The passion, pedagogy and politics of reading

References

• Adescope, O. O., T. Lavin, T. Thomson, and C. Ungerleider. 2011. “Pedagogical Strategies for Teaching Literacy to ESL Immigrant Students: A Meta-analysis.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 81 (4): 629–653. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02015.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amass, H. 2022. “How Phonics Became an Education Culture War.” Tes Magazine. https://www.tes.com/magazine/teaching-learning/primary/how-phonics-became-education-culture-war
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. 2020. “Reconsidering the Evidence that Systematic Phonics Is More Effective than Alternative Methods of Reading Instruction.” Educational Psychology Review 32 (3): 681–705. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09515-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, A. 2018. “The Impact of the Phonics Screening Check on Grouping by Ability: A ‘Necessary Evil’ amid the Policy Storm.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (4): 539–556. doi:10.1002/berj.3449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, A. 2020. “The Use of the Phonics Screening Check in Year 2: The Views of Year 2 Teachers and Headteachers.” Helen Hamlyn Centre for Pedagogy Working Paper. London: UCL Institute of Education. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10115685/1/Bradbury_Phonics_Check_WP_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. 2020. “The Assessment Has Become the Curriculum: Teachers’ Views of the Phonics Screening Check in England.” British Educational Research Journal 46 (3): 596–609. doi:10.1002/berj.3598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J. 1983. Learning to Read: The Great Debate. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Darnell, C. A., J. E. Solity, and H. Wall. 2017. “Decoding the Phonics Screening Check.” British Educational Research Journal 43 (3): 505–527. doi:10.1002/berj.3269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2021. “The Removal of Letters and Sounds 2007 from the Department’s List of Validated Phonics Programmes – Teachers’ Questions Answered.” Accessed 11th August 2021. https://dfemedia.blog.gov.uk/2021/05/17/the-removal-of-letters-and-sounds-2007-from-the-departments-list-of-validated-phonics-programmes-teachers-questions-answered
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2022. “Validation of Systematic Synthetic Phonics Programmes: Supporting Documentation.” Updated 18 January 2022. Accessed 2nd March 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/phonics-teaching-materials-core-criteria-and-self-assessment/validation-of-systematic-synthetic-phonics-programmes-supporting-documentation#essential-core-criteria
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. 2006. Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading. London: DfES. The Rose Review.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Skills. 2007. Letters and Sounds. Principles and Practice of High Quality Phonics. London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Double, K. S., J. A. McGrane, J. C. Stiff, and T. N. Hopfenbeck. 2019. “The Importance of Early Phonics Improvements for Predicting Later Reading Comprehension.” British Educational Research Journal 45 (6): 1220–1234. doi:10.1002/berj.3559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, S. 2007. “Policy and Research: Lessons from the Clackmannanshire Synthetic Phonics Initiative.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 7 (3): 281–297. doi:10.1177/1468798407083660.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, S., and G. Moss. 2013. “Ethics, Education Policy and Research: The Phonics Question Reconsidered.” British Educational Research Journal 40 (2): 241–260. doi:10.1002/berj.3039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galuschka, K., E. Ise, K. Krick, G. Schulte-Korne, and K. Lidzba. 2014. “Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” PLoS ONE 9 (2): 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, N. 2021. “Nick Gibb: My Advice to My Successors at Eduaction. Don’t Scrap Gcses or Ease Up on Standards.” Conservative Home (Blog), March 28th. https://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2021/03/nick-gibb-education-we-must-not-let-the-pandemic-lead-us-astray-from-our-mission-of-raising-school-standards.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, N. 2021. “Nick Gibb: My Advice to My Successors at Education. Don’t Scrap GCSEs or Ease up on Standards.” Conservative Home, March 28th. https://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2021/03/nick-gibb-education-we-must-not-let-the-pandemic-lead-us-astray-from-our-mission-of-raising-school-standards.html
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. 2009a. “A Comprehensive Programme for State Education.” http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/11/Michael_Gove_A_comprehensive_programme_for_state_education.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. 2009b. “Speech to Conservative Party Conference 2009.” http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/10/Michael_Gove_Failing_schools_need_new_leadership.aspx
   Google Scholar
• The Government Office for Science. 2008. “Foresight Mental Capital and Wellbeing Project (2008).” Final Project report. Government Office for Science.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M., and C. Mills. 2017. Consultants and Consultancy: The Case of Education. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2022. Opportunity for All: Strong Schools with Great Teachers for Your Child. London: Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, P. 1968. Rosie’s Walk. London: Aladdin Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• James, M. 2012. “Background to Michael Gove’s Response to the Report of the Expert Panel for the National Curriculum Review in England.” Accessed 30 March 2022. https://www.bera.ac.uk/bera-in-the-news/background-to-michael-goves-response-to-the-report-of-the-expert-panel-for-the-national-curriculum-review-in-england
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, W. 2012 “The New National Curriculum: Made to Order?” https://www.theguardian.com/education/2012/nov/12/primary-national-curriculum-review
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, G., Y. Sheehan, N. A. Badcock, D. A. Francis, H. C. Wang, S. Kohhen, E. Banales, T. Anandakumar, E. Marinus, and A. Castles. 2018. “Phonics Training for English-speaking Poor Readers.”Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018 (11). Art. No.: CD009115. John Wiley and Sons. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, M. 1988. How Texts Teach What Readers Learn. Stroud: Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, M. 1993. “What Will Literacy Be Like?” Cambridge Journal of Education 23 (1): 89–99. doi:10.1080/0305764930230110.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, M. 1997. “Rhetorics about Reading: Becoming Crystal Clear.” Changing English 4 (2): 259–276. doi:10.1080/1358684970040208.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, M. 2004. “Readings about Reading.” Changing English 11 (2): 307–317. doi:10.1080/09540250042000252749.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2019. “School Inspection Handbook.” Accessed 11th August 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-inspection-handbook-eif/school-inspection-handbook
   Google Scholar
• Styles, M., and M. J. Drummond. 1993. “Editorial: The Politics of Reading.” Cambridge Journal of Education 23 (1): 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Suggate, S. 2016. “A Meta-Analysis of the Long-Term Effects of Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, and Reading Comprehension Interventions.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 49: 77–96. doi:10.1177/0022219414528540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teacher Tapp. 2022. “Should We Keep the Phonics Check?” February 2022. TeacherTap.co.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Times Educational Supplement Magazine. 2019. “Nick Gibb: The Phonics Wars are ‘Over’. Minister Claims Evidence Has ‘Finally Trumped Rhetoric’ in the Debate over How Best to Teach Reading.” Accessed 28th March 2022. https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/nick-gibb-phonics-wars-are-over
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C., G. Brooks, G. Gascoine, and S. Higgins. 2019. “Phonics: Reading Policy and the Evidence of Effectiveness from a Systematic ‘Tertiary’ Review.” Research Papers in Education 34 (2): 208–238. doi:10.1080/02671522.2017.1420816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. 1990. Sponsored Reading Failure: An Object Lesson. Warlingham: Warlingham Park Scool, Education Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Weale, S. 2022. “Focus on Phonics to Teach Reading Is ‘Failing Children’, Says Landmark Study.” Accessed 19th January 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2022/jan/19/focus-on-phonics-to-teach-reading-is-failing-children-says-landmark-study
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., and M. Styles. 2007. “Synthetic Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: The Debate Surrounding England’s ‘Rose Report’.” Literacy 41 (1): 35–42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00455.x.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., and U. Goswami. 2008. “Synthetic Phonics and the Teaching of Reading.” British Educational Research Journal 34 (6): 691–710. doi:10.1080/01411920802268912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., P. Jones, H. Bradford, and M. A. Wolpert. 2018. Teaching English, Language and Literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., B. Aarts, J. Anders, A. de Gennaro, J. Dockrell, J. Y. Manyukhina, S. Sing, and C. Torgerson. 2022. “Grammar and Writing in England’s National Curriculum. A Randomised Controlled Trial and Implementation and Process Evaluation of Englicious.” https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10144257
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., and A. Bradbury. 2022. “Reading Wars or Reading Reconciliation?: A Critical Examination of Robust Research Evidence, Curriculum Policy, and Teachers’ Practices for Teaching Phonics and Reading.” Review of Education 10. doi:10.1002/rev3.3314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar