Regional actorness and interregional relations: ASEAN, the EU and Mercosur

References

• Abdelal, R., Y. M. Herrera, A. I. Johnston, and R. McDermott. 2006. “Identity as a Variable.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (4): 695–711.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. 2009. Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9780801459757
   Google Scholar
• Acosta, D., and A. Geddes. 2014. “Transnational Diffusion or Different Models? Regional Approaches to Migration Governance in the European Union and Mercosur.” European Journal of Migration and Law 16: 19–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, V. K., and J. T. Chow. 2010. “The Perils of Consensus: How ASEAN’s Meta-regime Undermines Economic and Environmental Cooperation.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (2): 262–290.10.1080/09692290903192962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASEAN. 1967. The ASEAN Declaration (Bangkok Declaration). August 8. Accessed September 2, 2015. http://www.asean.org/news/item/the-asean-declaration-bangkok-declaration
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. 1976. Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. February 24. Accessed September 2, 2015. http://www.asean.org/news/item/treaty-of-amity-and-cooperation-in-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976-3
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. 1980. Cooperation Agreement between the Member Countries of ASEAN and the European Community. March 7. Accessed September 2, 2015. http://www.asean.org/news/item/external-relations-european-union-nuremberg-declaration-on-an-eu-asean-enhanced-partnership-nuremberg-germany-15-march-2007
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. 1992. Singapore Declaration of 1992. January 28. Accessed September 2, 2015. http://www.asean.org/news/item/singapore-declaration-of-1992-singapore-28-january-1992
   Google Scholar
• ASEAN. 2007. The ASEAN Charter. Accessed September 4, 2015. http://www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. 2010. Institutions for Regional Integration: Toward an Asian Economic Community. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Baert, F., T. Scaramagli, and F. Söderbaum. 2014. “Introduction: Intersecting Interregionalism.” In Intersecting Interregionalism: Regions, Global Governance and the EU, edited by F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, and F. Söderbaum, 55–70. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7566-4
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., and T. Risse. 2009. “Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism – The EU as a Model of Regional Integration.” Working Paper Series of the Research College ‘The Transformative Power of Europe’ (7). Berlin: University of Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., and T. Risse. 2012. “From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction.” West European Politics 35 (1): 1–19.10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botto, M., and A. Bianculli. 2011. “Comparative Asymmetric Trade Negotiations in the Southern Cone: FTAA and EU-Mercosur.” In Asymmetric Trade Negotiations, edited by P. De Lombaerde and D. Tussie, 89–116. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 1999. The European Union as a Global Actor. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203196076
   Google Scholar
• Chin, K. W. 2009. “Emerging East Asian Regional Architecture: ASEAN Perspectives.” In ASEAN-India-Australia: Towards Closer Engagement in a New Asia, edited by W. T. Tow and K. W. Chin, 22–39. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chongkittavorn, K. 2012. “ASEAN Secretariat Must Be Empowered.” In The Nation. Accessed June 27, 2016. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinion/Asean-Secretariat-must-be-empowered-30182419.html
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, C. A., and K. J. Twitchett. 1970. The New International Actors – The United Nations and the European Economic Community. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Lombaerde, P., F. Mattheis, and C. Vanfraechem. 2010. “Mercosur Compared.” In The Law of Mercosur, edited by M. T. Franca Filho, L. Lixinski, and M. B. Olmos Giupponi, 165–190. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T. 2014. “EU Actorness, Cohesiveness and Effectiveness in Environmental Affairs.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (7): 1017–1032.10.1080/13501763.2014.912250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doctor, M. 2015. “Interregionalism’s Impact on Regional Integration in Developing Countries: The Case of Mercosur.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (7): 967–984.10.1080/13501763.2014.992932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doidge, M. 2007. “Joined at the Hip: Regionalism and Interregionalism.” Journal of European Integration 29 (2): 229–248.10.1080/07036330701252474
   Google Scholar
• Doidge, M. 2014. “Interregionalism and the European Union: Conceptualizing Group-to-group Relations.” In Intersecting Interregionalism, edited by F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, and F. Söderbaum, 37–54. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7566-4
   Google Scholar
• Dri, C. 2011. “The European Union and Latin America.” In The European Union and Global Governance – A Handbook, edited by J.-U. Wunderlich and D. J. Bailey, 254–263. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, U. 2015. “The African Union Finances – How Does It Work?” Working Paper Series of the Centre for Area Studies (6). Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• EU Delegation in Jakarta. 2013. EU-ASEAN: Natural Partners. 7th ed. Accessed September 2, 2015. http://www.eeas.europa.eu/asean/docs/eu_asean_natural_partners_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Europe Direct. 2015. EU-Mercosur Cooperation. Email Message to the Author. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1996a. Press Release. Accessed September 2, 2015. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-96-580_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1996b. Interregional Framework Cooperation Agreement: Joint Declaration on Political Dialogue between the European Union and Mercosur. OJ L 69, 4–22.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. Europe and Asia: A Strategic Framework for Enhanced Partnerships. COM2001(469). Accessed September 2, 2015. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52001DC0469&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. A New Partnership with Southeast Asia. COM2003(399/4). Accessed September 4, 2015. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2004/july/tradoc_116277.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007a. Towards an EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. COM2007(0281). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007b. Mercosur – Regional Strategy Paper 2007–2013. E2007(1640). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Mid-Term Review and Regional Indicative Programme for 2011–2013. Accessed May 25, 2017. http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/mercosur/rsp/11_13_mtr_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. The EU’s Bilateral Trade and Investment Agreements – Where Are We? Memo. Accessed September 11, 2015. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/november/tradoc_150129.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014a. Multiannual Indicative Programme for Latin America: Development Cooperation Instrument 2014–2020. Accessed September 20, 2015. http://eeas.europa.eu/la/docs/mip_alr_vf_07_08_14_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014b. The EU Allocates €925 Million to Regional Cooperation with Latin America over the Period 2014–2020. Accessed September 20, 2015. http://eeas.europa.eu/lac/docs/141105-visibility-event_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fahey, E. 2016. The Actors of Postnational Rule-making – Contemporary Challenges of European and International Law. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fioramonti, L., and F. Mattheis. 2016. “Is Africa Really following Europe? An Integrated Framework for Comparative Regionalism.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (3): 674–690.10.1111/jcms.12307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitriani, E. 2014. Southeast Asians and the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) – State’s Interests and Institution’s Longevity. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Franca Filho, M. T., L. Lixinski, and M. B. Olmos Giupponi, eds. 2010. The Law of Mercosur. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, J. 2004. “Trade Relations between Europe and East Asia.” Asia Europe Journal 2 (2): 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, J. 2005. “New Interregionalism? EU and East Asia.” Journal of European Integration 27 (3): 307–326.10.1080/07036330500190164
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Mera, L. 2013. Power and Regionalism in Latin America: The Politics of Mercosur. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haacke, J. 2003. ASEAN’s Quiet Diplomatic and Security Culture – Origins, Development and Prospects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haastrup, T. 2013. “EU as Mentor? Promoting Regionalism as External Relations Practice in EU–Africa Relations.” Journal of European Integration 35 (7): 785–800.10.1080/07036337.2012.744754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänggi, H. 2003. “Regionalism through Interregionalism: East Asia and ASEM.” In Regionalism in East Asia: Paradigm Shifting?, edited by F.-K. Liu and P. Régnier, 197–219. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hettne, B. 2007. “Interregionalism and World Order: The Diverging EU and US Models.” In European Union and New Regionalism – Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era, edited by M. Teló, 107–123. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hettne, B. 2011. “The European Union as an Emerging Global Actor.” In The European Union and Global Governance – A Handbook, edited by J.-U. Wunderlich and D. J. Bailey, 28–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hettne, B. 2014. “Regional Actorship: A Comparative Approach to Interregionalism.” In Intersecting Interregionalism: Regions, Global Governance and the EU, edited by F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, and F. Söderbaum, 55–70. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7566-4
   Google Scholar
• Hwee, Y. L. 2008. “EU–ASEAN Relations and Policy-learning.” In Europe-Asia Relations: Building Multilateralisms, edited by R. Balme and B. Bridges, 83–102. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230583467
   Google Scholar
• IMF. 2012. World Economic Outlook Database. April 2012. Accessed August 3, 2015. www.imf.org
   Google Scholar
• Jetschke, A. 2009. “Institutionalizing ASEAN: Celebrating Europe through Network Governance.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (3): 407–426.10.1080/09557570903107688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetschke, A., and P. Murray. 2012. “Diffusing Regional Integration: The EU and Southeast Asia.” West European Politics 35 (1): 174–191.10.1080/01402382.2012.631320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. 2010. “ASEAN’s Unchanged Melody? The Theory and Practice of ‘Non-interference’ in Southeast Asia.” The Pacific Review 23 (4): 479–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupille, J., and J. Caporaso. 1998. “States, Agency and Rules: The EU in Global Environmental Politics.” In The European Union in the World Community, edited by C. Rhodes, 213–229. London: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Khandekar, G. 2014. Mapping EU-ASEAN Relations. Madrid: FRIDE. Accessed September 4, 2015. http://fride.org/download/Mapping_EU_ASEAN_Relations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kjær, A. M. 2004. Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, T. 2012. “Spurred Emulation: The EU and Regional Integration in Mercosur and SADC.” West European Politics 35 (1): 155–173.10.1080/01402382.2012.631319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamud, A. 2015. “Interdependence, Leadership and Institutionalization: The Triple Deficit and Fading Prospects of Mercosur.” In Limits to Regional Integration, edited by S. Dosenrode, 163–178. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Malamud, A., and C. Dri. 2013. “Spillover Effects and Supranational Parliaments: The Case of Mercosur.” Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research 19 (2): 224–238.10.1080/13260219.2013.853354
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. “Normative Power Europe – A Contradiction in Terms?” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.10.1111/jcms.2002.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattheis, F. 2014. New Regionalisms in the South – SADC and Mercosur in Comparative and Interregional Perspective. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mercosur. 2012. Fondo para la Convergencia Estructural del Mercosur - Presupuesto 2013. Decision 48/12. Accessed May 20, 2017. http://focem.mercosur.int/uploads/normativa/DEC_048-2012_ES_Anteproyecto%20de%20Presupuesto%20FOCEM%202013-7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moxon-Browne, E., and P. Murry. 2013. “The European Union as a Template for Regional Integration? The Case of ASEAN and Its Committee of Representatives.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (3): 522–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murau, S., and K. Spandler. 2016. “EU, US and ASEAN Actorness in G20 Financial Policy-making: Bridging the EU Studies-new Regionalism Divide.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (4): 928–943.10.1111/jcms.v54.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., and L. Groen. 2015. “The Effectiveness Dimension of the EU’s Performance in International Institutions: Toward a More Comprehensive Assessment Framework.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (6): 1319–1335.10.1111/jcms.12279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, I. 2016. The European Union’s Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective: Beyond the ‘Actorness and Power’ Debate. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, M. G., L. Weissleder, H. M. de Souza Filho, M. O. Batalha, and M. Adenäuer. 2009. “Assessing Agricultural Trade Policies Options with the European Union: A Brazilian Perspective.” Agricultural Economics 40 (4): 447–457.10.1111/agec.2009.40.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponjaert, F. 2013. “Inter-regionalism as a Coherent and Intelligible Instrument in the EU Foreign Policy Toolbox: A Comparative Assessment.” In The EU’s Foreign Policy: What Kind of Power and Diplomatic Action?, edited by M. Telò and F. Ponjaert, 135–158. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Regelsberger, E. 1990. “The Dialogue of the EC/Twelve with Other Regional Groups: A New European Identity in the International System.” In Europe’s Global Links: The European Community and Inter-regional Cooperation, edited by E. Geoffrey and E. Regelsberger, 3–26. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. 2002. “Inter- and Transregionalism; Remarks on the State of the Art of a New Research Agenda.” National Europe Centre Paper (35), Paper prepared for the workshop on Asia-Pacific Studies in Australia and Europe: A Research Agenda for the Future, ANU, July 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. 2012. “The Rise of ‘Diminished Multilateralism’: East Asian and European Forum Shopping in Global Governance.” Asia Europe Journal 9 (2–4): 255–270.10.1007/s10308-012-0311-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santander, S. 2014. “The Impact of the Iberian States on European Union-Latin American Interregionalism.” In Intersecting Interregionalism: Regions, Global Governance and the EU, edited by F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, and F. Söderbaum, 107–127. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7566-4
   Google Scholar
• Senti, R. 1997. “NAFTA as a Model for Free Trade Areas between Economies in Different Stages of Development.” Materialien, Working Paper Series of the Institut Für Wirtschaftsforschung, ETH Zürich 97 (13).
   Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, G. 1977. The External Role of the European Community. Farnborough: Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, F. 2016. Rethinking Regionalism. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, F., P. Stålgren, and L. Van Langenhove. 2005. “The EU as a Global Actor and the Dynamics of Interregionalism: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of European Integration 27 (3): 365–380.10.1080/07036330500190297
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, R. 2002. “ASEAN Plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?” Asian Survey 42 (3): 440–455.10.1525/as.2002.42.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2014. Global Flow of Tertiary-level Students. Accessed September 17, 2015. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/international-student-flow-viz.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Van Langenhove, L. 2011. Building Regions: The Regionalization of the World Order. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, J.-U. 2012. “The EU and Actor Sui Generis? A Comparison of EU and ASEAN Actorness.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (4): 653–669.10.1111/jcms.2012.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar