The Intra-Urban Migration Process: a Perspective

REFERENCES

• Appley, Mortimer H. 1962. “Motivation, Threat Perception, and the Induction of Psychological Stress.” Proceedings of the XVI International Congress of Psychology, Bonn, 1960. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Appley, Mortimer H. and Richard Trumbull, eds. 1967. Psychological Stress. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Theodore R. 1955. “Inter-Metropolitan Migration: A Comparison of the Hypotheses of Zipf and Stoufler.” American Sociological Review, 20: 287–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Lawrence A. 1968. Diffusion Dynamics: A Review and Revision of the Quantitative Theory of the Spatial Diffusion of Innovation. Lund: Lund Series in Geography, B-29.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Lawrence A. 1968. Diffusion Processes and Location: A Conceptual Framework and Bibliography. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute, Bibliography Series, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Lawrence A. and David B. Longbrake. 1969. “On the Implementation of Place Utility and Related Concepts: The Intra Urban Migration Case,” in Kevin R. Cox and Reginald Golledge, eds. Behavioral Problems in Geography: A Symposium. Evanston: Northwestern University Studies in Geography, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Lawrence A. and David B. Longbrake, forthcoming. “Migration Flows in Intra-Urban Space: Place Utility Considerations.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Caplow, Theodore and Robert Forman. 1950. “Neighborhood Interaction in a Homogeneous Community.” American Sociological Review, 15: 357–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, D. H. and B. L. Driver. 1967. An Environmental Approach to Human Stress and Well-Being: With Implications for Planning. Ann Arbor: Mental Health Research Institute, Preprint 194.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, F. Stuart. 1968. “Activity Systems and Urban Structure: A Working Scheme.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34: 11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, F. Stuart and Henry C. Hightower. 1966. Household Activity Systems: A Pilot Investigation. Chapel Hill: Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, Kevin R. 1969. “The Genesis of Acquaintance Field Spatial Structures: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Tests,” in Kevin R. Cox and Reginald Golledge, eds. Behavioral Problems in Geography: A Symposium. Evanston: Northwestern University Studies in Geography, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, Stuart C. 1950. “The Interactance Hypothesis: A Gravity Model Fitting Physical Masses to Human Groups.” American Sociological Review, 15: 245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, Reginald G., Ronald Briggs, and Donald Demko. 1969. “The Configuration of Distances in Intra-Urban Space”. Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers, 1: 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Grigsby, William G. 1963. Housing Markets and Public Policy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, Torsten. 1957. “Migration and Area,” in David Hannerberg, Torsten Hägerstrand, and Bruno Odeving, eds. Migration in Sweden: A Symposium. Lund: Lund Studies in Geography, B-13, 25–158.
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, Torsten. 1965. “A Monte Carlo Approach to Diffusion.” Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 6: 43–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, Torsten. 1967. Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmens, George C. 1966. The Structure of Urban Activity Linkages. Chapel Hill: Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P. G. 1961. “A Theory of Simple Behavior Systems.” Human Relations, 14: 71–94 and 193–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, Frank E. and David R. Reynolds. 1969. “An Investigation of Individual Action Spaces. “Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers, 1: 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Earl B. 1962. Concept Learning: An Information Processing Problem. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, Georg. 1958. Social Mechanisms. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lansing, John B. and Gary Hendricks. 1967. Automobile Ownership and Residential Density. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, Richard S. 1966. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, Richard S. and Elizabeth Alfen. 1964. “The Short-Circuiting of Threat.” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 69: 195–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, Richard S., J. Deese, and Sonia F. Osler. 1952. “The Effects of Psychological Stress Upon Performance.” Psychological Bulletin, 49: 293–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, Kurt. 1951. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, Ira S. 1963. “Locational Parameters in the Pittsburgh Model.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 11: 145–166.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Kevin R. 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marble, Duane F. 1967. “A Theoretical Exploration of Individual Travel Behavior,” in William L. Garrison and Duane F. Marble, eds. Quantitative Geography Part I: Economic and Cultural Topics. Evanston: Northwestern University Studies in Geography. 13: 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Marble, Duane F. and John D. Nystuen. 1963. “An Approach to the Direct Measurement of Community Mean Information Fields.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 11: 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, Richard L. 1962. A Communications Theory of Urban Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, George A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review, 63: 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Eric G. 1966. Residential Mobility in an Urban Context. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Queensland,
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Eric G. 1966. “Models of Migration and the Intra-Urban Case.” The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 2: 16–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Eric G. 1969. “The Structure of Intra-Urban Movement Rates: An Ecological Model.” Urban Studies, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Eric G. and Lawrence A. Brown. 1969. “Spatial Properties of Urban Contact Fields: An Empirical Analysis.” Northwestern University, Department of Geography Research Poper Series, 52.
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, Richard L. and Forrest R. Pitts. 1967. “Marriage, Migration, and the Mean Information Field: A Study in Uniqueness and Generality.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57: 401–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, George C., George Masnick, and Robert McGinnis. 1967. “The Duration of Residence Approach to a Dynamic Stochastic Model of Internal Migration: A Test of the Axiom of Cumulative Inertia.” Eugenics Quarterly, 14: 121–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, George L. 1967. “A Model of Preference: Quantitative Analysis of the Perception of the Visual Appearance of Residential Neighborhoods.” Journal of Regional Science, 7: 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Reed M. 1952. “Sociometric Analysis of Informal Groups: Their Structure and Function in Two Contrasting Communities.” Sociometry, 15: 367–399.
   Google Scholar
• Priest, Robert F. and Jack Sawyer. 1967. “Proximity and Peership: Bases of Balance in Inter-Personal Attraction.” American Journal of Sociology, 72: 633–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapaport, Anatol. 1953. “Spread of Information Through a Population with Socio-Structural Bias: I. Assumption of Transitivity.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 15: 523–534.
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport, Anatol. 1953. “Spread of Information Through a Population with Socio-Structural Bias: II. Various Models with Partial Transitivity.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 15: 535–547.
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport, Anatol. 1957. “Contribution to the Theory of Random and Biased Nets.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 19: 257–277.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, Peter H. 1955. Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, James W. 1968. “Changing Residence in the City: A Review of Intra-Urban Mobility.” Geographical Review, 58: 622–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Models of Man. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stouffer, Samuel A. 1940. “Intervening Opportunities: A Theory Relating Mobility and Distance.” American Sociological Review, 5: 845–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stouffer, Samuel A. 1960. “Intervening Opportunities and Competing Migrants,” Journal of Regional Science, 2: 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taaffe, Edward J., Barry J. Garner, and Maurice H. Yeates. 1963. The Peripheral Journey to Work: A Geographic Consideration. Evanston: The Transportation Center, Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, John W. and Harold H. Kelley. 1959. The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, Edward C. 1948: “Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men.” The Psychological Review, 55: 189–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, Julian. 1965. “Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15: 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, Julian.. 1966. “Migration as an Adjustment to Environmental Stress.” Journal of Social Issues, 22: 92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar