Delimitation of functional transport regions: understanding the transport flows patterns at the micro-regional level

References

• Ajo, R. 1944. Der Verkehrsraum von Tampere. Helsinki: Universität Helsinki..
   Google Scholar
• Borruso, G. 2013. “A Nodal Regional Analysis of Passenger Transport in Europe.” International Journal of Business Inteligence and Data Mining 8 (4): 377–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM.2013.059260. doi: 10.1504/IJBIDM.2013.059260
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, R., and R. Bromley. 1979. “Defining Central Place Systems through the Analysis of Bus Services: The Case of Ecuador.” The Geographical Journal 145 (3): 416–436. doi: 10.2307/633211
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, W. I. 1957. “The Classification of Service Center in England and Wales – Analysis of Public Road Transport Services.” Geographical Journal 122: 371–385.
   Google Scholar
• Casado-Díaz, J. M., and M. Coombes. 2011. “The Delineation of 21st Century Local Labour Markets Areas: A Critical Review and a Research Agenda.” Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 57: 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cattan, N. 1995. “Barrier Effects: The Case of Air and Rail Flows.” International Political Science Review 16 (3): 237–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600304. doi: 10.1177/019251219501600304
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J., L. Bertolini, F. le Clercq, and L. Kapoen. 2013. “Understanding Urban Networks: Comparing a Node-, a Density- and an Accessibility-based View.” Cities 31: 165–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.005. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claval, P. 2007. “Regional Geography: Past and Present (A Review of Ideas, Approaches and Goals).” Geographia Polonica 80 (1): 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Coombes, M., and S. Openshaw. 1982. “The Use and Definition of Travel-to-work Areas in Great Britain: Some comments.” Regional Studies 16 (2): 141–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595238200185161. doi: 10.1080/09595238200185161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derudder, B., and F. Witlox. 2008. “Mapping Global City Networks through Airline Flows: Context, Relevance, and Problems.” Journal of Transport Geography 16 (5): 305–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.12.005. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drobne, S., and M. Lakner. 2016. “Intramax and Other Objective Functions: The Case of Slovenia.” Moravian Geographical Reports 24 (2): 12–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0007. doi: 10.1515/mgr-2016-0007
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, D. 1994. “Spatial Characteristics of Transportation Hubs: Centrality and Intermediacy.” Journal of Transport Geography 2 (1): 3–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0966-6923(94)90030-2. doi: 10.1016/0966-6923(94)90030-2
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J. B. 1970. “Functional Regions within the City Centre: A Study by Factor Analysis of Taxi Flows in Central London.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 49: 161–182. doi: 10.2307/621647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godlund, S. 1956. “The Function and Growth of Bus Traffic within the Sphere of Urban Influence.” Lund, Series in Human Geography 18: 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Good, P. R., B. Derudder, and F. Witlox. 2011. “The Regionalization of Africa: Delineating Africa’s Subregions Using Airline Data.” The Journal of Geography 110 (5): 179–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.567291. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2011.567291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F. 1953. “Community of Interest Areas in Western Europe: Some Geographical Aspects of Local Passenger Traffic.” Economic Geography 29 (4): 283–298. doi: 10.2307/142530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F. 1958. “Community of Interest Areas. Notes on the Hierarchy of Central Places and their Hinterlands.” Economic Geography 34 (3): 210–226. doi: 10.2307/142479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubesic, T., T. Matisziw, and M. Zook. 2008. “Global Airline Networks and Nodal Regions.” GeoJournal 71 (1): 53–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9117-0. doi: 10.1007/s10708-008-9117-0
   Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand, T. 1958. “Time Geography: Focus on the Corporeality of Man, Society and Environment.” In The Science and Praxis of Complexity, edited by Shūhei Aida, 193–216. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halás, M., P. Kladivo, P. Šimáček, P., and T. Mintálová. 2010. “Delimitation of Micro-regions in the Czech Republic by Nodal Relations.” Moravian Geographical Reports 18 (2): 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hampl, M. 2005. Geografická organizace společnosti v České republice: Transformační procesy a jejich obecný kontext. Prague: DemoArt.
   Google Scholar
• Hampl, M., V. Gardavský, and K. Kühnl. 1987. Regional Structure and Development of the Settlement System in Czechoslovakia. Prague: Charles University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampl, M., and M. Marada. 2015. “Sociogeografická regionalizace Česka (Socio-geographical Regionalization of Czechia).” Geografie 120 (3): 397–421.
   Google Scholar
• Horňák, M. 2006. “Identification of Regions of Transport Marginality in Slovakia.” Europa XXI 15: 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Horňák, M., T. Pšenka, and F. Križan. 2013. “The Competitiveness of the Long-distance Public Transport System in Slovakia.” Moravian Geographical Reports 21 (4): 64–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2013-0021. doi: 10.2478/mgr-2013-0021
   Google Scholar
• Hůrský, J. 1974. “K regionalizaci ČSR na základě výsledků sčítání silniční dopravy (towards the Regionalization of Czechoslovakia on the Basis of the Results of Road Transport Census).” Doprava 16 (3): 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Hůrský, J. 1978. Regionalizace České socialistické republiky na základě spádu osobní hromadné dopravy [Regionalization of the Czech Socialist Republic based on the Gravity of Public Transport]. Brno: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. 1995. “Functional Regions in East-Central Europe Defined on the Basis of the Frequency of Public Bus Traffic.” Geografický časopis/Geographical Journal 47 (1): 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., and M. Olsson. 2006. “The Identification of Functional Regions: Theory, Methods, and Applications.” Annals of Regional Science 40 (1): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0019-5. doi: 10.1007/s00168-005-0019-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komornicki, T. 2008. “Changes of Car Ownership and Daily Mobility in Selected Polish Cities.” Geografický časopis/Geographical Journal 60 (4): 339–362.
   Google Scholar
• Klapka, P., M. Halás, M. Erlebach, P. Tonev, and M. Bednář. 2014. “A Multistage Agglomerative Approach for Defining Functional Regions of the Czech Republic: The Use of 2001 Commuting Data.” Moravian Geographical Reports 22 (4): 2–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2014-0019. doi: 10.1515/mgr-2014-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, S. 2014. “Daily Spatial Mobility and Transport Behaviour in the Czech Republic: Pilot Study in the Písek and Bystřice nad Pernštejnem Regions.” Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography 8 (2): 51–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2014.82.51. doi: 10.5719/hgeo.2014.82.51
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, S., M. Halás, and M. Vančura. 2014. “The Delimitation of Urban Hinterlands Based on Transport Flows: A Case Study of Regional Capitals in the Czech Republic.” Moravian Geographical Reports 22 (1): 24–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2014-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Krygsman, S., T. de Jong, and J. Nel. 2009. “Functional Transport Regions in South Africa: An Examination of National Commute Data.” Proceedings of the 28th Southern African Transport Conference 144–154.
   Google Scholar
• Kunc, J., F. Križan, K. Bilková, P. Barlík, and J. Maryáš. 2016. “Are There Differences in the Attractiveness of Shopping Centres? Experiences from the Czech and Slovak Republics.” Moravian Geographical Reports 24 (1): 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Layos, L. A. 2005. Short Distance Passenger Mobility in Europe. Eurostat, Statistic in Focus – Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Lluch, E. 1970. Evolució de les árees de tránsit dels autobusos de línia a Catalunya, 1934–1964. Barcelona: Banca Catalana.
   Google Scholar
• Musil, J., and J. Müller. 2008. “Vnitřní periferie v České republice jako mechanismus sociální exkluze (Inner Peripheries as a Mechanism of Social exclusion). Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 44 (2): 321–348.
   Google Scholar
• Novák, J., R. Ahas, A. Aasa, and S. Silm. 2013. “Application of Mobile Phone Location Data in Mapping of Commuting Patterns and Functional Regionalization: A Pilot Study of Estonia.” Journal of Maps. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2012.762331.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, M. 2016. “Functional Regions in Gravity Models and Accessibility Measures.” Moravian Geographical Reports 24 (2): 60–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0011. doi: 10.1515/mgr-2016-0011
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J. 1999. “The Transformation of Urban Transport in the Czech Republic, 1988–1998.” Transport Policy 6 (4): 225–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(99)00023-2. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(99)00023-2
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue da Silva, A. N., G. G. Manzato, and H. Pereira. 2014. “Defining Functional Urban Regions in Bahia, Brazil, Using Roadway Coverage and Population Density Variables.” Journal of Transport geography 36 (1): 79–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.03.001. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Säntti, A. 1954. Autobusverkehr als Indikator der zentralen Orte. Turku: Einflussgebiete und Verkehrsdichte in Finnland.
   Google Scholar
• Śleszyński, P. 2014. “Delimitation and Typology of Functional Urban Regions in Poland Based on Commuting 2006.” Geographia Polonica 87: 277–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2014.21. doi: 10.7163/GPol.2014.21
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, J. 2005. “Are Commuting Patterns a Good Indicator of Urban Spatial Structure.” Journal of Transport geography 13 (4): 306–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.07.005. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Sýkora, L., and O. Mulíček. 2009. “The Micro-regional Nature of Functional Urban Areas (FUAs): Lessons from the Analysis of Czech Urban and Regional System.” Urban Research and Practice 2 (3): 287–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17535060903319228. doi: 10.1080/17535060903319228
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Z. 2003. “Accessibility to Facilities versus Daily Mobility of Rural Dwellers: The Case of Poland.” European Research in Regional Science 12: 95–125.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H., P. Waerden, M. Alves, J. Polak, S. Ellis, A. Harvey, S. Kurose, and R. Zandee. 2003. “Spatial Context and the Complexity of Daily Travel Patterns: An International Comparison.” Journal of Transport Geography 11 (1): 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00050-9. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00050-9
   Google Scholar
• Tuominen, O. 1949. Das Einflussgebiet der Stadt Turku im System der Einflussgebiete SW - Finnlands. Helsinki: Universität Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, E. 1980. Geography as Spatial Interaction. Washington, DC: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wackermann, G. 1999. “Changes in the Regionalisation of Transport and New Orientation of Centrality in Europe.” Promet – Traffic & Transportation 11 (2–3): 83–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., H. Mo, F. Wang, and F. Jin. 2011. “Exploring the Network Structure and Nodal Centrality of China’s Air Transport Network: A Complex Network Approach.” Journal of Transport geography 19 (4): 712–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.012. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wróbel, A. 1961. Nodal Regions of Passenger Traffic in Poland. Problems of Economic Regions. Warsaw: Państw. Wyd. Nauk.
   Google Scholar