Trade-offs and the importance of separating science and values in environmental flow assessment

References

• Armstrong, J. D., and K. H. Nislow. 2012. Modelling approaches for relating effects of change in river flow to populations of Atlantic salmon and brown trout. Fisheries Management and Ecology 19 (6): 527–536. 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2011.00835.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthington, A. H., S. E. Bunn, N. L. Poff, and R. J. Naiman. 2006. The challenge of providing environmental flow roules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications 16 (4): 1311–1318. 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binns, N. A., and F. M. Eiserman. 1979. Quantification of fluvial trout habitat in Wyoming. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 108 (3): 215–228. 10.1577/1548-8659(1979)108<215:QOFTHI>2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, M. J., P. S. Higgins, J. Korman, and J. Sneep. 2011. Test of an environmental flow release in a British Columbia river: Does more water mean more fish? Freshwater Biology 56 (10): 2119–2134. 10.1111/fwb.2011.56.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castleberry, D. T., J. J. Cech, D. C. Erman, D. Hankin, M. Healey, G. M. Kondolf, M. Mangel, et al. 1996. Uncertainty and instream flow standards. Fisheries 21 (8): 20–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M. 2008. Value and advocacy in conservation biology: Crisis discipline or discipline in crisis? Conservation Biology 22 (1): 1–3. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00869.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). 2013. Framework for assessing the ecological flow requirements to support fisheries in Canada. Canadian Science Advisory Secretatiat. Science Advisory Report 2013/017.
   Google Scholar
• Gopal, B., ed. 2013. Methodologies for the assessment of environmental flows. Environmental flows: An introduction for water resources managers, 129–182. New Delhi: National Institute of Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, T., and J. Bruce. 2000. Predicting Salmonid habitat–flow relationships for streams from western North America. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20 (4): 1005–1015. 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<1005:PSHFRF>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, T., and A. J. Paul. 2015. A comparison of desktop hydrologic methods for determining environmental flows. Canadian Water Resources Journal 40 (3): 303–318. 10.1080/07011784.2015.1050459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, T., Lewis, A., Ohlson, D., and Bradford, M. 2003. Development of instream flow thresholds as guidelines for reviewing proposed water uses. British Columbia instream flow guidelines for fish. Victoria, B.C: Consultants report prepared for the B.C. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management and B.C. Ministry of Water, Land, and Air Protection.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, T., A. Lewis, and S. Babakaiff. 2007. Guidelines for the collection and analysis of fish and fish habitat data for the purpose of assessing impacts from small hydropower projects in British Columbia. Victoria, B.C.: Consultants report prepared for the B.C. Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, I. G. 1997. Instream flow methods: A comparision of approaches. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 13 (2): 115–127. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1646
   Google Scholar
• Kendy, E., C., Apse, and K. Blann. 2012. A practical guide to environmental flows for policy and planning with nine case studies in the United States. Washington: The Nature Conservacy. https://www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationByGeography/NorthAmerica/UnitedStates/edc/Documents/ED_freshwater_envflows_PracticalGuideEflowsforPolicy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, F. A., A. J., Harwood, G., Zyla, K. D., Ganshorn, and T., Hatfield. 2012. Long term aquatic monitoring protocols for new and upgraded hydroelectric projects. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariate Research Document No. 2012/166. doi: ISSN 1919-5044.
   Google Scholar
• Linnansaari, T., W. A., Monk, D. J., Baird, and Curry, R. A. 2012. Review of approaches and methods to assess environmental flows across Canada and internationally. Canadian Science Advisory Secretariate 2012(039): 75. http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/Publications/ResDocs-DocRech/2012/2012_039-eng.html
   Google Scholar
• Locke, A., and Paul, A. 2011. A desktop method for establishing environmental flows in Alberta rivers and streams. Edmonton: Alberta Environment Communications. //www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm82/8230/8230.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, C. P., and R. A., Ptolemy. 1985. The use of prescribed percentages of mean annual discharge to recommend instream flows for fisn in British Columbia (the Montana Method revisited). Report to the joint DFO/MOE Workshop on Instream Flow Methods, March 7-8, 1985. http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/acat/public/viewReport.do?reportId=15767
   Google Scholar
• Patten, D. T., D. A. Harpman, M. I. Voita, and T. J. Randle. 2001. A managed flood on the colorado river: Background, objectives, design, and implementation. Ecological Applications 11 (3): 635–643. 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0635:AMFOTC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., and J. K. H. Zimmerman. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: A literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology 55 (1): 194–205. 10.1111/fwb.2009.55.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. A. Palmer, D. D. Hart, B. D. Richter, A. H. Arthington, K. H. Rogers, J. L. Meyer, and J. A. Stanford. 2003. River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1 (6): 298–306. 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0298:RFAWWE]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., B. D. Richter, A. H. Arthington, S. E. Bunn, R. J. Naiman, E. Kendy, M. Acreman, et al. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): A new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55 (1): 147–170. 10.1111/fwb.2009.55.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., C. M. Brown, T. E. Grantham, J. H. Matthews, M. A. Palmer, C. M. Spence, R. L. Wilby, et al. 2015. Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling. Nature Climate Change 6 (9): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, R. Wigington, and D. P. Braun. 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37 (1): 231–249. 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, B. D., M. M. Davis, C. Apse, and C. Konrad. 2012. A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Research and Applications 28 (8): 1312–1321. 10.1002/rra.v28.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, J. S., and R. Ptolemy. 2012. Modelling available habitat versus available energy flux: do PHABSIM applications that neglect prey abundance underestimate optimal flows for juvenile salmonids? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 69 (12): 1920–1934. 10.1139/f2012-115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, J. S., J. Post, G. Robins, and T. Hatfield. 2007. Hydraulic geometry as a physical template for the river continuum: Applications to optimal flows and longitudinal trends in fish habitat. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64 (5): 755–767. 10.1139/f07-020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souchon, Y., C. Sabaton, R. Deibel, D. Reiser, J. Kershner, M. Gard, C. Katopodis, et al. 2008. Detecting biological responses to flow management: Missed opportunities; future directions. River Research and Applications 24 (5): 506–518. 10.1002/(ISSN)1535-1467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, D. 1976. Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1 (4): 6–10. 10.1577/1548-8446(1976)001<0006:IFRFFW>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D., M. J. Bradford, J. G. Venditti, and R. M. Peterman. 2016. Evaluating uncertainty in physical habitat modelling in a high-gradient mountain stream. River Research and Applications 32 (5): 1106–1115.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 1996. Lost in space: Minimum confidence intervals for idealized PHABSIM studies. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125 (3): 458–465. 10.1577/1548-8659(1996)125<0458:LISMCI>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2010. Lost in space, the sequel: Spatial sampling issues with 1D PHABSIM. River Research and Applications 26 (3): 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn, T. G., P. W. Seelbach, and E. S. Rutherford. 2012. A regional-scale habitat suitability model to assess the effects of flow reduction on fish assemblages in Michigan streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48 (5): 871–895. 10.1111/jawr.2012.48.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar