Nothing like home: most males of Espadarana prosoblepon (Anura Centrolenidae) exhibit homing to calling site despite the availability of alternative suitable sites for calling and mating

REFERENCES

• Able KP. 1980. Mechanisms of orientation, navigation, and homing. In: Sidney A, Gauthreaux S, editors. Animal migration, orientation, and navigation. New York (NY): Academic Press; p. 264–284.
   Google Scholar
• Angeli NF, DiRenzo GV, Cunha A, Lips KR. 2015. Effects of density on spatial aggregation and habitat associations of the glass frog Espadarana (Centrolene) prosoblepon. J Herpetol. 49(3):388–394. doi:10.1670/13-110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arak A. 1983. Sexual selection by male-male competition in natterjack toad choruses. Nature. 306:261–266. doi:10.1038/306261a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcila-Pérez LF, Atehortua-Vallejo MA, Vargas-Salinas F. 2020. Homing in the rubí poison frog Andinobates bombetes (Dendrobatidae). Copeia. 108(4):948–956. doi:10.1643/CE-19-284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basto-Riascos MC, López-Caro J, Londoño-Guarnizo CA. 2017a. Espadarana prosoblepon (Boettger 1892). CARC. 3(1):52–61.
   Google Scholar
• Basto-Riascos MC, López-Caro J, Vargas-Salinas F. 2017b. Reproductive ecology of the glass frog Espadarana prosoblepon (Anura: Centrolenidae) in an urban forest of the Central Andes of Colombia. J Nat Hist. 51:2535–2550. doi:10.1080/00222933.2017.1371805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettger O. 1892. Katalog der batrachier-sammlung im museum der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellshaft in Frankfurt am Main [Catalog of the Batrachian Collection in the Museum of the Senckenberg Natural Research Society in Frankfurt am Main]. Frankfurt am Main (Germany): Gebrüder Knauer. German.
   Google Scholar
• Booksmythe I, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY. 2010. Investigating the ‘dear enemy’ phenomenon in the territory defence of the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi. Anim Behav. 79(2):419–423. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brattstrom BH. 1962. Homing in the giant toad, Bufo marinus. Herpetologica. 18(3):176–180.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce P, Bruce A. 2017. Practical statistics for data scientists: 50 essential concepts. Sebastopol (CA): O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brush JS, Narins PM. 1989. Chorus dynamics of a Neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour. Anim Behav. 37:33–44. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(89)90004-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella EG, Henry J. 2016. A case of homing after translocation of chuditch, Dasyurus geoffroii (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Aust Mammal. 39:118–120. doi:10.1071/AM16023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisneros-Heredia DF, McDiarmid RW. 2005. Amphibia, Centrolenidae, Centrolene peristictum, Centrolene prosoblepon, Cochranella cochranae, Cochranella midas, Cochranella resplendens, Cochranella spinosa, Hyalinobatrachium munozorum: range extensions and new provincial records. Check List. 1(1):18–22. doi:10.15560/1.1.18
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros-Heredia DF, McDiarmid RW. 2007. Revision of the characters of Centrolenidae with comments on its taxonomy. Zootaxa. 1572(1):1–82. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1572.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Crump ML. 1972. Territoriality and mating behavior in Dendrobates granuliferus (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Herpetologica. 28(3):195–198.
   Google Scholar
• Crump ML. 1986. Homing and site fidelity in a Neotropical frog, Atelopus varius (Bufonidae). Copeia. (2):438–444. doi:10.2307/1445001
   Google Scholar
• Crump ML, Scott NJ. 1994. Visual encounter survey. In: Heyer W, et al., editors. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press; p. 84–92.
   Google Scholar
• Davies NB, Krebs JR, West SA. 2012. An introduction to behavioural ecology. Southern Gate (UK): Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Ricaurte JC, Guevara-Molina EC, Serrano F. 2019. Oviposition site preference and reproductive ecology of Teratohyla midas (Anura: Centrolenidae) in the Colombian Amazon. J Nat Hist. 53(29–30):1811–1822. doi:10.1080/00222933.2019.1668490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diego FJ, Luengo RM, Phillips JB. 2005. Magnetic compass mediates nocturnal homing by the alpine newt, Triturus alpestris. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 58:361–365. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0951-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimarco RD, Farji-Brener AG, Premoli AC. 2010. Dear enemy phenomenon in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: behavioral and genetic evidence. Behav Ecol. 21(2):304–310. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole JW. 1968. Homing in leopard frogs, Rana pipiens. Ecology. 49(3):386–399. doi:10.2307/1934105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly MA, Guyer C, Juterbock JE, Alford RA. 1994. Techniques for marking amphibians. In: Heyer W, et al., editors. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press; p. 277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson DE. 1971. The sensory basis of orientation in amphibians. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 188:30–36. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb13087.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferner JW. 2010. Measuring and marking post-metamorphic amphibians. In: Dodd C Jr, editor. Amphibian ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; p. 123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer JH, Freak MJ, Borland SC, Phillips JB. 2001. Evidence for the use magnetic map information by an amphibian. Anim Behav. 62(1):1–10. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1722
   Google Scholar
• Fox SF, Baird TA. 1992. The dear enemy phenomenon in the collared lizard, Crotaphytus collaris, with a cautionary note on experimental methodology. Anim Behav. 44(4):780–782. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80306-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl TWP, Klump GM. 2005. Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European treefrog: body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Anim Behav. 70(5):1141–1154. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.017
   Google Scholar
• Frost DR. 2022. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.1. New York (NY): American Museum of Natural History. Available from: https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/ [Accessed 2022 Jan 5].
   Google Scholar
• Gonser RA, Woolbright LL. 1995. Homing behavior of the Puerto Rican frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. J Herpetol. 29(3):481–484. doi:10.2307/1565007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyes-Vallejos J, Gomez J, Hernández-Figueroa AB, Vera R, Green DM. 2021. Fertilization success suggests random pairing in frogs with regard to body size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 75:140. doi:10.1007/s00265-021-03081-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer BJ, Wells KD. 1980. Territorial and reproductive behavior of the tropical American frog Centrolenella fleischmanni. Herpetologica. 36(4):318–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday T, Tejedo M. 1995. Intrasexual selection and alternative mating behavior. In: Heatwole H, Sullivan B, editors. Amphibian biology. Chipping Norton (RU): Surrey Beatty and Sons; p. 419–468.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson LA, Åkesson S. 2014. Animal movement across scales. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedman H, Hughey MC. 2015. Body size, humeral spine size, and aggressive interactions in the emerald glass frog, Espadarana prosoblepon (Anura: Centrolenidae) in Costa Rica. Mesoam Herpetol. 2:500–508.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter CR, Escobar-Lasso S, Rojas-Morales J, Gutiérrez-Cárdenas PDA, Imba H, Guayasamin JM. 2013. The territoriality, vocalizations and aggressive interactions of the red-spotted glassfrog, Nymphargus grandisonae, Cochran and Goin, 1970 (Anura: Centrolenidae). J Nat Hist. 47:47–48. doi:10.1080/00222933.2013.792961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for windows. Version 25.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Ishii S, Kubokawa K, Kikuchi M. 1995. Orientation of the toad, Bufo japonicus, toward the breeding pond. Zool Sci. 12(4):475–484. doi:10.2108/zsj.12.475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson SK. 1985. Reproductive behavior and male mating success in two species of glass frogs (Centrolenidae). Herpetologica. 41(4):396–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson DL. 1957. Population structure and homing responses in the pacific tree frog. Copeia. (3):221–228. doi:10.2307/1439361
   Google Scholar
• Jennions MD, Backwell PRY. 1992. Chorus size influences on the anti-predator response of a Neotropical frog. Anim Behav. 44(5):990–992. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80596-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs CJ. 1999. Ecological methodology. Menlo Park (CA): Addison-Welsey Educational Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn AR, Voyles J. 2014. A short note on the use of humeral spines in combat in Espadarana prosoblepon (Anura: Centrolenidae). Alytes. 31:83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicki B. 2007. Glass frogs of Costa Rica. Santo Domingo de Heredia (Costa Rica): Editorial INBio.
   Google Scholar
• Leiser J, Itzkowitz M. 1999. The benefits of dear enemy recognition in three-contender convict cichlid (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) contests. Behaviour. 136(8):983–1003. doi:10.1163/156853999501685
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Day LB, Summers K, Burmeister SS. 2016. Learning to learn: advanced behavioural flexibility in a poison frog. Anim Behav. 111:167–172. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCranie J, Wilson L. 2002. The amphibians of Honduras. Contributions to herpetology. New York (NY): Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles.
   Google Scholar
• McVey ME, Zahary RG, Perry D, MacDougal J. 1981. Territoriality and homing behavior in the poison dart frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Copeia. (1):1–8. doi:10.2307/1444035
   Google Scholar
• Menard S. 2001. Applied logistic regression analysis. In: Laughton DC, editor. Series: quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc; p. 128.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro-Salcedo P, Arcila-Pérez LF, Pérez-González JL, Rueda-Solano LA, Rada M, Vargas-Salinas F. 2022. Sex difference in homing: males but not females return home despite offspring mortality in Ikakogi tayrona, a glassfrog with prolonged maternal care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 76:18. doi:10.1007/s00265-021-03107-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro-Salcedo P, Duarte-Marín S, Rada M, Vargas-Salinas F. 2021. Parental status is related to homing motivation in males of the glassfrog Centrolene savagei. Ethol Ecol Evol. 33:528–542. doi:10.1080/03949370.2020.1870569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson BV, Vance RR. 1979. Diel foraging patterns of the sea urchin Centrostephanus coronatus as a predator avoidance strategy. Mar Biol. 51:251–258. doi:10.1007/BF00386805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noronha JDC, Rodrigues DDJ. 2018. Reproductive behaviour of the glass frog Hyalinobatrachium cappellei (Anura: Centrolenidae) in the southern Amazon. J Nat Hist. 52(3–4):207–224. doi:10.1080/00222933.2017.1414324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nothacker JA, Neu CP, Mayer M, Wagner N, Lötters S. 2018. Homing behavior in the Neotropical poison frog Ameerega trivittata. Salamandra. 54(1):30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldham R. 1966. Spring movements in the American toad, Bufo americanus. Can J Zool. 44:63–100. doi:10.1139/z66-006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Ross X, Thompson ME, Salicetti-Nelson E, Vargas-Ramírez O, Donnelly MA. 2020. Oviposition site selection in three glass frog species. Copeia. 108(2):333–340. doi:10.1643/CE-19-243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osorio-Dominguez D, Quintero-Angel A. 2012. Espadarana prosoblepon Boettger, 1892 (Amphibia: Anura): distribution extension on the western slopes of the Cordillera Central, Colombia. Check List. 8(5):898–899. doi:10.15560/8.5.898
   Google Scholar
• Ospina-L AM, Ríos-Soto JA, Vargas-Salinas F. 2017. Size, endurance, or parental care performance? Male-male competition, female choice, and non-random mating pattern in the glassfrog Centrolene savagei. Copeia. 105(3):575–583. doi:10.1643/CE-17-591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papi F. 1992. Animal homing. Chapman and Hall animal behaviour Series. London (UK): Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Pašukonis A, Loretto MC, Landler L, Ringler M, Hödl W. 2014a. Homing trajectories and initial orientation in a Neotropical territorial frog, Allobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae). Front Zool. 11:29. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-11-29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pašukonis A, Ringler M, Brandl HB, Mangione R, Ringler E, Hödl W. 2013. The homing frog: high homing performance in a territorial dendrobatid frog Allobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae). Ethology. 119(9):762–768. doi:10.1111/eth.12116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pašukonis A, Serrano-Rojas SJ, Fischer MT, Loretto MC, Shaykevich DA, Rojas B, Ringler M, Roland AB, Marcillo-Lara A, Ringler E, et al. 2022. Contrasting parental roles shape sex differences in poison frog space use but not navigational performance. eLife. 11:e80483. doi:10.7554/eLife.80483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pašukonis A, Trenkwalder K, Ringler M, Ringler E, Mangione R, Steininger J, Warrington I, Hödl W. 2016. The significance of spatial memory for water finding in a tadpole-transporting frog. Anim Behav. 116:89–98. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pašukonis A, Warrington I, Ringler M, Hödl W. 2014b. Poison frogs rely on experience to find the way home in the rainforest. Biol Lett. 10(11):20140642. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevedello JA, Delciellos AC, Vieira MV. 2009. Homing behavior of Philander frenatus (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) across a fragmented landscape in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Mastozool Neotrop. 16(2):475–480.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana EC, Galdino CAB. 2017. Aggression towards unfamiliar intruders by male lizards Eurolophosaurus nanuzae depends on contestant’s body traits: a test of the dear enemy effect. Behaviour. 154(6):693–708. doi:10.1163/1568539X-00003438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Relyea RA, Ricklefs RE. 2018. Ecology. The economy of nature. New York (NY): WH Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ríos-Soto JA, Ospina-L AM, Basto-Riascos MC, López-Caro J, Vargas-Salinas F. 2017. Description of the distress call in Espadarana prosoblepon and the post-amplexus vocal display in Centrolene savagei (Anura: Centrolenidae). Herpetol Notes. 10:27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson JM, Lips KR, Heist EJ. 2008. Fine scale gene flow and individual movements among subpopulations of Centrolene prosoblepon (Anura: Centrolenidae). Rev Biol Trop. 56(1):13–26. doi:10.15517/rbt.v56i1.5506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez C. 1999. Biodiversidad del relicto “Cedro Rosado” de la Universidad del Quindío [Biodiversity of the “Cedro Rosado” relict of the Universidad del Quindío]. Biol Educ. 9:17–18. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Rosell F, Bjørkøyli T. 2002. A test of the dear enemy phenomenon in the Eurasian beaver. Anim Behav. 63(6):1073–1078. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3010
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein DR, Alcock J. 2018. Animal behavior: an evolutionary approach. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Carranza PM, Lynch JD. 1991. Ranas Centrolenidae de Colombia I. Propuesta de una nueva clasificación genérica [Centrolenidae frogs of Colombia I. Proposal for a new generic classification]. Lozania. 57:1–30. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan MJ, Tuttle MD, Taft LK. 1981. The costs and benefits of frog chorusing behavior. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 8:273–278. doi:10.1007/BF00299526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage JM. 2002. The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica: a herpetofauna between two continents, between two seas. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano-Rojas SJ, Pašukonis A. 2021. Tadpole-transporting frogs use stagnant water odor to find pools in the rainforest. J Exp Biol. 224:jeb243122. doi:10.1242/jeb.243122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinsch U. 1990. Migration and orientation in anuran amphibians. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2:65–79. doi:10.1080/08927014.1990.9525494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinsch U. 2006. Orientation and navigation in Amphibia. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol. 39(1):65–71. doi:10.1080/10236240600562794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotelo MI, Bingman VP, Muzio RN. 2019. The mating call of the terrestrial toad, Rhinella arenarum, as a cue for spatial orientation and its associated brain activity. Brain Behav Evol. 94:7–17. doi:10.1159/000504122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt K, Ospina SM, Mebs D, Pröhl H. 2010. Foraging behaviour and territoriality of the strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio) in dependence of the presence of ants. Amphibia-Reptilia. 31:217–227. doi:10.1163/156853810791069100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratman KD, Oldehoeft EA, Höbel G. 2021. Woe is the loner: female treefrogs prefer clusters of displaying males over single “hotshot” males. Evolution. 75:3026–3036. doi:10.1111/evo.14376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunyer J, Páiz G, Dehling DM, Köhler G. 2009. A collection of amphibians from Río San Juan, southeastern Nicaragua. Herpetol Notes. 2:189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Switzer PV. 1993. Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. 7:533–555. doi:10.1007/BF01237820
   Google Scholar
• Temeles EJ. 1994. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they “dear enemies”? Anim Behav. 47(2):339–350. doi:10.1006/anbe.1994.1047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo LF, Haddad CFB. 2009. Defensive vocalizations of Neotropical anurans. South Am J Herpetol. 4(1):25–42. doi:10.2994/057.004.0104
   Google Scholar
• Tumulty JP, Bee MA. 2021. Ecological and social drivers of neighbor recognition and the dear enemy effect in a poison frog. Behav Ecol. 32(1):138–150. doi:10.1093/beheco/araa113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia-Aguilar A, Zamudio KR, Haddad CFB, Bogdanowicz SM, Prado CP, Smiseth P. 2020. Show me you care: female mate choice based on egg attendance rather than male or territorial traits. Behav Ecol. 31(4):1054–1064. doi:10.1093/beheco/araa051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villaseñor NR, Escobar MAH, Estades CF. 2013. There is no place like home: high homing rate and increased mortality after translocation of a small mammal. J Wildl Res. 59(5):749–760. doi:10.1007/s10344-013-0730-y
   Google Scholar
• Villegas-Mora D, Muñoz-Acevedo S, Guevara-Molina EC, Vargas-Salinas F. 2020. Phenology and mortality of embryos in a Colombian population of Nymphargus grandisonae (Anura: Centrolenidae). Phyllomedusa. 19(2):225–241. doi:10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v19i2p225-241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walcott C. 2005. Multi-modal orientation cues in homing pigeons. Integr Comp Biol. 45:574–581. doi:10.1093/icb/45.3.574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman B. 2001. Kin recognition, sexual selection, and mate choice in toads In: Ryan M, editor. Anuran communication. Washington (DC) and London (UK): Smithsonian Institution Press; p. 232–244.
   Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 1977. Territoriality and male mating success in the green frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology. 58(4):750–762. doi:10.2307/1936211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlock MC, Schluter D. 2020. The analysis of biological data. New York (NY): Macmillan Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshiyama RM, Gaylord KB, Philippart MT, Moore TR, Jordan JR, Coon CC, Schalk LL, Valpey CJ, Tosques I. 1992. Homing behavior and site fidelity in intertidal sculpins (Pisces: Cottidae). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 160(1):115–130. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(92)90114-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 1998. Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey (NJ): Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zeil J. 2012. Visual homing: an insect perspective. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 22(2):285–293. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar