A multi-level perspective on the legitimacy of collaborative water governance in Québec

References

• Agence de bassin versant des 7 (ABV des 7). 2014. Plan directeur de l’eau de la zone de gestion de l’ABV Des 7. Bassins Versants des Rivières Blanche Ouest, Coulonge, Dumoine, Gatineau, Noire, Quyon et Des Outaouais. Agence de bassin versant des 7, 422 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4): 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audet, G., M.-C. Lapointe, K. Boothroyd, J. De Mello, S. Jeanneau, and F. Blackburn. 2014. Portrait de la zone Châteauguay. Saint-Chrysostome, Québec: SCABRIC.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., J. Velaniškis, R. Plummer, and J. Fitzgibbon. 2014. Political legitimacy and collaborative water governance: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Water Governance 2(1).
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, K., and C. Cook. 2011. Water governance in Canada: Innovation and fragmentation. Water Resources Development 27(2): 275–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baril, P., Y. Maranda, and J. Baudrand. 2006. Integrated watershed management in Québec: A participatory approach centred on local solidarity. Water Science & Technology 53(10): 301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, S. 2008. Les organismes de bassins versants: une entité en quête de légitimité. In Vers une gouvernance de l’eau au Québec, eds. A. Létourneau and C. Choquette, 227–244. Québec, QC: Éditions MultiMondes.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 1991. The legitimation of power. Houndmills, UK and New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S., and A. Park. 2006. The problematic metagovernance of networks: Water reform in New South Wales. Journal of Public Policy 26(1): 63.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S. 2011. Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 17–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher, D. E. 2004. Collaborative governance practices and democracy. National Civic Review 93(4): 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur, C., D. Brassard, V. Laberge, R. Labreque, J. Trépanier, and P. Turmel. 2012. Portrait Des Bassins Versants de La Capitale. Organisme des bassins versants de la Capitale. http://www.obvcapitale.org/plans-directeurs-de-leau-2/2e-generation/introduction2e (accessed October, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A., and R. O. Keohane. 2006. The legitimacy of global governance institutions. Ethics & International Affairs 20(4): 405–437.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., and S. Davidson. 2011. The watershed approach: Challenges, antecedents, and the transition from technical tool to governance unit. Water Alternatives 4(1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil des bassins versants des Mille-Îles (COBAMIL). 2013. Portrait de la zone de gestion intégrée de l’eau par bassins versants du COBAMIL. In Plan Directeur de L’eau, Vol. 2. 1st ed. Sainte-Thérèse, Québec: Conseil des bassins versants des Mille-Îles, 181 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil de gouvernance de l’eau des bassins versant de la rivière Saint-François (COGESAF). 2014. Résumé de l’analyse du bassin versant de la Rivière Saint-François. Sherbrooke, Québec: Conseil de gouvernance de l’eau des bassins versant de la rivière Saint-François, 144 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil du bassin versant de la région de Vaudreuil-Soulanges (COBAVER-VS). 2014. Portrait de la zone de gestion intégrée de l’eau par bassin versant de Vaudreuil-Soulanges. Rigaud, Québec: Conseil du bassin versant de la région de Vaudreuil-Soulanges, 159 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S. 2011. Constructing legitimacy in the new community governance. Urban Studies 48(5): 929–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, S., T. Richardson, and T. Miles. 2006. Situated legitimacy: Deliberative arenas and the new rural governance. Journal of Rural Studies 22(3): 267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumyn, M. C. 2009. Recent developments to the law applicable to water in Québec. Vermont Law Review 34: 859.
   Google Scholar
• de Loë, R., and R. Kreutzwiser. 2007. Challenging the status quo: The evolution of water governance in Canada. In Eau Canada: The Future of Canada’s Water, ed. K. Bakker, 85–103. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, D., R. Plummer, and M. Marschke. 2008. Is adaptive co-management ethical? Journal of Environmental Management 88(1): 62–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, K., and K. Bakker. 2011. Governance and sustainability at a municipal scale: The challenge of water conservation. Canadian Public Policy 37(2): 219–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearey, M., and P. Jeffrey. 2006. Concepts of legitimacy within the context of adaptive water management strategies. Ecological Economics 60(1): 129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häikiö, L. 2007. Expertise, representation and the common good: Grounds for legitimacy in the urban governance network. Urban Studies 44(11): 2147–2162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häikiö, L. 2012. From innovation to convention: Legitimate citizen participation in local governance. Local Government Studies 38(4): 415–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M. 2009. The democratic soup: Mixed meanings of political representation in governance networks. Governance 22(4): 689–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., K. Furlong, K. Bakker, and A. Cohen. 2008. Harmonization versus subsidiarity in water governance: A review of water governance and legislation in the Canadian provinces and territories. Canadian Water Resources Journal 33(4): 315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogl, K., E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck, and M. Pregernig. 2012. Legitimacy and effectiveness of environmental governance: Concepts and perspectives. In Environmental governance: The challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness, eds. K. Hogl, E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck and M. Pregernig. 1–26. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S., and G. K. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10(2): 328–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., and J. F. Gubrium. 2011. The constructionist analytics of interpretive practice. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, eds. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 341–357. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., and S. Meijerink. 2009. Realizing water transitions: The role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change. Ecology and Society 15(2): 26.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels et al., 1–29. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layzer, J. A. 2008. Natural experiments: Ecosystem-based management and the environment. Cambridge, MA; London, UK: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D. 2006. Collaborative public management and democracy: Evidence from western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review 66 (s1): 100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., N. W. Pelkey, and P. A. Sabatier. 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21(4): 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., and A. Agrawal. 2006. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment & Resources 31(1): 297–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milot, N., and L. Lepage. 2010. From a participative framework to communities’ realities: The challenges of implementing stakeholder involvement in Québec watershed management, Canada. In Social participation in water governance and management, ed. K. Berry and E. Mollard, 137–162. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement, de la Faune et des Parcs (MDDEFP). 2011. 2003–2009 Summary assessment report. Québec, QC: MDDEFP, Gouvernement du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement, de la Faune et des Parcs (MDDEFP). 2012. Gestion integree des ressources en eau: Cadre de reference. Québec, QC: MDDEFP, Gouvernement du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., and J. Newig. 2010. Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: Setting the stage for a broader debate. Environmental Management 46(1): 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., and T. M. Koontz. 2014. Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: The EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy 21(2): 248–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., M. Barnes, H. Sullivan, and A. Knops. 2004. Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy 33(2): 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J. 2001. Representing people, representing nature, representing the world. Environment and Planning C 19(4): 483–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2003. Cooperative forms of governance: Problems of democratic accountability in complex environments. European Journal of Political Research 42(4): 473–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. 2003. Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy. Political Studies 51(1): 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. 2004. Responsibility and environmental governance. Environmental Politics 13(3): 541–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, F. 2010. Political legitimacy. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Ed Zalta. Stanford University, Stanford, CA. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/legitimacy/ (accessed July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Prager, K. 2010. Local and regional partnerships in natural resource management: The challenge of bridging institutional levels. Environmental Management 46(5): 711–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quack, S. 2010. Law, expertise and legitimacy in transnational economic governance: An introduction. Socio-Economic Review 2010(8): 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Québec. 2002. Québec water policy: Water, our life, our future. Bibliothèque nationale du Québec, Québec, QC: Gouvernement du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Québec. 2009. An Act to Affirm the Collective Nature of Water Resources and Provide for Increased Water Resource Protection. Québec, QC: Québec Official Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90(5): 1933–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regroupement des Organismes de Bassins Versants du Québec (ROBVQ). 2014. Brigade PDE. Regroupement des Organismes de Bassins Versants du Québec. https://www.robvq.qc.ca/brigade_pde (accessed July, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. 2002. Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge, A., L. Bouthillier, and J. Mercier. 2011. The gap between theory and reality of governance: The case of forest certification in Québec (Canada). Society & Natural Resources 24(7): 656–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., and T. H. Morrison. 2012. Watershed management in an urban setting: Process, scale and administration. Land Use Policy 29(1): 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J. 2001. Justification and legitimacy: Essays on rights and obligations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. L. 2009. How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10(1): 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeltzer, E., A. D. Shambaugh, and P. Stangel. 2012. Environmental change in Lake Champlain revealed by long-term monitoring. Journal of Great Lakes Research 38: 6–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 1998. Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal 50(155): 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N., and M. E. Warren. 2008. The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. 2005. Institutions and the environment. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vérificateur général du Québec. 2013. Chapitre 3: Interventions gouvernementales: Gouvernance de l’eau. In Rapport du Vérificateur Général Du Québec à l’Assemblée Nationale pour l’année 2012–2013. Rapport Du Commissaire Au Développement Durable Hiver 2013. ed. M. Samson. 1–36. Québec, QC: Vérificateur général du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Wallington, T., and G. Lawrence. 2008. Making democracy matter: Responsibility and effective environmental governance in regional Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 24(3): 277–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallington, T., G. Lawrence, and B. Loechel. 2008. Reflections on the legitimacy of regional environmental governance: Lessons from Australia’s experiment in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 10(1): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar