Technical guidelines for future intensity–duration–frequency curve estimation in Canada

References

• Alila, Y. 1999. “A Hierarchical Approach for the Regionalization of Precipitation Annual Maxima in Canada.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 104 (D24): 31645–31655. doi:10.1029/1999JD900764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asong, Z., M. Khaliq, and H. Wheater. 2015. “Regionalization of Precipitation Characteristics in the Canadian Prairie Provinces Using Large–Scale Atmospheric Covariates and Geophysical Attributes.” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 29 (3): 875–892. doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0918-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, J., M. Babister, R. Nathan, W. Weeks, E. Weinmann, M. Retallick, and I. Testoni, eds. 2019. Australian Rainfall and Runoff: A Guide to Flood Estimation. Commonwealth of Australia. http://arr.ga.gov.au/arr-guideline
   Google Scholar
• Beck, H. E., E. F. Wood, M. Pan, C. K. Fisher, D. G. Miralles, A. I. J. M. Van Dijk, T. R. McVicar, and R. F. Adler. 2019. “MSWEP V2 Global 3–Hourly 0.1° Precipitation: Methodology and Quantitative Assessment.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 100 (3): 473–500. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0138.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, P., O. B. Christensen, K. Klehmet, G. Lenderink, J. Olsson, C. Teichmann, and W. Yang. 2019. “Summertime Precipitation Extremes in a EURO–CORDEX 0.11 Degrees Ensemble at an Hourly Resolution.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 19 (4): 957–971. doi:10.5194/nhess-19-957-2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, D. H. 1990. “Evaluation of Regional Flood Frequency Analysis with a Region of Influence Approach.” Water Resources Research 26 (10): 2257–2265. doi:10.1029/WR026i010p02257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, D. H. 2003. “The Use of Resampling for Estimating Confidence Intervals for Single Site and Pooled Frequency Analysis/Utilisation D'un Rééchantillonnage Pour L'Estimation Des Intervalles de Confiance Lors D'Analyses Fréquentielles Mono et Multi–Site.” Hydrological Sciences Journal 48 (1): 25–38. doi:10.1623/hysj.48.1.25.43485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, D. H. 2014. “A Framework for Regional Estimation of Intensity–Duration–Frequency (IDF) Curves.” Hydrological Processes 28 (14): 4209–4218. doi:10.1002/hyp.10231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, D. H., and A. Taleghani. 2013. “Estimates of Changes in Design Rainfall Values for Canada.” Hydrological Processes 27 (11): 1590–1599. doi:10.1002/hyp.9238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon, A. J. 2018. “Multivariate Quantile Mapping Bias Correction: An N–Dimensional Probability Density Function Transform for Climate Model Simulations of Multiple Variables.” Climate Dynamics 50 (1–2): 31–49. doi:10.1007/s00382-017-3580-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, I. 2014. A Guidebook on Climate Scenarios: Using Climate Information to Guide Adaptation Research and Decisions, 86. Canada: Ouranos.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., A. AghaKouchak, E. Gilleland, and R. W. Katz. 2014. “Non-Stationary Extreme Value Analysis in a Changing Climate.” Climatic Change 127 (2): 353–369. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1254-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSA. 2019. CSA plus 4013:19. Technical Guide: Development, Interpretation and Use of Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Information: Guideline for Canadian Water Resources Practitioners, 126. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Standards Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, T. 1960. “Flood Frequency Analyses.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1543A: 11–51.
   Google Scholar
• DeGaetano, A. T., and C. M. Castellano. 2017. “Future Projections of Extreme Precipitation Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curves for Climate Adaptation Planning in New York State.” Climate Services 5: 23–35. doi:10.1016/j.cliser.2017.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• ECCC. 2014. “Engineering Climate Datasets, Intensity–Duration–Frequency (IDF) Files.” v2.30 2014‐12‐21. Accessed January 2018. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/prods_servs/engineering_e.html
   Google Scholar
• ECCC. 2020. “Engineering Climate Datasets, Intensity–Duration–Frequency (IDF) Files.” v3.10 2020-03-27. Accessed September 2020. https://climate.weather.gc.ca/prods_servs/engineering_e.html
   Google Scholar
• Ganguli, P., and P. Coulibaly. 2017. “Does Nonstationarity in Rainfall Require Nonstationary Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curves?” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21 (12): 6461–6483. doi:10.5194/hess-21-6461-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguli, P., and P. Coulibaly. 2019. “Assessment of Future Changes in Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curves for Southern Ontario Using North American (NA)–CORDEX Models with Nonstationary Methods.” Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 22: 100587.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanzadeh, E., A. Nazemi, J. Adamowski, T. H. Nguyen, and V. T. V. Nguyen. 2019. “Quantile–Based Downscaling of Rainfall Extremes: Notes on Methodological Functionality, Associated Uncertainty and Application in Practice.” Advances in Water Resources. 131: 103371. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, W. D., D. A. Carr, and B. Routledge. 1989. Rainfall Intensity–Duration–Frequency Values for Canadian Locations. Ontario: Environment Canada, Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview.
   Google Scholar
• Hosking, J. R. M., and J. R. Wallis. 1997. Regional Frequency Analysis: An Approach Based on L–Moments, 240. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innocenti, S., A. Mailhot, and A. Frigon. 2017. “Simple Scaling of Extreme Precipitation in North America.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21 (11): 5823–5846. doi:10.5194/hess-21-5823-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenti, S., A. Mailhot, A. Frigon, A. J. Cannon, and M. Leduc. 2019. “Observed and Simulated Precipitation over Northeastern North America: How Do Daily and Sub–Daily Extremes Scale in Space and Time?” Journal of Climate 32 (24): 8563–8582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Hydrology. 1999. Flood Estimation Handbook (five volumes). Center for Ecology & Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Khalili, M., and V. T. V. Nguyen. 2018. “A Perfect Prognosis Approach for Daily Precipitation Series in Consideration of Space–Time Correlation Structure.” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 32 (12): 3333–3364. doi:10.1007/s00477-018-1625-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotamarthi, R., L. Mearns, K. Hayhoe, C. L. Castro, and D. Wuebble. 2016. Use of Climate Information for Decision–Making and Impacts Research: State of Our Understanding, 55. Prepared for the Department of Defense, Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, C., T. Y. Gan, and M. Gizaw. 2015. “Potential Impact of Climate Change on Intensity Duration Frequency Curves of Central Alberta.” Climatic Change 130 (2): 115–129. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1347-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., A. Sharma, F. Johnson, and J. Evans. 2015. “Evaluating the Effect of Climate Change on Areal Reduction Factors Using Regional Climate Model Projections.” Journal of Hydrology 528: 419–434. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., J. Evans, F. Johnson, and A. Sharma. 2017. “A Comparison of Methods for Estimating Climate Change Impact on Design Rainfall Using a High–Resolution RCM.” Journal of Hydrology 547: 413–427. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailhot, A., I. Beauregard, G. Talbot, D. Caya, and S. Biner. 2012. “Future Changes in Intense Precipitation over Canada Assessed from Multi‐Model NARCCAP Ensemble Simulations.” International Journal of Climatology 32 (8): 1151–1163. doi:10.1002/joc.2343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailhot, A., S. Lachance–Cloutier, G. Talbot, and A. Favre. 2013. “Regional Estimates of Intense Rainfall Based on the Peak–over–Threshold (POT) Approach.” Journal of Hydrology 476: 188–199. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraun, D. 2013. “Bias Correction, Quantile Mapping, and Downscaling: Revisiting the Inflation Issue.” Journal of Climate 26 (6): 2137–2143. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00821.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraun, D. 2016. “Bias Correcting Climate Change Simulations – A Critical Review.” Current Climate Change Reports 2 (4): 211–220. doi:10.1007/s40641-016-0050-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel, J. L., A. Mailhot, F. Brissette, and D. Caya. 2018. “Role of Natural Climate Variability in the Detection of Anthropogenic Climate Change Signal for Mean and Extreme Precipitation at Local and Regional Scales.” Journal of Climate 31 (11): 4241–4263. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0282.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney, D. W., M. F. Hutchinson, P. Papadopol, K. Lawrence, J. Pedlar, K. Campbell, E. Milewska, R. Hopkinson, D. Price, and T. Owen. 2011. “Customized Spatial Climate Models for North America.” Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 92 (12): 1612–1622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns, L. O, et al. 2017. The NA–CORDEX Dataset, Version 1.0. Boulder, CO: NCAR Climate Data Gateway. Accessed December 2018. doi: doi:10.5065/D6SJ1JCH.
   Google Scholar
• Milly, P. C. D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hirsch, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer. 2008. “Climate Change. Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management?” Science (New York, N.Y.) 319 (5863): 573–574. doi:10.1126/science.1151915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladjic, B., L. Sushama, M. Khaliq, R. Laprise, D. Caya, and R. Roy. 2011. “Canadian RCM Projected Changes to Extreme Precipitation Characteristics over Canada.” Journal of Climate 24 (10): 2565–2584. doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3937.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monette, A., L. Sushama, M. Khaliq, R. Laprise, and R. Roy. 2012. “Projected Changes to Precipitation Extremes for Northeast Canadian Watersheds Using a Multi‐RCM Ensemble.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 117: D13106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H., and V. T. V. Nguyen. 2018. “A Novel Scale–Invariance Generalized Extreme Value Model Based on Probability Weighted Moments for Estimating Extreme Design Rainfalls in the Context of Climate Change.” In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2018: Groundwater, Sustainability, and Hydro–Climate/Climate Change, 251–261. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H., and V. T. V. Nguyen. 2019. “Decision–Support Tool for Constructing Robust Rainfall IDF Relations in Consideration of Model Uncertainty.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 24 (7): 06019004. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. T. V., T. D. Nguyen, and A. Cung. 2007. “A Statistical Approach to Downscaling of Sub–Daily Extreme Rainfall Processes for Climate–Related Impact Studies in Urban Areas.” Water Supply 7 (2): 183–192. doi:10.2166/ws.2007.053.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, N. L., and D. H. Burn. 2018. “A Nonstationary Peaks–over–Threshold Approach for Modelling Daily Precipitation with Covariate–Dependent Thresholds.” Canadian Water Resources Journal / Revue Canadienne Des Ressources Hydriques 43 (3): 281–304. doi:10.1080/07011784.2018.1455538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouarda, T. B. M. J., L. A. Yousef, and C. Charron. 2019. “Non‐Stationary Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curves Integrating Information Concerning Teleconnections and Climate Change.” International Journal of Climatology 39 (4): 2306–2323. doi:10.1002/joc.5953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prein, Andreas F., Wolfgang Langhans, Giorgia Fosser, Andrew Ferrone, Nikolina Ban, Klaus Goergen, Michael Keller, et al. 2015. “A Review on Regional Convection‐Permitting Climate Modeling: Demonstrations, Prospects, and Challenges.” Reviews of Geophysics 53 (2): 323–361. doi:10.1002/2014RG000475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requena, A. I., D. H. Burn, and P. Coulibaly. 2019a. “Pooled Frequency Analysis for Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curve Estimation.” Hydrological Processes 33 (15): 2080–2094. doi:10.1002/hyp.13456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requena, A. I., D. H. Burn, and P. Coulibaly. 2019b. “Estimates of Gridded Relative Changes in 24–h Extreme Rainfall Intensities Based on Pooled Frequency Analysis.” Journal of Hydrology 577: 123940. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requena, A. I., T. H. Nguyen, D. Burn, P. Coulibaly, and V. T. V. Nguyen. 2021. “A Temporal Downscaling Approach for Sub–Daily Gridded Extreme Rainfall Intensity Estimation under Climate Change.” Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies 35: 100811. doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100811.
   Google Scholar
• Schardong, A., A. Gaur, S. P. Simonovic, and D. Sandink. 2018. Computerized Tool for the Development of Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curves under a Changing Climate. User’s Manual v.3, “Water Resources Research Report”, 62. Ontario, Canada: The University of Western Ontario, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. https://www.idf-cc-uwo.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Schardong, A., and S. P. Simonovic. 2019. “Application of Regional Climate Models for Updating Intensity–Duration–Frequency Curves under Climate Change.” International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 9 (5): 311–330. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2019/v9i530117.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, M. W., E. Mekis, R. J. Morris, Y. Feng, X. Zhang, K. Kilcup, and R. Fleetwood. 2014. “Trends in Canadian Short‐Duration Extreme Rainfall: Including an Intensity–Duration–Frequency Perspective.” Atmosphere-Ocean 52 (5): 398–417. doi:10.1080/07055900.2014.969677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovic, S. P., A. Schardong, D. Sandink, and R. Srivastav. 2016. “A Web–Based Tool for the Development of Intensity Duration Frequency Curves under Changing Climate.” Environmental Modelling & Software 81: 136–153. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunyer, M. A., I. B. Gregersen, D. Rosbjerg, H. Madsen, J. Luchner, and K. Arnbjerg‐Nielsen. 2015. “Comparison of Different Statistical Downscaling Methods to Estimate Changes in Hourly Extreme Precipitation Using RCM Projections from ENSEMBLES.” International Journal of Climatology 35 (9): 2528–2539. doi:10.1002/joc.4138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switzman, H., T. Razavi, S. Traore, P. Coulibaly, D. H. Burn, J. Henderson, E. Fausto, and R. Ness. 2017. “Variability of Future Extreme Rainfall Statistics: Comparison of Multiple IDF Projections.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 22 (10): 04017046. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, X., and T. Y. Gan. 2017. “Non–Stationary Analysis of the Frequency and Intensity of Heavy Precipitation over Canada and Their Relations to Large–Scale Climate Patterns.” Climate Dynamics 48 (9–10): 2983–3001. doi:10.1007/s00382-016-3246-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. E., M. M. Thornton, B. W. Mayer, Y. Wei, R. Devarakonda, R. S. Vose, and R. B. Cook. 2016. Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1-km Grid for North America, Version 3. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: ORNL DAAC. doi: doi:.10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1328.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G., D. Wang, K. E. Trenberth, A. Erfanian, M. Yu, M. G. Bosilovich, and D. T. Parr. 2017. “The Peak Structure and Future Changes of the Relationships between Extreme Precipitation and Temperature.” Nature Climate Change 7 (4): 268–274. doi:10.1038/nclimate3239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weedon, G. P., G. Balsamo, N. Bellouin, S. Gomes, M. J. Best, and P. Viterbo. 2014. “The WFDEI Meteorological Forcing Data Set: WATCH Forcing Data Methodology Applied to ERA–Interim Reanalysis Data.” Water Resources Research 50 (9): 7505–7514. doi:10.1002/2014WR015638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westra, S., H. Fowler, J. Evans, L. Alexander, P. Berg, F. Johnson, E. Kendon, G. Lenderink, and N. Roberts. 2014. “Future Changes to the Intensity and Frequency of Short‐Duration Extreme Rainfall.” Reviews of Geophysics 52 (3): 522–555. doi:10.1002/2014RG000464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, P., K. Arnbjerg-Nielsen, J. Olsson, and V. T. V. Nguyen. 2012. “Climate Change Impact Assessment on Urban Rainfall Extremes and Urban Drainage: Methods and Shortcomings.” Atmospheric Research 103: 106–118. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMO. 1966. Climatic Change: Report of a working group of the Commission for Climatology. “Technical Note No. 79: World Meteorological Organization.” WMO-No. 195.TP.100.
   Google Scholar
• WMO. 2009. Manual on Estimation of Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP). World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. S., S. Razavi, B. R. Bonsal, H. S. Wheater, and Z. E. Asong. 2017. “Inter–Comparison of Daily Precipitation Products for Large–Scale Hydro–Climatic Applications over Canada.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21 (4): 2163–2185. doi:10.5194/hess-21-2163-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar