Discursive postfunctionalism: theorizing the interface between EU politicization and policy-making

References

• Anders, Lisa H. 2021. “Dissensus, Deadlock, and Disintegration? Examining the Effects of EU Politicisation.” In Rethinking Politicisation in Politics, Sociology and International Relations, edited by Claudia Wiesner, 175–200. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin, and Tapio Raunio. 2014. “Connecting with the Electorate? Parliamentary Communication in EU Affairs.” Journal of Legislative Studies Special Issue 20 (1): 1. doi:10.1080/13572334.2013.871481.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, Felin, Nina Guérin, Stefan Jagdhuber, Berthold Rittberger, and Moritz Weiss. 2019. “Political (Non-)reform in the Euro Crisis and the Refugee Crisis: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Explanation.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (2): 246–266. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1408670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, Yelter, Marjolein Derous, Ferdi De Ville, Niels Gheyle, Jan Orbie, and Lore Van Den Putte. 2015. “Belgium’s Role in EU Trade Policy.” Studia Diplomatica 68 (2): 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja A., and Thomas Risse. 2018. “From the Euro to the Schengen Crises: European Integration Theories, Politicization, and Identity Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 83–108. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1310281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, Marcus, Tom Burns, and Dolores Calvo, eds. 2009. Paradigms in Public Policy: Theory and Practice of Paradigm Shifts in the EU. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Crespy, Amandine. 2015. “Analysing European Discourses.” In Research Methods in European Union Studies, edited by Kennet Lynggaard, Ian Manners, and Karl Löfgren, 102–120. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Daviter, Falk. 2011. Policy Framing in the European Union. Basingstoke [u.a.]: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, Ferdi, and Gabriel Siles-Brügge. 2016. TTIP: The Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, Pieter, Anna Leupold, and Henning Schmidtke. 2016. “Introduction: The Differentiated Politicisation of European Governance.” West European Politics 39 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament Research Service. 2017. ‘The Role of National Parliaments in the EU after Lisbon. Brussels: Potentialities and Challenges’, European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/583126/IPOL_STU(2017)583126_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gattermann, Katjana, and Claudia Hefftler. 2015. “Beyond Institutional Capacity: Political Motivation and Parliamentary Behavior in the Early Warning System.” West European Politics 38 (2): 305–334. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.990696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grande, Edgar, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2016. “Conclusions: The Postfunctionalists Were (Almost) Right.” In Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics, edited by Swen Hutter, Edgar Grande, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 279–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon, and Stefano Bartolini. 2006. Politics: The Right or the Wrong Sort of Medicine for the EU? Paris: Notre Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, Dermot, and Uwe Puetter. 2019. “The European Union in Disequilibrium: New Intergovernmentalism, Postfunctionalism and Integration Theory in the Post-Maastricht Period.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1153–1171. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1569712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Tobias Lenz, and Gary Marks. 2019. A Theory of International Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2006. “The Neo-Functionalists Were (Almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration.” In The Diversity of Democracy: Corporatism, Social Order and Political Conflict, edited by Colin Crouch and Wolfgang Streeck, 205–222, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2012. ”Politicization”. In The Oxford Handbook of the European Union, edited by Erik Jones, Anand Menon, and Stephen Weatherill, 841-853 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2018. “Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 109–135. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2019. “Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-first Century.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1113–1133. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, Kurt, Anne-Sophie Deman, and Tugce Balik. 2017. “EU and Trade Policy-Making: The Contentious Case of CETA.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 843–857. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1371708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrelmann, Achim, Anna Gora, and Andrea Wagner. 2015. “The Politicization of European Integration: More than an Elite Affair?” Political Studies 63 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurrelmann, Achim, Stephanie Kerr, Anna Gora, and Philipp Eibl. 2020. “Framing the Eurozone Crisis in National Parliaments: Is the Economic Cleavage Really Declining?” Journal of European Integration 42 (4): 489–507. doi:10.1080/07036337.2019.1658755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, and Edgar Grande. 2014. “Politicizing Europe in the National Electoral Arena: A Comparative Analysis of Five West European Countries, 1970–2010.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (5): 1002–1018. doi:10.1111/jcms.12133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, Edgar Grande, and Hanspeter Kriesi, eds. 2016. Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank, Daniel Nohrstedt, Christopher Weible, and Karin Ingold. 2017. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Overview of the Research Program.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher Weible and Paul Sabatier, 135–172. New York: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, Wolfram, and Richard McMahon. 2017. “Narrating European Integration: Transnational Actors and Stories.” National Identities 19 (2): 149–160. doi:10.1080/14608944.2016.1274722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinski, Lucy. 2021. European Representation in EU National Parliaments. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Edgar Grande. 2016. “The Euro Crisis: A Boost for the Politicisation of European Integration?” In Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics, edited by Swen Hutter, Edgar Grande, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 240–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix, Justine, and Kalypso Nicolaïdis, eds. 2010. European Stories: Intellectual Debates on Europe in National Contexts. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leupold, Anna. 2016. “A Structural Approach to Politicisation in the Euro Crisis.” West European Politics 39 (1): 84–103. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1081510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynggaard, Kennet. 2012. “Discursive Institutional Analytical Strategies.” In Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization, edited by Theofanis Exadaktylos and Claudio Radaelli, 85–104. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Magnette, Paul. 2017. CETA: Quand l’Europe déraille. Waterloo: Éditions Luc Pire.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, Kari, et al. 2019. “Critical Exchange: Rethinking Politicisation.” Contemporary Political Theory 18 (2): 248–281. DOI:10.1057/s41296-019-00326-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Yannis, and Paul Magnette. 2010. “On the Politicisation of the European Union: Lessons from Consociational National Politics.” West European Politics 33 (4): 711–729. doi:10.1080/01402381003794571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Jonathan Slapin. 2015. The Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Rebels and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio. 2011. “The Gatekeepers of European Integration? The Functions of National Parliaments in the EU Political System.” Journal of European Integration 33 (3): 303–321. doi:10.1080/07036337.2010.546848.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2014. “European Integration in the Euro Crisis: The Limits of Postfunctionalism.” Journal of European Integration 36 (3): 321–337. doi:10.1080/07036337.2014.886399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2018. “Brexit: Differentiated Disintegration in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (8): 1154–1173. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1467954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2020. “Politicisation Management in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (3): 342–361. doi:10.1080/13501763.2020.1712458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth “New Institutionalism”.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1017/S175577390999021X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2012. “Discursive Institutionalism: Scope, Dynamics, and Philosophical Underpinnings.” In The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice, edited by Frank Fischer and Herbert Gottweis, 85–113. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2015. “Discursive Institutionalism: Understanding Policy in Context‘.” In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by Frank Fischer, Douglas Torgerson, Anna Durnová, and Michael Orsini, 171–189. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien A. 2019. “Politicization in the EU: Between National Politics and EU Political Dynamics.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (7): 1018–1036. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1619189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Christina J. 2019. The Responsive Union: National Elections and European Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. 2017. “Transatlantic Investor Protection as a Threat to Democracy: The Potency and Limits of an Emotive Frame.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30 (5–6): 5–6, 464–488. doi:10.1080/09557571.2018.1461805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statham, Paul, and Hans-Jörg Trenz. 2013. The Politicization of Europe: Contesting the Constitution in the Mass Media. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Surel, Yves. 2009. “The Role of Cognitive and Normative Frames in Policy-Making.” In Paradigms in Public Policy: Theory and Practice of Paradigm Shifts in the EU, edited by M. Carson, T. Burns, and D. Calvo, 29–44. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ingelgom, Virginie. 2014. Integrating Indifference: A Comparative, Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to the Legitimacy of European Integration. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendler, Frank. 2014. “End of Consensus? The European Leadership Discourse of the Second Merkel Government during the Eurozone Crisis and Its Contestation in Debates of the Bundestag (2009–13).” German Politics 23 (4): 446–459. doi:10.1080/09644008.2014.967225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler, Frank. 2016. Debating Europe in National Parliaments. Public Justification and Political Polarization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wendler, Frank. 2017. “Parliaments as Arenas of Representation and Public Contestation: Insights from the Eurozone Crisis.” In National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis, edited by Davor Jancic, 177–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, Eric. 2017. “The Obstacles to Concluding the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and Lessons for the Future.” Global Trade and Customs Journal 12 (5): 176–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, Thomas. 2012. “National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Comparison.” West European Politics 35 (3): 657–672. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.665745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonka, Arndt. 2016. “The Party Politics of the Euro Crisis in the German Bundestag: Frames, Positions and Salience.” West European Politics 39 (1): 125–144. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1081512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelter, Bollen, Ferdi De Ville, and Niels Gheyle. 2020. “From Nada to Namur: National Parliaments’ Involvement in EU Trade Politics and the Case of Belgium.” In The Multilevel Politics of Trade, edited by Jörg Broschek and Patricia Goff, 256–278. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael. 2016. “Opening up Europe: Next Steps in Politicisation Research.” West European Politics 39 (1): 164–182. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1081513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. 2019. “Politicization Compared: At National, European, and Global Levels.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (7): 977–995. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1619188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, Michael, Martin Binder, and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt. 2012. “International Authority and Its Politicization.” International Theory 4 (1): 69–106. doi:10.1017/S1752971912000012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar