Explaining EU influence in international environmental negotiations

References

• Bäckstrand, K., and O. Elgström. 2013. “The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: From Leader to ‘Leadiator’.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (10): 1369–1386. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.781781.
   Google Scholar
• Biedenkopf, K., D. Torney, and C. Adelle. 2018. “Conclusions.” In European Union External Environmental Policy: Rules, Regulation and Governance beyond Borders, edited by C. Adelle, K. Biedenkopf, and D. Torney. Cham: Palgrave macmillan. 337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Brenton, A. 2013. “‘Great Powers’ in Climate Politics.” Climate Policy 13 (5): 541–546. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.774632.
   Google Scholar
• Cronqvist, L. 2019. “Tosmana [Version 1.61].“ Accessed 10 July 2021. https://www.tosmana.net
   Google Scholar
• Dee, M. J. 2013. “Challenging Expectations: A Study of European Union Performance in Multilateral Negotiations.” PhD Thesis. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T. 2014. “EU Actorness, Cohesiveness and Effectiveness in Environmental Affairs.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (7): 1017–1032. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.912250.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T., and F. Pipart. 2021. “Ego Vs Alter: Internal and External Perceptions of the EU’s Role in Global Environmental Negotiations.” Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (5): 1284–1302. doi:10.1111/jcms.13182.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, D., and C. Mitchell. 1995. “Flexibility in Negotiation and Mediation.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 542: 10–23. doi:10.1177/0002716295542001002.
   Google Scholar
• General Secretariat of the Council. 2019. Information Note. Fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal (Geneva, 29 April - 10 May 2019), Ninth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (Geneva, 29 April - 10 May 2019), Ninth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, (Geneva, 29 April - 10 May 2019) - Compilation of statements. Brussels: Council of the European Union
   Google Scholar
• Groen, L. 2018. “Explaining European Union Effectiveness (Goal Achievement) in the Convention on Biological Diversity: The Importance of Diplomatic Engagement.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 19 (1): 69–87. doi:10.1007/s10784-018-9424-y.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, L., and A. Niemann. 2013. “The European Union at the Copenhagen Climate Negotiations: A Case of Contested EU Actorness and Effectiveness.” International Relations 27 (3): 308–324. doi:10.1177/0047117813497302.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, J., and L. Ringius. 2001. “The EU’s Climate Leadership: Reconciling Ambition and Reality.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 1 (2): 281–299. doi:10.1023/A:1010185407521.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., V. Gravey, and C. Adelle. 2021. “EU Environmental Policy at 50: Retrospect and Prospect.” In Environmental Policy in the EU. Actors, Institutions and Processes, edited by A. Jordan and V. Gravey, 357–374, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kissack, R. 2010. Pursuing Effective Multilateralism. The European Union, International Organisations and the Politics of Decision Making. Chippenham and Eastbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., and Rüdiger K.W. Wurzel. 2017. “Environmental Leaders and Pioneers: Agents of Change?” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (7): 951–968. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1161657.
   Google Scholar
• Mello, P. A. 2021. Qualitative Comparative Analysis: An Introduction to Research Design and Application. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. 2000. “What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU–U.S. Trade Negotiations.” International Organization 54 (1): 103–135. doi:10.1162/002081800551136.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., and L. Groen. 2018. “Explaining Goal Achievement in International Negotiations: The EU and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (5): 708–727. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1291708.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., and F. Rabitz. 2014. “On the EU’s Performance and Leadership in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the Nagoya Protocol.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (1): 39–57. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.834547.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C. F., C. Karlsson, and M. Hjerpe. 2017. “Assessing the European Union’s Global Climate Change Leadership: From Copenhagen to the Paris Agreement.” Journal of European Integration 39 (2): 239–252. doi:10.1080/07036337.2016.1275608.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, D., L. Bullon-Cassis, I. Miyazawa, and K. Ripley. 2019. “Summary of the Fourth Session of the United Nations Environment Assembly: 11-15 March 2019.” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, International Institute for Sustainable Development 16 (153), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2006. “Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage.” Political Analysis 14 (3): 291–310. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj019.
   Google Scholar
• Rhinard, M., and M. Kaeding. 2006. “The International Bargaining Power of the European Union in ‘Mixed’ Competence Negotiations: The Case of the 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (5): 1023–1050. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00672.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., and G. De Meur. 2009. “Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Csqca).” In Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 33–68.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., and B. Lobe. 2009. “The Case for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Adding Leverage for Thick Cross-case Comparison.” The Sage Handbook of Case-based Methods 1: 222–242.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinson, C., L. Gerrits, R. Rutten, and T. Greckhamer. 2019. “Avoiding Common Errors in QCA: A Short Guide for New Practitioners.” COMPASSS Research Network 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, W., and L. Xie. 2018. “Can China Lead in Multilateral Environmental Negotiations? Internal Politics, Self-depiction, and China’s Contribution in Climate Change Regime and Mekong Governance.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 59 (5–6): 708–732. doi:10.1080/15387216.2019.1586557.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. E. 2010. “The European Union at the Human Rights Council: Speaking with One Voice but Having Little Influence.“ Journal of European Public Policy 17 (2): 224–241.
   Google Scholar
• Templeton, J., J. I. Allan, T. Kantai, O. Pasini, and P. P. d. Andrade. 2019. “Summary of the Meetings of the Conferences of the Parties to the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions: 29 April – 10 May 2019.” Earth Negotiations Bulletin, International Institute for Sustainable Development 15 (269): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schaik, L. 2013. EU Effectiveness and Unity in Multilateral Negotiations: More than the Sum of Its Parts? Hampshire: palgrave macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schaik, L., and S. Schunz. 2012. “Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm‐or Interest‐driven Actor?” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (1): 169–186. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02214.x.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, F. 2012. “Determinants of Bargaining Success in the Climate Change Negotiations.” Climate Policy 12 (5): 552–574. doi:10.1080/14693062.2012.691225.
   Google Scholar