References
- Agrillo C, Dadda M. 2007. Discrimination of the larger shoal in the poeciliid fish Girardinus faicatus. Ethol Ecol Evol. 19:145–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2007.9522574
- Agrillo C, Dadda M, Bisazza A. 2007. Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Anim Cogn. 10:63–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0036-5
- Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A, Chapouthier G. 2010. Large number discrimination by mosquitofish. PLoS ONE. 5(12):e15232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015232
- Amundsen T. 2000a. Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol Evol. 15:149–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01800-5
- Amundsen T. 2000b. Female ornaments: genetically correlated or sexually selected? In: Espmark Y, et al., editors. Animal signals. Trondheim (Norway): Tapir Academic Press; p. 133–154
- Amundsen T, Forsgren E. 2001. Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:13155–13160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211439298
- Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
- Barry KL, Kokko H. 2010. Male mate choice: why sequential choice can make its evolution difficult. Anim Behav. 80:163–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.04.020
- Beeching SC. 1993. Eyespots as visual cues in the intraspecific behavior of the cichlid fish Astronotus ocellatus. Copeia. (4):1157–1159
- Belliure J, Fresnillo B, Cuervo JJ. 2018. Male mate choice base don female coloration in a lizard: the role of a juvenile trait. Behav Ecol. 29(3):543–552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary005
- Bender N, Heg D, Hamilton MI, Bachar Z, Taborsky M, Oliveira FR. 2006. The relationship between social status, behavior, growth and steroids in male helpers and breeders of a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Hormones Behav. 50:173–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.02.009
- Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A. 1996. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol J Linn Soc. 58:385–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01442.x
- Berglund A, Rosenqvist G. 2001. Male pipefish prefer ornamented females. Anim Behav. 61(2):345–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1599
- Bisazza A, Manfredi S, Pilastro A. 2000. Sexual competition, coercive mating and mate assessment in the one-sided livebearer, Jenynsia multidentata: are they predictive of sexual dimporphism? Ethology. 106:961–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00620.x
- Blaxter JHS, Hempel G. 1963. The influence of egg size on herring larvae (Clupae harengus L.). J Cons Permanent Int Explor Mar. 28:211–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/28.2.211
- Bonduriansky R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev. 76:305–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793101005693
- Briffa M, Sneddon UL. 2007. Physiological constraints on contest behaviour. Funct Ecol. 21:627–637. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01188.x
- Bugel MS, White AL, Cooper RK. 2001. Decreased vitellogenin inducibility and 17-estradiol levels correlated with reduced egg production in killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) from Newark Bay, NJ. Aquat Toxicol. 105:1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2011.03.013
- Burley N. 1977. Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 74:3476–3479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.8.3476
- Candolin U. 1999. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim Behav. 58(6):1261–1267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1259
- Candolin U. 2004. Opposing selection on a sexually dimporphic traits through female choice and male competition in a water boatman. Evolution. 58:1861–1864. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00470.x
- Couldridge VCK. 2002. Experimental manipulations of male eggspots demonstrate female preference for one larger spot in Pseudotropheus lombardoi. J Fish Biol. 60:726–730.
- Daly M. 1978. The cost of mating. Am Nat. 112:771–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/283319
- Darwin C. 1871. El origen del hombre y la selección en relación al sexo [The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex]. Edition of 1966, Madrid (Spain): Catarata. Spanish
- Domínguez-Castanedo O, Mosqueda-Cabrera MA, Valdesalici S. 2013. First observations of annualism in Millerichthys robustus (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Ichthyol Explor Fres. 24:15–20
- Domínguez-Castanedo O, Uribe MC, Muñoz-Campos MT. 2019. Morphological patterns of cell death in ovarian follicles of primary and secondary growth and postovulatory follicle complex of the annual killifish Millerichthys robustus (Cyprinodontiformes: Cynolebiidae). J Morph. 280:1668–1681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21056
- Edward AD, Chapman T. 2011. The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol. 26:647–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.012
- Emlen ST, Oring LW. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 197:215–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327542
- Fitzpatrick CL, Servedio MR, Schlupp I. 2018. The evolution of male mate choice and female ornamentation; a review of mathematical models. Curr Zool. 64(3):323–333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy029
- Frame MA, Servedio RA. 2012. The evolution of preference strength under sensory bias: a role for indirect selection? Ecol Evol. 2(7):1572–1583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.273
- Fuller CR, Houlde D, Travis J. 2005. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences. Am Nat. 166(4):437–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/444443
- Galeotti P, Sacchi R, Pellitteri-Rosa D, Bellati A, Cocca W, Gentilli A, Scali S, Fasola M. 2013. Colour polymorphism and alternative breeding strategies: effects of parental´s colour morph on fitness traits in the common wall lizard. Evol Biol. 40:385–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-012-9222-3
- Garcia J, Munro ES, Monte MM, Fourrier MCS, Whitelaw J, Smail DA, Ellis AE. 2010. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) serum vitellogenin neutralises infectivity of infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 29:293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2010.04.010
- Gomez-Laplaza LM, Gerlai R. 2010. Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber’s law. Anim Cogn. 14(1):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0337-6
- Grafen A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol. 144:517–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80088-8
- Grant JWA, Casey PC, Bryant MJ, Shahsavarani A. 1995. Mate choice by male Japanese medaka (Pisces, Oryziidae). Anim Behav. 50:1425–1428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80058-1
- Grier JH, Uribe MC, Patiño R. 2009. The ovary, folliculogenesis, and oogenesis in teleosts. In: Jamieson BGM, editor. Reproductive biology and physiology of fishes (agnathans and bony fishes). Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 25–83
- Griggio M, Devigili A, Hoi H, Pilastro A. 2009. Female ornamentation and directional male mate preference in the rock sparrow. Behav Ecol. 20:1072–1078. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp099
- Hamilton WD, Zuk M. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science. 218(4570):384–387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7123238
- Helfman G, Collette BB, Facey DE, Bowen BW. 2009. The diversity of fishes: biology, evolution, and ecology. London (UK): Wiley
- Herdman JEE, Clint K, Gordon J. 2004. Male mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): do males prefer larger females as mate? Ethology. 110:97–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2003.00960.x
- Hill GE. 1991. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature. 350:337–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/350337a0
- Johnstone RA, Reynolds JD, Deutsch JC. 1996. Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution. 50:1382–1391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03912.x
- Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita K, Itoh M, Kawashima S, Katayama T, Araki M, Hirakawa M. 2006. From genomics to chemical genomic: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:354–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj102
- Karino K. 2009. Sexual selection: signaling and courtship. In: Jamieson BGM, editor. Reproductive biology and physiology of fishes (agnathans and bony fishes). Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 181–220
- Kelley LA, Kelley JL. 2014. Animal visual illusion and confusion: the importance of a perceptual perspective. Behav Ecol. 25:450–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art118
- Kjernsmo K, Gönholm M, Merilaita S. 2016. Adaptive constellations of protective marks: eyespots, eye stripes and diversion of attacks by fish. Anim Behav. 111:189–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.10.028
- Kjernsmo K, Merilaita S. 2013. Eyespots divert attacks by fish. Proc R Soc Lond B. 280:20131458
- Kokko H, Johnstone RA, Balshine S, Kempenaers B, Székely T. 2002. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signaling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 357:319–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0926
- Kotrschal K, Hirschenhauser K, Möstl E. 1998. The relationship between social stress and dominance is seasonal in greylag geese. Anim Behav. 55:171–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0597
- Li Z, Zhang S, Liu Q, May RC. 2008. Vitellogenin functions as a multivalent pattern recognition receptor with an opsonic activity. PLoS ONE. 3:e1940. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001940
- Loureiro M, de Sá OR. 2016. Diversity of aplocheiloidei. In: Berois N, et al., editors. Annual fishes: life history strategy, diversity and evolution. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 4–31
- Lubzens E, Yong G, Bobe J, Cerdà J. 2010. Oogenesis in teleosts: how the eggs are formed. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 165:367–389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.05.022
- Marsh E. 1986. Effects of egg size on offspring fitness and maternal fecundity in the Orangethroat Darter, Etheostoma spectabile (Pisces: Percidae). Copeia. (1):18–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1444883
- Miller RR, Hubbs LC. 1974. Rivulus robustus, a new cyprinodontid fish from Southeastern Mexico. Copeia. (4):865–868. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1442584
- Mommsen T, Korsgaard B. 2008. Vitellogenesis. In: Rocha MJ, et al., editors. Fish reproduction. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 112–166
- Nakamura A, Yasuda K, Adachi H, Sakurai Y, Ishii N, Goto S. 1999. Vitellogenin-6 is a major carbonylated protein in aged nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 264:580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.1549
- Ogden HJP, de Boer RA, Devigili A, Reuland C, Kahrl AF, Fitzpatrick. 2020. Male mate choice for large gravid spots in a livebearing fish. Behav Ecol. 31(1):63–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz156
- Passos C, Tassino B, Loureiro M, Rosenthal GG. 2013. Intra- and intersexual selection on male body size in the annual killifish Austrolebias charrua. Behav Proces. 96:20–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.008
- Passos C, Vidal N, D´Anatro A. 2019. Male mate choice in the annual fish Austrolebias reicherti (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae): when size matters. J Ethol. 37:301–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-019-00601-w
- Patiño R, Sullivan CV. 2002. Ovarian follicle growth, maturation, and ovulation in teleost fish. Fish Physiol Biochem. 26:57–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023311613987
- Pélabon C, Borg AA, Bjelvenmark J, Forsgren E, Barber I, Amundsen AA. 2003. Do male two-spotted gobies prefer larger fecundid females? Behav Ecol. 14:787–792. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arg074
- Pomiankowski A. 1987. The costs of choice in sexual selection. J Theor Biol. 128:195–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80169-8
- Poulton EB. 1890. The colours of animals: their meaning and use especially considered in the case of insects. London (UK): Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co
- Pruden AJ, Uetz GW. 2004. Assessment of potential predation costs of male decoration and courtship display in wolf spiders using video digitization and playback. J Insect Behav. 17:67–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000025133.54118.1e
- Prudic KL, Stoehr AM, Wasik BR, Monteiro A. 2015. Eyespots deflect predator attack increasing fitness and promoting the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Proc R Soc Lond B. 282:20141531
- Reynolds RC, Gross MR. 1992. Female mate preferences enhance offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proc R Soc Lond B. 250:57–62
- Richards-Zawacki CL, Wang IJ, Summers K. 2012. Mate choice and the genetic basis for colour variation in a polymorphic dart frog: inferences from a wild pedigree. Mol Ecol. 21:3879–3892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05644.x
- Robertson KA, Monteiro A. 2005. Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils. Proc Biol Sci. 272:1541–1546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3142
- Rosales-Torres AM, Guzmán-Sánchez A. 2008. Apoptosis in follicular atresia and luteal regression. Tec Pecu Mex. 46:159–182
- Rosenqvist G. 1990. Male mate choice and female-female competition for mates in the pipe fish Nerophis ophidion. Anim Behav. 39:1110–1115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80783-3
- Schlupp I. 2018a. Male mate choice in livebearing fishes: an overview. Curr Zool. 64(3):393–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy028
- Schlupp I. 2018b. Male mate choice, female competition, and female ornaments as components of sexual selection. Curr Zool. 64(3):321–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy037
- Selz OM, Thommen R, Pierotti MER, Anaya-Rojas JM, Seehausen O. 2016. Differences in male coloration are predicted by divergent sexual selection between populations of a cichlid fish. Proc R Soc Lond B. 283:20160172
- Shi X, Zhang S, Pang Q. 2006. Vitellogenin is a novel player in defense reactions. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 20:769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2005.09.005
- Shine R, Mason RT. 2005. Do a male garter snake’s energy stores limit his reproductive effort? Can J Zool. 83:1265–1270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-119
- Sozou PD, Seymour RM. 2005. Costly but worthless gifts facilitate courtship. Proc R Soc Lond B. 272:1877–1884
- Trivers RL. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Piscataway (NJ): Aldine Transaction; p. 136–179
- Vallin A, Jakobsson S, Lind J, Wiklund C. 2005. Prey survival by predators’ intimidation: an experimental study of peacock butterfly defense against blue tits. Proc R Soc Lond B. 272:1203–1207
- Vermeulen F. 2015. The killi´s of the lost world. Vol. 1, New world killi series. Portugal: Pastelaria Studios
- von Schantz T, Bensch S, Grahn M, Hasselquist D, Wittzell H. 1999. Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proc R Soc Lond B. 266:1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0597
- Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:313–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02533-8
- West-Eberhard MJ. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q Rev Biol. 58(2):155–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/413215
- Wong BBM, Candolin U. 2005. How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol Rev. 80(4):559–571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006809
- Wong BBM, Jennions MD. 2003. Costs influence male mate choice in a freshwater fish. Proc R Soc Lond B. 270:S36–S38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0003
- Zahavi A. 1977. The cost of honesty. Further remarks on the handicap principle. J Theor Biol. 67:603–605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(77)90061-3
- Zaret TM. 1977. Inhibition of cannibalism in Cichla ocellaris and hypothesis of predator mimicry among South American fishes. Evolution. 31:421–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb01022.x
- Zhang S, Dong Y, Cui P. 2015. Vitellogenin is an immunocompetent molecule for mother and offspring in fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 46:710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2015.08.011