Finding the pulse of the welfare landscape: reframing green space provision in modernist planning

References

• Åkerlund, U. 2021. “Public Space in the Green and Recreative City: The Planning and Policy Perspective in Sweden.” In Green Visions: Greenspace Planning and Design in Nordic Countries, edited by K. Nilsson, R. Weber, and L. Rohrer, 182–187. Arvinius & Orfeus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 2015. “A City is not a Tree.” In A City is not a Tree: 50th Anniversary Edition, edited by M. W. Mehaffy, 1–32. Sustasis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. 2016. Topologies of Power: Beyond Territory and Networks. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alon-Mozes, T. 2020. “Outdoor Recreation in Israel from the Early 1950s to the 1970s: From Nation Building to Landscape Consumption.” Journal of Planning History 19: 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1978. “Idrott och friluftsliv: hur skall det statliga stödet fördelas?” Naturvårdsverkets årsbok 1978: 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Åquist, A.-C. 2001. “Urban Change, Planning and the Organization of Everyday Life. The Case of Örebro.” In Change and Stability in Urban Europe: Form, Quality and Governance, edited by H. Andersson, G. Jorgensen, D. Joye, and W. Ostendorf, 193–210. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Åstrand, P. O. 1968. Hur man skall få bättre kondition, 6e omarbetade upplagan. Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrup, B. 1973. Hålligång. KW Gullers.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, T. 2010. “Postscript: Reassembling the City: Networks and Urban Imaginaries.” In Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies, edited by I. Farías, and T. Bender, 303–323. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bolling, H. 2005. Sin egen hälsas smed: idéer, initiativ och organisationer inom svensk motionsidrott 1945–1981. Stockholms universitet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Boverket. 1994a. Stadens parker och natur. Boverket rapport 1994: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Boverket. 1994b. Sverige 2009 – förslag till vision.
   Google Scholar
• Brattnäs, B. 1973. Fit for fun: A Swedish Message. KW Gullers.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A new Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by J. Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Centrala motionsrådet. 1976. Planera för motion. Centrala motionsrådet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P., S. Jokela, and J. Saarikivi. 2011. “Nature, Sport, and the European City: London and Helsinki 1880–2005.” In Greening the City: Urban Landscapes in the Twentieth Century, edited by D. Brantz, and S. Dümpelmann, 115–132. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Laet, M., and A. Mol. 2000. “The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology.” Social Studies of Science 30: 225–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek, R. 2012. “Topologies of Human-Mobile Assemblages.” In Mobile Technology and Place, edited by R. Wilken, and G. Goggin, 39–54. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, B. 2019. “The Historical Rise and Fall of Community Facility Provision Standards in the Metropolitan Planning of Melbourne.” Planning Perspectives 34: 693–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, G., J. Ödalen, and E. Wångmar. 2015. “Understanding Large-Scale Institutional Change: Social Conflicts and the Politics of Swedish Municipal Amalgamations, 1952–1974.” Scandinavian Journal of History 40: 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, H. 1992. En politisk nödvändighet: En studie av den fysiska riksplaneringens introduktion och tillämpning. Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Friluftsfrämjandet. 1984. Handledning Hålliform! Friluftsfrämjandet, Trosa Tryckeri.
   Google Scholar
• Frohm, M. 1972. Friskvårdsplan för Södermanlands län. Skid och Friluftsfrämjandet. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, S. M. 1973. Urban Recreation Planning. Philadelphia: LEA & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Grauers, J., and G. Sundbom. 1972. Hålliform: Handbok om Kost och Motion. Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren.
   Google Scholar
• Guinchard, C. G. 1971. Friluftslivets fysiska miljö. Civildepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelm, Å, and C. Jäderberg. (Eds). 1984. Natur för friluftsliv: Naturvårdsverkets årsbok 1984. Naturvårdsverket.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L., and J. Thatcher. 2019. “Urban Studies and Thinking Topologically.” Territory, Politics and Governance 7: 141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hönke, J., and I. Cuesta-Fernandez. 2017. “A Topolographical Approach to Infrastructure: Political Topography, Topology and the Port of Dar es Salaam.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35: 1076–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järdler, S. 1975. “På fritid – kommunernas fritidsforum.” På Fritid, no 1, 1975: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T., and J. Sandström. 2020. “Organizing Rocks: Actor-Network Theory and Space.” Organization 27: 701–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortelainen, J. 2010. “Old-Growth Forests as Objects in Complex Spatialities.” Area 42: 494–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristersson, E. 2003. Rymlighetens betydelse: en undersökning av rymlighet i bostadsgårdens kontext. Institutionen för arkitektur, Lunds universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Kungl. Maj:t. 1970. Kungl. Maj:ts proposition nr 79 år 1970 angående stöd till idrotten.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A. 2011. “Topologies and the Multiplicities of Space-Time.” Dialogues in Human Geography 1: 312–315.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. “Technology is Society Made Durable.” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by J. Law, 103–131. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005a. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005b. “Trains of Thought: The Fifth Dimension of Time and its Fabrication.” In Thinking Time, edited by A. N. Perret-Clermont, 173–187. Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and E. Hermant. 1998. Paris, Ville Invisible. Paris: Empécheurs de penser rond.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 1999. “After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by J. Law, and J. Hassard, 1–14. Oxford: Blackwell publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and V. Singleton. 2005. “Object Lessons.” Organization 12: 331–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecomte, J. 2013. “Beyond Indefinite Extension: About Bruno Latour and Urban Space.” Social Anthropology/Anthropologoe Sociale 21: 462–478.
   Google Scholar
• Lexén, T., and M. Qviström. 2021. “Negotiating Asymmetric Borders in an Emerging Soft Region.” European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1895081.
   Google Scholar
• Lillienhöök, B. 1971a. Mark för människor. Rabén & Sjögren.
   Google Scholar
• Lillienhöök, B. 1971b. “Motionslandskap – närlandskap.” K-Kontur (1): 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Littke, H. 2015. “Planning the Green Walkable City: Conceptualizing Values and Conflicts for Urban Green Space Strategies in Stockholm.” Sustainability 7: 11306–11320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren Alm, E. 2001. Stadslandskapets obrukade resurs. Om grönstrukturens potential och synliggörande i en hållbar stadsutveckling. Chalmers tekniska högskola.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, J. 2019. “Renovation Year Zero: Swedish Welfare Landscapes of Anxiety, 1975 to the Present.” Bebyggelsehistorisk Tidskrift 76: 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mårald, E., and C. Nordlund. 2020. “Modern Nature for a Modern Nation: An Intellectual History of Environmental Dissonances in the Swedish Welfare State.” Environment and History 26: 495–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., and A. Secor. 2014. “Towards a Post-Mathematical Topology.” Progress in Human Geography 38: 420–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2016. “The Geographies of Urban Density: Topology, Politics and the City.” Progress in Human Geography 40: 629–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2020. “De/re-Densification: A Relational Geography of Urban Density.” City 24: 314–324.
   Google Scholar
• McHarg, I. 1992. Design with Nature. 25th Anniversary Edition. New York: John Wylie & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, S. 2013. Getting Physical: The Rise of Fitness Culture in America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2015. “Assemblages and Actor-Networks: Rethinking Socio-Material Power, Politics and Space.” Geography Compass 9: 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., and C. Schnurr. 2016. “Assemblage Thinking and Actor-Network Theory: Conjunctions, Disjunctions, Cross-Fertilisations.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41: 217–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Norrbom, C.-E. 1970. “Friluftslivet i samhällsplaneringen.” K-Kontur (1): 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, H.-E. 1993. “Leisure Policy in Sweden.” In Leisure Policies in Europe, edited by P. Bramham, I. Henry, H. Mommaas, and H. van der Poel, 71–100. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Österlind, M., and J. Wright. 2014. “If Sport’s the Solution Then What’s the Problem? The Social Significance of Sport in the Moral Governing of ‘Good’ and ‘Healthy’ Citizens in Sweden, 1922–1998.” Sport, Education and Society 19: 973–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson-Forsberg, L. 2014. “Swedish Spatial Planning: A Blunt Instrument for the Protection of Outdoor Recreation.” Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 5: 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pries, J. 2019. “Rapport från förtätad förort: Fältanteckningar från Norra Fäladen, Lund.” Arkitekturtidskriften KRITIK, 28–42.
   Google Scholar
• Pries, J., and M. Qviström. 2021. “The Patchwork Planning of a Welfare Landscape: Reappraising the Role of Leisure Planning in the Swedish welfare state.” Planning perspectives. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02665433.2020.1867884.
   Google Scholar
• Prop 1975:46. Primära rekreationsområden.
   Google Scholar
• Qviström, M. 2013. “Landscape with a Heartbeat: Tracing Portable Landscapes for Jogging in Sweden (1958–1971).” Environment and Planning A 45: 312–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qviström, M. 2016. “The Nature of Running: On Embedded Landscape Ideals in Leisure Planning.” Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 17: 202–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qviström, M. 2017. “Competing Geographies of Recreational Running: The Case of the “Jogging Wave” in Sweden in the Late 1970s.” Health & Place 46: 351–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, K. 2008. “Från välfärdsprojekt till upplevelseindustri - Fritidsnatur under det sena 1900-talet: exemplet Ådalen/Höga kusten.” In När dalen var röd och kusten blev hög, edited by M. Erland, 169–190. Umeå: Umeå Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1961:9. Principer för en ny kommunindelning.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1969:29. Idrott åt alla.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1973:52. Turism och rekreation i Sverige.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1979:60. Bidrag till folkrörelser: betänkande om statens stöd till folkrörelserna.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1981: 99. Stadsförnyelse och bostadsförbättring.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1994:36. Miljö och fysisk planering.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35: 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’, and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals on Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology.” Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statens naturvårdsverk. 1970. Statligt stöd till anläggningar för idrott och friluftsliv. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Statens Naturvårdsverk. 1971. Friluftsområdet: motionsspår. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Statens naturvårdsverk. 1975. Översiktlig naturinventering och naturvårdsplanering 1975: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Statens naturvårdsverk & Statens institut för byggnadsforskning. 1971. Planering för friluftsliv.
   Google Scholar
• Statens naturvårdsverk & Statens planverk. 1979. Naturvården i kommunernas planering. Statens planverk, Rapport 44, del 11.
   Google Scholar
• Statens planverk. 1977. Bostadsbestämmelser: information om nybyggnadsbestämmelser för bostaden och grannskapet.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm stad. 1970. Planfaktorer 70.
   Google Scholar
• Stryjan, N. 2020. Planering för fysisk aktivitet: en analys av Hallonbergen, 1967–2020. SLU.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, D. 2013. “How Much Sport is There in Sport Physiology? Practice and Ideas in the Stockholm School of Physiology at GCI, 1941–1969.” The International Journal of the History of Sport 30: 892–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunström, M. 2009. På spaning efter den goda staden: Om konstruktioner av ideal och problem i svensk stadsbyggnadsdiskussion. Örebro universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, T. 1992. “Open Space Planning in London, From Standards per 1000 to Green Strategy.” Town Planning Review 63: 365–386.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe. 1969. Planning and development of recreational areas including the development of the natural environment: proceedings of the Seminar organized by the Committee on Housing, Building and Planning of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and held in France and Luxembourg, 27 April - 10 May 1969. New York, United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Wikman, P. 2019. Kulturgeografin tar plats i välfärdsstaten: vetenskapliga modeller och politiska reformer under efterkrigstidens första decennier. Uppsala universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Zettersten, G. 1984. “Friluftsliv i frihet.” In Natur för friluftsliv: Naturvårdsverkets årsbok 1984, edited by Å Hjelm, and C. Jäderberg, 7–17. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
   Google Scholar
• Riksarkivet, Arninge.
   Google Scholar
• Friluftsfrämjandet.
   Google Scholar