Context and capacity: The potential for performance-based agricultural water quality policy

References

• Abdalla, C., T. Borisova, D. Parker, and K. Saacke Blunk. 2007. Water quality credit trading and agriculture: Recognizing the challenges and policy issues ahead. Choices 22(2): 117–124.
   Google Scholar
• Allaway, C. 2003. Phosphorus loading algorithms for the South Nation River. Berwick, ON: South Nation Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Amin-Hanjani, S., and Todd, R. 2005. Catchment-sensitive farming: Tackling diffuse water pollution from agriculture in England – policies and drivers. In Water and agriculture: Sustainability, markets and policies, 337–356. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, A. P., J. Willock, C. Hall, and L. Toma. 2009. Farmer perspectives and practices regarding water pollution control programmes in Scotland. Agricultural Water Management 96(12): 1715–1722.10.1016/j.agwat.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis, K., S. Peplow, G. Rausser, and L. Simon. 2008. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison. Ecological Economics 65: 753–764.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutz, R. 2007. Agents of change: South Nation conservation. Environment Canada 2007. http://www.ec.gc.ca/p2/default.asp?lang=En&n=21E379B9-1 (accessed December, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Cantin, B., S. Kalff, and Campbell, I. 2005. Assessing the feasibility of water quality trading to address agricultural sources of pollution in Canada. In Water and agriculture: Sustainability, markets and policies, 157–168. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, R., A. Cattaneo, and R. Johansson. 2008. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: US experience in theory and pratice. Ecological Economics 65: 737–752.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen, R., V. Breneman, S. Brucholtz, A. Cattaneo, R. Johansson, and M. Morehart. 2004. Environmental compliance in US agricultural policy: Past performance and future potential. USDA Economic Research Services: Agricultural Economic Report No. 832. 55 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, R., L. Hansen, M. Peters, V. Breneman, M. Weinberg, A. Cattaneo, P. Feather, et al. 2001. Agri-environmental policy at the crossroads: Guideposts on a changing landscape. USDA Economic Research Services: Agricultural Economic Report No. 794. 73 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. B., and S. N. Goward. 2004. Landsat’s role in ecological applications of remote sensing. BioScience 54: 535–545.10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0535:LRIEAO]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A., and M. A. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 16: 371–386.10.1080/08941920309181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coote, D. R., and L. J. Gregorich, eds. 2000. The health of our water: Toward sustainable agriculture in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 188 pp.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, M. 2009. Rose’s “10 steps”: Why process messiness, history and culture are not vague and banal. Policy and Politics 37(1): 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., and D. Marsh. 1996. Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies 44: 343–357.10.1111/post.1996.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., and D. Marsh. 2000. Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13: 5–23.10.1111/gove.2000.13.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driedger, S. M. 2010. Creating shared realities through communication: Exploring the agendabuilding role of the media and its sources in the E. coli contamination of a Canadian public drinking water supply. Journal of Risk Research 11(1): 23–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P., and N. Ellison. 2009. “We nicked stuff from all over the place”: Policy transfer or muddling through? Policy and Politics 37(3): 389–407.10.1332/030557309X435862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigenraam, M., L. Strappazzon, N. Lansdell, C. Beverly, and G. Stoneham. 2007. Designing frameworks to deliver unknown information to support market-based instruments. Agricultural Economics 37(s1): 261–269.10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00250.x
   Google Scholar
• Eilers, W., R. MacKay, L. Graham, and A. Lefebvre, eds. 2010. Environmental sustainability of agriculture: Agri-environmental indicator report. Series Report #3. Ottawa, ON: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/?id=1295901472640 (accessed May, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Engel, S., S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder. 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65: 663–674.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environment Canada. 2010a. Cleaning up Lake Winnipeg: Part of the Government of Canada’s action plan for clean water. http://www.ec.gc.ca/paae-apcw/default.asp?lang=En&n=61284017-1 (accessed April, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Environment Canada. 2010b. Water quality. In Canadian environmental sustainability indicators. Environment Canada. http://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=En&n=13307B2E-1 (accessed March, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources based on Member State reports for the period 2004–2007. Brussels: European Commission. 12 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, F., W. Easter, and P. L. Brezonik. 2005. Point-nonpoint source water quality trading: A case study in the Minnesota River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41(3): 645–658.10.1111/jawr.2005.41.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro, P. J. 2008. Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 65: 810–821.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Water Partnership. 2009. Triggering change in water policies. http://www.gwp.org/en/ToolBox/PUBLICATIONS/Policy-Briefs/ (accessed March, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Guiling, J., and J. St. John. 2007. Paying for environmental performance: Estimating the environmental outcomes of agricultural best management practices. World Resources Institute. http://www.envtn.org/uploads/WRI_AgBrief-Paying_for_Environmental_Performance.pdf (accessed April, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., A. McVittie, and D. Moran. 2004. What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside? A review of evidence and methods. Journal of Rural Studies 20: 211–225.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., M. Whitby, and I. Simpson. 2004. Assessing the success of agri-environmental policy in the UK. In The economics of agri-environmental policy, ed. S. S. Batie and R. D. Horan, 67–80. Burlington, VT: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt Creek Watershed Improvement Association Inc. 2008. 2008 Watershed improvement fund annual project progress report. Hewitt Creek, IA: Hewitt Creek Watershed Improvement Association Inc. http://hewittcreek.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/2008-hewitt-wirb-progress-report.pdf (accessed April, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, I. 2000. Agri-environmental relationships and the choice of policy mechanism. The World Economy 23(2): 257–273.10.1111/twec.2000.23.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J., and S. Beugelsdijk. 2002. Regional cluster policies: Learning by comparing? Kyklos 55: 381–401.10.1111/kykl.2002.55.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X. 1999. Integrated catchment management in China: Application of the Australian experience. International Water Resources Association 24(4): 323–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack, B. K., C. Kousky, and K. R. E. Sims. 2008. Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28): 9465–9470.10.1073/pnas.0705503104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, D., and G. Boody. 2005. Performance-based approaches to agricultural conservation programs dealing with non-point source pollution, including utilization of the provisions of the Conservation Security Program. http://landstewardshipproject.org/repository/1/276/conceptbasednonpoint.pdf (accessed May, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Lal, H., J. A. Delgado, C. M. Gross, E. Hesketh, S. P. McKinney, H. Cover, and M. Shaffer. 2009. Market-based approaches and tools for improving water and air quality. Environmental Science and Policy 12: 1028–1039.10.1016/j.envsci.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latacz-Lohmann, U., and C. Van der Hamsvoort. 1997. Auctioning conservation contracts: A theoretical analysis and an application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(2): 407–418.10.2307/1244139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, K., J. Drohan, C. Hajek, C. Beverly, and M. Lee. 2007. A science-driven market-based instrument for determining the cost of environmental services: A comparison of two catchments in Australia. Ecological Economics 64: 61–69.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgregor, C. J., and C. Warren, R. 2006. Adopting sustainable farm management practices within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone in Scotland: The view from the farm. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 113: 108–119.10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maille, P., A. R. Collins, and N. Gillies. 2009. Performance-based payments for water quality: Experiences from a field experiment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64(3): 85a–87a.10.2489/jswc.64.3.85A
   Google Scholar
• Malano, H. M., M. J. Bryant, and H. N. Turral. 1999. Management of water resources: Can Australian experiences be transferred to Vietnam? International Water Resources Association 24: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Mandarano, L. A. 2009. Social network analysis of social capital in collaborative planning. Society and Natural Resources 22: 245–260.10.1080/08941920801922182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S. 2005. Different perspectives on cross-compliance. Environmental Values 14: 471–482.10.3197/096327105774462719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, S. L. 2001. Watershed-based pollution trading development and current trading programs. Environmental Engineering and Policy 2: 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• McVittie, A., D. Moran, and D. A. Elston. 2010. Public preferences for rural policy reform: Evidence from Scottish surveys. Regional Studies 44(5): 609–626.10.1080/00343400902926359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink, G. 2008. The role of measurement problems and monitoring in PES schemes. Chap. 4 in Economics of poverty, environment and natural-resource use, ed. R. D. Dellink and A. Ruijs. 61–85. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. In Millennium ecosystem assessment. http://www.maweb.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf (accessed March, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Morton, L. W. 2008. The role of civic structure in achieving performance-based watershed management. Society and Natural Resources 21: 751–766.10.1080/08941920701648846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, L. W., J. Rodecap, S. Brown, and G. A. Miller. 2006. Performance-based environmental management: The Hewitt Creek model. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM2013.pdf (accessed April, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., and H. Wolman. 2003. Policy transfer as a form of prospective policy evaluation: Challenges and recommendations. Public Administration Review 63(4): 428–440.10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H. O., A. B. Pedersen, and T. Christensen. 2009. Environmentally sustainable agriculture and future developments of the CAP. European Integration 31(3): 369–387.10.1080/07036330902782238
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, D.R. 2002. Part one: A summary report of the Walkerton Inquiry: The events of May 2000 and related issues. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. 507 pp.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, D. 2011. Sociopolitical conditions for successful water quality trading in the South Nation River Watershed, Ontario, Canada. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47(1): 39–51.10.1111/jawr.2011.47.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario Farm Environmental Coalition (OFEC). 2006. OFEC letter regarding Bill 43 – The proposed Clean Water Act. OFEC. April 5, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Environment (OMOE). 1994. Water management policies, guidelines, provincial water quality objectives. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Environment. 67 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2003. Agri-environmental policy measures: Overview of developments. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/46/18987100.pdf (accessed August, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2010a. Environmental cross compliance in agriculture. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/10/44737935.pdf (accessed March, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2010b. Guidelines for cost-effective agri-environmental policy measures. OECD Publishing. 118 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, S., and H. Cook, F. 1997. Nitrate vulnerable zones and nitrate sensitive areas: A policy and technical analysis of groundwater source protection in England and Wales. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40(2): 217–234.10.1080/09640569712191
   Google Scholar
• Peerlings, J., and N. B. P. Polman. 2008. Agri-environmental contracting of Dutch dairy farms: The role of manure policies and the occurrence of lock-in. European Review of Agricultural Economics 35(2): 167–191.10.1093/erae/jbn022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrot-Maȋtre, D. 2006. The Vittel payments for ecosystem services: a “perfect” PES case?. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development. 24 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Pigram, J. J. 2001. Opportunities and constraints in the transfer of water technology and experience between countries and regions. International Journal of Water Resources Development 17(4): 563–579.10.1080/07900620120094091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichelderfer, K., and W. D. Boggess. 1988. Government decision making and program performance: The case of the Conservation Reserve Program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 1–11.10.2307/1241970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribaudo, M. O., D. L. Hoag, M. E. Smith, and R. Heimlich. 2001. Environmental indices and the politics of the Conservation Reserve Program. Ecological Indicators 1(1): 11–20.10.1016/S1470-160X(01)00002-4
   Google Scholar
• Rolfe, J., and J. Windle. 2011. Using auction mechanisms to reveal costs for water quality improvements in the Great Barrier Reef catchments in Australia. Agricultural Water Management 98(4): 493–501.10.1016/j.agwat.2010.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R. 1993. Lesson-drawing in public policy, 192. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Salki, A. 2007. Lake Winnipeg. Climate change connection. http://climatechangeconnection.org/impacts/lake-winnipeg-impacts/ (accessed April, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, C. J., A. G. Ellis, W. J. Robertson, D. F. Charron, J. J. Aramini, B. J. Marshall, and D. T. Medeiros. 2005. Infectious disease outbreaks related to drinking water in Canada, 1974–2001. Canadian Journal of Public Health 96(4): 254–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman, M., S. Greenhalgh, M. Taylor, and J. Guiling. 2008. Paying for environmental performance: Potential cost savings using a reverse auction in program sign-up, 10. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Selman, M., S. Greenhalgh, E. Branosky, C. Jones, and J. Guiling. 2009. Water quality trading programs: An international overview, 16. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Swainson, B., and R. C. de Loë. 2010. Exploring the role of policy transfer in water governance. Waterloo, ON: Water Policy and Governance Group, University of Waterloo. 29 pp.
   Google Scholar
• van Grinsven, H., M. van Eerdt, J. Willems, F. Hubeek, and E. Mulleneers. 2005. Evaluation of the Dutch manure and fertiliser policy, 1998–2002. In Evaluating agri-environmental policies: Design, practice, and results. 389–405. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vojtech, V. 2010. Policy measures addressing agri-environmental issues. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 24. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/policy-measures-addressing-agri-environmental-issues_5kmjrzg08vvb-en?crawler=true (accessed May, 2014).10.1787/18156797
   Google Scholar
• Wätzold, F., and M. Dreschler. 2005. Spatially uniform versus spatially heterogeneous compensation payments for biodiversity-enhancing land-use measures. Environmental & Resource Economics 31: 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weersink, A., J. Livernois, J. F. Shogren, and J. S. Shortle. 1998. Economic instruments and environmental policy in agriculture. Canadian Public Policy 24: 309–327.10.2307/3551971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, M., and R. Claassen. 2006. Rewarding farm practices versus environmental performance. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service: Economic Brief No. EB-5. 6 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Winsten, J. R. 2009. Improving the cost-effectiveness of agricultural pollution control: The use of performance-based incentives. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 64(3): 88a–93a.10.2489/jswc.64.3.88A
   Google Scholar
• Winsten, J., C. Kerchner, C. Ingels, J. Rodecap, and J. Tilley. 2011. Pilot-testing performance-based incentives for agricultural pollution control in Iowa: Iowa State University and Winrock International. http://www.uvm.edu/~pepa/files/documents/pt/Overall%20Project%20Summary.pdf (accessed March, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, H. 1992. Understanding cross-national policy transfers: The case of Britain and the US. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 5(1): 27–45.10.1111/gove.1992.5.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. T. 2003. Lessons about effluent trading from a single trade. Review of Agricultural Economics 25(1): 235–245.10.1111/raec.2003.25.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. T., R. A. Kaiser, and A.-M. B. Wicks. 2002. The structure and practice of water quality trading markets. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(4): 967–979.10.1111/jawr.2002.38.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, F., E. Spencer, and T. P. Burt. 2009. The effectiveness of nitrate vulnerable zones for limiting surface water concentrations. Journal of Hydrology 370(1): 21–28.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.036
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization (WTO). 2008. Agriculture – explanation of the agreement – domestic support. World Trade Organization. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/agric_e/ag_intro03_domestic_e.htm#green (accessed August, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wunder, S. 2006. Between purity and reality: Taking stock of PES schemes in the Andes: Ecosystem marketplace. http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=4585&section=home&eod=1 (accessed March, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Wunder, S., S. Engel, and S. Pagiola. 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65: 834–852.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabel, A., and B. Roe. 2009. Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives. Ecological Economics 69(1): 126–134.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar