Turkey’s compliance with the European Union’s development policy: a pattern of external differentiated integration?

References

• Altunişik, M. B. 2014. “Turkey as an ‘Emerging Donor’ and the Arab Uprisings.” Mediterranean Politics 19 (3): 333–350. doi:10.1080/13629395.2014.959761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apaydin, F. 2012. “Overseas Development Aid across the Global South: Lessons from the Turkish Experience in Sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia.” European Journal of Development Research 24: 261–282. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2012.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın-Çakır, A., and G. Arıkan Akdağ. 2017. “An Empirical Analysis of the Change in Turkish Foreign Policy under the AKP Government.” Turkish Studies 18 (2): 334–357. doi:10.1080/14683849.2016.1261021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, R., and F. Keyman. 2012. “Turkey: An Emerging Hub of Globalization and Internationalist Humanitarian Actor?” Globalizations 1 (9): 73–90. doi:10.1080/14747731.2012.627721.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2007. The European Union and International Development. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, P., and A. Kellow. 2013. “The OECD.” In Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Institutions, edited by K. E. Jorgensen and K. V. Laatikainen, 247–258. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2007. “Conclusions of the Council on Keeping Europe’s Promises on Financing for Development.” Document No: 9556/07, May 15 . Brussels: Council of the European Union, (accessed February 2018). http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%209556%202007%20INIT
   Google Scholar
• Dauderstadt, M. 2002. “Eastern Enlargement and Development Policy.” In EU Eastern Enlargement and Development Cooperation, edited by M. Dauderstadt, Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stfitung. (accessed February 2018). http://library.fes.de/fulltext/id/01424toc.htm
   Google Scholar
• Denizhan, E. 2010. “Turkey’s Caucasian and Central Asia Policy and TIKA [Türkiye’nin Kafkasya Ve Orta Asya Politikası Ve TIKA].” Sosyal Ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi 2 (1): 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Donelli, F., and A. G. Levaggi. 2016. “Becoming Global Actor: The Turkish Agenda for the Global South.” Rising Powers Quarterly 2 (1): 93–115.
   Google Scholar
• European Consensus. 2006. “Joint Statement by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States Meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European Union Development Policy: ‘The European Consensus.’” Official Journal of the European Union Document No: 2006/C 46/01, 24 February, Brussels, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A42006X0224%2801%29 (accessed February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2008. “The Challenge of EU Development Cooperation Policy for the New Member States.” Resolution 2007/2140(INI), Brussels: European Parliament, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2F%2FEP%2F%2FTEXT%2BTA%2BP6-TA-2008-0097%2B0%2BDOC%2BXML%2BV0%2F%2FEN&language=EN (accessed February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Fidan, H., and R. Nurdun. 2008. “Turkey’s Role in the Global Development Assistance Community: The Case of TIKA (Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency).” Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 10: 93–111. doi:10.1080/14613190801895888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frommelt, C. 2017. “In search of effective differentiated integration: Lessons from the European Economic Area.” PhD dissertation, ETH Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, S., and A. Harmer. 2005. “Diversity in Donorship: The Changing Landscape of Official Humanitarian Aid: Aid Donorship in Central Europe.”, HPG Background Paper, September (accessed February 2018). http://www.odi.org.uk/hpg/ndd.html
   Google Scholar
• Hatipoğlu, E., and G. Palmer. 2013. “Contextualizing Change in Turkish Foreign Policy: The Promise of the Two-Good Theory.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 14 (4): 1–20. doi:10.1080/09557571.2014.888538.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, J. 2014. “Turkey as a Donor Country and Potential Partner in Triangular Cooperation.” German Development Institute (DIE) Discussion Paper No: 14/2014, Bonn: DIE, http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2015/5599/pdf/DP_14.2014.pdf (accessed February 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Holland, M. 2002. The European Union and the Third World. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, M. 2008. “The EU and Global Development Agenda.” Journal of European Integration 30 (3): 343–362. doi:10.1080/0703633082141907.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, M., and M. Doidge. 2012. Development Policy of the European Union. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, S. 2014. “The Global Construction of EU Development Policy.” Journal of European Integration 36 (6): 567–583. doi:10.1080/07036337.2014.902943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horky, O. 2011. “The Impact of the Shallow Europeanisation of the “New” Member States on the EU’s Actorness: What Coherence between Foreign and Development Policy?” In EU Policy for Global Development: Superpower in the Making?, edited by S. Ganzle, S. Grimm, and D. Makhan, 57–73. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Horky, O., and S. Lightfoot. 2012. “From Aid Recipients to Aid Donors? Development Policies of Central and Eastern European States.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/15705854.2011.649169.
   Google Scholar
• Ipek, P. 2015. “Ideas and Change in Foreign Policy Instruments: Soft Power and the Case of the Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency.” Foreign Policy Analysis 11: 173–193. doi:10.1111/fpa.12031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirişçi, K. 2009. “The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40: 29–56. doi:10.1017/S089663460000520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirişçi, K., and N. Kaptanoğlu. 2011. “The Politics of Trade and Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of Trading State.” Middle Eastern Studies 47 (5): 705–724. doi:10.1017/S0896634600005203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, T. 2013. “China: From an Aid Recipient to an Emerging Major Donor.” In Aid as Handmaiden from the Development Institutions: A New Comparative Perspective, edited by M. Nissanke and Y. Shimomura, 220–254. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kragelund, P. 2008. “The Return of the non-DAC Donors to Africa: New Prospects for African Development.” Development Policy Review 26 (5): 555–584. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00423.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulaklıkaya, M., and R. Nurdun. 2010. “Turkey as a New Player in Development Cooperation.” Insight Turkey 12 (4): 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, M. 2017. “Virtuous Power Turkey in sub-Saharan Africa: The ‘Neo-Ottoman’ Challenge to the European Union.” Third World Quarterly 38 (6): 1399–1414. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1229569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2015. “The External Face of Differentiated Integration: Third Country Participation in EU Sectoral Bodies.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 836–853. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1020836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuffen, D., B. Rittberger, and F. Schimmelfennig, eds. 2013. Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, S. 2008. “Enlargement and Challenge in EU Development Policy.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9 (2): 128–142. doi:10.1080/15705850801999602.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, S. 2010. “The Europeanisation of International Development Policies: The Case of Central and Eastern European States.” Europe-Asia Studies 62 (2): 329–350. doi:10.1080/09668130903506854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, S., and B. Szent-Ivanyi. 2014. “Reluctant Donors? the Europeanization of International Development Policies in the New Member States.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (6): 1257–1272. doi:10.1111/jcms.12141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, M. 1997. The European Union and the South: Relations with Developing Countries. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, R., and S. McBride. 2009. “Standardizing and Disseminating Knowledge: The Role of the OECD in Global Governance.” European Political Science Review 1 (1): 83–101. doi:10.1017/S1755773909000058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M. 2011. “Turkish Foreign Policy Change, Its Domestic Determinants and the Role of the European Union.” South East European Politics and Society 16 (2): 279–291. doi:10.1080/13608746.2011.577947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M. 2017. “Turkey’s Future with the European Union: Alternative Modes of Differentiated Integration.” Turkish Studies,18, no. 2: 416–439. doi:10.1080/14683849.2017.1300534.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 2011. “Multiple Faces of the ‘New’ Turkish Foreign Policy: Underlying Dynamics and a Critique.” Insight Turkey 1 (13): 47–65. (accessed February 2018). https://www.insightturkey.com/news/multiple-faces-of-the-new-turkish-foreign-policy-underlying-dynamics-and-a-critique
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J. 2012. “The EU as an Actor in Development: Just Another Donor, European Norm Maker or Eclipsed by Superpower Temptations?” In EU Policy for Global Development: Superpower in the Making?, edited by S. Ganzle, S. Grimm, and D. Makhan, 17–36. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Orbie, J., and H. Versluys. 2008. “The European Union’s International Development Policy: Leading and Benevolent?” In Europe’s Global Role, edited by J. Orbie, 67–90. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, M. 2013. “Does Rising Power Mean Rising Donor-Turkey’s Development Aid in Africa.” Africa Review 5 (5): 139–147. doi:10.1080/09744053.2013.855358.
   Google Scholar
• Parlak, N. 2007. Relations with Central Asian – Caucasian – Balkan States and Turkish Foreign Aid (1992-2003) [Orta Asya- Kafkasya-Balkan Ülkeleriyle Ilişkiler Ve TüRk Dış Yardımları (1992-2003)]. Ankara: TIKA.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, P. W. 2014. “Calibrating U.S. And European Development Aid for the Reshaping World Order.” In Liberal Order in a Post-Western World, edited by T. Flockhart, C. A. Kupchan, B. E. Christina Lin, P. W. Nowak, and L. X. Quirk, 39–55. Washington, DC: Transatlantic Academy. (accessed February 2018). http://www.transatlanticacademy.org/sites/default/files/publications/TA%202014report_May14_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Riddell, R. 2007. Does Foreign Aid Really Work? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TIKA Annual Report. 2013. Turkish Development Assistance 2013. Ankara: TIKA.
   Google Scholar
• TIKA Annual Report. 2014. Turkish Development Assistance 2014. Ankara: TIKA.
   Google Scholar
• Timofejevs, H. P. 2015. “Europeanization of Foreign-Aid Policy in Central and East Europe: The Role of EU, External Incentives and Identification in Foreign-Aid Policy Adoption in Latvia and Slovenia 1998–2010.” Journal of European Integration 37 (4): 433–449. doi:10.1080/07036337.2014.987140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaeve, J., and J. Orbie. 2016. “Once a Member, Always a Member? Assessing the Importance of Time in the Relationship between the EU and the Development Assistance Committee.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (2): 512–527. doi:10.1080/09557571.2015.1015486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaeve, J., and J. Orbie. 2018. “Ignoring the Elephant in the Room? Assessing the Impact of the European Union on the DevelopmentAssistance Committee’s Role in International Development.” Development Policy Review 36: O44–O58. doi:10.1111/dpr.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, N. 2008. “Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance.” International Affairs 84 (6): 1205–1221. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00765.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar