“Sport for All” in a financial crisis: survival and adaptation in competing organisational models of local authority sport services

References

• Association for Public Service Excellence (APSE). (2011a). Localism and decentralisation bill. The views of APSE members on the proposed ‘community right to challenge’. Briefing Paper 11–21, Manchester, NH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Public Service Excellence (APSE). (2011b). Proof of delivery? A review of the role of co-operatives and mutual organisations in local public service provision. Manchester, NH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Public Service Excellence (APSE). (2012a). Local authority sport and recreation services in England: Where next? Manchester, NH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Association for Public Service Excellence (APSE). (2012b). The ensuring council. An alternative vision for the future of local government. Manchester, NH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. (2006). Public sports and recreation services: Making them fit for the future. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S., & Reid, G. (1994). Contracting municipal sports management: Policy-making interactions. Local Government Policy Making, 21(2), 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsgard, N. A., Houlihan, B., Mangset, P., Nodland, S. I., & Rommetvedt, H. (Eds.). (2007). Sport policy: A comparative analysis of stability and change. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, G., & Keep, M. (2011). The local government finance settlement 2011–13. House of Commons Library, Research Paper 11/16, February; London: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1998). Interpreting British governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blond, P. (2009). The ownership state: Restoring excellence, innovation and ethos to the public services. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA)/ResPublica.
   Google Scholar
• Blond, P. (2010). Red Tory: How left and right have broken Britain and how we can fix it. London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt, L., & Harris, M. (2010). Mass localism: A way to help small communities solve big social challenges. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA)/The Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, D. (2009). The challenge of co-production. London: New Economics Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, T. L., & Glover, T. D. (1999). Back to the future: Leisure services and the re-emergence of the enabling authority of the state. In E. L. Jackson & T. L. Burton (Eds.), Leisure studies: Prospects for the twenty-first century (pp. 371–384). State College, PA: Venture.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, P. (2005). Review of national sport effort and resources. London: Sport England/Dept of Culture, Media and Sport.
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA)/Solace. (2009). After the downturn: Managing a significant and sustained adjustment in public sector funding. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chief Leisure and Culture Officers Association (CLOA). (2011). Culture and leisure impact survey: Summary of findings. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F. (1985). The defence of public leisure services: Professional rationality or political struggle? Leisure Management, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F. (1995). Compulsory competitive tendering for sport and leisure management: A lost opportunity? Managing Leisure, 1(1), 3–15. doi:10.1080/136067195376538
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F. (1998). Leisure studies, leisure policy and social citizenship: The failure of welfare or the limits of welfare? Leisure Studies, 17(1), 21–36. doi:10.1080/026143698375231
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F. (2007). A wider social role for sport: Who's keeping the score? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. (2004). Modernization, managerialism and the culture wars: Reshaping the local welfare state in England. Local Government Studies, 30(4), 481–496. doi:10.1080/0300393042000318950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. F. (1997). Does a new philosophy change the structures? Compulsory competitive tendering and local authority leisure services in Midland England. Managing Leisure, 2(4), 204–216. doi:10.1080/136067197376158
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. F., & Kay, T. (2003). Sport and social exclusion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. (2010). Big society, not big government. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Co-operative Council Citizens’ Commission. (2010). The co-operative council: Sharing power: A new settlement between citizens and the state. London: Author/Lambeth Borough Council.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2010). Local government finance report 2010/11. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2011a). Community right to buy. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2011b). Community right to challenge. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Culture Media and Sport/Strategy Unit (DCMS). (2002). Game plan. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Culture Media and Sport (DCMS). (2011). Encouraging involvement in big society: Cultural and sporting perspective. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment. (1975). Sport and recreation, Cmnd 6200. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2012). The new public health role of local authorities. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2004). Changing policy priorities for sport in England: The emergence of elite sport development as a key policy concern. Leisure Studies, 23(4), 365–385. doi:10.1080/0261436042000231646
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. (2006). From ‘Sport for All’ to not about ‘sport’ at all? Interrogating sport policy interventions in the United Kingdom. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(3), 217–238. doi:10.1080/16184740601094936
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, L. (1992). Community recreation and local government in the 1990s. In J. Sugden & C. Knox (Eds.), Leisure in the 1990s: Rolling back the welfare state (pp. 41–44). LSA Publication No. 46. Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I. P. (2001). The politics of leisure policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. (1997). Sport, policy and politics: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. (2001). Citizenship, civil society and the sport and recreation professions. Managing Leisure, 6(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/13606710010026331
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B., & White, A. (2002). The politics of sports development. Development of sport or development through sport? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2011). Open public services. White Paper. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2010a). Spending review 2010. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2010b). Budget 2010. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Local Government Studies (INLOGOV). (2012). A new model for public services? A discussion paper. Birmingham: Author, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR)/PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2009). Who's accountable? The challenge of giving power away in a centralised political culture. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B. (1988). The new politics of welfare. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. (2009). Sport policy and governance: Local perspectives. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. (2013). Local authority sport services under the UK coalition government: Retention, revision or curtailment. International Journal of Sport Politics and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C., Bartlett, J., & Gallagher, N. (2008). Making it personal. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Leisure Research Unit (LRU). (1994). CCT in leisure management: An interim report. London: The Sports Council.
   Google Scholar
• Lentell, B. (1993). Sports development: Goodbye to community recreation? In C. Brackenridge (Ed.), Body matters: Leisure images and lifestyles (pp. 141–149) ( LSA Publication No. 47). Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Association (LGA). (2010). Funding outlook for councils from 2010/11 to 2019/20: Preliminary modelling. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Localis. (2012). Catalyst councils: A new future for public service delivery. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Loughborough Partnership. (2008). School sport partnerships. Annual monitoring and evaluation report for 2007: PDM survey. Loughborough: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘Big Society’. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21–40. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.642949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, I. (1995). Sport for All – RIP: A political critique of the relationship between national sport policy and local authority sports development in London. In S. Fleming, M. Talbot, & A. Tomlinson (Eds.), Policy and politics in sport, PE and leisure (pp. 71–94). Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• National Endowment for Science, Technology & the Arts (NESTA). (2010). Co-production: Right here, right now. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• New Local Government Network (NLGN). (2011) Future councils: Life after the spending cuts. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2001). Modernizing governance: New labour, policy and society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, G. (1996). The impact of compulsory competitive tendering on planning in leisure departments. Managing Leisure, 1(2), 105–114. doi:10.1080/136067196376474
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, G., & Taylor, P. (1995). The impact on local authority leisure of CCT, financial cuts and changing attitudes. Local Government Studies, 21(4), 607–622. doi:10.1080/03003939508433799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, M., Hoye, R., & Houlihan, B. (Eds.). (2011). Participation in sport: International policy perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ockenden, N., Hill, M., & Stuart, J. (2012). The Big Society and volunteering: Ambitions and expectations. In A. Ishkanian & S. Szreter, The Big Society debate. A new agenda for social welfare? (pp. 157–197). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, N. (1992). The future role of the public sector in the provision of leisure facilities in Britain. In J. Sugden & C. Knox (Eds.), Leisure in the 1990s: Rolling back the welfare state (pp. 21–32). ( LSA Publication No. 46). Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, N. (1993). Public leisure provision and the good citizen. Leisure Studies, 12(1), 33–44. doi:10.1080/02614369300390031
   Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, N. (2001). The changing regulation of public service provision. Leisure Studies, 17(2), 138–154. doi:10.1080/026143698375204
   Google Scholar
• Razin, A., & Sadka, E. (2005). The decline of the welfare state: Demography and globalization. Boston, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. (2004). Managing public leisure services. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. (2000). Changing images of the state: Overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration, 15(3), 3–19. doi:10.1177/095207670001500302
   Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2013). Who plays sport – the latest data. Retrieved July 15, 2013, from www.sportengland.org/research/who-plays-sport/national-picture
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2005). What is local government for? Refocusing local governance to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century. London: New Local Government Network.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. (2010). Governing the mix: How local government still matters. In J. Richardson (Ed.), From recession to renewal: The impact of the financial crisis on public services and local government (pp. 179–190). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeting, D., & Copus, C. (2012). Whatever happened to local democracy? Policy and Politics, 40(1), 20–37. doi:10.1332/030557310X550123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., & Page, K. (1994). The financing of local authority sport and recreation: A service under threat? Sheffield: Institute of Sport and Recreation Management.
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament. (2012). Public services (social value) act. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Game, C. (2011). Local Government in the UK (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Young Foundation. (2010). Public services and civil society working together: Promising ideas for effective local partnerships between state and citizens. London: Author.
   Google Scholar