195
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Relationship between ‘Luxembourg’ and European and national administrative bodies

References

  • Adam, C. 2018. “Multilevel Conflict over Policy Application – Detecting Changing Cleavage Patterns.” Journal of European Integration 40 (6).
  • Alec, S. S. 1998. “Constitutional Dialogues in the European Community.” In The European Court and National Courts – Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in Its Social Context, edited by A.-M. Slaughter, A. S. Sweet, and J. Weiler, 303–328. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Alec, S. S. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Arnull, A. 2001. “Private Applicants and the Action for Annulment since Codorniu.” Common Market Law Review 38: 7–52. doi:10.1023/A:1005625416189.
  • Arnull, A. 2006. The European Union and Its Court of Justice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Arrowsmith, S., and P. Kunzlik. 2009. Social and Environmental Policies in EC Procurement Law: New Directives and New Directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Börzel, T., and T. Risse. 2003. “Conceptualising the Domestic Impact of Europe.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by K. Featherstone and C. M. Radaelli, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bovis, C. 2012. “Public Procurement in the EU: Jurisprudence and Conceptual Directions.” Common Market Law Review 49: 247–290.
  • Burgi, M. 2014. “Vertragsverletzungsverfahren[Infringement Proceedings].” § 6. In Handbuch Des Rechtsschutzes in Der Europäischen Union, edited by H. W. Rengeling, A. Middeke, and M. Gellermann, 3rd ed. Munich: C.H. Beck.
  • CEPS and College of Europe. 2012. “The Uptake of Green Public Procurement in the EU27.” Report submitted to the European Commission, DG Environment, February 29. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/CEPS-CoE-GPP%20MAIN%20REPORT.pdf
  • Chalmers, D., and M. Chaves. 2012. “The Reference Points of EU Judicial Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 25–42. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.632125.
  • Dervisopoulos, J. 2014. “Nichtigkeitsklagen [Annulment Proceedings].” § 7, § 8. In Handbuch Des Rechtsschutzes in Der Europäischen Union, edited by H.-W. Rengeling, A. Middeke, and M. Gellermann, 3rd ed. Munich: C.H.Beck.
  • Döhler, M. 2015. “Das Verhältnis Zwischen Politik Und Verwaltung Im Wandel – Über Das Ende Alter Gewissheiten [Change in the Relationship between Politics and Administration – The End of Old Certainties] .” In Der Gut Organisierte Staat – Festschrift Für Werner Jann Zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by M. Döhler, J. Franzke, and J. Wegrich, 91–108. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  • Ginsburg, R. B. 1992. “Speaking in a Judicial Voice.” New York University Law Review: 1185–1209.
  • Halliday, S. 2004. Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law. Portland: Hart.
  • Hepperle, F., and M. Martin. 2016. “Welche Hemmnisse Stehen Einer Nachhaltigen Öffentlichen Beschaffung Im Wege [Obstacles for Sustainable Public Procurement].” Zeitschrift Für Umweltpolitik Und Umweltrecht, 30–58.
  • Hertogh, M. 2001. “Coercion, Cooperation, and Control: Understanding the Policy Impact of Administrative Courts and the Ombudsman in the Netherlands.” Law and Policy 23 (1): 47–67. doi:10.1111/1467-9930.00102.
  • Hertogh, M., and S. Halliday. 2004. Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hunter, C., J. Bretherton, S. Halliday, and S. Johnson. 2016. “Legal Compliance in Street-Level Bureaucracy: A Study of UK Housing Officers.” Law and Policy 38 (1): 81–95. doi:10.1111/lapo.12049.
  • Kirchen, J. 2016. “Die Bedeutung Des Vorrangs Des EU-Rechts Für Die Verwaltung [The Significance Oft He Principle of Primacy of EU Law for the Administration].” Deutsche Verwaltungspraxis 67 (11): 479–486.
  • Krämer, R. 2013. Die Koordinierung Zwischen Umweltschutz Und Freihandel Im Mehrebenenrechtsverbund: Am Beispiel Des Vergaberechts [Coordination between Trade and Environment in Multilevel-Settings: Public Procurement as an Example]. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  • Krämer, R., and J. J. Märten. 2015. "Der Dialog Der Gerichte – Die Fortentwicklung Des Persönlichkeitsschutzes Im Europäischen Mehrebenenrechtsverbund [The Dialogue between Courts – The Development of the Right to Privacy in European Multilevel-Settings]". Europarecht: 169–189.
  • Kruis, T. 2011. “Primacy of European Union Law – From Theory to Practice.” Ritsumeikan Law Review 28: 269–279.
  • Kruis, T. 2013. Der Anwendungsvorrang Des EU-Rechts in Theorie Und Praxis: Seine Durchsetzung in Deutschland; Eine Theoretische Und Empirische Untersuchung Anhand Der Finanz- Und Verwaltungsgerichte Und Behörden [The Primacy of EU Law in Theory and Practice: Its Enforcement in Germany; a Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Courts Administrative Courts and Administrative Authorities]. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  • Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Lodge, M. 2000. “Isomorphism of National Policies? the ‘Europeanisation’ of German Competition and Public Procurement Law.” West European Politics 23 (1): 89–107. doi:10.1080/01402380008425353.
  • Mathieu, E., and M. W. Bauer. 2018. “Domestic Resistance against EU Policy Implementation: Member States Motives to Take the Commission to Court.” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
  • McCrudden, Cristoph. 2007. Buying Social Justice: Equality, Government Procurement, and Legal Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pollack, M. 2013. “The New EU Legal History: What’s New, What’s Missing?” Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 09.
  • Radaelli, C. M. 2003. “The Europeanization of Public Policy.” In The Politics of Europeanization, edited by K. Featherstone and C. M. Radealli, 27–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Richardson, G., and M. Sunkin. 1996. “Judicial Review: Questions of Impact.” Public Law 79–103.
  • Sack, D. 2012. “Europeanization through Law, Compliance, and Party Differences – The CJEU’s ‘Rüffert’ Judgement (C-346/06) and Amendments to Public Procurement Laws in German Federal States.” Journal of European Integration 34 (3): 241–260. doi:10.1080/07036337.2011.584344.
  • Sánchez-Graells, A. 2015. “CJEU Clarifies and Minimises Rüffert, and Expands Scope for Minimum Wage Requirements in Public Procurement (C-115/14).” How to crack a nut - A Blog on EU Economic Law. November 17. http://howtocrackanut.blogspot.de/2015/11/cjeu-clarifies-and-minimises-ruffert.html.
  • Stolleis, M. 1992. Geschichte Des Öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland: Zweiter Band Staatsrechtslehre Und Verwaltungswissenschaft 1800–1914 [The History of Public Law in Germany: Volume 2 Constitutional Law and Administrative Science 1800–1914]. Munich: C.H. Beck.
  • Stone Sweet, A. 2010. “The European Court of Justice and the Judicialization of EU Governance.” Living Reviews in European Governance 5 (2).
  • Waegenbaur, B. 2013. Court of Justice of the EU – Commentary on Statute and Rules of Procedure. Munich: C.H. Beck.
  • Wendel, M. 2013. “Richterliche Rechtsvergleichung Als Dialogform: Die Integrationsrechtsprechung Nationaler Verfassungsgerichte in Gemeineuropäischer Perspektive [Judicial Comparative Law as Dialogue: Integration Jurisprudence of National Constitutional Courts in a European Perspective].” Der Staat 52: 339–370.
  • Wheeler, D. A. 2011. “Methodoligical, Theoretical and Topical Challenges in Judicial Implementation and Impact Studies.” Indiana Journal of Political Science 13: 18–26.
  • Winter, S. C. 2012. “Implementation.” In Sage Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. Guy Peters and J. Pierre, 255–263. London: Sage.
  • Woods, L., and P. Watson. 2012. EU Law. 11th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zedekia, S. 2017. “Street Level Bureaucrats as the Ultimate Policy Makers.” Journal of Political Sciences and Public Affairs 5 (4): 1–6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.