The EU’s Performance with and within NATO: Assessing Objectives, Outcomes and Organisational Practices

References

• Adler , E. and Pouliot , V. 2011 . International Practices . International Theory , 3 ( 1 ) : 1 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albright, M. 1998. The right balance will secure NATO’s future. Financial Times, 7 December.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. 2006. NATO, ESDP and the Riga Summit: no transformation without re-equilibration. Brussels & Texas: Royal Institute for International Relations & European Union Center of Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. 2010. The EU, NATO and military capabilities: coordinating windmills. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Björkdahl , A. 2011 . “ Building peace – normative and military power in EU peace operations ” . In Normative power Europe: empirical and theoretical perspectives , Edited by: Whitman , Richard . London : Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics .
   Google Scholar
• Bono, G., and S. Ulriksen, eds. 2004. The EU, Crisis Management and Peace Support Operations. International Peacekeeping 11, no. 3 (special issue).
   Google Scholar
• Burwell , F.G. , Gompert , D.C. , Lebl , L.S. , Lodal , J.M. and Slocombe , W.B. 2006 . Transatlantic transformation: building a NATO-EU security architecture , Washington , DC : Atlantic Council of the United States .
   Google Scholar
• Cameron , F. 2009 . What ambitions for European defence in 2020? . European Security , 18 ( 3 ) : 364 – 367 .
   Google Scholar
• Consilium. 2003. EU-NATO: the framework for permanent relations and Berlin Plus, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/03-11-11%20Berlin%20Plus%20press%20note%20BL.pdf (accessed 15 June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Cooley , A. and Nexon , D.H. 2007 . Bases of empire: globalization and the politics of U.S. overseas basing , Oslo : NUPI .
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M.K.D. (2010) Cooperation by committee: the EU Military Committee and the Committee for Civilian Crisis Management. Occasional Paper no. 82. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Daalder, I. 2010. Breaking a Brussels logjam. The New York Times, 18 October.
   Google Scholar
• de Vasconcelos, Á. 2009a. Europe’s NATO. ISSues, no. 29. Paris: European Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• de Vasconcelos , Á. , ed. 2009b . What ambitions for European defence in 2020? , Paris : European Institute for Security Studies .
   Google Scholar
• de Vasconcelos, Á. 2010. Introduction: Why an EU perspective on the NATO Strategic Concept matters. In What do Europeans Want from NATO?, coord. Á. de Vasconcelos, 4–7. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• deCamp , W.S. 2005 . ESDP: NATO’s demise or opportunities for NATO? , Carlisle Barracks , PA : U.S. Army War College .
   Google Scholar
• Dumbrell , J. and Schäfer , A.R. 2009 . “ Introduction ” . In America’s ‘special relationships’: foreign and domestic aspects of the politics of alliance , Edited by: Dumbrell , J. and Schäfer , A. Abingdon : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• EU and NATO . 2002 . European Union–NATO Declaration on ESDP , Brussels : NATO .
   Google Scholar
• EU External Action. N.d. European Union @ United Nations, http://www.europa-eu-un.org/ (accessed 7 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 1999a. Declaration of the European Council on strengthening the Common European Policy on Security and Defence. Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 1999b. Presidency Conclusions. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• European Council . 2010 . Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , Brussels : Official Journal of the European Union .
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2001. The European Capabilities Action Plan, Laeken.
   Google Scholar
• Forster , A. 2006 . Armed forces and society in Europe , Basingstoke : Palgrave .
   Google Scholar
• France and the United Kingdom 1998, Joint Declaration on European Defence, St Malo, 4 December.
   Google Scholar
• Garbers, J. 2008. France’s rapprochement with NATO: paving the way for an EU caucus? European Security Review no. 40. Paris: ISIS.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, E. 2009. Security sector reform in Afghanistan: the EU’s contribution. Occasional Paper no. 78. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Græger , N. 2007 . “ Norway between Europe and the US ” . In New security issues in Northern Europe: the Nordic and Baltic states and the ESDP , Edited by: Archer , C. 94 – 114 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Græger , N. and Haugevik , K.M. 2009 . The revival of Atlanticism in NATO? Changing security identities in Britain, Norway and Denmark , Oslo : NUPI .
   Google Scholar
• Howorth , J. 2003 . ESDP and NATO: wedlock or deadlock? . Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association , 38 ( 2 ) : 235 – 254 .
   Google Scholar
• Howorth , J. 2009 . A new institutional architecture for the transatlantic relationship? Europe Visions 5 , Brussels : Institut Francais des Relations Internationales (IFRI) .
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen , P.V. 2009 . Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP . Journal of Common Market Studies , 47 ( 1 ) : 81 – 102 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen , K.E. 2009a . “ Conclusion and perspectives ” . In The European Union and international organizations , Edited by: Jørgensen , K.E. 188 – 197 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen , K.E. , ed. 2009b . The European Union and international organizations , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Laatikainen , K.V. and Smith , K.E. , eds. 2006 . The European Union at the United Nations: intersecting multilateralisms , Houndmills : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Lachmann , N. 2010 . The EU-CSDP-NATO relationship: asymmetric cooperation and the search for momentum . Studia Diplomatica , 63 ( 3–4 ) : 185 – 202 .
   Google Scholar
• Larsen , H. 2002 . The EU: a global military actor? . Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association , 37 ( 3 ) : 283 – 302 .
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, G. 2007. Enter the EU Battlegroups. Chaillot Paper no. 97. Paris: European Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lusthaus , C. , Adrien , M.H. , Anderson , G. , Carden , F. and Montalván , G.P. 2002 . Organizational assessment: a framework for improving performance , Washington , DC/Ottawa : Inter-American Development Bank/International Development Research Centre .
   Google Scholar
• Manners , I. 2006 . Normative power Europe reconsidered: beyond the crossroads . European Journal of Public Policy , 13 ( 2 ) : 182 – 199 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Defence. 2010. Securing Britain in an age of uncertainty: the Strategic Defence and Security Review. London: Ministry of Defence.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2005-2006. On the Implementation of European policy, White Paper No. 23 (2005-2006), Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• NATO.2002. Prague Capabilities Commitment, statement from the Heads of State and Government, Prague.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2003. Berlin Plus agreement, http://www.nato.int/shape/news/2003/shape_eu/se030822a.htm (accessed 14 June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2009. Financial and economic data relating to NATO defence. Communique PR/CP(2009)009, http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2009_02/2009_03_D34F22C9AE854B7FAA0BB409A21C90D3_p09-009.pdf (accessed 7 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• NATO . 2010a . Active engagement, modern defence. Strategic Concept for the defence and security of the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation , Brussels : NATO .
   Google Scholar
• NATO . 2010b . NATO 2020: assured security; dynamic engagement. Analysis and recommendations of the Group of Experts on a new Strategic Concept for NATO , Brussels : NATO Public Diplomacy Division .
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2010c. North Atlantic Council meeting with Political and Security Committee of the European Union, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-3DCE7098-504F0BCA/natolive/news_63807.htm (accessed 7 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2011a. NATO-EU: a strategic partnership, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49217.htm#cooperation-other (accessed 15 June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2011b. Commitment to operations and missions, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-41CE7A1F-ED7F63B3/natolive/topics_52081.htm (accessed 7 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Ojanen , H. 2006 . The EU and NATO: two competing models for a common defence policy . Journal of Common Market Studies , 44 ( 1 ) : 57 – 76 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega, M., ed. 2005. The European Union and the United Nations: partners in effective multilateralism. Chaillot Paper no. 78. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pop, V. 2010. ‘Intense’ discussion on EU-NATO relations at Lisbon summit. EUobserver.com, 21 November.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot , V. 2010 . International security in practice: the politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A.F. 2010. The new Strategic Concept: active engagement, modern defence. Speech by NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen at the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF), Brussels, 8 October.
   Google Scholar
• Rieker , P. 2009 . The EU – a capable security actor? Developing administrative capabilities . Journal of European Integration , 31 ( 6 ) : 703 – 719 .
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. 1999. Speech at the Annual Session of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, Amsterdam, 15 November.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. 2003. Berlin Plus, NATO and the EU. Speech at the Grandes Conférences Catholiques, Brussels, October 22.
   Google Scholar
• Shake , K. , Block-Lainé , A. and Grand , C. 1999 . Building a European defence capability . Survival , 41 ( 1 ) : 20 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• Sjursen , H. 2006 . What kind of power? . Journal of European Public Policy , 13 ( 2 ) : 169 – 181 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm, P. 2010. NATO and the EU: cooperation? European Security Review no. 48 (February): 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2010. Franco-British defence cooperation. London: International Affairs and Defence Section, House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Toje , A. 2010 . The European Union as a small power: after the post-Cold War , London : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Utenriksdepartementet. 2006-2006. Om gjennomføring av europapolitikken. 4. Utenriks- og sikkerhetspolitikk [The implementation of European policy. 4. Foreign and security policy], http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/ud/dok/regpubl/stmeld/20052006/Stmeld-nr-23-2005-2006-/4.html (accessed 15 June 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Varwick , J. and Koops , J. 2009 . “ The European Union and NATO. ’Schrewd interorganizationalism in the making? ” . In The European Union and… , Edited by: Jørgensen , K.E. London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Weis , A. 2009 . “ Improving capabilities for ESDP’s future needs ” . In What ambitions for European defence in 2020? , Edited by: de Vasconcelos , Á. 101 – 110 . Paris : European Union Institute for Security Studies .
   Google Scholar
• Whitman , R.G. , ed. 2011 . Normative power Europe: empirical and theoretical perspectives , London : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, N. 2008. The death of NATO. Europe’s World, Autumn: 62–67.
   Google Scholar