EU public procurement policy: the economic crisis as trigger for enhanced harmonisation

References

• Arrowsmith, S. 2005. The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement. 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Arrowsmith, S. 2011. “EU Public Procurement Law: An Introduction.” edited by. In The EU Asia Inter University Network for Teaching and Research in Public Procurement Regulation, 1–338. EuropeAid Conference Office, University of Nottingham. Accessed 12 December 2018. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pprg/documentsarchive/asialinkmaterials/eupublicprocurementlawintroduction.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instabilities in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C. J., D. Hodson, and U. Puetter. 2015. “The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era.” Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (4): 703–722. doi:10.1111/jcms.12212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovis, C. H. 2012. “EU Public Procurement Law.” 2nd ed. Elgar European Law Series. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/eu-public-procurement-law
   Google Scholar
• Bovis, C. H. 2013. “The Challenges of Public Procurement Reform in the Single Market of the European Union.” ERA Forum 14: 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bovis, C. H. 2016. Research Handbook on EU Public Procurement Law. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G. 2009. “Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice 11 (1): 7–31. doi:10.1080/13876980802648284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caranta, R., and D. Dragos. 2012. Outside the EU Procurement Directives - inside the Treaty? European Procurement Law. Copenhagen: Djoef.
   Google Scholar
• Citi, M. 2013. “EU Budgetary Dynamics: Incremental or Punctuated Equilibrium?” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (8): 1157–1173. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.760333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission, European. 2018. “Public Procurement, Thresholds.” Accessed 13 December 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/public-procurement/rules-implementation/thresholds_en
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., and S. James. 2014. “Policy Windows, Ambiguity and Commission Entrepreneurship: Explaining the Relaunch of the European Union’s Economic Reform Agenda.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.800789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daigneault, P. M. 2014. “Reassessing the Concept of Policy Paradigm: Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Policy Studies.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (3): 453–469. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.834071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeg, R. 2005. “Change from Within: German and Italian Finance in the 1990s.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by W. Streeck and K. Thelen, 169–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1991. “Introduction.” In The New Institionalism In Organizational Analysis, edited by P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell, 1–38. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Public Procurement: Commission Recognises Need for Accelerated Procurement Procedure. In Its Conclusions of 12 December the European Council Invited the Commission to Adopt a Number of Measures in Response to the Financial Crisis, IP/08/2040, Brussels, 19 December 2008. Accessed 13 September 2019. https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-08-2040_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009b. “Debates, Tuesday, 10 March 2009-strasbourg, 9. explanations of vote, oral explanations of vote, report: edit Herczog (A6-0074/2009).” Accessed 16 April 2017. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=CRE&reference=20090310&secondRef=ITEM-009&language=EN&ring=A6-2009-0074#2-199
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. EUROPE 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, Brussels, 3.3.2010, COM(2010) 2020 Final. Brussels: European Commission, Communication from the Commission
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. “Debates, Wednesday, 11 May 2011-strasbourg, 12. Small business act review (debate).” Accessed 16 April 2017. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=CRE&reference=20110511&secondRef=ITEM-012&language=EN&ring=B7-2011-0286
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011a. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Procurement by Entities Operating in the Water, Energy, Transport and Postal Services Sectors. Brussels: European Commission. Accessed 20 December 2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011b. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Public Procurement, Brussels, 20.12.2011, COM(2011) 896 Final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011c. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Award of Concession Contracts, Brussels, 20.12.2011, COM/2011/0897 Final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011d. Green Paper on the Modernisation of EU Public Procurement Policy. Towards a More Efficient European Procurement Market, Brussels, 27.1.2011, COM(2011) 15 Final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014a. Memo 14/19, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Award of Concession Contratcs-Frequently Askes Questions, Brussels 15. 1.2017. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014b. Memo 14/20, Revision of Public Procurement Directives-Frequently Asked Questions, Brussels 15. 1.2014. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. Public Procurement Action Plan, Ref. Ares(2015)5549963-03/12/2015. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016a. “Growth. Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship, SMEs. Public Procurement.” Accessed 12 December 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/public-procurement_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016b. “Growth. Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Public Procurement Strategy.” Accessed 12 December 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/public-procurement/strategy_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016c. Public Procurement Reform Fact Sheet No.8: Social Aspects of the New Rules, Ref. Ares(2016)883527-19/02/2016. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016d. Public Procurement Reform Factsheet No.2: Simplifying the Rules for Bidders, Ref. Ares(2016)783942-15/02/2016. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016e. Public Procurement Reform Factsheet No.4: E-procurement, Ref. Ares(2016)789950-15/02/2016. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016f. Public Procurement Reform Factsheet No.5: Public-Public Cooperation, Ref. Ares(2016)840757-17/02/2016. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016g. Public Procurement Reform Factsheet No.7: Green Public Procurement, Ref. Ares(2016)861004-18/02/2016. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016h. Public Procurement Reform Factsheet No.9: Innovation, Ref. Ares(2016)883905-19/02/2016. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016i. Public Procurement Reform, Fact Sheet No 1: General Overview Ref. Ares(2016)782979-15/02/2016. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. “Single Market Scoreboard.” Performance per Policy Area, Public Procurement (reporting Period: 01/2017-12/2017). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2009a. “Debates, Monday, 9 March 2009-strasbourg, 18. Statute for a European Private company-Cross-borders Transfers of Companies’ Registered Offices - Small Business Act - Workers’ Participation in Companies with a European Statute (debate).” Accessed 15 April 2017. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=CRE&reference=20090309&secondRef=ITEM-018&language=EN&ring=A6-2009-0074
   Google Scholar
• European Public Service Union (EPSU). 2016. The New EU Directives on Public Procurement: A Step Forward for Green and Social Public Procurement. EPSU Article by Penny Clarke and Christine Jakob, December 7. Brussels: European Public Service Union. Accessed 13 September 2019. https://www.epsu.org/sites/default/files/article/files/new%20Public%20Procurement%20Directives%20Dec2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. 2016. “The EU’s Current Crisis and Its Policy Effects: Research Design and Comparative Findings”, In: Special Issue: “EU Policies in Times of Crisis. Mechanisms of Change and Varieties of Outcomes”, Edited by Gerda Falkner.” Journal of European Integration 38 (3): 219–235. doi:10.1080/07036337.2016.1140154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. 2017. EU Policies in Times of Crisis. Ashgate: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. 2014. “Protectionism Rising as Growth Slows. Watchdog Warns of ‘global Trade Disorder’, Shawn Donnan,” Financial Times, November 12. Accessed 9 December 2016. https://www.ft.com/content/4ee2d69a-6aa3-11e4-bfb4-00144feabdc0
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., J. Edler, E. Uyarra, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Policy Instruments for Public Procurement of Innovation: Choice, Design and Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86 (no issue number): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.018.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, H., S. Rimmer, and S. Arrowsmith. 1998. “The Economic Impact of the European Union Regime on Public Procurement: Lessons for the WTO.” The World Economy 21 (2): 159–187. doi:10.1111/1467-9701.00125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greener, I. 2002. “Understanding Nhs Reform: The Policy-transfer, Social Learning and Path-dependency Perspectives.” Governance 15 (2): 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296. doi:10.2307/422246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and B. Cashore. 2009. “The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1080/13876980802648144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kudrna, Z. 2016. “Financial Market Regulation: Crisis-induced Supranationalization.” Journal of European Integration 38 (3): 251–264. doi:10.1080/07036337.2016.1140153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, B., and P. Schlosser. 2016. “Public Finances in Europe: Fortifying EU Economic Governance in the Shadow of the Crisis.” Journal of European Integration 28 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1080/07036337.2016.1140158.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V., R. Kattel, and T. Kalvet. 2014. Public Procurement, Innovation and Policy. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. 1959. “The Science of “Muddling Through”.” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power, edited by J. Mahoney and K. Thelen, 1–27. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 2014. “Policy Harmonization: Limits and Alternatives.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 16 (1): 4–21. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.873191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbelt, M. 2016. “Protectionism on the Rise? Modernization of EU Public Procurement Rules during the Economic Crisis.” In EU Economic Law in a Time of Crisis, edited by H. Kalimo and M. S. Jansson, 57–75. Cheltenhem: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1991. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs and Local Development.The Impact of the Global Crisis on SME and Entrepreneurship Financing and Policy Responses Centre, Contribution to the OECD Strategic Response to the Financial and Economic Crisis. Paris: OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs and Local Development. Accessed 13 September 2019. https://www.oecd.org/industry/smes/43183090.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pempel, T. J. 1998. “Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy.” 1st ed. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 1996. “The Path to European Integration: A Historical‐Institutionalist Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 123–163. doi:10.1177/0010414096029002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267. doi:10.2307/2586011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politico, C. R. 2016. Corruption Costs Eu ‘up to €990 Billion a Year’. Accessed 19 February 2017 http://www.politico.eu/article/corruption-costs-eu-990-billion-year-rand-study-fraud-funding/
   Google Scholar
• Quack, S., and M.-L. Djelic. 2005. “Adaptation, Recombination, and Reinforcement: The Story of Antitrustand Competition Law in Germany and Europe.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by W. Streeck and K. Thelen, 255–281. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfstam, M. 2013. Public Procurement and Innovation. The Role of Institutions. Cheltenhem: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., and F. Terpan. 2015. “Do Crises Lead to Policy Change? the Multiple Streams Framework and the European Union’s Economic Governance Instruments.” Policy Sciences 49 (1): 35–53. doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9239-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schickler, E. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semple, A. 2015. A Practical Guide to Public Procurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., and K. Thelen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by W. Streeck and K. Thelen, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 2003. “How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative-Historical Analysis.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, 208–240. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treumer, S. 2011. “Enforcement of the EU Public Procurement Rules.” In Enforcement of the EU Public Procurement Rules, edited by S. Treumer and F. Lichère, 17–52. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, C. 1972. “Public Contracts in the ECC.” Common Market Law Review 9 (4): 411–424.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. 2015. “A Historical Institutionalist Explanation of the EU’s Responses to the Euro Area Financial Crisis.” Journal of Europen Public Policy 22 (2): 219–237. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.994023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weishaar, S. E. 2016. “Striking an Uneasy Balance between Competition and Market Integration: The Case of EU Public Procurement.” In Market Integration: The EU Experience and Implications for Regulatory Reform in China, edited by N. Philipsen, E. W. Stefan, and X. Guangdong, 97–121. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization. 2017. “Agreement on government procurement.” Accessed 27 January 2017. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/gp_gpa_e.htm
   Google Scholar