Southern Quebec environmental flow assessments: spatial and temporal scales sensitivity

References

• Acreman, M. C., and M. J. Dunbar. 2004. “Defining Environmental River Flow Requirements: A Review.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 8 (5): 861–876. doi:10.5194/hess-8-861-2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acreman, M. C., and A. J. D. Ferguson. 2010. “EFs and the European Water Framework Directive.” Freshwater Biology 55 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthington, A. H. 2012. Environmental Flows: Saving Rivers in the Third Millennium. Freshwater Ecology Series. Berkley, CA: University of California. doi:10.1525/california/9780520273696.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Arthington, A. H., J. G. Kenne, E. D. Stein, and J. A. Webb. 2018. “Recent Advances in Environmental Flows Science and Water Management: Innovation in the Anthropocene.” Freshwater Biology 63 (8): 1022–1034. doi:10.1111/fwb.13108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudelin, P., and P. Bérubé. 1994. “Cadre d’analyse des projets de petites centrales hydroélectriques.” Document de régie interne. Québec: Ministère de l'Environnement et de la Faune.
   Google Scholar
• Belzile, L., P. Bérubé, V. D. Hoang, et, and M. Leclerc. 1997. “Méthode écohydrologique de détermination des débits réservés pour la protection des habitats du poisson dans les rivières du Québec.” Rapport scientifique, Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Faune et Pêches et Océans Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brisbane Declaration. 2007. “Environmental Flows Are Essential for Freshwater Ecosystem Health and Human Well-Being.” Paper Presented at the 10th International River Symposium and International Environmental Flows Conference, Brisbane, September 3-6.
   Google Scholar
• Caissie, D., and N. El-Jabi. 1995. “Comparison and Regionalization of Hydrologically Based Instream Flow Techniques in Atlantic Canada.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 22 (2): 235–246. doi:10.1139/l95-033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caissie, D., N. El-Jabi, and C. Hébert. 2007. “Comparison of Hydrologically Based Instream Flow Methods Using a Resampling Technique.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 34 (1): 66–74. doi:10.1139/l06-095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caissie, J., D. Caissie, and N. El-Jabi. 2015. “Hydrologically Based Environmental Flow Methods Applied to Rivers in the Maritime Provinces (Canada).” River Research and Applications 31 (6): 651–662. doi:10.1002/rra.2772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daigle, A., A. St-Hilaire, D. Beveridge, D. Caissie, and L. Benyahya. 2011. “Multivariate Analysis of the Low Flow Regimes in Eastern Canadian Rivers.” Hydrological Sciences Journal 56 (1): 51–67. doi:10.1080/02626667.2010.535002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEFACC (Department of Environment and Fight Against Climate Change). 2015. Guide de conception des installations de production d'eau potable, Volume 1. Québec: Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les Changements Climatiques.
   Google Scholar
• DEFACC (Department of Environment and Fight Against Climate Change). 2018. Document d’accompagnement de l’Atlas hydroclimatique du Québec méridional. Québec: Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les Changements Climatiques.
   Google Scholar
• DEHAQ (Direction de l’Expertise Hydrique et Atmosphérique du Québec). 2015. Lignes directrices pour l’estimation des débits d’étiage sur le territoire québécois. Direction d’expertise hydrique du MELCC, Québec, February. Accessed 10 March 2020. http://www.cehq.gouv.qc.ca/debit-etiage/methode/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• DEHAQ (Direction de l’Expertise Hydrique et Atmosphérique du Québec). 2020. Rivières (bassins versants): Les régions hydrographiques. Direction d’expertise hydrique du MELCC. Québec. Accessed 23 January 2020. http://www.environnement.gouv.qc.ca/eau/bassinversant/regionshydro/index.htm#liste
   Google Scholar
• El-Jabi, N., and D. Caissie. 2019. “Characterization of Natural and Environmental Flows in New Brunswick, Canada.” River Research and Applications 35 (1): 14–24. doi:10.1002/rra.3387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIEC (Groupe d’experts Intergouvernemental sur l’Évolution du Climat). 2014. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HCAN (Hydrologie du Canada). 2013. Hydrologie du Canada. Ressources naturelles Canada, July, 8. Accessed 10 March 2020. https://www.canada.ca/fr/environnement-changement-climatique/services/eau-apercu/volume/surveillance/releves/hydrologie.html
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, R. S., and D. R. Maidment. 2006. “Assessment of Hydrologic Alteration Software.” The University of Texas at Austin CRWR Online Report 06–11. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/7019/crwr_onlinereport06-11.pdf?sequence=2
   Google Scholar
• Kite, G. W. 1978. Frequency and Risk Analysis in Hydrology, 224 p. Fort Collins, CO: Water Resources Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Linnansaari, T., W. A. Monk, D. J. Baird, and R. A. Curry. 2013. “Review of Approaches and Methods to Assess Environmental Flows across Canada and Internationally.” Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat document 2012-039, vi + 73 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Meylan, P., A. C. Favre, and A. Musy. 2008. Hydrologie Fréquentielle: Une Science Prédictive. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
   Google Scholar
• MFFP (Ministère de la Faune, des Forêts et des Parcs). 1999. Politique de Débits Réservés Écologiques Pour la Protection du Poisson et de Ses Habitats. 4th éd. Québec: Direction de la faune et des habitats, Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs.
   Google Scholar
• Olden, J. D., and N. L. Poff. 2003. “Redundancy and the Choice of Hydrologic Indices for Characterizing Streamflow Regimes.” River Research and Applications 19 (2): 101–121. doi:10.1002/rra.700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellet Dallaire, C., B. Lehner, and I. F. Creed. 2019. “Multidisciplinary Classification of Canadian River Reaches to Support the Sustainable Management of Freshwater Systems.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 77 (2): 326–341. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2018-0284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., A. Arthington, J. Bogardi, S. E. Bunn, H. Hoff, L. Lebel, E. Nikitina, et al. 2013. “Environmental Flows and Water Governance: Managing Sustainable Water Uses.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5 (3–4): 341–351. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, and J. C. Stromberg. 1997. “The Natural Flow Regime: A Paradigm for River Conservation and Restoration.” Bioscience 47 (11): 769–784. doi:10.2307/1313099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., B. D. Richter, A. H. Arthington, S. E. Bunn, R. J. Naiman, E. Kendy, M. Acreman, et al. 2010. “The Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA): A New Framework for Developing Regional Environmental Flow Standards.” Freshwater Biology 55 (1): 147–170. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., and J. V. Ward. 1989. “Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46 (10): 1805–1818. doi:10.1139/f89-228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N. L., and J. K. H. Zimmerman. 2010. “Ecological Responses to Altered Flow Regimes: A Literature Review to Inform Environmental Flows Science and Management.” Freshwater Biology 55 (1): 194–205. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, B. D. 2010. “Re-Thinking Environmental Flows: From Allocations and Reserves to Sustainability Boundaries.” River Research and Applications 26 (8): 1052–1063. doi:10.1002/rra.1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell, and D. P. Braun. 1996. “A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems.” Conservation Biology 10 (4): 1163–1174. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10041163.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smakhtin, V. U. 2001. “Low Flow Hydrology: A Review.” Journal of Hydrology 240 (3–4): 147–186. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00340-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, D. L. 1976. “Instream Flow Regimens for Fish, Wildlife, Recreation and Related Environmental Resources.” Fisheries 1 (4): 6–10. > 2.0.CO;2. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1976)001 < 0006:IFRFFW.
   Google Scholar
• Tharme, R. E. 2003. “A Global Perspective on Environmental Flow Assessment: Emerging Trends in the Development and Application of Environmental Flow Methodologies for Rivers.” River Research and Applications 19 (5–6): 397–441. doi:10.1002/rra.736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 1981. Interim Regional Policy for New England Streams Flow Recommendations. Memorandum from H.N. Larsen. Newton Corner, MA: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 3 p.
   Google Scholar
• WMO (World Meteorological Organization) 2008. Manual on Low-flow Estimation and Prediction. Operational Hydrology Report No. 50. WMO-No. 1029. Geneva.
   Google Scholar