A Sociology of Knowledge Approach to European Integration: Four Analytical Principles

References

• Abbott, A. 1999. Department & discipline, Chicago sociology at one hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abélès, M. 1992. La vie quotidienne au Parlement européen. Paris: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R. 2008. Organized duplicity? When states opt out of the European union. In Sovereignty Games: Instrumentalizing State Sovereignty in Europe and Beyond, eds. R. Adler-Nissen and T. Gammeltoft-Hansen, 81–103. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230616936
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R. 2014. Opting out of the European Union: diplomacy, sovereignty and European integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107337916
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D.M. 2012. The rise and fall of EU Studies in the USA. Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 5: 755–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, M.D., and G. Schneider. 2000. Same menu, seperate tables: The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration. European Journal of Political Research 38, no. 1: 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 1993. The European Community and European government harmonization, mobility and Eyropean Community and European government. Economy and Society 22, no. 3: 314–326.10.1080/03085149300000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., and D. Castiglione. 2003. Legitimizing the Euro-‘polity’ and its ‘Regime’: the normative turn in EU studies. European Journal of Political Theory 2, no. 1: 7–34.10.1177/1474885103002001277
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, S. 2011. Beyond constructivism: the political sociology of an EU policy field. International Political Sociology 5, no. 4: 426–445.10.1111/ips.2011.5.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C.J. 2012. European integration: From nation-states to member states. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606252.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. 1991. Knowledge and social imagery, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991. The political ontology of Martin Heidegger. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Büger, C., and F. Gadinger. 2007. Reassembling and dissecting: international relations practice from a science studies perspective. International Studies Perspectives 8, no. 1: 90–110.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1995. Four models for the dynamics in science. In Handbook of science and technology studies, Vol. 2, eds. S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 29–63. London: Sage.10.4135/9781412990127
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1998. The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C. 2003. European studies: always already there and still in formation. Comparative European Politics 1, no. 1: 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Camic, C. 1991. Book review: The Impossoble Science: An institutional analysis of American sociology by S.P. Turner and J.H. Turner. American Journal of Sociology 96, no. 6: 1542–1544.10.1086/ajs.1991.96.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camic, C. 1995. Three departments in search of a discipline: localism and interdisciplinary interaction in American sociology, 1890–1940. Social Research 62, no. 4: 1003–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camic, C., and N. Gross. 2001. The new sociology of ideas. In The Blackwell companion to sociology, ed. J.R. Blau, 236–250. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Camic, C., N. Gross, and M. Lamont, eds. 2011. Social knowledge in the making. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., K.E. Jorgensen, and A. Wiener. 1999. The social construction of Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 4: 528–544.10.1080/135017699343450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, R. 1998. The sociology of philosophy: a global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M.A.K.D. 2013. Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later. Review of International Studies 39, no. 01: 137–160.10.1017/S0260210512000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, R. 2006. Conceptions of contemporary European universities: to do research or not to do research? European Journal of Education 41, no. 2: 281–304.10.1111/ejed.2006.41.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. 1998. The politics of large numbers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1982. The rules of sociologial method. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favell, A. 2011. Integration policy and integration research in Europe: a review and critique. In Citizenship today: global perspectives and practices, eds. T.A. Aleinikoff and D.B. Klusmeyer, 371–404. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favell, A., and V. Guiraudon. 2009. The sociology of the European Union: an agenda. European Union Politics 10, no. 4: 550–76.10.1177/1465116509346384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Føllesdal, A. 2006. Survey article: the legitimacy deficits of the European Union. Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 4: 441–468.10.1111/jopp.2006.14.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Føllesdal, A., and S. Hix. 2006. Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no. 3: 533–562.10.1111/jcms.2006.44.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frickel, S., and K. Moore. 2006. The new political sociology of science: institutions, networks, and power. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T.F. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T.F. 2001. “Science, sociology of.” In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, eds. N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes, 13692–13698. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Guetzkow, J., M. Lamont, and G. Mallard. 2004. What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? American Sociological Review 69, no. 2: 190–212.10.1177/000312240406900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilhot, N. (ed.). 2011. The invention of international relations theory: realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 conference on theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B. 1958. The uniting of Europe. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2004. Why Europe needs a constitution. In Developing a constitution for Europe, eds. E.O. Eriksen, J.E. Fossum and A.J. Menéndez, 17–32. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., and B. Rosamond. 2002. Globalization, European integration and the discursive construction of economic imperatives. Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 2: 147–167.10.1080/13501760110120192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how?: Types of multi-level governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Igo, S.E. 2009. The average American: surveys, citizens, and the making of a mass public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on nature, science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C.S. 2013. Neo-functionalism. In European Union politics, eds. M. Cini and N.P.S. Borragán, 59–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C., and J. Tallberg. 2008. Institutional theory in international relations. In Debating institutionalism, eds. J. Pierre, G. Peters and G. Stoker, 1–30. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N. 2003. Bourdieu’s political sociology and the politics of European integration. Theory and Society 32, no. 5/6: 775–789.10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004919.28417.7c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 1987. How to become a dominant French philosopher: the case of Jacques Derrida. American Journal of Sociology 93, no. 3: 584–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 2009. How professors think. Cambridge, MA: Haverd Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., and V. Molnár. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28, no. 1: 167–195.10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, C. 2000. Legitimacy, democracy and the EU: when abstract questions become practical policy problems. Policy Paper 3: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, C., and D. Beetham. 2001. Legitimizing the EU: is there a ‘post-parliamentary basis’ for its legitimation? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 39, no. 3: 443–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., and P. Magnette. 2004. E pluribus unum? Creative disagreement about legitimacy in the EU. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 42, no. 1: 183–202.10.1111/jcms.2004.42.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 1993. Scientific practice and ordinary action, ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D.A. 2006. An engine, not a camera, how financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262134606.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 2: 235–258.10.1111/jcms.2002.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2008. The normative ethics of the European Union. International Affairs 84, no. 1: 45–60.10.1111/inta.2008.84.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. 1985. Ideology and Utopia: an introduction to the sociology of knowledge. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1970. The German Ideology, Part One, with selections from Parts Two and Three with Supplementary Texts. Edited and with Introd., by C.J. Arthur. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, N. 1998. How to become a forgotten intellectual: intellectual movements and the rise and fall of Erich Fromm. Sociological Forum 13, no. 2: 215–246.10.1023/A:1022189715949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. 1968. Social theory and social structure, Enlarged edn. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. 1973. The sociology of science, theoretical and empirical investigations. Edited by Norman W. Storer. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. 2002. Machine Dreams, economics becomes a Cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, S.L., and A. Vauchez. 2012. Building Europe on a weak field: law, economics, and scholarly avatars in transnational politics. American Journal of Sociology 118, no. 2: 449–492.10.1086/666382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mügge, D. 2011. From pragmatism to dogmatism: European Union governance, policy paradigms and financial meltdown. New Political Economy 16, no. 2: 185–206.10.1080/13563461003789753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. 2003. Towards a European administrative space? Journal of European Public Policy 10, no. 4: 506–531.10.1080/1350176032000101244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., ed. 2010. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. 2008. José Manuel Barroso: political scientist, ECPR member. European Political Science 7, no. 1, 64–77.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J. 2010. Sociology. In The history of the social sciences since 1945, eds. Roger E. Backhouse and Philippe Fontaine, 102–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T.M. 1995. Trust in numbers, the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T.M., and D. Ross. 2003. The modern social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C.M. 1995. The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy 2, no. 2: 159–183.10.1080/13501769508406981
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C.M. 1999. The public policy of the European Union: whither politics of expertise? Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 5: 757–774.10.1080/135017699343360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. 2000. Theories of European Integration, the European Union series. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. 2005. The uniting of Europe and the foundation of EU studies: Revisiting the neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas. Journal of European Public Policy 12, no. 2: 237–254.10.1080/13501760500043928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. 2007. The political sciences of European integration: disciplinary history and EU studies. The SAGE handbook of European Union politics, 7–30. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, D., and T. Skocpol, eds. 1996. States, social knowledge, and the origins of modern social policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., J. Law, and M. Savage. 2013. Reassembling social science methods: the challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture & Society 30, no. 4: 22–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryner, M. 2012. Financial crisis, orthodoxy and heterodoxy in the production of knowledge about the EU. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 40, no. 3: 647–673.10.1177/0305829812442300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. 2014. Theoretical approaches to European integration. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., and F. Mérand. 2010. Does European integration theory need sociology? Comparative European Politics 8, no. 1: 1–18.10.1057/cep.2010.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 1992. Discipline and bounding: the history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism-internalism debate. History of Science 30, no. 4: 333–69.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 1995. Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 289–321.10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.001445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the air-pump, Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life, including a translation of Thomas Hobbes. Dialogus Physicus de Natura Aeris, by Simon Schaffer. 1. Princeton pbk. print. with corrections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. 2000. Building Europe: the cultural politics of European integration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2011. French Political Science and European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 7, no. 4: 663–669.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G. 2005. The politics of method in the human sciences. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822386889
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A., and J. Arditi. 1994. The new sociology of knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology, 20: 305–329.10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.001513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamtik, M., and M.S. Creso. 2012. The role of experts in the European Union’s research policy. Review of Policy Research 29, no. 4: 449–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vauchez, A. 2008. The force of a weak field: law and lawyers in the government of the European Union (for a renewed research agenda). International Political Sociology 20, no. 2: 128–144.10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00040.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. 1999. The role of the Delors Committee in the creation of EMU: an epistemic community? Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 2: 308–328.10.1080/135017699343739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, N. 1998. Sovereignty and differentiated integration in the European Union. European Law Journal 4, no. 4: 355–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O. 1998. The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations. International Organization 52, no. 4: 687–727.10.1162/002081898550725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. 2001. A history and theory of the social sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Warleigh, A. 2006. Learning from Europe? EU studies and the re-thinking of ‘international relations’. European Journal of International Relations 12, no. 1: 31–51.10.1177/1354066106061325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J.P. 2003. Theory guiding practice: the neofunctionalists and the Hallstein EEC Commission. Journal of European Integration History 9, no. 1: 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. 1984. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A., and T. Diez, eds. 2009. European integration theory. Oxford: Oxford University Oress.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, B., P. Wagner, and H. Wollmann. 1991. Social science and the modern state: policy knowledge and political institutions in Western Europe and the United States. In Social sciences and modern states, national experiences and theoretical crossroads, eds. B. Wittrock, P. Wagner, H. Wollmann, and C.H. Weiss, 28–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H. 1988. The sociology of science. In Handbook of sociology, ed. N.J. Smelser, 511–574. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar