EU-supported reforms in the EU neighbourhood as organized anarchies: the case of post-Maidan Ukraine

References

• Aggestam, Lisbeth. 2008. “Introduction: Ethical Power Europe?” International Affairs 84 (1): 1–11.10.1111/inta.2008.84.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Graham. 1969. “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” American Political Science Review 63 (3): 689–718.10.2307/1954423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bátora, Jozef, & Navrátil, Matej (2016). “Extending the EU’s Security Community Amidst Conflict: The Case of Ukraine.” In Pernille Rieker (ed.) External Governance as Security Community Building. The Limits and Potential of the European Neighbourhood Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berti, Benedetta, Kristina Mikulová, and Nicu Popescu, eds. 2015. Democratization of EU Foreign Policy? The Role of New Member States. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bildt, Carl. 2015. “The Right Intervention in Ukraine.” Project Syndicate, 15 July. Accessed September 14, 2015. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/ukraine-international-peacekeeping-mission-by-carl-bildt-2015-07
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja A. 2011. “When Europe Hits … Beyond Its Borders: Europeanization and the Near Abroad.” Comparative European Politics 9 (4–5): 394–413.10.1057/cep.2011.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja, and Thomas Risse. 2012. “From Europeanisation to Diffusion: An Introduction.” West European Politics 35 (1): 1–19.10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanya A., and Vera van Hüllen. 2014. “One Voice, One Message, But Conflicting Goals: Cohesiveness and Consistency in the European Neighbourhood Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 21: 1033–1049.10.1080/13501763.2014.912147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brattskaar, Hans. 2015. Speech at the International Support for Ukraine Conference, Kiev, 28 April. Accessed November 28, 2015. http://supportforukraine.com/mediafiles/files/speech_brattskar.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cadier, David. 2013. “Is the European Neighbourhood Policy a Substitute for Enlargement?” In The Crisis of EU Enlargement. Special Report. LSE IDEAS, November, 52–58. http://www.lse.ac.uk/IDEAS/publications/reports/SR018.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie. 2015. Ukraine Reform Monitor, October. http://carnegieendowment.org/2015/10/05/ukraine-reform-monitor-october-2015/iik7.
   Google Scholar
• Casier, Tom. 2011a. “The EU’s Two-Track Approach to Democracy Promotion: The Case of Ukraine.” Democratization 18 (4): 956–977.10.1080/13510347.2011.584734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casier, Tom. 2011b. “To Adopt or Not to Adopt: Explaining Selective Rule Transfer under the European Neighbourhood Policy.” Journal of European Integration 33 (1): 37–53.10.1080/07036337.2010.526709
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, and Johan P. Olsen. 1972. “Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 1–25.10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremona, Marise. 2004. “The European Neighbourhood Policy: Legal and Institutional Issues.” Stanford CDDRL Working Paper No 25, October.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, Richard, and James G. March. 1963. Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Del Sarto, Raffaella A., and Tobias Schumacher. 2011. “From Brussels with Love: Leverage, Benchmarking, and the Action Plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU’s Democratization Policy.” Democratization 18 (4): 932–955.10.1080/13510347.2011.584733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delcour, Laure, and Kataryna Wolczuk. 2015. “The EU’s Unexpected ‘Ideal Neighbour’?” The Perplexing Case of Armenia’s Europeanisation’ in Journal of European Integration 37 (4): 491–507.10.1080/07036337.2015.1004631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Democracy Reporting International. 2015. “The Seven Pitfalls for Political Reforms in Ukraine.” Policy Memo, 1 (March). http://democracy-reporting.org/files/policy_memo_the_seven_pitfalls_for_ukraine__s_political_reforms_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECFR. 2014. European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2014. London: European Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.ecfr.eu/scorecard
   Google Scholar
• ECFR. 2015. European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2015. London: European Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.ecfr.eu/scorecard
   Google Scholar
• EU. 2015a. “Towards a New European Neighbourhood Policy.” Joint Consultation Paper. Brussels: European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, 4 March. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/neighbourhood/consultation/consultation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU. 2015b. “Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy.” Joint Communication/JOIN, 50. Brussels: European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, 11 November. http://eeas.europa.eu/enp/documents/2015/151118_joint-communication_review-of-the-enp_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Federal Government of Germany. 2015. Aktionsplan Ukraine. Berlin: Federal Government of Germany, 5 June. Accessed September 14, 2015. http://www.kiew.diplo.de/contentblob/4539124/Daten/5510808/pdf_aktionsplan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freyburg, Tina, Sandra Lavenex, Frank Schimmelfennig, Tatiana Skripka, and Anne Wetzel. 2015. Democracy Promotion by Functional Cooperation. The European Union and its Neighbourhood.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137489357
   Google Scholar
• Gozzi, Paolo M. 2015. “TAIEX and Twinning: Results, Challenges and Reform.” European Commission, DG NEAR; Institution Building, TAIEX, Twinning Unit; Presentation at the 9th Annual Regional Conference on Institution Building, Kiev: National Agency of Ukraine on Civil Service, 12 November.
   Google Scholar
• Gressel, Gustav. 2016. Keeping up Appearances: How Europe is Supporting Ukraine’s Transformation. Brussels: European Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, Sieglinde. 2015. “Models of External Differentiation in the EU’s Neighbourhood: An Expanding Economic Community?” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 854–870.10.1080/13501763.2015.1020834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, Sieglinde. 2017. “Theoretical Approaches to the European Neighbourhood Policy.” In Theorizing the European Neighbourhood Policy, edited by Sieglinde Gstöhl and Simon Schunz. London: Routledge ( online version).
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Christopher. 1993. “The Capability-expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (3): 305–328.10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00466.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra. 2011. “A Governance Perspective on the European Neighbourhood Policy: Integration Beyond Conditionality?” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 938–955.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra. 2014. “The Power of Functionalist Extension: How EU Rules Travel.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (6): 885–903.10.1080/13501763.2014.910818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2011. “EU Democracy Promotion in the Neighbourhood: From Leverage to Governance?” Democratization 18 (4): 885–909.10.1080/13510347.2011.584730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, Sandra, and Nicole Wichmann. 2009. “The External Governance of EU Internal Security.” Journal of European Integration 31 (1): 83–102.10.1080/07036330802503932
   Google Scholar
• Lehne, Stefan. 2014. ‘Time to Reset the European Neighbourhood Policy’, Policy Paper, February 2014. Brussels: Carnegie Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, Mark. 2005. Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century. New York: 4th Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Manners, Ian. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.10.1111/jcms.2002.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Pierre J. Romelaer. 1976. “Position and Presence in the Drift of Decisions.” In Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, edited by J. G. March and P. J. Olsen, 251–276. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Herbert Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Roger Weissinger-Baylon. 1986. Ambiguity and Command: Organizational Perspectives on Military Decision-Making. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, Andrew. 2016. Lessons from Ukraine: Why a Europe-led Geo-economic Strategy is Succeeding. Transatlantic Academy Paper No 10, Transatlantic Academy.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2012. “Utenfor og innenfor: Norges avtaler med EU.” NOU, 2. Oslo: Norges Offentlige Utredninger. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/nou-2012-2/id669368/
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Johan P. 2010. Governing through Institution Building: Institutional Theory and Recent European Experiences in Democratic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593934.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Prodi, Romano. 2002. “A Wider Europe: A Proximity Policy as the Key to Stability.” Sixth ECSA World Conference, ‘Peace, Security and Stability International Dialogue and the Role of the EU’, Brussels, 5–6 December.
   Google Scholar
• Rieker, Pernille, ed. 2016. External Governance as Security Community Building: The Limits and Potential of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rieker, Pernille. 2017. “Outsidership and the European Neighbourhood Policy. The case of Norway.” Global Affairs 3 (3): 293–305.10.1080/23340460.2017.1410720
   Google Scholar
• Rieppola, Marikki. 2017. The EU Advisory Mission Ukraine: Normative or Strategic Objectives? EU Diplomacy Paper 2/2017. Bruges: College of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, Maria E. 2011. Faktor Bürokratie. Der Einfluss bürokratischer Politik auf deutsche und amerikanische Demokratieförderung in Polen und der Ukraine. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, Gwendolyn. 2008. “The European Neighbourhood Policy: Conditionality Revisited for the EU’s Eastern Neighbours.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (2): 295–316.10.1080/09668130701820150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank, Dirk Leuffen, and Berchtold Rittberger. 2015. “The European Union as a System of Differentiated Integration: Interdependence, Politicization and Differentiation.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 764–782.10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (1): 99–118.10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjursen, Helene. 2006. “The EU as a “Normative” Power: How Can This Be?” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 235–251.10.1080/13501760500451667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, D., and J. Bátora, eds. 2015. The European External Action Service: European Diplomacy Post-Westphalia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vooren, Bart. 2012. EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy: A Paradigm for Coherence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, Daniel. 2011. “Europeanization through the Grapevine: Communication Gaps and the Role of International Organizations in Implementation Networks of EU External Migration Policy.” Journal of European Integration 34 (5): 485–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar