In pursuit of common good? Understanding contestation over the partnership principle for structural funds in the new member states

References

• Andreou, G., and I. Bache. 2010. Europeanization and multi-level governance in Slovenia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 10, no. 1: 29–43.10.1080/14683851003606861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I. 2010. Partnership as an EU policy instrument: a political history. West European Politics 33, no. 1: 58–74.10.1080/01402380903354080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I., and J. Olsson. 2001. Legitimacy through Partnership? EU policy diffusion in Britain and Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies 24, no. 3: 215–37.10.1111/scps.2001.24.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batory, A., and A. Cartwright. 2011. Re-visiting the partnership principle in cohesion policy: the role of civil society organizations in structural funds monitoring. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 49, no. 4: 697–717.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. 2002. The EU “partnership principle”: still a sustainable governance device across multiple administrative arenas? Public Administration 80, no. 4: 769–89.10.1111/padm.2002.80.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2007. Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism: towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics 30, no. 3: 443–66.10.1080/01402380701276287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzel, T. 2010. Why you don’t always get what you want: EU enlargement and civil society in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica 45: 1–10. doi:10.1057/ap.2010.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzel, T., and A. Buzogany. 2010. Governing EU accession in transition countries: the role of non-state actors. Acta Politica 45, no. 1–2: 158–82.10.1057/ap.2009.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzel, T., and T. Risse. 2003. Conceptualising the domestic impact of Europe. In The Politics of Europeanization, eds. K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199252092.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L. 2008. Multi-level governance - the eastern versions: emerging patterns of regional developmental governance in the new member states. Regional and Federal Studies 18, no. 5: 607–27.10.1080/13597560802351622
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M. 2014. EU cohesion policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: insights from Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 1, no. 1: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, A. 2005. Taking stock of civil-society development in post-communist Europe: evidence from the Czech Republic. Democratization 12, no. 4: 528–47.10.1080/13510340500226077
   Google Scholar
• Gąsior-Niemiec, A. 2010. Lost in the system? Civil society and regional development policy in Poland. Acta Politica 45, no. 1–2: 90–111. doi:10.1057/ap.2009.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritier, A. 2001. Differential Europe: national administrative responses to community policy. In Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change, (eds.) T. Risse, M. Cowles Green, and J. Caporaso, 44–59. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Universty Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iankova, E., and L. Turner. 2004. Building the new Europe: western and eastern roads to social partnership. Industrial Relations Journal 35, no. 1: 76–92.10.1111/irj.2004.35.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, J. 2010. The limits and possibilities of third sector Europeanization. Journal of Civil Society 6, no. 1: 39–65.10.1080/17448689.2010.481937
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. 2009. The three worlds of European civil society—What role for civil society for what kind of Europe? Policy and Society 28, no. 1: 47–57.10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Kutter, A., and V. Trappmann. 2010. Civil society in Central and Eastern Europe: the ambivalent legacy of accession. Acta Politica 45, no. 1–2: 41–69.10.1057/ap.2009.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebert, U., and H.-J. Trenz. 2009. Civil society and the reconstitution of democracy in Europe: introducing a new research field. Policy and Society 28, no. 1: 1–9.10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milio, S. 2014. The conflicting effects of multi-level governance and the partnership principle: evidence from the Italian experience. European Urban and Regional Studies 1, no. 1: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ost, D. 2000. Illusory corporatism in Eastern Europe: neoliberal tripartism and postcommunist class identities. Politics and Society 28, no. 4: 503–30.10.1177/0032329200028004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2006. Informal governance in structural policy. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 7, no. 1: 56–74.10.1080/15705850600839561
   Google Scholar
• Potluka, O., and J. Liddle. 2014. Managing European union structural funds: using a multilevel governance framework to examine the application of the partnership principle at the project level. Regional Studies 48, no. 8: 1434–47.10.1080/00343404.2014.898837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sissenich, B. 2010. Weak states, weak societies: Europe’s east–west gap. Acta Politica 45, no. 1–2: 11–40.10.1057/ap.2009.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., N. Mathur, and M. Smith. 2005. The public governance of collaborative spaces: discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration 83, no. 3: 573–96.10.1111/padm.2005.83.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smismans, S. 2003. European civil society: shaped by discourses and institutional interests. European Law Journal 9, no. 4: 473–95.10.1111/eulj.2003.9.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J. 2006. Talking our way to meaningful explanations. A practice-centered view of interviewing for interpretive research. In Interpretation and method, eds. D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea 127–49. New York and London: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H., M. Barnes, and E. Matka. 2006. Collaborative capacity and strategies in area-based initiatives. Public Administration 84, no. 2: 289–310.10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H., and C. Skelcher. 2003. Working across boundaries: collaboration in public services. Health and Social Care in the Community 11, no. 2: 185–85.10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.04183.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2008. The invisible constitution of politics. Contested norms and international encounters 253. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2009. Enacting meaning-in-use: qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies 35: 175–193. doi:10.1017/S0260210509008377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2014. A Theory of contestation 95. Springer-Verlag Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-55235-9
   Google Scholar