Digital Single Market and the EU Competition Regime: An Explanation of Policy Change

References

• ALTER-EU (2020) Open Letter to Vestager and Breton: Aggressive Lobbying by Digital Platforms Must Have Consequences. Available at15 May 2021. https://www.alter-eu.org/open-letter-to-vestager-and-breton-aggressive-lobbying-by-digital-platforms-must-have-consequences.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., and M. Mariniello (2021) ‘Regulating Big Tech: The Digital Markets Act’. Blog post. Bruegel.org, 16 February. Available at 2 April 2021. https://www.bruegel.org/2021/02/regulating-big-tech-the-digital-markets-act/
   Google Scholar
• Apple (2021) ‘Apple Initial Comments on the Proposed Digital Markets Act’. Submitted to the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment of the Irish government. January. Available at6 July 2021. https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/Consultations/Call-for-views-Digital-Services-Act-Digital-Markets-Act-proposals.html.
   Google Scholar
• Barshefsky, C (2020), EU Digital Protectionism Risks Damaging Ties with the US, Financial Times, 2 August.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• BEUC (2019), ‘The Role of Competition Policy in Protecting Consumers’ Well-being in the Digital Age’. Available at 15 May 2021. https://www.beuc.eu/publications/role-competition-policy-protecting-consumers%E2%80%99-well-being-digital-era
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, M. 2019. “Historical Institutionalism and Technological Change: The Case of Uber.” Business and Politics 23 (1): 67–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2019.23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEO (2020), Big Tech Brings Out the Big Guns in Fight for Future of EU Tech Regulation. 11 December. Available at 16 May 2021. https://corporateeurope.org/en/2020/12/big-tech-brings-out-big-guns-fight-future-eu-tech-regulation
   Google Scholar
• Cini, M., and L. McGowan. 2009. Competition Policy in the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, L. (2021) Why the EU’s New Tech Legislation Could Become the Most Lobbied in History. New Statesman. [Accessed 13 June 2021]. Available at: https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/2021/02/why-eus-new-tech-legislation-could-become-most-lobbied-history
   Google Scholar
• CNMC (2020), ‘CNMC Position Paper for the Public Consultation on the Digital Services Act and a New Competition Tool’. Available at 3 July 2021. https://www.cnmc.es/sites/default/files/editor_contenidos/Notas%20de%20prensa/2020/CNMC%20position%20paper%20on%20DSA%20and%20NCT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. 2009. “Business Lobbying in the European Union.” In Lobbying in the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issues, edited by D. Coen and J. Richardson, 145–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crémer, J., Y.-A. de Montjoye, and H. Schweitzer (2019) ‘Competition Policy for the Digital Era’, Final Report, Brussels: European Commission, Available at 19 March 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0419345enn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Streel, A., B. Liebhaberg, A. Fletcher, R. Feasey, J. Krämer, and G. Monti (2021) ‘The European Proposal for A Digital Markets Act: A First Assessment’. Centre on Regulation in Europe, 19 January. Available at 15 July 2021. https://cerre.eu/publications/the-european-proposal-for-a-digital-markets-act-a-first-assessment/
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and D. de Bièvre. 2007. “Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy.” Journal of Public Policy 27 (1): 79–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X0700061X.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2016. Insiders and Outsiders. Interest Group Politics in Multilevel Europe. Oxford: Oxfor University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza, J. (2020), ‘EU Has Been Too Slow to Tame Big Tech, Says Bloc’s Auditor’ Financial Times, Available at 15 March 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/abb8ebe1-99e1-4547-8c42-df265bf5125c
   Google Scholar
• Espinoza, J. (2021), Brussels Faces Test of Its Will to Tackle Big Tech’, Financial Times, 4 August.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017), Commission Decision of 27. 6.2017. Proceedings under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (AT.39740- - Google (Search Shopping)), C(2017) 4444 final, (Brussels: European Commission).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018) Shaping Competition Policy in the Era of Digitisation (Information on the Conference). Available at 15 March 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/information/digitisation_2018/conference_en.html
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2019) DG Competition Conference ‘Shaping Competition Policy in the Era of Digitisation’. Available at 15 March 2021https://ec.europa.eu/competition/information/digitisation_2018/conference_en.html
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020a) ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Contestable and Fair Markets in the Digital Sector (Digital Markets Act)’. Brussels, COM(2020) 842 final. Available at 16 March 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0842&from=en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020b), ‘Statement by the Executive Vice-President Vestager on the Commission Proposal on New Rules for Digital Platforms’, European Commission – Statement, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020c), ‘Factual Summary of the Contributions Received in the Context of the Open Public Consultation on the New Competition Tool. Available at 12 May 2021.’ https://ec.europa.eu/competition-policy/system/files/2021-03/summary_stakeholder_consultation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021a) Shaping Europe’s Digital Future’, Available at 10 May 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/shaping-europe-digital-future_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021b) ‘Platform-to-business Trading Practices’, Available at 15 May 2021https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/platform-business-trading-practices
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021c), ‘Shaping the Digital Single Market’, Available at 15 May 2021https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/shaping-digital-single-market.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021d) ‘EU Observatory on the Online Platform Economy.’ Available at 15 May 2021https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eu-observatory-online-platform-economy
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021e) ‘European Commission’s Priorities’, Available at 16 May 2021https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021f) ‘The Digital Compass’ https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-compass
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021g) ‘Impact Assessment of the Digital Markets Act’. Available at 16 May 2021. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/impact-assessment-digital-markets-act
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021h) ‘Europe Fit for the Digital Age: New Online Rules for Users’ Available at 17 May 2021https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-services-act-ensuring-safe-and-accountable-online-environment/europe-fit-digital-age-new-online-rules-users_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021i) ‘Digital Markets Act. Ensuring Fair and Open Digital Markets’. Available at 17 May 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-markets-act-ensuring-fair-and-open-digital-markets_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021j) ‘Shaping Competition Policy in the Era of Digitisation: Contributions Received in Reply to the Call for Contributions Launched on 6 July 2018ʹ, Available at 12 June 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/competition/scp19/media_en.html#Contributions
   Google Scholar
• Facebook (2021) ‘Preliminary Comments on the EU Digital Markets Act’. Submitted to the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment of the Irish government. January. Available at 9 July 2021. https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/Consultations/Call-for-views-Digital-Services-Act-Digital-Markets-Act-proposals.html.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. 2007. Business Power and Conflict in International Environment Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Geradin, D. (2018), ‘What Should EU Competition Policy Do to Address the Concerns Raised by the Digital Platforms’ Market Power?’ TILEC Discussion Paper, No. 2018-041, Available at 22 May 2021. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3299910
   Google Scholar
• Google (2021) ‘Google Response to the DETE Consultations on DSA & DMA’. Submitted to the Department of Enterprise, Trade and Employment of the Irish government. January. Available at 9 July 2021. https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/Consultations/Call-for-views-Digital-Services-Act-Digital-Markets-Act-proposals.html.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland (2020), ‘The Irish Position on the EU Commission’s Proposed Digital Services Act Package – Submission to the Public Consultation’, Available at 10 July 2021. https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/Publications/Publication-files/National-submission-to-EU-consultation-on-DSA-package.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, M. (2020a) Google Increases Lobbying against EU Digital Services Act. Short Term Rentalz. (Accessed 7 April 2021). Available at https://shorttermrentalz.com/news/google-lobbying-digital-services/
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, M. (2020b) Airbnb Responds to Upcoming EU Digital Services Act. Short Term Rentalz, 18 September (Accessed 7 April 2021). Available at https://shorttermrentalz.com/news/airbnb-responds-digital-services/
   Google Scholar
• Kelion, L. (2020) ‘EU Reveals Plan to Regulate Big Tech’. BBC News, 15 December. Available at 25 March 2021. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-55318225
   Google Scholar
• Kergueno, R. (2018) It’s Always Sunny in Silicon Valley: How Big Tech Dominates Digital Lobbying. Transparency International. (Accessed 8 April 2021). Available at https://transparency.eu/sunny-silicon-vallley/
   Google Scholar
• Laitenberger, J. (2019a) ‘Closing Remarks at the ‘Shaping Competition Policy in the Era of Digitisation’ conference, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Laitenberger, J. (2019b), ‘Competition Enforcement in Digital Markets: Using Our Tools Well and a Look at the Future’, Speech, 14th Annual Conference of the GCLC “Remedies in EU Competition Law: Substance, Process and Policy”, Brussels, 31 January.
   Google Scholar
• Lübbig, T. J., Aitken, S. Jensen, and J. Goyder (2020), ‘The EU’s (Proposed) New Competition Tool - a Paradigm Shift Towards More Intervention in Digital Markets and Possibly Beyond’, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer blog. Available at 20 July 2021. https://technologyquotient.freshfields.com/post/102g8y2/the-eus-proposed-new-competition-tool-a-paradigm-shift-towards-more-interven
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen, eds. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambrid University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Competition Authorities (2020), ‘Digital Platforms and the Potential Changes to Competition Law at the European Level: The View of the Nordic Competition Authorities’. Available at 20 July 2021. https://www.kfst.dk/media/ockjqz0b/digital-platforms-and-the-potential-changes-to-competition-law.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2018), ‘Rethinking Antitrust Rules in Multisided Platforms’. Available at 19 July 2021. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/Rethinking-antitrust-tools-for-multi-sided-platforms-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, L. (2021) Transparency International EU Report on Big Tech Lobbying in Brussels Reveals Higher Spending and Inadequate Rules. Transparency International EU. Available at 25 May 2021. https://transparency.eu/deep-pockets-open-doors/
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C M. 1999. “The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise?” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (5): 757–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., and H. C. Jenkins-Smith, ed. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Satariano, A., and M. Stevis-Gridneff (2020). ‘Big Tech Turns Its Lobbyists Loose on Europe, Alarming Regulators’ The New York Times, 14 December. Available at 3 July 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/14/technology/big-tech-lobbying-europe.html
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., and L. Kayali (2020) Big Guns and Zoom Cliques: Inside Silicon Valley’s Digital Lobbying Playbook. Politico. Available at 3 July 2021. https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-digital-lobbying-platforms/
   Google Scholar
• Stolton, S. (2020) ‘Digital Brief, Powered by Google: DSA and DMA – Member States Respond’. Euractiv. Available at 15 May 2021. https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/digital-brief-powered-by-google-dsa-and-dma-member-states-respond/
   Google Scholar
• Tirole, J. (2019), ‘Competition in the Digital Age’ Keynote Speech, ‘Shaping Competition Politics in the Era of Digitisation’ Conference, Brussels, 17 January.
   Google Scholar
• Vaitilingam, R. (2020), ‘How Leading Economists View Antitrust in the Digital Economy’ LSE blog. Available at 10 July 2021. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2020/11/18/how-leading-economists-view-antitrust-in-the-digital-economy/
   Google Scholar
• Vestager, M. (2016), ‘Competition and the Digital Single Market’ Speech to the Forum for EU-US Legal-Economic Affairs, Paris, 15 September.
   Google Scholar
• Vestager, M. (2018) ‘Fair Markets in a Digital World’ Speech to the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority, Copenhagen, 9 March.
   Google Scholar
• Zeilinger, B. 2021. “The European Commission as a Policy Entrepreneur under the European Semester.” Politics and Governance 9 (3): 63–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar