After the Brexit vote: what’s left of ‘split’ popular sovereignty?

References

• Anderson, B. [1983] 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London/New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. 2017. “A European Republic of Sovereign States: Sovereignty, Republicanism and the European Union.” European Journal of Political Theory 16 (2): 188–209. doi:10.1177/1474885116654389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., and D. Castiglione. 2003. “Legitimizing the Euro-‘Polity’ and Its ‘Regime’: The Normative Turn in EU Studies.” European Journal of Political Theory 2 (1): 7–34. doi:10.1177/1474885103002001277.
   Google Scholar
• Brunkhorst, H. 2005. Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheneval, F., S. Lavenex, and F. Schimmelfennig. 2015. “Demoi-Cracy in the European Union: Principles, Institutions, Policies.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.886902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheneval, F., and K. Nicolaïdis. 2017. “The Social Construction of Demoicracy in the European Union.” European Journal of Political Theory 16 (2): 235–260. doi:10.1177/1474885116654696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn-Bendit, D., and G. Verhofstadt. 2012. For Europe! Manifesto for a Postnational Revolution in Europe. München: Carl Hanser.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. O. 2014. The Normativity of the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. O. 2016. “On the Pouvoir Constituant of the European Union.” In Jürgen Habermas and the European Economic Crisis: Cosmopolitanism Reconsidered, edited by G. M. Genna, T. O. Haakenson, and I. W. Wilson, 192–214. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fossum, J. E. 2016. “Norwegian Reflections on Brexit.” The Political Quarterly 87 (3): 343–347. doi:10.1111/poqu.2016.87.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2001a. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2001b. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory 29 (6): 766–781. doi:10.1177/0090591701029006002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2012. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2015. “Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the EU into a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible.” European Law Journal 21 (4): 546–557. doi:10.1111/eulj.12128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2017. “Citizen and State Equality in a Supranational Political Community: Degressive Proportionality and the Pouvoir Constituant Mixte.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 171–182. doi:10.1111/jcms.12517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, W. 2017. “Limits of Cultural Engineering: Actors and Narratives in the European Parliament’s House of European History Project.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (3): 518–534. doi:10.1111/jcms.12475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, J. 2016. “Conceptually Mapping the European Union: A Demoi-Cratic Analysis.” Journal of European Integration 38 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1080/07036337.2015.1081186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I., and P. Murray. 2016. “The End of a Noble Narrative?: European Integration Narratives after the Nobel Peace Prize.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (1): 185–202. doi:10.1111/jcms.12324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, J. P. 2006. “Habermas, Supranational Democracy and the European Constitution.” European Constitutional Law Review 2 (3): 398–423. doi:10.1017/S1574019606003981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle, eds. 2017. Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. 2016. “Liberalism, Nationalism, and Post-Brexit Europe.” Biblioteca Della Libertà 51 (215): 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaïdis, K. 2012. “The Idea of European Demoicracy.” In Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law, edited by J. Dickson and P. Z. Eleutheriadēs, 247–274. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaïdis, K. 2018. “Sustainable Integration in A Demoicratic Polity: A New (Or Not so New) Ambition for the European Union after Brexit.” In Brexit and Beyond: Rethinking the Futures of Europe, edited by B. Martill and U. Staiger, 212–221. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nida-Rümelin, J., D. Hirschel, H. Meyer, T. Meyer, A. Möller, N. Scheer, G. Schwan, and G. Schwengel. 2013. “We Need a Europe that Is Truly Social and Democratic: The Case for a Fundamental Reform of the European Union.” Social Europe Occasional Paper. Accessed January 6 2017. https://www.socialeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/OccPap3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, T. V., and C. F. Rostbøll. 2017. “Why Withdrawal from the European Union Is Undemocratic.” International Theory 9 (3): 436–465. doi:10.1017/S1752971917000094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patberg, M. 2016. “Against Democratic Intergovernmentalism: The Case for a Theory of Constituent Power in the Global Realm.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 14 (3): 622–638. doi:10.1093/icon/mow040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patberg, M. 2017. “A Systematic Justification for the EU’s Pouvoir Constituant Mixte: Principles of Constitutional Politics in Supranational Polities.” European Law Journal 23 (6): 441–453. doi:10.1111/eulj.12262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T. 2014. “No Demos? Identities and Public Spheres in the Euro Crisis.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (6): 1207–1215. doi:10.1111/jcms.12189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. 2017. “The Quintessentially Democratic Act? Democracy, Political Community and Citizenship in and after the UK’s EU Referendum of June 2016.” Journal of European Integration 39 (5): 559–574. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1333119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M. 2003. Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. R. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and Society 23 (5): 605–649. doi:10.1007/BF00992905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, C. 2017. “A Tale of Two Constitutions: Whose Legitimacy? Whose Crisis?” In Brexit: Sociological Responses, edited by W. Outhwaite, 77–89. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wandan, S. 2015. “Nothing Out of the Ordinary: Constitution Making as Representative Politics.” Constellations 22 (1): 44–58. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weale, A. 2016. “Nostalgic Democracy Triumphs over Democratic Internationalism.” The Political Quarterly 87 (3): 352–354. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weale, A. 2017. “The Democratic Duty to Oppose Brexit.” The Political Quarterly 88 (2): 170–181. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar