Bleak Prospects? Varieties of Europessimism and their Application to the Eurozone Debt Crisis and the Future of Integration

References

• Aggestam, L. 2008. Introduction: ethical power Europe? International Affairs 84, no. 1: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, A. 2007. National Referendums in the process of European integration: time for a change. In The European constitution and national constitutions: ratification and beyond, eds. A. Albi and J. Ziller, 261–72. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S. 2010. Taking ‘constitutionalism’ and ‘legitimacy’ seriously. In Federalism and constitutionalism in the EU: the legacy of Altiero Spinelli, eds. A. Glencross and A.H. Trechsel, 11–33. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. 2010. Democracy without democracy? Can the EU’s democratic ‘outputs’ be separated from the democratic ‘inputs’ provided by competitive parties and majority rule? Journal of European Public Policy 17: 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. 2005. We the states: why the anti-federalists won. In With us or against US? European trends in American perspective, eds. N. Jabko and C. Parsons, 105–121. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. 2008. One no too many. Pittsburgh, PA:European Union Studies Association Review.
   Google Scholar
• Delors, J. 2013. ‘Economic governance in the European Union: past, present, and future’. Journal of Common Market Studies 51: 169–178..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. 2008. Narrating the process: questioning the progressive story of European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 46, no. 3: 641–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, J. 2003. European integration, 1950–2003. Superstate or new market economy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glencross, A. 2009. What makes the EU viable? European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Godley, W. 1992. Maastricht and all that. London Review of Books 14, no. 9: 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Guilhot, N. 2008. The realist gambit: postwar American political science and the birth of IR. International Political Sociology 2, no. 4: 281–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. 1958. The uniting of Europe: political, social and economic forces, 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2001. Why Europe needs a constitution. New Left Review 11, no. September/October: 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2012. The economics and politics of the Euro crisis. German Politics 21, 4: 355–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. 1966. Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of western Europe’. Daedalus 95, no. 3: 862–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judt, T. 1996. A grand illusion? an essay on Europe. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2007) ‘Built to last? the durability of EU federalism’. In Making history: state of the European union, vol. 8, eds. Sophie Meunier and Kate McNamara. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and C. Mudde. 2002. The two sides of Euroscepticism: party positions on European integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics 3: 297–326.
   Google Scholar
• Krotz, U., R. Maher, D. McCourt, A. Glencross, N. Ripsman, M.S. Sheetz, and J.-Y. Haine. 2012. Correspondence: debating the sources and prospects of European integration. International Security 37, no. 1: 178–199.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. 2007. Political opposition and the European union. Government and Opposition 42, no. 1: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. 1994. The false promise of international institutions. International security 19, no. 3: 5–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minford, P. 2002. ‘Should Britain join the Euro? The chancellor’s five tests examined’, occasional paper 126. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. 2002. In defence of the democratic deficit: reassessing legitimacy in the European union. Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 603–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. 2012. Europe after the crisis: how to sustain a common currency. Foreign Affairs 91, no. 3: 54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Pijl, K. 2006. A lockean Europe. New Left Review 37: 7–37.
   Google Scholar
• Piris, J.-C. 2011. The future of Europe: towards a two-speed EU? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pistone, S. 1975. L’idea dell’unificazione europea dalla prima alla seconda Guerra mondiale[The idea of European unifiication from the first to the second world war]. Turin: Fondazione Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Pistone, S. 1990. Altiero spinelli and the strategy for the united states of Europe. In Altiero spinelli and federalism in Europe and the world, ed. L. Levi, Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. 2011. Theorizing the European union: realist, intergovernmentalist, and institutionalist approaches. In The Oxford handbook of European integration, eds. E. Jones, A. Menon and S. Weatherill, 3–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzano, P. 2010. The ‘spinelli treaty’ of February 1984: the start of the process of constitutionalizing the EU. In EU federalism and constitutionalism: the legacy of Altiero Spinelli, eds. Andrew Glencross and Alexander H. Trechsel, 3–10. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. 2005. Revisiting the Neo-Functionalism of Ernst Haas. Journal of European Public Policy 12, no. 2: 237–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosato, S. 2011. Europe’s troubles: power politics and the state of the European project. International Security 35, no. 4: 45–86.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 1997. Economic integration, democracy and the welfare state. Journal of European Public Policy 4: 18–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 1999. Governing in Europe: effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 2010. The asymmetry of European integration, or why the EU cannot be a ‘social market economy’. Socio-Economic Review 8, no. 2: 211–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 2005. Democracy in Europe: the impact of European integration. Perspectives on Politics 3, no. 4: 761–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpf, F. 2006. The joint-decision trap revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies 44: 845–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. 2010. The European Union’s Eurozone crisis and what (not) to do about it. Brown Journal of World Affairs 17, no. 1: 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. 2000. How to democratize the European Union—and why bother? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Shambaugh, J.C. 2012. The Euro’s three crises. Brookings papers on economic activity. Spring: 157–211.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli, A. 1993. Il modello costituzionale americano e i tentavi di unità europea [The US constitutional model and attempts at European Unity in federalism: an anthology and definitions]. In Il Federalismo: Anthologia e definizione, ed. M. Albertini, , 269–81. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. 1998. A touchstone of dissent: euroscepticism in contemporary western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research 33: 363–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, C. 2004. ‘Jürgen habermas: European or German’. European Journal of Political Theory 3, no. 3: 293–314.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of international politics. USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. 2006. Europe as empire: the nature of the enlarged European union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar