The ‘Russia Threat’ in the Eyes of National Parliamentarians: An Opportunity for Foreign Policy Integration?

References

• Aalto, P. (ed.). 2008. The EU-Russian energy dialogue: Europe’s future energy security. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Baranovsky, V. 2000. Russia: a part of Europe or apart from Europe? International Affairs 76, no. 3: 443–458. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, H., G. Lengyel, and L. Verzichelli. 2012. The Europe of elites. A study into the Europeanness of Europe’s political and economic elites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602315.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., T. Risse, and A. Dandashly. 2015. The EU, external actors, and the arabellions: much ado about (almost) nothing. Journal of European Integration 37, no. 1: 135–153. doi:10.1080/07036337.2014.975993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2005. The European Union as a global actor. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cotta, M., and F. Russo. 2012. Europe À La Carte? European citizenship and its dimensions from the perspective of national elites. In The Europe of elites, eds. H. Best, G. Lengyel, and L. Verzichelli, 14–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602315.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• David, M., J. Gower, and H. Haukkala. 2011. Introduction: the European Union and Russia. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 19, no. 2: 183–188. doi:10.1080/14782804.2011.580906.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., and P. Dumont. 2008. The selection of ministers in Europe: hiring and firing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, M. 2001. The elephant and the bear. The European Union, Russia, and their near abroads. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, M.R., and L. Simão. 2013. The EU’s security actorness: the case of EUMM in Georgia. European Security 22, no. 4: 464–477. doi:10.1080/09662839.2013.808191.
   Google Scholar
• Glarbo, K. 1999. Wide-awake diplomacy: reconstructing the common foreign and security policy of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 4: 634–651. doi:10.1080/135017699343513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A. 2008. Rhetoric versus reality: Russian threats to European energy supply. Energy Policy 36, no. 2: 686–692. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P.H. 1998. Europe’s uncommon foreign policy. International Security 22, no. 3: 74–100. doi:10.1162/isec.22.3.74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower, J., and G. Timmins. 2009. Russia and Europe in the twenty-first century: an uneasy partnership. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, M. 2008. The European integration as an elite process: the failure of a dream? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haukkala, H. 2015. From cooperative to contested Europe? the conflict in Ukraine as a culmination of a long-term crisis in EU–Russia relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23, no. 1: 25–40. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.1001822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. 1993. The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies 31, no. 3: 305–328. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00466.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. 1998. Closing the capabilities-expectations gap? In A common foreign policy for Europe? Competing visions of the CFSP, eds. J. Peterson and H. Sjursen, 19–40. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. 2000. Towards a common European foreign and security policy?. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 38, no. 2: 189–198.10.1111/jcms.2000.38.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39, no. 01: 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jireš, J. 2009. Perceiving the Russian threat: how identity politics are shaping central European attitudes towards Moscow. In Central Europe digest. Center for European Policy Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.cepa.org/content/perceiving-russian-threat-how-idenity-politics-are-shaping-central-european-attitudes
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. 2000. Concepts of security in the European Union after the cold war. Australian Journal of International Affairs 54, no. 3: 337–355. doi:10.1080/00049910020012615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M., and N. Popescu. 2007. A power audit of EU-Russia relations. London: European Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Light, M. 2001. Post-soviet Russian foreign policy: the first decade. In Contemporary Russian politics. a reader., ed. A. Brown, 419–428. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J.S., and J. Freese. 2014. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata, 3rd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucarelli, S. 2000. Europe and the breakup of Yugoslavia: a political failure in search of a scholarly explanation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Lukyanov, F. 2008. Russia–EU: the partnership that went astray. Europe-Asia Studies 60, no. 6: 1107–1119. doi:10.1080/09668130802181007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankoff, J. 2011. Russian foreign policy: the return of great power politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Matonytė, I., and V. Morkevičius. 2012. The other side of European identity: elite perceptions of threats to a cohesive Europe. In The Europe of elites, eds. H. Best, G. Lengyel, and L. Verzichelli, 94–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602315.001.0001/acprof-9780199602315-chapter-5.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, A., and W. Wessels. 2001. National parliaments on their ways to Europe. losers or latecomers?, Nomos Verlag. http://aei.pitt.edu/1476/.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J.J. 1990. Back to the future: instability in Europe after the cold war. International Security 15, no. 1: 5–56.10.2307/2538981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J.J. 2014. Why the Ukraine crisis is the west’s fault. Foreign Affairs, October. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/141769/john-j-mearsheimer/why-the-ukraine-crisis-is-the-wests-fault.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, A. 2004. From crisis to catharsis: ESDP after Iraq. International Affairs 80, no. 4: 631–648. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00408.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. 1998. The choice for Europe: social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moshes, A. 2009. EU-Russia relations: unfortunate continuity. (European issues No. 129). Foundation Robert Schuman.  Retrieved from http://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/doc/questions-d-europe/qe-129-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I.B. 2008. Russia as a great power, 1815–2007. Journal of International Relations and Development 11, no. 2: 128–151. doi:10.1057/jird.2008.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, B. 2007. The rebuilding of greater Russia: Putin’s foreign policy towards the CIS countries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., and H. Sjursen. 1998. A common foreign policy for Europe?: Competing visions of the CFSP. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Real-Dato, J., B. Göncz, and G. Lengyel. 2012. National elites’ preferences on the Europeanization of policy making. In The Europe of elites, eds. H. Best, G. Lengyel, and L. Verzichelli, 67–93. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602315.001.0001/acprof-9780199602315-chapter-4.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, M.E. 2003. Why a common security and defence policy is bad for Europe. Survival 45, no. 4: 193–206. doi:10.1080/00396338.2003.9687571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, G., and C. Seybold. 1997. Twelve tongues, one voice: an evaluation of European political cooperation. European Journal of Political Research 31, no. 3: 367–396. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1997.tb01171.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J.D. 1958. Threat-perception and the armament-tension dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2, no. 1: 90–105.10.1177/002200275800200110
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2004. Toward a theory of EU foreign policy-making: multi-level governance, domestic politics, and national adaptation to Europe's common foreign and security policy. Journal of European Public Policy 11, no. 4: 740–758. doi:10.1080/1350176042000248124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.E. 2004. Europe’s foreign and security policy: the institutionalization of cooperation. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strömvik, M. 2005. To act as a union: explaining the development of the EU’s collective foreign policy. Lund: Dep. of Political Science, Lund Univ.
   Google Scholar
• Toje, A. 2008. The consensus—expectations gap: explaining Europe’s ineffective foreign policy. Security Dialogue 39, no. 1: 121–141. doi:10.1177/0967010607086826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsygankov, A.P. 2013. Russia’s foreign policy: change and continuity in national identity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, S.M. 1987. The origins of alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woldendorp, J., H. Keman, and I. Budge. 2000. Party Government in 48 democracies (1945–1998). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2547-7.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, M., A.F. Jakobsen, I.B. Holmgaard, L. Wilmhelmsen, and R. Boey. 2015. The EU as a foreign policy actor – The EU’s responce towards Russia in relation to the conflict in Ukraine. Thesis. http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/19368.
   Google Scholar