Testing coyotes in an object choice task following a human gesture

REFERENCES

• Barocas A, Hefner R, Ucko M, Merkle JA, Geffen E. 2018. Behavioral adaptations of a large carnivore to human activity in an extremely arid landscape. Anim Conserv. 21:433–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman PW, Fleming PA. 2012. Big city life: carnivores in urban environments. J Zool. 287:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benard MF, McCauley SJ. 2008. Integrating across life‐history stages: consequences of natal habitat effects on dispersal. Am Nat. 171:553–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee D, Mandal S, Shit P, Varghese MG, Vishnoi A, Bhadra A. 2020. Free-ranging dogs are capable of utilizing complex human pointing cues. Front Psychol. 10:2818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee D, Sau S, Bhadra A. 2018. Free-ranging dogs understand human intentions and adjust their behavioral responses accordingly. Front Ecol Evol. 6:232. doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonduriansky R, Day T. 2009. Nongenetic inheritance and its evolutionary implications. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 40:103–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breck SW, Poessel SA, Mahoney P, Young JK. 2019. The intrepid urban coyote: a comparison of bold and exploratory behavior in coyotes from urban and rural environments. Sci Rep. 9:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champagne FA. 2008. Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care. Front Neuroendocrinol. 29:386–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppinger R, Coppinger L. 2001. Dogs: A startling new understanding of canine origin, behavior & evolution. New York (NY): Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Coues E. 1873. The prairie wolf, or coyote: Canis latrans. Am Nat. 7:385–389.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth RA, Belloni V, Anderson SR. 2015. Cycles of species replacement emerge from locally induced maternal effects on offspring behavior in a passerine bird. Science. 347:875–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgier AM, Jakovcevic A, Mustaca AE, Bentosela M. 2012. Pointing following in dogs: are simple or complex cognitive mechanisms involved? Anim Cogn. 15:1111–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gácsi M, Gyoöri B, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Range F, Belényi B, Miklósi Á. 2009. Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS ONE. 4:e6584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M. 2002. The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science. 298:1634–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare B, Plyusnina I, Ignacio N, Schepina O, Stepika A, Wrangham R, Trut L. 2005. Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Curr Biol. 15:226–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare B, Rosati A, Kaminski J, Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M. 2010. The domestication hypothesis for dogs’ skills with human communication: a response to Udell et al. (2008) and Wynne et al. (2008). Anim Behav. 79:e1–e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare B, Tomasello M. 2005. Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci. 9:439–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris CE, Knowlton FF. 2001. Differential responses of coyotes to novel stimuli in familiar and unfamiliar settings. Can J Zool. 79:2005–2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heberlein MT, Turner DC, Range F, Virányi Z. 2016. A comparison between wolves Canis lupus and dogs Canis familiaris in showing behaviour towards humans. Anim Behav. 122:59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J. 2006. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Soft. 15:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang KY, Zeger SL. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 73:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DJ, Uller T. 2007. When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos. 116:1957–1963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley J, Sambrook TD. 2000. Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn. 3:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler AE, Shivik JA. 2007. Dominance and neophobia in coyote (Canis latrans) breeding pairs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 102:85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V. 2003. A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans but dogs do. Curr Biol. 13:763–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklósi Á, Topál J. 2013. What does it take to become ‘best friends’? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence. Trends Cogn Sci. 17:287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklósi Á, Soproni K. 2006. A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn. 9(2):81–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawroth C, Martin ZM, McElligott AG. 2020. Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task. Front Psychol. 11:915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack AA, Herman LM. 2007. The dolphin’s (Tursiops truncatus) understanding of human gazing and pointing: knowing what and where. J Comp Psychol. 121:34–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pongrácz P, Miklosi Á, Dóka A, Csányi V. 2003. Successful application of video-projected human images for signaling to dogs. Ethology. 109:809–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://wwwR-projectorg/ [Accessed 2018 Oct 1].
   Google Scholar
• Sandlos J. 1999. The coyote came back. The return of an ancient song dog in the post-colonial literature and landscape of North America ISLE. Interdiscip Stud Liter Environ. 6:99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Schell CJ, Young JK, Lonsdorf EV, Santymire RM, Mateo JM. 2018. Parental habituation to human disturbance over time reduces fear of humans in coyote offspring. Ecol Evol. 8:12965–12980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivik JA, Palmer GL, Gese EM, Osthaus B. 2009. Captive coyotes compared to their counterparts in the wild: does environmental enrichment help? J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 12:223–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soproni K, Á M, Topál J, Csányi V. 2002. Dogs’ responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol. 116:27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivathsa A, Puri M, Karanth KK, Patel I, Kumar NS. 2019. Examining human–carnivore interactions using a socio-ecological framework: sympatric wild canids in India as a case study. R Soc Open Sci. 6:182008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trut LN. 1999. Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment: foxes bred for tamability in a 40-year experiment exhibit remarkable transformations that suggest an interplay between behavioral genetics and development. Am Sci. 87:160–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udell MA, Dorey NR, Wynne CD. 2008. Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav. 76:1767–1773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udell MA, Dorey NR, Wynne CD. 2010. What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biol Rev. 85:327–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udell MA, Spencer JM, Dorey NR, Wynne CD. 2012. Human-socialized wolves follow diverse human gestures... and they may not be alone. Int J Compar Psychol. 25:97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Uller T. 2008. Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Trends Ecol Evol. 23:432–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á. 2008. Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn. 11:373–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bayern AM, Emery NJ. 2009. Jackdaws respond to human attentional states and communicative cues in different contexts. Curr Biol. 19:602–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Cheverud JM, Moore AJ, Wade MJ. 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol Evol. 13:64–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young JK, Hammill E, Breck SW. 2019a. Interactions with humans shape coyote responses to hazing. Sci Rep. 9:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young JK, Touzot L, Brummer SP. 2019b. Persistence and conspecific observations improve problem-solving abilities of coyotes. PloS ONE. 14:e0218778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young SP, Jackson HHT. 1951. The clever coyote. Harrington (PA), (Washington (DC): The Stackpole Gompany Harrisburg Pennsylvania, Wildlife Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang KY. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 42:121–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar