Politics of public interest: Finnish forest capital’s strategy in the Kaipola paper mill shutdown

References

• Ahlqvist, T., and S. Moisio. 2014. “Neoliberalisation in a Nordic State: From Cartel Polity Towards a Corporate Polity in Finland.” New Political Economy 19 (1): 21–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlqvist, T., and H. Sirviö. 2019. “Contradictions of Spatial Governance: Bioeconomy and the Management of State Space in Finland.” Antipode 51 (2): 395–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, M., I. Grundel, and D. Morales. 2021. “Regional Bioeconomies: Public Finance and Sustainable Policy Narratives.” Geografiska Annaler B: Human Geography 103 (2): 116–132.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, M., and J. Kortelainen. 2020. “Recoding of an Industrial Town: Bioeconomy Hype as a Cure from Decline?” European Planning Studies 29 (1): 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, M., and J. Lukkarinen. 2020. “Blue Bioeconomy Localities at the Margins: Reconnecting Norwegian Seaweed Farming and Finnish Small-Scale Lake Fisheries with Blue Policies.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 38 (7–8): 1465–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anshelm, J., and S. Haikola. 2018. “Depoliticization, Repoliticization, and Environmental Concerns: Swedish Mining Politics as an Instance of Environmental Politicization.” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 17 (2): 561–596.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C., and S. Lavery. 2017. “Towards a Political Economy of Depoliticization: Help to Buy, the Office for Budget Responsibility, and the UK Growth Model.” In Anti-politics, Depoliticization, and Governance, edited by P. Fawcett, M. Flinders, C. Hay, and M. Wood, 245–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R., and P. Koch. 2019. “Depoliticization and Urban Politics: Moving Beyond the “Post-Political” City.” In Comparing Strategies of (De)Politicisation in Europe: Governance, Resistance and Anti-Politics, edited by J. Buller, P. E. Dönmez, A. Standring, and M. Wood, 189–208. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., and D. Tyfield. 2013. “Theorizing the Bioeconomy: Biovalue, Biocapital, Bioeconomics or … What?” Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (3): 299–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, S., G. Diprose, and A. C. Thomas. 2019. “Contesting Deep sea oil: Politicisation–Depoliticisation–Repoliticisation.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (3): 519–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, J., P. E. Dönmez, A. Standring, and M. Wood. 2019. “Depoliticisation, Post-Politics and the Problem of Change.” In Comparing Strategies of (De)Politicisation in Europe: Governance, Resistance and Anti-Politics, edited by J. Buller, P. E. Dönmez, A. Standring, and M. Wood, 1–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P. 2001. “New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (2): 127–149.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P. 2014. “Depoliticisation: Economic Crisis and Political Management.” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., and R. Marshall. 2002. “Utilitarianism’s Bad Breath? A Re-evaluation of the Public Interest Justification for Planning.” Planning Theory 1 (2): 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. 2020. 190 Jobs at Risk as Shotton Paper Mill Put Up for Sale. Prolific North. Accessed October 14, 2020. https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news/publishing-news/2020/08/190-jobs-risk-shotton-paper-mill-put-sale.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M., and K. Iveson. 2015. “Recovering the Politics of the City: From the ‘Post-Political City’ to a ‘Method of Equality’ for Critical Urban Geography.” Progress in Human Geography 39 (5): 543–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deas, I. 2014. “The Search for Territorial Fixes in Subnational Governance: City-Regions and the Disputed Emergence of Post-Political Consensus in Manchester, England.” Urban Studies 51 (11): 2285–2314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeside.com. 2020. UPM to Sell its Shotton Paper Mill. Deeside.com. Accessed October 14, 2020. http://www.deeside.com/upm-to-sell-its-shotton-paper-mill/.
   Google Scholar
• Eskelinen, T. 2019. Demokratia utopiana ja sen vastavoimat. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, D., and M. Jones. 2018. “Restating the Post-Political: Depoliticization, Social Inequalities and City-Region Growth.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (1): 51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P., M. Flinders, C. Hay, and M. Wood, eds. 2017. Anti-politics, Depoliticization, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FBS. 2014. Sustainable Growth from Bioeconomy: Finnish Bioeconomy Strategy. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://biotalous.fi/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/The_Finnish_Bioeconomy_Strategy_110620141.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF. 2017a. Global Paper and Board Production by Grade. Finnish Forest Industries Federation Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF. 2017b. Development of Volume and Value of Chemical Pulp Exports. Finnish Forest Industries Federation Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF. 2018a. Forest Industry Exports from Finland Since 1960. Finnish Forest Industries Federation Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF. 2018b. Consumption of Paper and Board in Finland. Finnish Forest Industries Federation Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF. 2019a. Finland’s Top Export Products 2018. Finnish Forest Industries Federation Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF. 2019b. Personnel Employed by Forest Industry in Finland. Finnish Forest Industries Federation Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF. 2020a. Forest Industries’ Production Volumes Since 1960. Finnish Forest Industries Federation Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF. 2020b. Paper and Paperboard Production in Finland. Finnish Forest Industries Federation Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• FFIF 2020c. “Finnish Forest Industry is Building Future Growth.” Finnish Forest Industries Federation Press Release. Accessed October 15, 2020. https://www.forestindustries.fi/releases/finnish-forest-industry-is-building-future-growth/.
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., and J. Buller. 2006. “Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics and Tools.” British Politics 1 (3): 293–318.
   Google Scholar
• Goven, J., and V. Pavone. 2015. “The Bioeconomy as Political Project: A Polanyian Analysis.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (3): 302–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1978. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Hänninen, V. 2018. “Will the Independent Sawmill Industry in Finland Survive?” Forest2Market. Accessed April 14, 2021. https://www.forest2market.com/blog/will-the-independent-sawmill-industry-in-finland-survive.
   Google Scholar
• Harrinkari, T., P. Katila, and H. Karppinen. 2016. “Stakeholder Coalitions in Forest Politics: Revision of Finnish Forest Act.” Forest Policy and Economics 67: 30–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2006. “Neo-liberalism as Creative Destruction.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88 (2): 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2014. “Depoliticisation as Process, Governance as Practice: What did the ‘First Wave’ Get Wrong and Do We Need a ‘Second Wave’ to Put it Right?” Policy & Politics 42 (2): 293–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, E. 2020. “Pääministeri Sanna Marin Jämsässä: ‘Valtio on sitoutunut etsimään korvaavia työpaikkoja alueelle’ – Seurasimme tiedotustilaisuutta suorana.” YLE. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11515699.
   Google Scholar
• Hytönen, J. 2019. “Limits of Localism: Institutional Perspectives on Communicativeness, Neoliberalization and Sustainability in Finnish Spatial Planning.” Nordia Geographical Publications 48 (4): 1–110.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, J. 2020. “Sahat ovat vaikeuksissa ja pelkäävät jäävänsä suurteollisuuden jalkoihin – ‘Puun maksimaalinen ohjaaminen sahaukseen olisi myös ilmastollisesti fiksumpaa’.” YLE. Accessed April 14, 2021. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11431403.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2000. “The Crisis of the National Spatio-Temporal fix and the Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capitalism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (2): 323–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2004. “Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Economy.” Critical Discourse Studies 1 (2): 159–174.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2007. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2016. The State: Past, Present, Future. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., and S. Oosterlynck. 2008. “Cultural Political Economy: On Making the Cultural Turn Without Falling Into Soft Economic Sociology.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 39 (3): 1155–1169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. M. T. 2016. “Global Paper Market Forecasts to 2030 Under Future Internet Demand Scenarios.” Journal of Forest Economics 25: 14–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajander, R. 2020. “Björn Wahlroos lakon uhkasta: ‘Jos hyväksymme ay-liikkeen vaatimukset, täältä lähtee työpaikkoja ja niitä lähtee paljon’.” YLE. Accessed October 13, 2020. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11175630.
   Google Scholar
• Kanninen, V., P. Bäcklund, and R. Mäntysalo. 2013. “Trading Zone and the Complexity of Planning.” In Urban Planning as a Trading Zone, edited by A. Balducci and R. Mäntysalo, 159–178. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, A. 2021. Ruotsalaislehti: Pääministerit Marin ja Löfven lobbasivat yhdessä EU:n metsäesitystä – Marinin alivaltiosihteeri vakuuttaa: “Näin toimitaan jatkossakin”. Maaseudun Tulevaisuus: Metsä. Accessed June 17, 2021. https://www.maaseuduntulevaisuus.fi/metsa/artikkeli-1.1411895.
   Google Scholar
• Kellokumpu, V. 2021. “The Bioeconomy, Carbon Sinks, and Depoliticization in Finnish Forest Politics.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/25148486211049322.
   Google Scholar
• Kervinen, E. 2020. “‘Tämä oli tietenkin pääministeriltä valittu linja’ – Marinin Kaipola-puheiden sävy oli hämmentävä, sanoo EK:N Häkämies.” Helsingin Sanomat. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://www.hs.fi/politiikka/art-2000006617684.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kettell, S. 2008. “Does Depoliticisation Work?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10 (4): 630–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgannon, L. 2020. “UPM to Sell Paper Mill in Shotton.” Insider Media. Accessed October 14, 2020. https://www.insidermedia.com/news/wales/upm-to-sell-paper-mill-in-shotton.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M. 2018. “The Naturalisation of Growth: Marx, the Regulation Approach and Bourdieu.” Environmental Values 27 (1): 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M. 2020. “The State in Transformation to a Sustainable Postgrowth Economy.” Environmental Politics 29 (1): 115–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotilainen, J., and T. Rytteri. 2011. “Transformation of Forest Policy Regimes in Finland Since the 19th Century.” Journal of Historical Geography 37 (4): 429–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, M., and K. Raitio. 2017. “Finnish Forest Policy in the Era of Bioeconomy: A Pathway to Sustainability.” Forest Policy and Economics 77: 6–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M. 1997. “Green Gold and Capitalism: Finland, Forests and the World Economy.” Historiallinen Aikakausikirja 952: 144–152.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M. 1999. “Europe’s Wood Basket Transformed: Finnish Economic History in a Long Perspective.” In Europe’s Northern Frontier: Perspectives on Finland’s Western Identity, edited by T. Lehtonen, 50–85. Jyväskylä: PS–Kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M., S. Siltala, and T. Keskisarja. 2014. Paperin painajainen – Metsäliitto, metsät ja miljardit Suomen kohtaloissa. Kustannusosakeyhtiö Siltala: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kukkonen, L. 2021. “Teknologiateollisuus irtautuu osin yleisistä työehtosopimuksista, perustaa uuden sopijayhdistyksen.” Helsingin Sanomat. Accessed March 25, 2020. https://www.hs.fi/talous/art-2000007880481.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kurppa, S., A. Tolvanen, V. Alenius, and A. Reinikainen. 2018. “The Potential of the Finnish Arctic Bioeconomy Depends on Entrepreneurial Spirit and Cooperation.” Luke Policy Brief 3/2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-326-596-7
   Google Scholar
• Lassila, A., and T. Luukka. 2021. “Stora Enson toimitusjohtaja perustelee Veitsiluodon tehtaan sulkemista: ‘Euroopassa on ylikapasiteettia 15 paperikoneen verran’.” Helsingin Sanomat. Accessed 20 April 2021. https://www.hs.fi/talous/art-2000007929680.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. 2017. “On ‘the Subject’ of Planning’s Public Interest.” Planning Theory 16 (2): 150–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J., and H. Sirviö. 2019. “The Politics of Depoliticization and the Constitution of City-Regionalism as a Dominant Spatial-Political Imaginary in Finland.” Political Geography 73: 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 2015. “Depoliticizing Urban Discourse: How “We” Write.” Cities 44: 152–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1976. Collected Works: Volume 5 Marx and Engels 1845–1847. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2013. “We Have Never Been Post-Political.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 24 (1): 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, G. 2011. “Urban Politics Reconsidered: Growth Machine to Post-Democratic City.” Urban Studies 48 (12): 2629–2660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2008. “Rethinking Economy.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 39 (3): 1116–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2011. Carbon Democracy. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• MMM. 2021. Bieconomy and Circular Economy. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://mmm.fi/en/bioeconomy.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. 2018. Geopolitics of Knowledge-Based Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., and L. Leppänen. 2007. “Towards a Nordic Competition State? Politico-Economic Transformation of Statehood in Finland, 1965–2005.” Fennia – International Journal of Geography 185 (2): 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni, S. 2017. “The Public Interest.” In The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, edited by M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, and V. Watson, 69–80. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Institute Finland. 2019. Forest Ownership. Accessed 24 February 2021. https://www.luke.fi/en/natural-resources/forest/forest-resources-and-forest-planning/forest-ownership/.
   Google Scholar
• Niinivuo, S. 2020. “Asiantuntijat: Nämä UPM:N Pesosen väitteet kaipolan tehtaan sulkemisesta eivät pidä paikkaansa.” Ilta-Sanomat. Accessed October 13, 2020. https://www.is.fi/taloussanomat/art-2000006615784.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pesonen, J. 2020. “Jussi Pesonen peräänkuuluttaa aitoa teollisuuspolitiikkaa avoimessa kirjeessään: ‘Suomalaiset tehtaat ansaitsevat puolustuspuheensa. Niissä tehdään hyvää työtä’.” UPM Media Bulletin. Accessed October 13, 2020. https://www.upm.com/fi/tietoa-meista/medialle/tiedotteet/2020/08/jussi-pesonen-peraankuuluttaa-aitoa-teollisuuspolitiikkaa-avoimessa-kirjeessaan-suomalaiset-tehtaat-ansaitsevat-puolustuspuheensa.-niissa-tehdaan-hyvaa-tyota/.
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. 1978. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, S., R. Mäntysalo, and K. Jarenko. 2017. “The Varying Interpretations of Public Interest: Making Sense of Finnish Urban Planners’ Conceptions.” Current Urban Studies 5 (1): 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sirviö, H., and J. Luukkonen. 2020. “Metropolitanizing a Nordic State? City-Regionalist Imaginary and the Restructuring of the State as a Territorial Political Community in Finland.” In Foregrounding Urban Agendas: The new Urban Issue in European Experiences of Policy-Making, edited by S. Armondi and S. De Gregorio Hurtado, 211–227. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Soimakallio, S., L. Saikku, L. Valsta, and K. Pingoud. 2016. “Climate Change Mitigation Challenge for Wood Utilization – The Case of Finland.” Environmental Science & Technology 50 (10): 5127–5134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. 2016. Statistical Yearbook of Finland 2016: 7.8 Development of Exports by Commodity Group, 1900–2015. Accessed February 23, 2021. https://pxhopea2.stat.fi/sahkoiset_julkaisut/vuosikirja2016/data/kaupp_08.xlsx.
   Google Scholar
• Stora Enso. 2019. Stora Enso muuntaa Oulun paperitehtaan pakkauskartonkitehtaaksi. Accessed October 8, 2020. https://www.storaenso.com/fi-fi/newsroom/regulatory-and-investor-releases/2019/5/stora-enso-muuntaa-oulun-paperitehtaan-pakkauskartonkitehtaaksi.
   Google Scholar
• Sum, N.-L., and B. Jessop. 2013. Towards a Cultural Political Economy: Putting Culture in Its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2017. “Interrogating Post-Democratization: Reclaiming Egalitarian Political Spaces.” Political Geography 30 (7): 370–380.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., and J. Wilson, eds. 2014. The Post-Political and its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takala, T., A. Lehtinen, M. Tanskanen, T. Hujala, and J. Tikkanen. 2020. “Discoursal Power and Multi-Objective Forestry in the Finnish Print Media.” Forest Policy and Economics 111: 102031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsson, I. 2020. “Suomen Yrittäjät: Pääministerin tehtävä ei ole kertoa yritykselle mitä tulee tehdä – Marinin kommentit herättivät keskustelua yrittäjäpuolella.” YLE. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11518239.
   Google Scholar
• Tikka, J.-P. 2020. “Miksi lietsot luokkataistelua, pääministeri Sanna Marin?” Verkkouutiset. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://www.verkkouutiset.fi/miksi-lietsot-luokkataistelua-paaministeri-sanna-marin/#299dd86c.
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen, T., and S. Vaaherkumpu. 2020. “Pääministeri Marin arvostelee Ykkösaamussa Jämsän kannattavan tehtaan sulkemista: Mikä riittää, miksi juuri nyt? ‘Elämme sotien jälkeisen Suomen pahinta kriisiä’.” YLE. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11514522.
   Google Scholar
• UPM. 2017. Aiming Higher with Biofore. Annual business report. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.upm.com/siteassets/asset/investors/2017/upm_annual-report_2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UPM. 2019. UPM Biofore Beyond Fossils. Annual Business Report. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.upm.com/siteassets/asset/investors/2019/upm-annual-report-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UPM. 2020a. This is Biofore: Innovating for a Future Beyond Fossil Fuels. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.upm.com/about-us/this-is-biofore/.
   Google Scholar
• UPM. 2020b. Ensuring Performance: UPM Communication Papers. Helsinki Capital Markets Day. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.upm.com/siteassets/asset/investors/2020/7-upm-communication-papers_winfried-schaur_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UPM. 2021. Paso de los Toros: Growth Opportunity. Accessed March 24, 2020. https://www.upmpasodelostoros.com/
   Google Scholar
• Vaaherkumpu, S., and T. Keränen. 2020. “UPM:n toimitusjohtaja Jussi Pesonen: Kaipolan tehdas ei ole kannattava – ‘Jos tehtaiden sulkeminen olisi helpointa täällä, kaikki sulkemamme tehtaat olisivat Suomessa’.” YLE. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11525435.
   Google Scholar
• Valtioneuvosto. 2019. Marin’s Government Programme. Accessed February 22, 2021. https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/marin/government-programme/.
   Google Scholar
• Valtioneuvostonkanslia. 2015. Ratkaisujen Suomi: Pääministeri Juha Sipilän hallituksen strateginen ohjelma. Edita Prima: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Van Sant, K., R. Fredheim, and G. Bergmanis-Korāts. 2021. Abuse of Power: Coordinated Online Harassment of Finnish Government Ministers. Riga: NATO STRATCOM COE. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/abuse-of-power-coordinated-online-harassment-of-finnish-government-ministers/5 ().
   Google Scholar
• Vänttinen, P. 2021. Environmentalists ‘Up in Arms’ about Finnish-Swedish Defence of Forest Industry. EURACTIV.com. Accessed June 17, 2021. https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/environmentalists-up-in-arms-about-finnish-swedish-defence-of-forest-industry/.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J. 2016. “The Creation to Come. Pre-Empting the Evolution of the Bioeconomy.” In Environmental Change and the World’s Futures: Ecologies, Ontologies and Mythologies, edited by J. P. Marshall and L. H. Connor, 264–281. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. 2016. “Politicisation, Depoliticisation and Anti-Politics: Towards a Multilevel Research Agenda.” Political Studies Review 14 (4): 521–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylöstalo, H. 2020. “Depoliticisation and Repoliticisation of Feminist Knowledge in a Nordic Knowledge Regime: The Case of Gender Budgeting in Finland.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 28 (2): 126–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar