Striving for trade not peace? Revisiting trade-peace and trade-security nexuses in the EU’s trade policy strategy amidst the Russia-Ukraine war

References

• Aggarwal, V., and K. Govella, eds. 2013. Linking Trade and Security. Evolving Institutions and Strategies in Asia, Europe, and the United States. Berlin: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4765-8.
   Google Scholar
• Bapat, N., and B. R. Kwon. 2015. “When are Sanctions Effective? A Bargaining and Enforcement Framework.” International Organization 69 (1): 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818314000290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, K. 1996. “Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?” Journal of Peace Research 33 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343396033001003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, K. 2002. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace?. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.16590.
   Google Scholar
• Bashota, B., and A. Hoti. 2021. “The Role of the EU in Facilitating a Hard Implementation Dialogue.” Southeastern Europe 45 (3): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.30965/18763332-45010001.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, R. 2009. “European Integration and the Western Balkans: Lessons, Prospects and Obstacles.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 11 (3): 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448950903152177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birchfield, V. L., J. Krige, and A. Young. 2017. “European Integration as a Peace Project.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 19 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116685274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. 2016. “The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European Characteristics.” Egmont Institute Egmont Security Policy Brief 75: Available at. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep06638.
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. 1962. “The Relations of Economic, Political and Social Systems.” Social and Economic Studies 11 (4): 351–362.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, A. S. 2019. “Coercive Diplomacy and the Donbas: Explaining Russian Strategy in Eastern Ukraine.” Journal of Strategic Studies 42 (3–4): 312–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1413550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso, R. 2017. “Peace Economics and Peaceful Economic Policies.” The Economics of Peace & Security Journal 12 (2): 16–20. https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.12.2.16.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2014. “Decision 2014/146/CFSP of 17 March 2014 Concerning Measures in Respect of Actions Undermining or Threatening the Territorial Integrity, Sovereignty and Independence of Ukraine.” Oj L 78 (16): 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/iur.2014.a838526.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2015. “Foreign Affairs Council, 29 January 2015.” Main Results of the Foreign Affairs Council. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2015/01/29.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2016. “Foreign Affairs Council, 14 March 2016.” Main Results of the Foreign Affairs Council. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2016/03/14/.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2010. Joint Statement on the Partnership for Modernisation. EU-Russia Summit. 31 May-1 June 2010/10546/10, PRESSE 154. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/er/114747.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2022. “The Eu’s Hegemonic Imaginaries: From European Strategic Autonomy in Defense to Technological Sovereignty.” European Security 31 (3): 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettke, D. 2011. “Europe and Russia: From Neighbourhood without a Shared Vision to a Modernization Partnership.” European Security 20 (1): 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2011.557367.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council “Energy Security Strategy.” COM/2014/0330final of 28 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. “Trade for All. Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy.” Available at: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/october/tradoc_153846.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an EU Strategy for Liquefied Natural Gas and Gas Storage.” COM(2016)049final of 16 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. “Trade Policy Review. An Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy.” Available at: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2021/april/tradoc_159541.0270_EN_05.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, High Representative. 2021. “Joint Communication on EU-Russia Relations – Push Back, Constrain and Engage.” JOIN 2021 (20): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• European Communities. 1997. “Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation Establishing a Partnership Between the European Communities and Their Member States, of One Part, and the Russian Federation, of the Other Part.” Oj L 327 (28.11): 3–69.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2014a. “Conclusions. 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework.” EUCO 169/14 of 24 October 1994. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-169-2014-INIT/en/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2014b. “Joint Letter to the EU Heads of State or Government by the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy and the President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso, on Restrictive Measures Against Russia.” EUCO 174/14 of 5 September 2014. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/144670.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2014c. “Statement by the President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy on Further EU Restrictive Measures Against Russia.” EUCO 179/14 of 11 September. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/144867.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2015. “Conclusions – 19 and 20 March 2015, EUCO 11/15.” Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21888/european-council-conclusions-19-20-march-2015-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. 2023. “Eastern Ukraine and Flight MH17 Case Declared Partly Admissible.” ECHR 026. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-222889%22]}.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2003. “European Security Strategy. A Secure Europe in a Better World.” Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/30823/qc7809568enc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2012a. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union. OJ C 326 (13): 1–47. of 26.10.2012.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2012b. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. OJ C 326 (13): 47–390. of 26.10.2012.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2016. “Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy.” Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union External Action Service. 2021). “EU Security, Defense and Crisis Response.” Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-security-defence-and-crisis-response_en.
   Google Scholar
• Fix, L. 2021. Germany’s Role in European Russia Policy. A New German Power?. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68226-2.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, M. R., C. Syropoulous, and V. Yotov. 2020. “Arming in the Global Economy: The Importance of Trade with Enemies and Friends.” Journal of International Economics 123:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geis, A., and U. Schröder. 2023. “Globale Folgen des Kriegs gegen die Ukraine: das endgültige Ende des liberalen Interventionismus.” Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 11 (2): 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42597-022-00089-1. Online First.
   Google Scholar
• Giannopoulous, G., H. Smith, and M. Theocharidou. 2020. “The Landscape of Hybrid Threats. A Conceptual Model.” European Commission: JRC. Available at: https://euhybnet.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Conceptual-Framework-Hybrid-Threats-HCoE-JRC.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hegre, H., J. Oneal, and B. Russett. 2010. “Trade Does Promote Peace: New Simultaneous Estimates of the Reciprocal Effects of Trade and Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (6): 736–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310385995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrynkiv, O. 2022. “Export Controls and Securitization of Economic Policy: Comparative Analysis of the Practice of the United States, the European Union, China and Russia.” Journal of World Trade 56 (4): 633–656. https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD2022026.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2020. “European Union 2020.” Energy Policy Review. Available at: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ec7cc7e5-f638-431b-ab6e-86f62aa5752b/European_Union_2020_Energy_Policy_Review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. 2006. “Economic Security in an Era of Globalization: Definition and Provision.” The Pacific Review 17 (4): 485–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274042000326032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalymon, B. 2022. “Europe Must Stop Funding Vladimir Putin’s War Crimes in Ukraine.” Atlantic Council, 12 April. Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/europe-must-stop-funding-vladimir-putins-war-crimes-in-ukraine/.
   Google Scholar
• Kamel, A. M. 2016. “Trade and Peace: The EU and Gaddafi’s Final Decade.” International Affairs 92 (3): 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavakli, K. C., J. T. Chatagnier, and E. Hatipoğlu. 2020. “The Power to Hurt and the Effectiveness of International Sanctions.” The Journal of Politics 82 (3): 879–894. Available at. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337433176_The_Power_to_Hurt_and_the_Effectiveness_of_International_Sanctions.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemoklidze, N., and S. Wolff. 2020. “Trade as a Confidence-Building Measure in Protracted Conflicts: The Cases of Moldova and Georgia Compared.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 61 (3): 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2019.1702567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshk, O. M., R. Reuveny, and M. Pollins. 2010. “Trade and Conflict: Proximity, Country Size and Measures.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 27 (1): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659009352137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krickovic, A. 2015. “When Interdependence Produces Conflict: EU-Russia Energy Relations as a Security Dilemma.” Contemporary Security Policy 36 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2015.1012350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larik, J. 2016. Foreign Policy Objectives in European Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2017. “On the Fringes of the European Peace Project: The Neighbourhood Policy’s Functionalist Hubris and Political Myopia.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 19 (1): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116685261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, M., J. Pisany-Ferry, E. Ribakova, J. Shapiro, and G. Wolff 2019. “Redefining Europe’s Economic Sovereignty” Bruegel. (9) Available at. https://www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/wp_attachments/PC-09_2019_final-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., V. Hull, Ch Godfray, and S. Li, P. Gleick, H. Hoff, C. Pahl-Wostl, Z. Xu, M. G. Chung, J. Sun, S. Li. 2018. “Nexus Approaches to Global Sustainable Development.” Nature Sustainability 1 (9): 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0135-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P., T. Meyer, and M. Thoenig. 2008. “Make Trade Not War?” The Review of Economic Studies 75 (3): 865–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00492.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution.” Kalgenfurt. Available at: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/39517/ssoar-2014-mayring-Qualitative_content_analysis_theoretical_foundation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. 2004. “Peace Through Trade or Free Trade?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (4): 547–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704266117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., and C. Nicolaïdis. 2006. “The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6): 906–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600838623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakovsky, B. 2020. “Trade or Blockade? Economic Relations with Uncontrolled Territories in Moldova and Ukraine.” Kennan Cable 48: Available at. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/uploads/documents/KI_200304_cable%2048_v1_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Milošević, A., and M. Hrnjaz. 2018. “Exploring Serbia-Kosovo Trade Relations: Achieving Peace Through Trade Interdependence?” Ethnopolitics 17 (1): 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2017.1339458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muravska, T., and A. Berlin. 2016. “Towards a New Neighbourhood Policy (ENP): What Benefits of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements (DCFTAs) for Shared Prosperity and Security?” In Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, edited by T. Kerikmäe and A. Chochia, 23–37. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_3.
   Google Scholar
• The Nobel Prize. 2012. “The Nobel Peace Prize 2012.” Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2012/summary/.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. M. 2020. “Reconsidering Economic Leverage and Vulnerability: Trade Ties, Sanction Threats, and the Success of Economic Coercion.” Conflict Management and Peace Studies 37 (4): 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894218797024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portela, C., and B. G. Usobiaga. 2015. “The Eu’s Sanctions and Their Contribution to Peace.” International Catalan Institute for Peace 23: Available at. https://www.icip.cat/perlapau/en/article/the-eus-sanctions-and-their-contribution-to-peace/?pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, E. 2005. “From a Punitive to a Bargaining Model of Sanctions: Lessons from Iraq.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (3): 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00373.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwebach, V. L. 2000. “Sanctions as Signals: A Line in the Sand or a Lack of Resolve?” In Sanctions as Economic Statecraft. Theory and Practice, edited by S. Chan and A. Cooper Drury, 187–211. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596979_9.
   Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. 2022a. “The Partnership That Failed: EU-Russia Relations and the War in Ukraine.” Journal of European Integration 44 (6): 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2109651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddi, M. 2022b. “The Role of Power in EU–Russia Energy Relations: The Interplay Between Markets and Geopolitics.” In Shared Neighbourhood, Battleground or Transit Zone on the New Silk Road? edited by V. Akchurina and V. Della Sala, 10–29. Chapter 1. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003081722-2.
   Google Scholar
• Stelzenmüller, C. 2009. “Germany’s Russia Question: A New Ostpolitik for Europe.” Foreign Affairs 88 (2): 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taufar, P. 2017. “Tackling Coherence in the Eu’s External Human Rights Policy.” Global Campus Working Paper 4/17. Available at: https://repository.gchumanrights.org/items/4ae2673e-4354-4833-8207-ac48ea61a6ce.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, R. “The Changing Nature of Modern Warfare. Responding to Russian Information Warfare.” The RUSI Journal 160 (4): 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tulmets, E. 2008. “The European Neighbourhood Policy: A Flavour of Coherence in the Eu’s External Relations.” Hamburg Review of Social Sciences 3:107–141.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bergeijk, P. 2022. “Sanctions Against the Russian War on Ukraine: Lessons from History and Current Prospects.” Journal of World Trade 56 (4): 571–586. https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD2022023.
   Google Scholar
• Veebel, V., and R. Markus. 2015. “Lessons from the EU-Russia Sanctions 2014-2015.” Baltic Journal of Law and Politics 8 (1): 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2015-0015.
   Google Scholar
• Visoka, G., and J. Doyle. 2016. “Neo-Functional Peace: The European Union Way of Resolving Conflicts.” Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (4): 862–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerka, P. 2022. “The Power of Interdependence: Europe’s Under-Rated Influence Over Russia.” ECFR, 15 September. Available at: https://ecfr.eu/article/the-power-of-interdependence-europes-under-rated-influence-over-russia/.
   Google Scholar