Revisiting Creeping Competences in the EU: The Case of Security R&D Policy

References

• Baumgartner, F.R., and B.D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., and B.D. Jones. 1991. Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics 53, no. 4: 1044–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brousseau, E., and M.Fares. 2000. Incomplete contracts and governance structures: are incomplete contract theory and new institutional economics substitutes or complements? In Institutions, contracts and organizations: perspectives from new institutional economics, ed. C. Me´nard. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 399–421.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, A., and H. Spruyt. 2009. Contracting states: sovereign transfers in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. 2011. Policy framing in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1996a. The challenges facing the European defence-related industry, a contribute for action at European level, communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM(96) 10 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1996b. The European Union and space: fostering applications, markets and industrial competitiveness, communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM(96) 617 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1997a. Implementing European Union strategy on defence-related industries, communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(97) 583 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1997b. The European aerospace industry: meeting the global challenge communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(97) 466 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. Cooperation in the European Union on preparedness and response to biological and chemical agent attacks (health security), communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM(2003) 0320 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2004a. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament — prevention, preparedness and response to terrorist attacks, COM(2004) 0698 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2004b. Security research: the next steps, communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2004) 0590 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2004c. Towards a programme to advance European security through research and technology, communication on the implementation of the preparatory action on the enhancement of the European industrial potential in the field of security research, COM(2004) 72 final.
   Google Scholar
• Commission, European. 2004. Research for a secure Europe, report of the group of personalities in the field of security research. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Commission, European. 2006. Meeting the challenge: the European security research agenda, report from the European Security Research Advisory Board. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 1999. Presidency conclusions — annex III: declaration on strengthening the common European policy on security and defence, Cologne 3–4 June.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and European Council. 2006. Decision no. 1982/2006/EC concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007–2013), Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union, L 412/1 of 30/12/2006.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., and A. Héritier. 2007. Introduction: Contested competences in the European Union. West European Politics 30, no. 2: 227–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchino, F. 2007. The powers of the Union: delegation in the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, A.L., and A.Bennett. 2004. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences/Alexander L. George and Andrew Bennett. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2007. Case study research: principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, S. 2006. Uninvited Europeanization: neofunctionalism and the EU in the health policy. Journal of European Public Policy 13, no. 1: 134–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A.D. 2006. The transatlantic defence R&D gap: Causes, consequences and controversies. Defence and Peace Economics 17, no. 3: 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. 2002. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Matlary, J.H. 1997. Energy policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W.A. 1975. Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18 : 617–43.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W.A. 1971. Bureaucracy and representative government. New York: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, J.S. 2001. Case study methods in international political economy. International Studies Perspectives 2, no. 2: 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, D., and A. Stone Sweet. 2001. The liberalization and reregulation of air transport. Journal of European Public Policy 5, no. 3: 447–466.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. 2003. The engines of European integration: delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. 2000. The end of creeping competences? EU policy-making since Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies 38, no. 3: 519–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. 1997. Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community. International Organization 51, no. 1: 99–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princen, S., and M. Rhinard. 2006. Crashing and creeping: agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 13, no. 7: 1119–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhinard, M. 2010. Framing Europe: the policy shaping strategies of the European Commission. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. 2000. Government, interest groups and policy change. Political Studies 48, no. 5: 1006–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W. 1993. Institutions and collective action: the new telecommunications in Western Europe. World Politics 45, no. 2: 242–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W. 1992. High-tech Europe: the politics of international cooperation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W., and A.S. Stone Sweet. 1998. European integration and supranational governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sbragia, A. 2005. Institution-building from below and above: the European Community in global environmental politics. In Environmental policy in the European Union, ed. A. Jordan, 201–224. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, P. 2010. Let’s get physical: the European Commission and cultivated spillover in completing the single market’s transport infrastructure. Journal of European Public Policy 17, no. 7: 1039–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar