845
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Averting degradation of southern Ontario wetlands due to hydrologic alterations associated with development

Pages 543-553 | Received 19 Oct 2014, Accepted 08 Nov 2015, Published online: 04 Jan 2016

References

  • Acreman, M. C., and F. Miller. 2007. Hydrologic impact assessment of wetlands. In The global importance of groundwater in the 21st century, ed. S. Ragone, N. Hernandez-Mora, A. de la Hera, C. Bergkamp, and J. McKay, 225–255. Westerville, OH: National Groundwater Association Press.
  • Aldous, A. R., and L. B. Bach. 2014. Hydro-ecology of groundwater dependent ecosystems: Applying basic science to groundwater management. Hydrological Sciences Journal 59 (3–4): 530–544.
  • Bedford, B. L. 1999. Cumulative effects on wetland landscapes: Links to wetland restoration in the United States and Southern Canada. Wetlands 19 (4): 775–788.
  • Blackwell, M. S. A., D. V. Hogan, G. Pinay, and E. Maltby. 2009. The role of buffer zones for agricultural runoff. In The wetlands handbook, ed. E. Maltby and T. Barker, 417–439. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Bradford, A., and B. Gharabaghi. 2004. Evolution of Ontario’s stormwater management planning and design guidance. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada 39 (4): 343–355.
  • Brinson, M. 2009. The United States HGM (hydrogeomorphic) approach. In The wetlands handbook, eds. E. Maltby and T. Barker, 486–512. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Burns, M. J., T. D. Fletcher, C. J. Walsh, A. R. Ladson, and B. E. Hatt. 2012. Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform. Landscape and Urban Planning 105: 230–240.
  • Davidson, N. C. 2014. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Marine & Freshwater Research 65 (10): 934–941.
  • Ducks Unlimited. 2001. Beyond the pipe: The importance of wetlands and upland conservation practices in watershed management. http://www.ducks.ca/aboutduc/news/archives/pdf/pipefull.pdf (accessed August, 2012).
  • Ducks Unlimited. 2010. Southern Ontario wetland conversion analysis. http://www.ducks.ca/aboutduc/news/archives/prov2010/pdf/duc_ontariowca.pdf (accessed August, 2012)
  • Duval, T. P., and J. M. Waddington. 2011. Extreme variability of water table dynamics in temperate calcareous fens: Implications for biodiversity. Hydrological Processes 25: 3790–3802.
  • Duval, T. P., J. M. Waddington, and B. A. Branfireun. 2011. Hydrological and biogeochemical controls on plant species distribution within calcareous fens. Ecohydrology. doi:10.1002/eco.202.
  • Eamus, D., R. Froend, R. Loomes, G. Hose, and B. Murray. 2006. A functional methodology for determining the groundwater regime needed to maintain the health of groundwater-dependent vegetation. Australian Journal of Botany 54: 97–114.
  • Fetter, C. W. 2001. Applied hydrogeology. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Gasca, D., and D. Ross. 2009. The use of wetland water balances to link hydrogeological processes to ecological effects. Hydrogeology Journal 17: 115–133.
  • Gopal, B. 2009. Biodiversity in wetlands. 2009. In The wetlands handbook, ed. E. Maltby and T. Barker, 65–95. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Graham, P., L. Maclean, D. Medina, A. Patwardhan, and G. Vasarhelyi. 2004. The role of water balance modelling in the transition to low impact development. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada 39 (4): 331–342.
  • Hancock, P. J., R. J. Hunt, and A. J. Boulton. 2009. Preface: Hydrogeoecology, the interdisciplinary study of groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Hydrogeology Journal 17: 1–3.
  • Hanson, A., L. Swanson, D. Ewing, G. Grabas, S. Meyer, L. Ross, M. Watmough, and J. Kirkby. 2008. Wetland ecological functions assessment: An overview of approaches. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Wildlife Service Technical Report Series, no. 497.
  • Hill, A. R., and K. J. Devito. 1997. Hydrological–chemical interactions in headwater forest wetlands. In Northern forested wetlands: Ecology and management, eds. C.C. Trettin, M.R. Jurgensen, D.F. Grigal, M.R. Gale and J.K. Jeglum, 213–230. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
  • Hunt, R. J., and D. A. Wilcox. 2003. Ecohydrology – why hydrologists should care. Ground Water 41 (3): 289.
  • Johansen, O. M., M. L. Pedersen, and J. B. Jensen. 2011. Effect of groundwater abstraction on fen ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology 402: 357–366.
  • Klove, B., P. Ala-aho, G. Bertrand, Z. Boukalova, A. Erturk, N. Goldscheider, J. Ilmonen, et al. 2011. Groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Part 1: Hydroecological status and trends. Environmental Science & Policy 14: 770–781.
  • Loheide, S. P., and E. G. Booth. 2011. Effects of changing channel morphology on vegetation, groundwater and soil moisture regimes in groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Geomorphology 126: 364–376.
  • Lowry, C. S., and S. P. Loheide. 2010. Groundwater-dependent vegetation: Quantifying the groundwater subsidy. Water Resources Research 46: W06202. doi:10.1029/2009WR008874.
  • Maltby, E. ed. 2009. Functional Assessment of Wetlands: Towards Evaluation of Ecosystem Services. Cambridge: Wo odhead Publishing.
  • Maltby, E., and M. C. Acreman. 2011. Ecosystem services of wetlands: Pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56 (8): 1341–1359.
  • McLaughlin, D. L., and M. J. Cohen. 2013. Realizing ecosystem services: Wetland hydrologic function along a gradient of ecosystem condition. Ecological Applications 23 (7): 1619–1631.
  • Mitsch, W. J., B. Bernal, and M. E. Hernandez. 2015. Ecosystem services of wetlands. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 11 (1): 1–4.
  • Mitsch, W. J., and J. G. Gosselink. 2000a. The value of wetlands: Importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics 35: 25–33.
  • Mitsch, W. J., and J. G. Gosselink. 2000b. Wetlands. 3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Murray, B. R., M. J. B. Zeppel, G. C. Hose, and D. Eamus. 2003. Groundwater-dependent ecosystems in Australia: It’s more than just water for rivers. Ecological Management & Restoration 4 (2): 110–113.
  • Nilsson, C., and M. Svedmark. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: Riparian plant communities. Environmental Management 30 (4): 468–480.
  • Odum, W. E. 1982. Environmental degradation and the tyranny of small decisions. BioScience 32: 728–729.
  • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR). 2014. Ontario wetland evaluation system. Southern Manual. 3rd ed., Version 3.3. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
  • Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (OMNRF). 2015. Wetland conservation in Ontario: A discussion paper. http://apps.mnr.gov.on.ca/public/files/er/wetlandsdiscussionpaper_en.pdf ( accessed September, 2015).
  • Ontario Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). 2014. Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. http://www.ontario.ca/pps ( accessed February, 2014)
  • Poff, N. L., B. D. Richter, A. H. Arthington, S. E. Bunn, R. J. Naiman, E. Kendy, M. Acreman, et al. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): A new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55: 147–170.
  • Rains, M. C., G. E. Fogg, T. Harter, R. A. Dahlgren, and R. J. Williamson. 2006. The role of perched aquifers in hydrological connectivity and biogeochemical processes in vernal pool landscapes, Central Valley, California. Hydrological Processes 20: 1157–1175.
  • Ramsar Convention Secretariat (RCS). 2010. Managing groundwater: Guidelines for the management of groundwater to maintain wetland ecological character. Vol. 11, Ramsar Handbooks for the Wise Use of Wetlands, 4th ed. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
  • Rayburg, S., and M. Thoms. 2009. A coupled hydraulic–hydrologic modelling approach to deriving a water balance for a complex floodplain wetland system. Hydrology Research 40 (4): 364–379.
  • Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell, and D. P. Braun. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10 (4): 1163–1174.
  • Rivera, A. ed. 2014. Canada's groundwater resources. Geological Survey of Canada. Markham, ON: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.
  • Sheldon, D., T. Hrubey, P. Johnson, K. Harper, A. McMillan, T. Granger, S. Stanley, and E. Stockdale. 2005. Wetlands in Washington State – Volume 1: A synthesis of the science. Olympia: Washington State Department of Ecology.
  • Snell, E. A. 1987. Wetland distribution and conversion in Southern Ontario. Working Paper No. 48. Ottawa, ON: Inland Waters and Lands Directorate, Environment Canada.
  • Thompson, J. R., H. Gavin, A. Refsgaard, H. Refstrup Sorenson, and D. J. Gowing. 2009. Modelling the hydrological impacts of climate change on UK lowland wet grassland. Wetlands Ecology and Management 17: 503–523.
  • Todd, A. K., J. M. Buttle, and C. H. Taylor. 2006. Hydrologic dynamics and linkages in a wetland-dominated basin. Journal of Hydrology 319: 15–35.
  • van der Kamp, G., and M. Hayashi. 2009. Groundwater–wetland ecosystem interaction in the semiarid glaciated plains of North America. Hydrogeology Journal 17: 203–214.
  • Waddington, J. M., P. J. Morris, N. Kettridge, G. Granath, D. K. Thompson, and P. A. Moore. 2015. Hydrological feedbacks in northern peatlands. Ecohydrology 8: 113–127.
  • Warner, B. G., and C. D. A. Rubec (eds.). 1997. The Canadian wetland classification system. 2nd ed. Waterloo, ON: Wetlands Research Centre.
  • Wenger, S. J., A. H. Roy, C. R. Jackson, E. S. Bernhardt, T. L. Carter, S. Filoso, C. A. Gibson, et al. 2009. Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: An assessment of the state of the science. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28 (4): 1080–1098.
  • Wheeler, B. D., D. J. G. Gowing, S. C. Shaw, J. O. Mountford, and R. P. Money. 2004. Ecohydrological guidelines for lowland wetland plant communities. Environment Agency, Anglian Region, ed. A. W. Brooks, P. V. Jose, and M. I. Whiteman. http://www.floodplainmeadows.org.uk/files/floodplain/d96435.pdf ( accessed June, 2012).
  • Winter, T. C. 1981. Uncertainties in estimating the water balance of lakes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 17 (1): 82–115.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.