3,575
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Unified in response to rising powers? China, Russia and EU-US relations

&

References

  • Anderson, J. G., J. Ikenberry, and T. Risse eds. 2008. The End of the West? Crisis and Change in the Atlantic Order. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Anderson, J. G. 2018. “Rancor and Resilience in the Atlantic Political Order: The Obama Years in Crises and EU-US Relations.” Journal of European Integration 40 (5): 621–636.
  • Auer, S. 2015. “Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin: The Ukraine Crisis and the Return of Geopolitics.” International Affairs 91 (5): 953–968. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12392.
  • Biscop, S. 2013. “Peace without Money. War without Americans: Challenges for European Strategy”. International Affairs 89 (5): 1125–1142.
  • Böller, F., and S. Werle. 2016. “Fencing the Bear? Explaining US Foreign Policy Towards Russian Interventions.” Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 319–340. doi:10.1080/13523260.2016.1202653.
  • Bretherton, C., and D. Vogler. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  • Brooks, S. G., and W. C. Wohlforth. 2016. “The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-First Century.” China’s Rise and the Fate of America’s Global Position International Security 40 (3): 7–53.
  • Casier, T. 2016. “The EU and Russia: A Marriage of Convenience.” In The Diplomatic System of the European Union London, edited by M. Smith, S. Keukeleire, and S. Vanhoonacker. London: Routledge.
  • Council. 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. https://europa.eu/global-strategy/sites/globalstrategy/les/pages/les/eugs_review_web_13.pdf
  • Deitelhoff, N. 2009. “The Discursive Process of Legalisation: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case.” International Organization 63: 33–65. doi:10.1017/S002081830909002X.
  • Duchâtel, M. 2016. ‘The European Union’s ‘Principled Neutrality’ – Can it Achieve Anything?’, Sense and Sensibility. Addressing the south China Sea disputes, EU Institute for Security Studies Report no 28, May 2016: 53–56.
  • Duke, S., and C. Gebhard. 2017. “The Eu and NATO’s Dilemmas with Russia and the Prospect for Deconfliction.” European Security 26 (3): 379–397. doi:10.1080/09662839.2017.1352577.
  • Dyer, G., and G. Parker. 2015. “Us Attacks Uk’s ‘Constant Accommodation’ with China. Washington Criticises Decision to Join World Bank Rival.” Financial Times 12/3-2015. Accessed 17 June 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/31c4880a-c8d2-11e4-bc64-00144feab7de
  • Flockhart, T. 2016. “The Coming Multi-Order World.” Contemporary Security Policy 37 (1): 3–30.
  • Foot, R. 2016. “China’s Resurgence and its Effects on Transatlantic Relations PacNet Nr. 17 Pacific Forum CSIS Honolulu.” Hawaii Number 17 Feb. 10. Accessed 17 June 2018. https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/160210_PacNet_1617.pdf
  • Forbrig, J. ed. 2015. A Region Disunited – Central European Responses to the Russia-Ukraine Crisis’. Europe Policy Paper, 1/2015. Washington: German Marshall Fund of the United States.
  • Gehring, T., K. Urbanski, and S. Oberthür. 2017. “The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (4): 727–743. doi:10.1111/jcms.12530.
  • Haine, J.-Y. 2015. “A New Gaullist Moment? European Bandwagoning and International Polarity.” International Affairs 91 (5): 991–1008. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12394.
  • Haukkala, H. 2015. “From Cooperative to Contested Europe? the Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of Long-Term Crisis in EU-Russia Relations.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (1): 25–40. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.1001822.
  • House of Lords. 2014. “European Union sub-committee on External Affairs ‘The EU and Russia: Before and Beyond the Crisis in Ukraine’, Oral and Written Evidence.” Accessed 24 June 2018. https://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/eu-sub-com-c/EU-Russia/EU-Russia-EvidenceFINAL.pdf.
  • Howorth, J. 2017. “Stability on the Borders: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU’s Constrained Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (1): 121–136. doi:10.1111/jcms.12448.
  • Howorth, J. 2018. “Strategic Autonomy and EU-NATO Cooperation: Threat or Opportunity for Transatlantic Defence Relations?.” Journal of European Integration 40 (5): 523–537.
  • Hyde-Price, A. 2006. “Normative’ Power Europe: A Realist Critique.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 217–234. doi:10.1080/13501760500451634.
  • Jørgensen, K. E., Å. K. Aarstad, E. Driesken., K. Laatikainen., and B. Tonra, eds. 2015. The Sage Handbook of European Foreign Policy. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Jupille, J., and J. A. Caparoso. 1998. “States, Agency, and Rules: The European Union in Global Environmental Politics.” In The European Union in the World Community, edited by C. Rhodes, 213–230. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Kirchner, J. E., T. Christiansen, and H. Dorussen. 2016. “EU China Security Cooperation in Context.” In Security Relations between China and the European Union: From Convergence to Cooperation?, edited by E. Kirchner, T. Christiansen, and H. Dorussen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Larson, D. W. 2018. “Outsourced Diplomacy: The Obama Administration and the Ukraine Crisis.” In Triangular Diplomacy among the United States, the European Union and the Russian Federation. Responses to the Crisis in Ukraine, edited by A. Young and V. Birchfeld, 55–76, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmilan.
  • MacFarlane, N., and A. Menon. 2014. “The EU and Ukraine.” Survival 56 (3): 95–101. doi:10.1080/00396338.2014.920139.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. 2014. “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions that Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs 39 (5): 77–89.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. 2014b. “Can China Rise Peacefully? the National Interest, 25/ 10-2014 At.” http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/can-china-rise-peacefully-10204
  • Mearsheimer, J. J., and S. Walt. 2016. “The Case for Offshore Balancing.” Foreign Affairs July/August. 70–83.
  • Norman, L. 2016. “EU Issues South China Sea Statement Ending Discord Within Bloc. Foreign Policy Chief’s Statement ‘Does Not Take a Position on Sovereignty Aspects Relating to Claims’.” The Wall Street Journal 17/7-2016. Accessed 17 June 2018. https://www.wsj.com/articles/eu-issues-south-china-sea-statement-after-failing-to-agree-common-stance-1468583961
  • Pejsova, E. 2016. “Introduction: Light at the end of the tunnel? in Sense and sensibility”. Addressing the south China Sea disputes, EU Institute for Security Studies Report no 28, May 2016, 5–10.
  • Peterson, J. 2018. “Structure, Agency and Transatlantic Relations in the Trump Era.” Journal of European Integration 40 (5): 637–652.
  • Posen, B. 2003. “Command of the Commons: The Military Foundation of U.S. Hegemony.” International Security 28 (1): 5–46. doi:10.1162/016228803322427965.
  • Riddervold, M. 2018. The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies. Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schleich, C. 2014. “NATO and EU in Conflict Regulation: Interlocking Institutions and Division of Labour.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 12 (2): 182–205. doi:10.1080/14794012.2014.900970.
  • Sjursen, H., and G. Rosén. 2017. “Arguing Sanctions. On the EU’s Response to the Crisis in Ukraine.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (1): 20–36. doi:10.1111/jcms.12443.
  • Smith, M. E. 2015. “The EU and the US.” In The Sage Handbook of European Foreign Policy, edited by K. E. Jørgensen, Å. K. Aarstad, E. Driesken., K. Laatikainen., and B. Tonra. London: SAGE.
  • Smith, M. E. 2018a. “The EU, the US and the Crisis of Contemporary Multilateralism, in ‘Crises and EU-US Relations’.” Journal of European Integration 40 (5): 539–553.
  • Smith, M. E. 2018b. “Transatlantic Security Relations since the European Security Strategy: What Role for the EU in Its Pursuit of Strategic Autonomy.” Journal of European Integration 40 (5): 605–620.
  • Tunsjø, Ø. 2015. “China’s Rise: Towards a Division of Labor in Transatlantic Relations.” In Responding to China’s Rise: US and EU Strategies, edited by. V. Aggarwal and S. Newland, 151–174. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Waltz, K. 2000. “Structural Realism after the Cold War.” International Security 25 (1): 5–41. doi:10.1162/016228800560372.
  • White House. 2014. “Statement by the President on Ukraine.” Office of the Press Secretary, March 6. Accessed 24 June 2018. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/06/statement-president-ukraine.
  • Young, A., and V. Birchfield. 2017. “Empirical Scene Setting: The Countours of the Crisis and Response.” In Triangular Diplomacy among the United States, the European Union, and the Russian Federation. Responses to the Crisis in Ukraine, edited by V. Birchfield and A. Young, 21–54. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Youngs, R. 2010. The EU’s Role in World Politics. A Retreat from Liberal Internationalism. London: Routledge.
  • Yuan, J. 2012. “Emerging Maritime Rivalry in the South China Sea: Territorial Disputes, Sea - Lane Security, and the Pursuit of Power,” International Security Research and Outreach Programme paper: http://www.international.gc.ca/isrop-prisi/assets/pdfs/Report-South_China_Sea.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.