Promoting the regulatory or the redistributive state? The politicisation of core state power integration in the German Bundestag, 1978-2019

References

• Aspinwall, M. 2002. “Preferring Europe: Ideology and National Preferences on European Integration.” European Union Politics 3 (1): 81–111. doi:10.1177/1465116502003001005.
   Google Scholar
• Auel, K. 2007. “Democratic Accountability and National Parliaments: Redefining the Impact of Parliamentary Scrutiny in EU Affairs.” European Law Journal 13 (4): 487–504. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00380.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auel, K., O. Rozenberg, and A. Tacea. 2015. “To Scrutinise or Not to Scrutinise? Explaining Variation in EU-Related Activities in National Parliaments.” West European Politics 38 (2): 282–304. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.990695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R., C. De Vries, E. Edwards, L. Hooghe, S. Jolly, G. Marks, J. Polk, J. Rovny, M. Steenbergen, and M. A. Vachudova. 2015. “Measuring Party Positions in Europe the Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010.” Party Politics 21 (1): 143–152. doi:10.1177/1354068812462931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannas, G. (2012, June 27). Merkel Gegen Eurobonds: Mit Vollem Einsatz. Faz.net. https://www.faz.net/1.1800805
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. & M. Weiss. 2021. “Power without a cause? Germany’s conflict avoidance and the integration of European defence procurement.„ Journal of European Integration 43 (2). doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.1877691
   Google Scholar
• Bunde, T. 2021. “Defending European Integration by (Symbolically) Integrating European Defence? Germany and Its Ambivalent Role in European Security and Defence Policy.„ Journal of European Integration 43 (2). doi: 10.1080/07036337.2021.1877693
   Google Scholar
• Calliess, C., and T. Beichelt. 2013. Auf Dem Weg Zum Europäisierten Bundestag: Vom Zuschauer Zum Akteur?, 54. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E. 2007. “Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale?: How European Integration Affects National Elections.” European Union Politics 8 (3): 363-385.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E. 2018. Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E., and S. B. Hobolt. 2012. “When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 246–268. doi:10.1177/1465116511434788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P. 2011. “No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration.” Journal of European Integration 33 (5): 559–575. doi:10.1080/07036337.2010.546849.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., and M. Zürn. 2012. “Can the Politicization of European Integration Be Reversed?” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (s1): 137–153. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02232.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudlsperger, C. & M. Jachtenfuchs. 2021. “A member state like any other? Germany and the European integration of core state powers.” Journal of European Integration 43(2). doi: 10.1080/07036337.2021.1877695
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., and M. Jachtenfuchs, Eds.. 2014. Beyond the Regulatory Polity?: The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., and M. Jachtenfuchs. 2016. “More Integration, Less Federation: The European Integration of Core State Powers.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (1): 42–59. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1055782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, J. 2008. “Partisan Responses to Europe: The Role of Ideology for National Political Parties’ Positions on European Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 15 (2): 189–207. doi:10.1080/13501760701817690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höhlscheidt, S. 2001. “The German Bundestag: From Benevolent ‘Weakness’ Towards Supportive Scrutiny.” In National Parliaments on Their Ways to Europe: Losers or Latecomers?, edited by A. Maurer and W. Wessels, 117–146. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and C. J. Wilson. 2002. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 965–989. doi:10.1177/001041402236310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., T. Lenz, and G. Marks. 2019. A Theory of International Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. & J. Schild. 2021. “Nein to ‘Transfer Union’: The German Brake to the Construction of a European Union Fiscal Capacity.„ Journal of European Integration 43 (2). doi: 10.1080/07036337.2021.1877690
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J., Ed.. 1997. Tamed Power: Germany in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• König., F. & F. Trauner. 2021. “From Trevi to Europol: Germany’s role in the integration of EU police cooperation.„ Journal of European Integration 43 (2). doi: 10.1080/07036337.2021.1877694
   Google Scholar
• König, T. 2018. “Still the Century of Intergovernmentalism? Partisan Ideology, Two-level Bargains and Technocratic Governance in the post-Maastricht Era.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (6): 1240–1262. doi:10.1111/jcms.12738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 1994. “The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe.” West European Politics 17 (3): 77–101. doi:10.1080/01402389408425031.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, C. 2016. “Dimensionality, Ideology and Party Positions Towards European Integration.” West European Politics 39 (4): 731–754. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1116199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, C., and P. de Wilde. 2018. “The Opposition Deficit in EU Accountability: Evidence from over 20 Years of Plenary Debate in Four Member States.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (1): 194–216. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, T. 2011. “The Gatekeepers of European Integration? the Functions of National Parliaments in the EU Political System.” Journal of European Integration 33 (3): 303–321. doi:10.1080/07036337.2010.546848.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T., and S. Hix. 2000. “Backbenchers Learn to Fight Back: European Integration and Parliamentary Government.” West European Politics 23 (4): 142–168. doi:10.1080/01402380008425404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, L. 1999. “Measuring Party Orientations Towards European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey. Research Note.” European Journal of Political Research 36 (2): 283–306. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzio, W. 2015. Das Politische System Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeller, M. G. 2017. “Providing Political Leadership? Three Case Studies on Germany’s Ambiguous Role in the Eurozone Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1146325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeller, M. G. & O. Karlsson. 2021. “Championing the ‘German Model’? Germany’s Consistent Preferences on the Integration of Fiscal Constraints.„ Journal of European Integration 43 (2). doi: 10.1080/07036337.2021.1877697
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Eijk, C., and M. N. Franklin. 2004. “Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe.” In European Integration and Political Conflict, edited by G. Marks and M. R. Steenbergen, 32–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendler, F. 2014. “End of Consensus? the European Leadership Discourse of the Second Merkel Government during the Eurozone Crisis and Its Contestation in Debates of the Bundestag (2009−13).” German Politics 23 (4): 446–459. doi:10.1080/09644008.2014.967225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. 2012. “National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-national and Longitudinal Comparison.” West European Politics 35 (3): 657–672. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.665745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T., R. de Ruiter, and J. Rocabert. 2018. “Is Parliamentary Attention to the EU Strongest When It Is Needed the Most? National Parliaments and the Selective Debate of EU Policies.” European Union Politics 19 (3): 481–501. doi:10.1177/1465116518763281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonka, A. 2016. “The Party Politics of the Euro Crisis in the German Bundestag: Frames, Positions and Salience.” West European Politics 39 (1): 125–144. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1081512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaun, N. & A. Ripoll Servent. 2021. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Ambiguous Role of Germany in EU Asylum Policies.„ Journal of European Integration 43 (2). doi: 10.1080/07036337.2021.1877692
   Google Scholar