Equifinality and automatic calibration: What is the impact of hypothesizing an optimal parameter set on modelled hydrological processes?

References

• Aissia, M. A. B., F. Chebana, T. B. M. J. Ouarda, L. Roy, G. Desrochers, I. Chartier, and É. Robichaud. 2012. Multivariate analysis of flood characteristics in a climate change context of the watershed of the Baskatong reservoir, Province of Québec, Canada. Hydrological Processes 26 (1): 130–142.10.1002/hyp.v26.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsenault, R., A. Poulin, P. Côté, and F. Brissette. 2014. Comparison of stochastic optimization algorithms in hydrological model calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 19 (7): 1374–1384.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Nasr, Imène. 2014. Incertitudes sur les débits simulés par le modèle HYDROTEL attribuables aux incertitudes sur les paramèetres. Application au bassin de la rivière Beaurivage, Québec, Canada, Institut National de la recherche scientifique, Centre Eau terre environnement, Québec, QC 94 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Beven, K. 1993. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Advances in Water Resources 16 (1): 41–51.10.1016/0309-1708(93)90028-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. 2006a. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology 320 (1-2): 18–36.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. 2006b. On undermining the science? Hydrological Processes 20 (14): 3141–3146.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. 2008. On doing better hydrological science. Hydrological Processes 22 (17): 3549–3553.10.1002/hyp.v22:17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. J. 2009. Comment on “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?” by Jasper A. Vrugt, Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Hoshin V. Gupta and Bruce A. Robinson. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 23 (7): 1059–1060.10.1007/s00477-008-0283-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K. 2016. Facets of uncertainty: epistemic uncertainty, non-stationarity, likelihood, hypothesis testing, and communication. Hydrological Sciences Journal 61 (9): 1652–1665.10.1080/02626667.2015.1031761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K., and A. Binley. 1992. The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 6 (3): 279–298.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K., and J. Freer. 2001. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology 249 (1-4): 11–29.10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouda, M., A. N. Rousseau, B. Konan, P. Gagnon, and S. J. Gumiere. 2012. Case study: Bayesian uncertainty analysis of the distributed hydrological model HYDROTEL. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17 (9): 1021–1032.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouda, M., A. N. Rousseau, S. J. Gumiere, P. Gagnon, B. Konan, and R. Moussa. 2014. Implementation of an automatic calibration procedure for HYDROTEL based on prior OAT sensitivity and complementary identifiability analysis. Hydrological Processes 28 (12): 3947–3961.10.1002/hyp.v28.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEHQ. 2012. Niveau d’eau et débit. http://www.cehq.gouv.qc.ca/hydrometrie/index.htm (accessed September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• CEHQ. 2013. Atlas hydroclimatique du Québec méridional - Impact des changements climatiques sur les régimes de crue, d’étiage et d’hydraulicité à l’horizon 2050. Québec, 21 pp.
   Google Scholar
• CEHQ. 2015. Hydroclimatic Atlas of Southern Québec. The Impact of Climate Change on High, Low and Mean Flow Regimes for the 2050 horizon. Québec, 81 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. Gupta. 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research 28 (4): 1015–1031.10.1029/91WR02985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Q. Y., V. K. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 1993. Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 76 (3): 501–521.10.1007/BF00939380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. K. Gupta. 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology 158 (3-4): 265–284.10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., and K. J. Beven. 1996. Modelling of stream flow at Slapton Wood using topmodel within an uncertainty estimation framework. Field Studies 8 (4): 577–584.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, J.-P., R. Turcotte, S. Massicotte, R. Moussa, and J. Fitzback. 2001a. A distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. Part 2: Application to the Chaudière watershed. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6 (2): 100–108.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:2(100)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, J.-P., R. Turcotte, S. Massicotte, R. Moussa, J. Fitzback, and J.-P. Villeneuve. 2001b. A distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. Part I: Description of the model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6 (2): 91–99.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:2(91)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey, M., and A. N. Rousseau. 2016a. Assessing the long-term hydrological services provided by wetlands under changing climate conditions: A case study approach of a Canadian watershed. Journal of Hydrology 541 (Part B):1287–1302.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.032
   Google Scholar
• Fossey, M., and A. N. Rousseau. 2016b. Can isolated and riparian wetlands mitigate the impact of climate change on watershed hydrology? A case study approach. Journal of Environmental Management 184. Part 2 : 327–339.10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.043
   Google Scholar
• Fossey, M., A. N. Rousseau, F. Bensalma, S. Savary, and A. Royer. 2015. Integrating isolated and riparian wetland modules in the PHYSITEL/HYDROTEL modelling platform: model performance and diagnosis. Hydrological Processes 29 (22): 4683–4702.10.1002/hyp.v29.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey, M., A. N. Rousseau, and S. Savary. 2016. Assessment of the impact of spatio-temporal attributes of wetlands on stream flows using a hydrological modelling framework: a theoretical case study of a watershed under temperate climatic conditions. Hydrological Processes 30 (11): 1768–1781.10.1002/hyp.v30.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freer, J., K. Beven, and B. Ambroise. 1996. Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resources Research 32 (7): 2161–2173.10.1029/95WR03723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, C., A. L. James, and H. Yao. 2015. Investigations of uncertainty in SWAT hydrologic simulations: a case study of a Canadian Shield catchment. Hydrological Processes 29 (18): 4000–4017.10.1002/hyp.v29.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futter, M. N., P. G. Whitehead, S. Sarkar, H. Rodda, and J. Crossman. 2015. Rainfall runoff modelling of the Upper Ganga and Brahmaputra basins using PERSiST. Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts 17 (6): 1070–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaborit, É., S. Ricard, S. Lachance-Cloutier, F. Anctil, and R. Turcotte. 2015. Comparing global and local calibration schemes from a differential split-sample test perspective. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 52 (11): 990–999.10.1139/cjes-2015-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, H. V., H. Kling, K. K. Yilmaz, and G. F. Martinez. 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology 377 (1-2): 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, M., F. Brissette, and R. Leconte. 2011. Effectiveness of multi-site weather generator for hydrological modeling. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 47 (2): 303–314.10.1111/jawr.2011.47.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemeš, V. 1986. Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal 31 (1): 13–24.10.1080/02626668609491024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. Z., L. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Q. Zhang, F. L. Yu, and D. H. Yan. 2012. The transferability of hydrological models under nonstationary climatic conditions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16 (4): 1239–1254.10.5194/hess-16-1239-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linhoss, A., R. Muñoz-Carpena, G. Kiker, and D. Hughes. 2013. Hydrologic modeling, uncertainty, and sensitivity in the Okavango basin: insights for scenario assessment. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 18 (12): 1767–1778.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litynski, J. 1988. Climat du Québec d’après la classification numérique. Carte de format 100 x 130 cm. Éditions Gamma.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, R., I. May, R. Turcotte, L. Vescovi, M. Braun, J. F. Cyr, L. G. Fortin, D. Chaumont, S. Biner, I. Chartier, D. Caya, and W. Mauser. 2009. The role of hydrological model complexity and uncertainty in climate change impact assessment. Advances in Geosciences 21 : 63–71.10.5194/adgeo-21-63-2009
   Google Scholar
• Minville, M., F. Brissette, S. Krau, and R. Leconte. 2009. Adaptation to climate change in the management of a Canadian water-resources system exploited for hydropower. Water Resources Management 23 (14): 2965–2986.10.1007/s11269-009-9418-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mockler, E. M., K. P. Chun, G. Sapriza-Azuri, M. Bruen, and H. S. Wheater. 2016. Assessing the relative importance of parameter and forcing uncertainty and their interactions in conceptual hydrological model simulations. Advances in Water Resources 97 : 299–313.10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugunthan, P., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2006. Assessing the impacts of parameter uncertainty for computationally expensive groundwater models. Water Resources Research 42 (10). doi:10.1029/2005WR004640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nearing, G. S., Y. Tian, H. V. Gupta, M. P. Clark, K. W. Harrison, and S. V. Weijs. 2016. A philosophical basis for hydrological uncertainty. Hydrological Sciences Journal 61 (9): 1666–1678.10.1080/02626667.2016.1183009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël, P., A. N. Rousseau, C. Paniconi, and D. F. Nadeau. 2014. An algorithm for delineating and extracting hillslopes and hillslope width functions from gridded elevation data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 19 (2): 366–374.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreiller, M., D. F. Nadeau, M. Minville, and A. N. Rousseau. 2013. Modelling snow water equivalent and spring runoff in a boreal watershed, James Bay, Canada. Hydrological Processes.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poirier, C., T. C. Fortier Filion, R. Turcotte, and P. Lacombe. 2012. Apports verticaux journaliers estimés de 1900 à 2010, Rep., Centre d’expertise hydrique du Québec (CEHQ), Direction de l’expertise hydrique, Québec: 99. ISBN 978-2-550-71155-1.
   Google Scholar
• Poulin, A., F. Brissette, R. Leconte, R. Arsenault, and J. S. Malo. 2011. Uncertainty of hydrological modelling in climate change impact studies in a Canadian, snow-dominated river basin. Journal of Hydrology 409 (3-4): 626–636.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prada, A. F., M. L. Chu, and J. A. Guzman. 2016. Probabilistic approach to modeling under changing scenarios. Paper read at 2016 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, ASABE 2016. pp.
   Google Scholar
• Quilbé, R., A. N. Rousseau, J. S. Moquet, N. B. Trinh, Y. Dibike, P. Gachon, and D. Chaumont. 2008. Assessing the effect of climate change on river flow using general circulation models and hydrological modeling - Application to the Chaudière River (Québec, Canada). Canadian Water Resources Journal 33 (1): 73–94.10.4296/cwrj3301073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricard, S., R. Bourdillon, D. Roussel, and R. Turcotte. 2013. Global calibration of distributed hydrological models for large-scale applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 18 (6): 719–721.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanowicz, R. J., K. Beven, and J. A. Tawn. 1994. Evaluation of predictive uncertainty in nonlinear hydrological models using a Bayesian Approach. In Statistics for the Environment, Water Related Issues (Volume 2), ed. V. Barnett and F. Turkman, 297-318. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, A.N., J.P. Fortin, R. Turcotte, A. Royer, S. Savary, F. Quévry, P. Noël, and C. Paniconi. 2011. PHYSITEL, a specialized GIS for supporting the implementation of distributed hydrological models. Water News, Official Magazine of CWRA – Canadian Water Resources Association 31 (1):18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, A. N., S. Savary, D. W. Hallema, S. J. Gumiere, and Étienne Foulon. 2013. Modeling the effects of agricultural BMPs on sediments, nutrients and water quality of the Beaurivage River watershed (Quebec, Canada). Canadian Water Resources Journal 38 (2): 99–120.10.1080/07011784.2013.780792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiller, G., F. Anctil, and C. Perrin. 2012. Multimodel evaluation of twenty lumped hydrological models under contrasted climate conditions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16 (4): 1171–1189.10.5194/hess-16-1171-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoaib, S. A., L. Marshall, and A. Sharma. 2016. A metric for attributing variability in modelled streamflows. Journal of Hydrology 541 : 1475–1487.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thériault, R., Beauséjour, S. 2012. Geological map of Québec. Gouvernement du Québec. ISBN: 978-2-550-66220-4.
   Google Scholar
• Tolson, B. A., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2007. Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration. Water Resources Research 43 (1). doi:10.1029/2005WR004723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolson, B. A., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2008. Efficient prediction uncertainty approximation in the calibration of environmental simulation models. Water Resources Research 44 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudel, M., P. L. Doucet-Généreux, R. Leconte, and B. Côté. 2016. Vulnerability of water demand and aquatic habitat in the context of climate change and analysis of a no-regrets adaptation strategy: Study of the Yamaska River Basin, Canada. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 21 (2): 05015025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, R., J. P. Fortin, A. N. Rousseau, S. Massicotte, and J. P. Villeneuve. 2001. Determination of the drainage structure of a watershed using a digital elevation model and a digital river and lake network. Journal of Hydrology 240 (3-4): 225–242.10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00342-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, R., A.N. Rousseau, J.-P. Fortin, and J.-P. Villeneuve. 2003. Development of a process-oriented, multiple-objective, hydrological calibration strategy accounting for model structure. In Advances in Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Science & Application, no. 6, ed. Q. Duan, Hoshin V. Gupta, Soroosh Sorooshian, A. N. Rousseau and R. Turcotte, 153–163. Washinghton, USA: American Geophysical Union (AGU).10.1029/WS006
   Google Scholar
• Turcotte, R., P. Lacombe, C. Dimnik, and J. P. Villeneuve. 2004. Distributed hydrological prediction for the management of Quebec’s public dams. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 31 (2): 308–320.10.1139/l04-011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, R., L. G. Fortin, V. Fortin, J. P. Fortin, and J. P. Villeneuve. 2007a. Operational analysis of the spatial distribution and the temporal evolution of the snowpack water equivalent in southern Québec, Canada. Nordic Hydrology 38 (3): 211–234.10.2166/nh.2007.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, R., L.-G. Fortin, V. Fortin, J.-P. Fortin, and J. P. Villeneuve. 2007b. Operational analysis of the spatial distribution and the temporal evolution of the snowpack water equivalent in southern Quebec, Canada. Nordic Hydrology 38 (3): 211–234.10.2166/nh.2007.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. Ter Braak, C. G. H. Diks, B. A. Robinson, J. M. Hyman, and D. Higdon. 2009a. Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 10 (3): 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, H. V. Gupta, and B. A. Robinson. 2009b. Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 23 (7): 1011–1026.10.1007/s00477-008-0274-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, H. V. Gupta, and B. A. Robinson. 2009c. Response to comment by Keith Beven on “Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?”. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 23 (7): 1061–1062.10.1007/s00477-008-0284-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilby, R. L. 2005. Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment. Hydrological Processes 19 (16): 3201–3219.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, H., J. Jeong, and D. R. Smith. 2016. Evaluation of dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for optimizing SWAT by altering sampling distributions and searching range. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 52 (2): 443–455.10.1111/1752-1688.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Q., H. Chen, C. Y. Xu, M. X. Jie, and Y. K. Hou. 2016. Feasibility and uncertainty of using conceptual rainfallrunoff models in design flood estimation. Hydrology Research 47 (4): 701–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., G. Hörmann, N. Fohrer, and J. Gao. 2012. Parameter calibration and uncertainty estimation of a simple rainfall-runoff model in two case studies. Journal of Hydroinformatics 14 (4): 1061–1074.10.2166/hydro.2012.084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar