A GIS-supported fuzzy-set approach for flood risk assessment

References

• Abdalla, R., C. Tao, H. Wu, and I. Maqsood. 2006. A GIS-supported 3D approach for flood risk assessment of the Qu’Appelle River, Southern Saskatchewan. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 6(4): 440–455.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S. S., and S. P. Simonovic. 2011. A three-dimensional fuzzy methodology for flood risk analysis. Journal of Flood Risk Management 4(1): 53–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borri, D., G. Concilio, and E. Conte. 1998. A fuzzy approach for modelling knowledge in environmental systems evaluation. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 22(3): 299–313.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, G. 2001. HEC-RAS hydraulic reference manual. Davis, CA: US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• Burn, D. H. 1999. Perceptions of flood risk: A case study of the Red River flood of 1997. Water Resources Research 35 (11): 3451–3458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R. J. 2011. Impacts of natural disasters on regional economies: An overview. Tourism Analysis 16(3): 367–371.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., G. H. Huang, and A. Chakma. 1998. Integrated environmental risk assessment for petroleum contaminated sites: A North America case study. Water Science and Technology 38: 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Chuntian, C. 1999. Fuzzy optimal model for the flood control system of the upper and middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Hydrological Science 44: 573–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmazoghi, H. G. 2013. Fuzzy algorithm for estimating average breach widths of embankment dams. Natural Hazards 68: 229–248.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). 2011. ArcGIS desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: ESRI.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, C. E. 2000. Risk Assessment, emergency preparedness and response to hazards: The case of the 1997 Red River Valley Flood, Canada. Natural Hazards 21: 225–245.
   Google Scholar
• Heijne, I. S. 1992. Fluvial flooding: Decision making in floodplain management. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Floods and Flood Management, edited by A. J. Saul, 119–129. Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggan, D. H. 1989. Computer assisted floodplain hydrology and hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, A., J. Lamond, R. Bloch, N. Bhattacharya, A. Lopez, N. Papachristodolou, and A. Bird. 2011. Five feet high and rising: Cities and flooding in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kliskey, A. D., and A. E. Byrom. 2004. Development of a GIS-based methodology for quantifying predation risk in a spatial context. Transactions in GIS 8(1): 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzmin, V. B. 1981. A parametric approach to description of linguistic values of variables and hedges. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 6: 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza, L., and F. Siccardi. 1995. The role of GIS as a tool for the assessment of flood hazard at the regional scale. In Geographical information system in assessing natural hazards, edited by A. Carrara and F. Guzzetti, 199–217. Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, L. 1988. Spatial analysis and planning under imprecision. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., J. Zhou, X. An, Y. Zhang, and L. Yang. 2010. Using fuzzy theory and information entropy for water quality assessment in Three Gorges Region, China. Expert Systems with Applications 37(3): 2517–2521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10(3): 282–290.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke Jr, R. A. 1999. Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change 42(2): 413–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A., P. E. Weinmann, T. M. Hoang, and E. M. Laurenson. 2002. Monte Carlo simulation of flood frequency curves from rainfall. Journal of Hydrology 256: 196–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovic, S. 2005. A spatial Multi-Objective Decision-Making under uncertainty for water resources management. Journal of Hydroinformatics 7: 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V. P., A. K. Rajagopal, and K. Singh. 1986. Derivation of some frequency distributions using the Principle of Maximum Entropy (POME). Advances in Water Resources 9(2): 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2002. Environmental hazards assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Todini, E. 1999. An operational decision support system for flood risk mapping, forecasting and management. Urban Water 1(2): 131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, A. 1999. Red River at Winnipeg: Hydrometerologic parameter generated floods for design purposes. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Water Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, H. J. 2001. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar