Under what conditions? How the narrative of EMU fiscal stability is reshaping Cohesion policy’s EU solidarity

References

• Andor, L. 2018. Resources for a Prosperous Europe: Redesigning the EU Budget in a Progressive Way. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Division for Economic and Social Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., and L. DePropris. 2002. “The 1988 Reform of the European Structural Funds: Entitlement or Empowerment?” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (3): 408–428. doi:10.1080/13501760210139696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. M. 2012. ‘Speech by President Barroso ‘Europe’s Future Budget - Investing for Growth’, Brussels 22 March 2012’. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. 2017. “Citizenship and Collective Identities as Political Sources of Solidarity in the European Union.” In The Strains of Commitment. The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, edited by K. Banting and W. Kymlicka, 80–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baun, M. J. 1995. “The Maastricht Treaty as High Politics: Germany, France, and European Integration.” Political Science Quarterly 110 (4): 605–624. doi:10.2307/2151886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burelli, C. 2018. “Solidarity, Stability and Enlightened Self-Interest in the EU.” Social Policies 3: 449–464.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B. 2011. “Ideas are Not as Stable as Political Scientists Want Them to Be: A Theory of Incremental Ideational Change.” Political Studies 59 (3): 596–615. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00868.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COR. 2012. “Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on ‘Proposal for a General on the Funds Covered by the Common Strategic Framework.” Official Journal of the European Union, C 225: 58–113.
   Google Scholar
• Delors, J. 1989. ‘Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community’. Luxembourg: EEC.
   Google Scholar
• Delors, J. 1992. Intervention de Jacques Delors Sur la Coopération Interrégionale. Brussels: EEC.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, K. 2012. “Maastricht Plus’: Managing the Logic of Inherent Imperfections.” Journal of European Integration 34 (7): 791–808. doi:10.1080/07036337.2012.726015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, K. 2014. ‘States, Debt, and Power: ‘Saints’ and ‘Sinners’ in European History and Integration’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, K., and K. Featherstone. 1999. ‘The Road to Maastricht: Negotiating Economic and Monetary Union’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ECA. 2011. “Opinion No 7/2011.” Official Journal of the European Union, C 47: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S. 2015. ‘Which European Union?’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2007. “Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society.” European Planning Studies 15 (4): 567–583. doi:10.1080/09654310701232079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. 2017. “Mission Impossible? Reconciling Economic and Social Europe after the Euro Crisis and Brexit.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M., and C. Burelli. 2019. “Cross‐National Solidarity and Political Sustainability in the EU after the Crisis.” Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (1): 94–110. doi:10.1111/jcms.12812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M., J. Mirò, and S. Ronchi. 2021. “Walking the Road Together? EU Polity Maintenance during the COVID-19 Crisis.” West European Politics 44: 1329–1352. doi:10.1080/01402382.2021.1905328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., and M. Jachtenfuchs. 2021. “Postfunctionalism Reversed: Solidarity and Rebordering during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (3): 350–369. doi:10.1080/13501763.2021.1881588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Council of Economic Experts. 1993. “Jahresgutachten 1992/93 des Sachverständigenrates zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.” Deutscher Bundestag Wahlperiode 12 (3774): 250–295.
   Google Scholar
• Gotev, G. 2012. “Countries Frown at German ‘Blood, Sweat and Tears Plan‘.” Euractiv Retrieved 30 08 2022 https://www.euractiv.com/section/eu-priorities-2020/news/countries-frown-at-german-blood-sweat-and-tears-plan/.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, J. 2012. ‘Commission’s Proposal for a Reformed Cohesion Policy – Informal Ministerial Meeting of Visegrad Countries, Prague, 22 March 2012’. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hallstein, W. 1963. ‘Exposé fait par le Prof. Hallstein, Président de la Commission de la C.E.E. le lundi 20 mai 1963 à Leeuwarden’. Brussels: EEC.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D, and C Rommerskirchen. (2013). A Panacea for All Times? The German Stability Culture as Strategic Political Resource. West European Politics, 36(4), 750–770. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.783355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, D. 2016. “The European Parliament and Cohesion Policy.” In Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU, edited by S. Piattoni and L. Polverari, 140–155. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. 2015. “Process Tracing the Effects of Ideas.” In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, edited by A. Bennet and J. T Checkel, 41–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., and C. M. Radaelli. 2015. “The Narrative Policy Framework: Child or Monster?” Critical Policy Studies 9 (3): 339–355. doi:10.1080/19460171.2015.1053959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffan, B., and J. Lindner. 2014. “The Budget Who Gets What, When, and How.” In Policy-Making in the European Union (7th Edn), edited by H. Wallace, A. Pollack, and A. R. Young, 220-240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahusen, C., and M.T. Grasso. 2018. Solidarity in Europe: Citizens' responses in times of crisis. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, J. 2006. ‘Conflict and Change in EU Budgetary Politics’. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manzella, G. P. and Mendez, C. 2009. The turning points of EU cohesion policy. Working Paper Report to Barca Report.
   Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M., and K. McNamara. 2015. “The Euro Crisis’ Theory Effect: Northern Saints, Southern Sinners, and the Demise of the Eurobond.” Journal of European Integration 37 (2): 229–245. doi:10.1080/07036337.2014.990137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, C. 2013. “The Post-2013 Reform of EU Cohesion Policy and the place-based Narrative.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (5): 639–659. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.736733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. 2017. Solidarity and its sources. In The strains of commitment: The political sources of solidarity in diverse societies, edited by K. Banting and W. Kymlicka. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, E. 1994. Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadri, A. 1994. Max Weber’s Sociology of Intellectuals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelkle, W. 2017. ‘The Political Economy of Monetary Solidarity: Understanding the Euro Experiment’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidhuber, P. M. 1987. Hauptreferat auf der Euro-Construct-Konferenz am 4. Dezember in München. Brussels: EEC.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidhuber, P. M. 1991. Rede von Peter M. Schmidhuber auf dem Seminar der Börsenzeitung ‘Der Europäische Binnenmarkt 1992’ am 15 April’. Brussels: EEC.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trein, P. 2020. “Federal Dynamics, Solidarity, and European Union Crisis Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (7): 977–994. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1640272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rompuy, H, et al. 2010. ‘Strengthening Economic Governance in the EU’. Brussels: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• Viță, V. 2019. “‘Revisiting the Dominant Discourse on Conditionality in the EU: The Case of EU Spending Conditionality’.” Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 19: 116–143. doi:10.1017/cel.2017.4.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, P. 1970. ‘Report to the Council and the Commission on the Realisation by Stages of Economic and Monetary Union in the Community’. Brussels: EEC.
   Google Scholar
• Wettmann, R. W., and E. Ciciotti. 1981. ‘The Mobilisation of Indigenous Potential’. Brussels: EEC.
   Google Scholar