The Europeanisation of interest groups: beyond access, fit and resources

References

• Baumgartner, F. R., J. M. Berry, M. Hojnacki, B. L. Leech, and D. C. Kimball. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226039466.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., and R. A. W. Rhodes. 2006. “Defending Interpretation.” European Political Science 5 (1): 69–83.10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210059
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, J. 2002. “Gaining and Seeking Access. The European Adaptation of Domestic Interest Associations.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (5): 585–612.10.1111/ejpr.2002.41.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., C. Braun, D. Marshall, and I. De Bruycker. 2014. “Let’s Talk! On the Practice and Method of Interviewing Policy Experts.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 3 (2): 174–187.10.1057/iga.2014.11
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, J., and B. Kerremans. 2012. “Domestic Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Multi-level Venue-shopping in Four EU Member-states.” Governance 25 (2): 262–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A., and H. Petersen. 2016. “What is Access? A Discussion of the Definition and Measurement of Interest Group Access.” European Political Science. doi:10.1057/eps.2016.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A., and R. Ibenskas. 2016. “Estimating Interest Groups’ Policy Positions through Content Analysis: A Discussion of Automated and Human-coding Text Analysis Techniques Applied to Studies of EU Lobbying.” European Political Science. doi:10.1057/eps.2016.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., and J. Richardson, eds. 2009. Lobbying in the European Union: Institutions, Actors and Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Constantelos, J. 2004. “The Europeanization of Interest Group Politics in Italy: Business Associations in Rome and the Regions.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (6): 1020–1040.10.1080/1350176042000298084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duina, F. G., and F. Blithe. 1999. “Nation-states and Common Markets: The Institutional Conditions for Acceptance.” Review of International Political Economy 6: 494–530.10.1080/096922999347146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2013. “Gaining Access or Going Public? Interest Group Strategies in Five European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (5): 660–686.10.1111/ejpr.2013.52.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R. 2007. “Institutional Context, Organizational Resources and Strategic Choices: Explaining Interest Group Access in the European Union.” European Union Politics 8 (3): 329–362.10.1177/1465116507079542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R. 2016. “Studying Interest Groups: Methodological Challenges and Tools.” European Political Science. doi:10.1057/eps.2016.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exadaktylos, T., and C. Radaelli. 2009. “Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanization.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 47 (3): 507–530.10.1111/jcms.2009.47.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, J., and F. Kratochwil. 2009. “On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology.” International Organization 63 ( 4): 701–731.10.1017/S0020818309990142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidemann, K. A. 2012. “The View from below: Exploring the Interface of Europeanization and Basque Language Activism in France.” Mobilization: An International Journal 17 (2): 195–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2001. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, K. 2010. “Europeanization of Lobbying Activities: When National Interest Groups Spill over to the European Level.” Journal of European Integration 32 (2): 175–191.10.1080/07036330903486037
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., C. Braun, and J. Beyers. 2015. “Legislative Lobbying in Context: Towards a Conceptual Framework of Interest Group Lobbying in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 447–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, H., and S. Saurugger. 2013. “Opening the Black Box: The Professionalization of Interest Groups in the European Union.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 2: 185–205.10.1057/iga.2013.2
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., and A. Lenschow. 1998. “Coping with Europe: The Impact of British and German Administrations on the Implementation of EU Environmental Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 5 (4): 595–614.10.1080/13501769880000041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, S. 2013. “Creating a European Demos? The Representativeness of European Umbrella Organizations” Journal of European Integration 35 (5): 583–600.10.1080/07036337.2013.799940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurzman, C. 2004. “The Poststructuralist Consensus in Social Movement Theory.” In Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotion, edited by J. Goodwin and J. Jasper, 111–120. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. 2008. Brussels versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, K. 2015. “The Use of Surveys in Interest Group Research.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 4 (3): 272–282.10.1057/iga.2015.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. 2003. “The Europeanization of Public Policy.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by K. Featherstone and C. M. Radaelli, 26–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rootes, C. A. 2002. “The Europeanization of Environmentalism.” In L’action Collective En Europe, edited by R. Balme, D. Chabanet, and V. Wright, 377–404. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Salgado, R. 2014. “Rebalancing EU Interest Representation? Associative Democracy and EU Funding of Civil Society Organizations.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (2): 337–353.10.1111/jcms.2014.52.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. 2005. “Europeanization as a Methodological Challenge: The Case of Interest Groups.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 7 (4): 291–312.10.1080/13876980500319337
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. 2007. “Differential Impact: Europeanizing French Non-state Actors.” Journal of European Public Policy 14 (7): 1079–1097.10.1080/13501760701576569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 1999. “National Patterns of Governance under Siege.” In The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, edited by B. Kohler-Koch and R. Eising, 155–172. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E., B. Rittberger, and A. Wonka. 2014. “Adapting to Europe? Regional MPs’ Involvement in EU Affairs in Germany” Regional & Federal Studies 24 (4): 407–427.10.1080/13597566.2013.835569
   Google Scholar
• Slepcevic, R. 2009. “The Judicial Enforcement of EU Law through National Courts: Possibilities and Limits.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (3): 378–394.10.1080/13501760802662847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varone, F., K. Ingold, and C. Jourdain. 2016. “Studying Policy Advocacy through Social Network Analysis.” European Political Science. doi:10.1057/eps.2016.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. 1997. “At Odds with Europe.” Political Studies 45 (4): 677–688.10.1111/1467-9248.00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S., and P. Lowe. 1998. “National Environmental Groups and Europeanisation: A Survey of the British Environmental Lobby.” Environmental Politics 7 (4): 155–165.10.1080/09644019808414429
   Google Scholar