European economic governance: deficient in democratic legitimacy?

References

• van den Brink, T. 2018. “National Parliaments and EU Economic Performance Policies. Impact defines involvement?” Journal of European Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, P. 2017. “The Alternative Externalisation Strategy, Operational Independence and the Bank of England.” Parliamentary Affairs 70 (1): 173–189.10.1093/pa/gsw017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buskjær Rasmussen, M. 2018. “Accountability Challenges in EU Economic Governance? Parliamentary Scrutiny of the European Semester” Journal of European Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, I. 2017. “A Separate Parliament for the Eurozone? Differentiated Representation, Brexit, and the Quandary of Exclusion.” Parliamentary Affairs 70: 655–672.10.1093/pa/gsx022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, P. (n.d.) “The Eurogroup: Legitimacy, Democratic Accountability and Decision-making.” Accessed June 12. https://mxdoc.com/p-craig-the-eurogroup-legitimacy-democratic-accountability-a.html.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, B. 2017. “Parliamentary Accountability in Multilevel Governance: What Role for Parliaments in Post-Crisis EU Economic Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1363270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. 2015. “Democratic Accountability of EU Executive Power: A Reform Agenda for Parliaments.” In What form of Government for the European Union and the Eurozone? edited by Federico Fabbrini, Ernst Hirsch Ballin, Han Somsen, 171–194. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. 2017. “‘Accountable Independence’ of the European Central Bank: Seeing the Logics of Transparency.” European Law Journal 23 (1): 28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cygan, A. 2017. “Legal Implications of Economic Governance for National Parliaments.” Parliamentary Affairs 70: 710–727.10.1093/pa/gsx020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grauwe, P., and Y. Ji. 2015. “Correcting for the Eurozone Design Failures: The Role of the ECB.” Journal of European Integration 37 (7): 739–754.10.1080/07036337.2015.1079370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. A Blueprint for a Deep and Genuine Economic and Monetary Union: Launching a European Debate Brussels, 28.11.2012 COM(2012) 777 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union, Brussels, 31.5.2017 COM(2017) 291 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Ombudsman. 2018. Recommendation in Case 1697/2016/ANA, January 15.
   Google Scholar
• Fromage, D. 2018. “The European Parliament in the Post-crisis Era: An Institution Empowered on Paper Only?” Journal of European Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Fromage, D., and R. Ibrido. 2018. “The ‘Banking Dialogue’ as a Model to Improve Parliamentary Involvement in the Monetary Dialogue?” Journal of European Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. H., and J.-H. Meyer-Sahling. 2008. “The Europeanisation of National Political Systems: Parliaments and Executives.” Living Reviews in European Governance 3 (2): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hallerberg, M., B. Marzinotto, and G. Wolff. 2017. “Explaining the Evolving Role of National Parliaments under the European Semester.” Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1363273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefftler, J.-H., C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, and J. Smith. 2015. Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137289131
   Google Scholar
• Hinarejos, A. 2013. “Fiscal Federalism in the European Union: Evolution and Future Choices for EMU.” Common Market Law Review 50: 1621–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinarejos, A. 2015. The Euro Area Crisis in Constitutional Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714958.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Högenauer, A.-L., and D. Howarth. 2016. “Unconventional Monetary Policies and the European Central Bank’s Problematic Democratic Legitimacy.” Journal of Public Law/Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 17 (2): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jančić, D. 2010. “Caveats from Karlsruhe and Berlin: Whither Democracy after Lisbon?” Columbia Journal of European Law 16 (3): 337–384.
   Google Scholar
• Jančić, D. 2016. “Parliamentary Involvement in the Economic and Monetary Union after the Euro Crisis.” In Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution, edited by N. Lupo and C. Fasone, 183–204. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jančić, D., ed. 2017. “Accountability of the European Central Bank in a Deepening Economic Monetary Union.” In National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis, 141. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J-C., with D. Tusk, J. Dijsselbloem, M. Draghi, and M. Schulz. 2015. “Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union.” European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. R. 2015. “Towards a New Constitutional Architecture in the EU.” In What Form of Government for the European Union and the Eurozone, edited by F. Fabbrini, E. Ballin, and H. Somsen, 197–215. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinski, L. 2016. “Whom to Represent? National Parliamentary Representation During the Eurozone Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1253764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreilinger, V. 2016. National Parliament, Surveillance Mechanisms and Ownership in the Euro Area. Berlin: Jacques Delors Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kreilinger, V. 2018. “Normal and Exceptional Activities of National Parliaments in EU Economic Governance” Journal of European Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Maatsch, A. 2017. “Effectiveness of the European Semester: Explaining Domestic Consent and Contestation.” Parliamentary Affairs 70: 691–709.10.1093/pa/gsx021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maatsch, A., and I. Cooper. 2017. “Governance Without Democracy? Analysing the Role of Parliaments in European Economic Governance after the Crisis.” Parliamentary Affairs 70: 645–654.10.1093/pa/gsx018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 1992. The Bundesbank: The Bank That Rules Europe. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhold, C., O. Rozenberg, J. Smith, and C. Hefftler, eds. 2015. The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pernice, I. 2017. “Financial Crisis, National Parliaments, and the Reform of the Economic and Monetary Union.” In National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation? edited by Davor Jančić, 115–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pisani-Ferry, J. 2014. The Euro Crisis and Its Aftermath. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199993338.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2013. “Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’.” Political Studies 61 (1): 2–22.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Kuile, G., L. Wissink, and W. Bovenschen. 2015. “Tailor Made Accountability Within the Single Supervisory Mechanism.” Common Market Law Review 52 (1): 155–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rompuy, H., with J. Barroso, Jean-Claude Juncker, and M. Draghi. 2012. Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union. Brussels: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A., and J. Zeitlin. 2017. “The European Semester as a New Architecture of EU Socioeconomic Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1363807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, J., U. Haltern, and F. Mayer. 2007. “European Democracy and its Critique.” West European Politics 18: 4–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zilioli, C. 2016. “The Independence of the European Central Bank and its New Banking Supervisory Competences.” In Independence and Legitimacy in the Institutional System of the European Union, edited by D. Ritleng, 125–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar