Assessing coastal flood risk in a changing climate for the City of Vancouver

References

• Bornhold, B. 2008. Projected sea level changes for British Columbia in the 21st century in publication. Government of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Bubeck, P., H. de Moel, L. M. Bouwer, and J. C. J. H. Aerts. 2011. How reliable are projections of future flood damage? Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 11: 3293–3306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammerer, H., a. H. Thieken, and J. Lammel. 2013. “Adaptability and Transferability of Flood Loss Functions in Residential Areas.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 13 (11): 3063–81. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Vancouver. 2012. Climate change adaptation strategy. http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/Vancouver-Climate-Change-Adaptation-Strategy-2012-11-07.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J.B. 2015. “Economic Analysis of the Costs of Flooding.” Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1055804.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2009a. Flood Information Tool user manual.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2009b. Hazus – MH: Flood model technical manual.
   Google Scholar
• Ec.europa.eu. 2003. Best Practices on Flood Prevention , Protection. Ec.Europa.Eu: 1–29. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/flood_risk/pdf/flooding_bestpractice.pdf. Accessed May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hallegatte, S., C. Green, R. J. Nicholls, and J. Corfee-Morlot. 2013. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Climate Change 3 (9): 802–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2007. “IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4).” IPCC 1: 976. doi:ISSN: .
   Google Scholar
• IPCC Working Group 1. 2014. “IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) - The Physical Science Basis.” IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, A. K, R. Bloch, and J. Lamond. 2012. Cities and flooding: A guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jongman, B., H. Kreibich, H. Apel, J. I. Barredo, P. D. Bates, L. Feyen, A. Gericke, J. Neal, J. C. J. H. Aerts, and P. J. Ward. 2012. Comparative flood damage model assessment: Towards a European approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 12: 3733–3752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, I., and R. Spence. 2004. An overview of flood actions on buildings. Engineering Geology 73: 297–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreibich, H., K. Piroth, I. Seifert, H. Maiwald, U. Kunert, J. Schwarz, B. Merz, and A. H. Thieken. 2009. Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling? Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 9 (5): 1679–1692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, Frank, and V Meyer. 2006. Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception - challenges for flood damage research. Flood Risk Management Hazards Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures. http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/45258/1/489068715.pdf. Accessed May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, F., E. Penning-Rowsell, C. Green, V. Meyer, S. Tunstall, and A. van der Veen. 2006. Guidelines for socio-economic flood damage evaluation. FLOODSite Report Number T9-06-01.
   Google Scholar
• Middelmann-Fernandes, M. H. 2010. Flood damage estimation beyond stage–damage functions: An Australian example. Journal of Flood Risk Management 3: 88–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moel, H., and J. C. J. H. Aerts. 2010. Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Natural Hazards 58 (1): 407–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastev, M., and N. Todorov. 2013. Hazus: A standardized methodology for flood risk assessment in Canada. Canadian Water Resources Journal 38 (3): 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHC, Ebbwater Consulting, and Arlington Planning and Architecture Ltd. 2014. City of Vancouver Coastal Flood Risk Assessment. Phase 1 Report. Prepared for City of Vancouver. December.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Reconstruction Authority. 2013. “Planning for Stronger , More Resilient Floodplains: Part 1.” http://qldreconstruction.org.au/u/lib/cms/Planning-for-stronger-more-resilient-flo.pdf. Accessed January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, Helen. 2011. “Flood Risk Management in New Zealand: Where Are We, and Where Are We Going?” GNS Science Report 2012/04, December 2011, no. April.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institute of British Architects. n.d. Climate change toolkit designing for flood risk. http://www.architecture.com/Files/RIBAHoldings/PolicyAndInternationalRelations/Policy/Environment/2Designing_for_floodrisk.pdf (accessed January, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Sandink, Dan, Paul Kovacs, Greg S Oulahen, and Dan Shrubsole. 2016. “Public Relief and Insurance for Residential Flood Losses in Canada: Current Statis and Commentary.” Canadian Water Resources Journal. doi:10.1080/07011784.2015.1040458.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, N. 2013. The state of Hazus 2.1. http://www.usehazus.com/uploads/main/The_State_of_Hazus_Flood_2.1_March_2012.pdf (accessed March, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• UK Environment Agency. 2009. Flooding in England: A national assessment of flood risk.
   Google Scholar
• US Army Corps of Engineers, Rijkswaterstaat, MLIT, and UK Environment Agency. 2011. Flood risk management approaches: As being practiced in Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States.
   Google Scholar