Championing the ‘German model’? Germany’s consistent preferences on the integration of fiscal constraints

References

• Bremer, B., P. Genschel, and M. Jachtenfuchs. 2020. “Juncker’s Curse? Identity, Interest, and Public Support for the Integration of Core State Powers.” Journal of Common Market Studies 58 (1): 56–75. doi:10.1111/jcms.12980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S. 2014. “Germany and the Eurozone Crisis: Between Hegemony and Domestic Politics.” West European Politics 37 (6): 1244–1263. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.929333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S., and W. E. Paterson. 2019. Germany and the European Union: Europe’s Reluctant Hegemon?. London: Palgrave Macmillan/Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium der Finanzen. 2020a. “Wir werden die Wirtschaft nicht hängen lassen.” https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Interviews/2020/2020-03-17-Handelsblatt-Corona.html
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium der Finanzen. 2020b. “Eine solidarische Antwort auf die Corona-Krise in Europa.” https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Reden/2020/2020-04-06-Maas-Scholz.html
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium der Finanzen. 2020c. “Monatsbericht: Juli 2020.” https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Monatsberichte/2020/07/monatsbericht-07-2020.html?nn=f26a2c4d-5da4-4fd4-b50e-19774ff177c2.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. 2006. “Reforming the Stability and Growth Pact: Size and Influence in EMU Policymaking.” Journal of European Integration 28 (1): 107–120. doi:10.1080/07036330500480664.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M. 2016. Economic and Monetary Union. London: Palgrave/Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Degner, H., and D. Leuffen. 2019. “Crises and Responsiveness: Analysing German Preference Formation during the Eurozone Crisis.” Political Studies Review. doi:10.1177/1478929919864902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, S. 2018. Power Politics, Banking Union and EMU: Adjusting Europe to Germany. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, K., and K. Featherstone. 1999. The Road To Maastricht. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2000. “Flash Eurobarometer 76: ‘Euro Introduction Attitudes (Step 1)’.” http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/flash_arch_079_060_en.htm#76.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2002. “Flash Eurobarometer 121/4: ‘Euro Attitudes – Eurozone’.” http://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S41_121_4.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. “Flash Eurobarometer 153: The Euro, Two Years Later.” http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/flash_arch_173_153_en.htm#153.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. “Standard Eurobarometer 93: The EU and the Coronavirus Outbreak.” http://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2262_93_1_93_1_ENG.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2011. “Special Eurobarometer 76.1: ‘Crisis’.” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/be-heard/eurobarometer/europeans-and-the-crisis-iv.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2020. “Uncertainty/EU/hope: Public Opinion in Times of Covid 19.” https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/620396
   Google Scholar
• Freudlsperger, C., and M. Jachtenfuchs. 2021. “A member state like any other? Germany and the European integration of core state powers.”Journal of European Integration 43(2), doi: 10.1080/07036337.2021.1877695.
   Google Scholar
• Freudlsperger, C., and M. Weinrich. 2021. “Promoting the regulatory or the redistributive state? The politicisation of core state power integration in the German Bundestag, 1978–2019.” Journal of European Integration 43(2), doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.1877696.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, J. 1999. “Actors and Preferences in International Relations.” In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by D. A. Lake and R. Powell, 39–72, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., and M. Jachtenfuchs, Eds. 2014. Beyond the Regulatory Polity? the European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., and M. Jachtenfuchs. 2016. “More Integration, Less Federation: The European Integration of Core State Powers.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (1): 42–59. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1055782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, D., and F. Roth 2011. “Do Germans Support the Euro?.“ (Working Paper No. 359). Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, G. 1996. “Die EWS-Turbulenzen 1992, 1993 und die Perspektiven für die Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion.” In Unsere Zukunft heißt Europa: Der Weg zur Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion, edited by T. Waigel, 77–97, ECON, Düsseldorf.
   Google Scholar
• Heipertz, M., and A. Verdun. 2004. “The Dog that Would Never Bite? What We Can Learn from the Origins of the Stability and Growth Pact.” Journal of European Public Policy 11 (5): 765–780. doi:10.1080/1350176042000273522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, R., C. Horstmann, J. Knabl, D. Kruse, and S. Wiedemann 2007. “Germanizing Europe? the Evolution of the European Stability and Growth Pact.” (Working Papers on Economic Governance No. 24). Department of Economics and Political Science at Hamburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., and J. Schild. 2021. “Nein to ‘Transfer Union’: The German Brake to the Construction of a European Union Fiscal Capacity.” Journal of European Integration 43(2). doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.1877690.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., and C. Rommerskirchen. 2013. “A Panacea for All Times? the German Stability Culture as Strategic Political Resource.” West European Politics 36 (4): 750–770. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.783355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. 2020a. “Exporterwartungen—April 2020.” https://www.ifo.de/node/54903
   Google Scholar
• Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. 2020b. “Exporterwartungen—März 2020.” https://www.ifo.de/node/54039
   Google Scholar
• Interview BMF. 2015. “Senior Official.” Federal Ministry of Finance, Berlin, Germany, 23 March.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W. 2015. “Europe´s New German Problem: The Timing of Politics and the Politics of Timing.” In The Future of the Euro, edited by M. Matthijs and M. Blyth, 187–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenthaler, K. 2002. “German Interests in European Monetary Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (1): 69–87. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, H., and A. Kees. 1996. “Die Verhandlungen zur Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion.” In Unsere Zukunft heißt Europa: Der Weg zur Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion, edited by T. Waigel, 145–174, ECON, Düsseldorf.
   Google Scholar
• Koos, S., and D. Leuffen. 2020. “Betten oder Bonds? Konditionale Solidarität in der Corona-Krise.“ (Policy Paper No. 1). Universität Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Lehner, T., and F. Wasserfallen. 2019. “Political Conflict in the Reform of the Eurozone.” European Union Politics 20 (1): 45–64. doi:10.1177/1465116518814338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M. 2016. “Powerful Rules Governing the Euro: The Perverse Logic of German Ideas.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 375–391. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M., and M. Blyth 2011. “Why Only Germany Can Fix the Euro: Reading Kindleberger in Berlin.” Foreign Affairs Snapshot. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/germany/2011-11-17/why-only-germany-can-fix-euro
   Google Scholar
• Mody, A. 2018. EuroTragedy: A Drama in Nine Acts. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nedergaard, P., and H. Snaith. 2015. “‘As I Drifted on a River I Could Not Control’: The Unintended Ordoliberal Consequences of the Eurozone Crisis.” Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (5): 1094–1109. doi:10.1111/jcms.12249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politbarometer. “Archiv - Pressemeldungen seit dem Jahr 2004.” Forschungsgruppe Wahlen. https://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Umfragen/Politbarometer/Archiv/
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, D. 2016. “A Banking Union of Ideas? the Impact of Ordoliberalism and the Vicious Circle of the EU Banking Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (4): 961–980. doi:10.1111/jcms.12351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 2018. “International Monetary Regimes and the German Model.“ (MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/1). Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Schild, J. 2020. “EMU’s Asymmetries and Asymmetries in German and French Influence on EMU Governance Reforms.” Journal of European Integration 42 (3): 449–464. doi:10.1080/07036337.2020.1730351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, P. 2019. Europe’s New Fiscal Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeller, M. G. 2019. Leadership in the Eurozone: The Role of Germany and EU Institutions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeller, M. G. 2020a. “Free Riders, Allies or Veto Players? Preferences and Strategies of Smaller Creditor States in the Euro Area.“ (EIF Working Paper 2/2020). Centre for European Integration Research, Vienna. https://eif.univie.ac.at/downloads/workingpapers/wp2020-02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schoeller, M. G. 2020b. “Germany, the Problem of Leadership, and Institution-building in EMU Reform.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 23 (3): 309–324. doi:10.1080/17487870.2018.1541410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikel, D., and A. Truger 2019. “The Blocked Completion of the European Monetary Union: Making the Case for a Pragmatic Use of Fiscal Leeway (WSI Report No. 52).” WSI - Institute for Economic and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, J. 1996. “Von der D-Mark zur gemeinsamen Europäischen Währung (aus der Sicht der Bundesregierung).” In Unsere Zukunft heißt Europa: Der Weg zur Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion, edited by T. Waigel, 278–294, ECON, Düsseldorf.
   Google Scholar
• Waigel, T. 1996. “Vom Finanzpolitischen Alltag zur europäischen Vision.” In Unsere Zukunft heißt Europa: Der Weg zur Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion, edited by T. Waigel, 9–29, ECON, Düsseldorf.
   Google Scholar
• Waigel, T. 2019. Ehrlichkeit ist eine Währung: Erinnerungen. Econ, Ullstein Buchverlage, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Zaun, N. and A. Ripoll Servent. 2021. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Ambiguous Role of Germany in EU Asylum Policies.” Journal of European Integration 43(2), doi:10.1080/07036337.2021.1877692.
   Google Scholar