calls: A review of functional reference in avian alarm calling. Ethology. 119(6):449–461. doi:10.1111/eth.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griesser M. 2008. Referential calls signal predator behavior in a group-living bird species. Curr Biol. 18(1):69–73. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grim T, Samaš P, Procházka P, Rutila J. 2014. Are tits really unsuitable hosts for the common cuckoo. Ornis Fennica. 91:166–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igic B, Magrath RD. 2014. A songbird mimics different heterospecific alarm calls in response to different types of threat. Behav Ecol. 25(3):538–548. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igic B, McLachlan J, Lehtinen I, Magrath RD. 2015. Crying wolf to a predator: deceptive vocal mimicry by a bird protecting young. Proc R Soc Lond B. 282(1809):20150798. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RR, Wilcox RS. 1993. Spider flexibly chooses aggressive mimicry signals for different prey by trial and error. Behaviour. 127(1–2):21–36. doi:10.1163/156853993X00407
   Google Scholar
• Kelly LA, Coe RL, Madden JR, Healy SD. 2008. Vocal mimicry in songbirds. Anim Behav. 76(3):521–528. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.04.012
   Google Scholar
• Krams I, Krama T. 2002. Interspecific reciprocity explains mobbing behaviour of the breeding chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs. Proc R Soc Lond B. 269(1507):2345–2350. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krams I, Krama T, Berzins A, Rantala MJ. 2010. The risk of predation favors cooperation among breeding prey. Commun Integr Biol. 3(3):243–244. doi:10.4161/cib.3.3.11395
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krams I, Vrublevska J, Koosa K, Mierauskas P, Rantala MJ, Tilgar V. 2014. Hissing calls improve survival in incubating female great tits (Parus major). Acta Ethol. 17(2):83–88. doi:10.1007/s10211-013-0163-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmore NE, Stevens M, Maurer G, Heinsohn R, Hall ML, Peters A, Kilner RM. 2011. Visual mimicry of host nestlings by cuckoos. Proc R Soc Lond B. 278(1717):2455–2463. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson SL, Enos JK, Mendes NC, Gill SA, Hauber ME. 2020. Heterospecific eavesdropping on an anti-parasitic referential alarm call. Commun Biol. 3(1):143. doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0875-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang W, Møller AP, Stokke BG, Yang C, Kovařík P, Wang H, Yao C-T, Ding P, Lu X, Moksnes A, et al. 2016. Geographic variation in egg ejection rate by great tits across 2 continents. Behav Ecol. 27(5):1405–1412. doi:10.1093/beheco/arw061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilly MV, Lucore EC, Tarvin KA. 2019. Eavesdropping grey squirrels infer safety from bird chatter. PLoS ONE. 14(9):e0221279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima SL. 1994. Collective detection of predatory attack by birds in the absence of alarm signals. J Avian Biol. 25(4):319–326. doi:10.2307/3677279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima SL. 1998. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions. Bioscience. 48(1):25–34. doi:10.2307/1313225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima SL. 2009. Predators and the breeding bird: behavioral and reproductive flexibility under the risk of predation. Biol Rev. 84(3):485–513. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00085.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima SL, Rattenborg NC, Lesku JA, Amlaner CJ. 2005. Sleeping under the risk of predation. Anim Behav. 70(4):723–736. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd JE. 1965. Aggressive mimicry in photuris: firefly femmes fatales. Science. 149(3684):653–654. doi:10.1126/science.149.3684.653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Yang C, Liang W. 2018. Hawk mimicry does not reduce attacks of cuckoos by highly aggressive hosts. Avian Res. 9(1):35. doi:10.1186/s40657-018-0127-4
   Google Scholar
• Magrath RD, Haff TM, Fallow PM, Radford AN. 2015. Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences. Biol Rev. 90(2):560–586. doi:10.1111/brv.12122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrath RD, Haff TM, Horn AG, Leonard ML. 2010. Calling in the face of danger: predation risk and acoustic communication by parent birds and their offspring. Adv Study Behav. 41:187–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao J. 2013. An exploration on technology and comprehensive management measures for raising chickens in forest. Ningxia J Agric For Sci Technol. 54:79–80.
   Google Scholar
• Maran T. 2017. Mimicry and meaning: structure and semiotics of biological mimicry. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Møller AP, Kwiecinski Z, Tryjanowski P. 2017. Prey reduce risk-taking and abundance in the proximity of predators. Curr Zool. 63(6):591–598. doi:10.1093/cz/zow114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Vollmer C. 2013. Asymmetries in commitment in an avian communication network. Naturwissenschaften. 100(2):199–203. doi:10.1007/s00114-013-1009-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roche DP, McGhee KE, Bell AM. 2012. Maternal predator-exposure has lifelong consequences for offspring learning in threespined sticklebacks. Biol Lett. 8(6):932–935. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe MP, Coss RG, Owings DH. 1986. Rattlesnake rattles and burrowing owl hisses: a case of acoustic Batesian mimicry. Ethology. 72(1):53–71. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1986.tb00605.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JR, Sherwood E, Webster MT, Jiang L, Ingman M, Sharpe T, Ka S, et al. 2010. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature. 464(7288):587–591. doi:10.1038/nature08832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP. 2004. Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley CG. 1955. Behavioral mimicry in the titmice (Paridae) and certain other birds. Wilson Bull. 67:128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Soler M. 2014. Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev. 89(3):688–704. doi:10.1111/brv.12075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar H, Beauchamp G, Shanker K. 2009. Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis. Anim Behav. 78(2):337–347. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suraci JP, Clinchy M, Dill LM, Roberts D, Zannette LY. 2016. Fear of large carnivores causes a trophic cascade. Nat Commun. 7(1):10698. doi:10.1038/ncomms10698
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki TN. 2011. Parental alarm calls warn nestlings about different predatory threats. Curr Biol. 21(1):R15–R16. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki TN. 2015. Assessment of predation risk through referential communication in incubating birds. Sci Rep. 5(1):10239. doi:10.1038/srep10239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Templeton CN. 2005. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science. 308(5730):1934–1937. doi:10.1126/science.1108841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorogood R, Davies NB. 2012. Cuckoos combat socially transmitted defenses of reed warbler hosts with a plumage polymorphism. Science. 337(6094):578–580. doi:10.1126/science.1220759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trnka A, Prokop P. 2012. The effectiveness of hawk mimicry in protecting cuckoos from aggressive hosts. Anim Behav. 83(1):263–268. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trnka A, Trnka M, Grim T. 2015. Do rufous common cuckoo females indeed mimic a predator? An experimental test. Biol J Linn Soc. 116(1):134–143. doi:10.1111/bij.12570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tryjanowski P, Morelli F, Osiejuk TS, Møller AP. 2018. Functional significance of cuckoo Cuculus canorus calls: responses of conspecifics, hosts and non-hosts. Peer J. 6:e5302. doi:10.7717/peerj.5302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voipio P. 1953. The hepaticus variety and the juvenile plumage types of the cuckoo. Ornis Fennica. 30:97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Welbergen JA, Davies NB. 2008. Reed warblers discriminate cuckoos from sparrowhawks with graded alarm signals that attract mates and neighbours. Anim Behav. 76(3):811–822. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.020
   Google Scholar
• Welbergen JA, Davies NB. 2011. A parasite in wolf’s clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol. 22(3):574–579. doi:10.1093/beheco/arr008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West B, Zhou B. 1988. Did chickens go north? New evidence for domestication. J Archaeol Sci. 15(5):515–533. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(88)90080-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyllie I. 1981. The cuckoo. London: Batsford.
   Google Scholar
• York JE, Davies NB. 2017. Female cuckoo calls misdirect host defences towards the wrong enemy. Nat Ecol Evol. 1(10):1520–1525. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0279-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorzinski JL, Platt ML. 2012. The difference between night and day: antipredator behavior in birds. J Ethol. 30(2):211–218. doi:10.1007/s10164-011-0318-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorzinski JL, Vehrencamp SL. 2009. The effect of predator type and danger level on the mob calls of the American crow. Condor. 111(1):159–168. doi:10.1525/cond.2009.080057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Lu H, Sun W, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. 2019. Heterospecific alarm-call recognition in two warbler hosts of common cuckoos. Anim Cogn. 22(6):1149–1157. doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01307-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Wang L, Xing X, Yang C, Ma J, Møller AP, Wang H, Liang W. 2016. Barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) differentiate between common cuckoo and sparrowhawk in China: alarm calls convey information on threat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 70(1):171–178. doi:10.1007/s00265-015-2036-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Xing X, Jiang Y, Liang W, Wang H, Møller AP. 2017. Alarm call-based discrimination between common cuckoo and Eurasian sparrowhawk in a Chinese population of great tits. Ethology. 123(8):542–550. doi:10.1111/eth.12624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Liu J, Gao Z, Zhang L, Wan D, Liang W, Møller AP. 2020. Comparative analysis of hissing calls in five tit species. Behav Process. 171:104029. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2019.104029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zub K, Czeszczewik D, Ruczyński I, Kapusta A, Walankiewicz W. 2017. Silence is not golden: the hissing calls of tits affect the behaviour of a nest predator. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 71(5):79. doi:10.1007/s00265-017-2313-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar