Reappraising the EU-Turkey Refugee Statement within the Human Rights and Neoliberalism Nexus

References

• Agnew, J. 2001. “How Many Europes? The European Union, Eastward Enlargement and Uneven Development.” European Urban and Regional Studies 8 (1): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/096977640100800103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2016a. EU-Turkey Refugee Deal a Historic Blow to Rights. Accessed June 10, 2020. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/03/eu-turkey-refugee-deal-a-historic-blow-to-rights/.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2016b. Say No to A Bad Deal with Turkey. Accessed June 13, 2020. https://www.amnesty.nl/actueel/say-no-to-a-bad-deal-with-turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, B., and Y. Duman. 2019. “I/NGOs’ Assistance to Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Opportunities and Challenges.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 21 (4): 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2018.1530382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulos, H. K. 2020. EU Migration Management and the Social Purpose of European Integration: The Spillover of Misery. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. 2009. “Europe as Borderland.” Environment and Planning, Society and Space 27 (2): 190–215. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengoetxea, J. 2022. “The Solidarity Constitution in the EU: Refugees and Asylum as Litmus Test.” In Law, Solidarity and the Limits of Social Europe, edited by Ann-Christine Hartzén, Andrea Iossa, and Eleni Karageorgiou, 117–135. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bieler, A. 2002. “The Struggle Over EU Enlargement: A Historical Materialist Analysis of European Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (4): 575–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210152448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieler, A. 2005. “Class Struggle Over the EU Model of Capitalism: Neo‐Gramscian Perspectives and the Analysis of European Integration.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4): 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230500205177.
   Google Scholar
• Bieler, A., and Adam D Morton. 2018. Global Capitalism, Global War, Global Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D. 2006. “Neoliberal Hegemony, Transnational Capital and the Terms of the Eu’s Eastward Expansion.” Capital & Class 30 (1): 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680608800104.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2007. “Neoliberalism, Embedded Neoliberalism and Neocorporatism: Towards Transnational Capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe.” West European Politics 30 (3): 443–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701276287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, U. 2005. “Order and Regulation: Global Governance as a Hegemonic Discourse of International Politics?” Review of International Political Economy 12 (1): 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S., and J. Joseph. 2016. “European Integration in Crisis? Of Supranational Integration, Hegemonic Projects and Domestic Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 22 (4): 725–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115612558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caradaica, M. 2014. “Neo-Gramscian Approach on Europeanization.” Romanian Review of Social Science 6 (1): 719–727.
   Google Scholar
• Čerkez, T. 2018. “EU-Turkey Migration Deal: A Pyrrhic Victory.” In Panorama of Global Security Environment The Central European Perspective 2017-2018, edited by R. Ondrejcsák, P. Bátor, R. Q. Turcsányi, and M. Mochťak, 182–197. Bratislava, Slovakia: STRATPOL.
   Google Scholar
• Cocks, P. 1980. “Towards a Marxist Theory of European Integration.” International Organization 34 (1): 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300003957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collett, E. 2016. The Paradox of the EU-Turkey Refugee Deal, Accessed June 12, 2020 https://www.migrationpolicy.org/news/paradox-eu-turkey-refugee-deal.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2009. The Stockholm Programme – an Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting the Citizens. Brussels. Accessed June 15 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/eu-policy/stockholm-programme-open-and-secure-europe-serving-and-protecting-citizens-0_en.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. 1986. “Social Forces, States, and World Orders.” In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by Robert O Keohane, 204–254. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. 1987. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. 1992. “Global Perestroika.” In Vol. 28: Socialist Register 1992: New World Order?, edited by R. Miliband and L. Panitch, 26–43. London: Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demirsu, I., and D. Cihangir-Tetik. 2019. “Constructing the Partnership with Turkey on the Refugee Crisis: EU Perceptions and Expectations.“ Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 21(6): 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2018.1506291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drahokoupil, J., A. van Bastiaan, and L. Horn. 2008. “Introduction: Towards a Critical Political Economy of European Governance.” In Contradictions and Limits of Neoliberal European Governance, edited by B. van Apeldoorn, J. Drahokoupil, and L. Horn, 1–17. London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Düzgit-Aydın, S., F. Keyman, and K. S. Biehl. 2019. Changing Parameters of Migration Cooperation: Beyond the EU-Turkey Deal? İstanbul Policy Center (IPC), Sabancı University-Stiftung Mercator Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, M., and D. Özkul. 2016. “Editors’ Introduction: Precarious Lives and Syrian Refugees in Turkey.” New Perspectives on Turkey 54 (54): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2016.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey. 2021. Accessed September 17, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/facility_table.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. On Immigration, Integration and Employment. Accessed December 11, 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52003DC0336&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Commission Assesses Progress by Turkey in Visa Dialogue. Accessed June 4, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/es/ip_14_1173.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. “Action Plan on the Integration of Third Country Nationals.” Accessed September 05 2023. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0377.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 1999. Presidency Conclusions Tampere European Council, para 4. Accessed July 12, 2020. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/tam_en.hyms-tc.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2022. “The Fundamental Rights of Irregular Migrant Workers in the EU: Understanding and Reducing Protection Gaps.” PE 702.670. Accessed May 05, 2023. www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/702670/IPOL_STU(2022)702670_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EU-Turkey Joint Action Plan. 2015. Accessed June 7, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_15_5860.
   Google Scholar
• Fekete, L. 2017. “Flying the Flag for Neoliberalism.” Race & Class 58 (3): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396816670088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futák-Campbell, B., and M. Pütz. 2021. “From the ‘Open Door’ Policy to the EU-Turkey Deal: Media Framings of German Policy Changes During the EU Refugee ‘Crisis’.” International Relations 36 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117821999413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, M. 2016 The EU-Turkey Statement: A Treaty That Violates Democracy. Accessed June 19, 2020. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-eu-turkey-statement-a-treaty-that-violates-democracy-part-2-of-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. 2000. ”Lobbying for Migrant Inclusion in the European Union: New Opportunities for Transnational Advocacy?” Journal of European Public Policy 7 (4): 632–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760050165406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkliati, M. 2017. “”The EU-Turkey Deal and the Safe Third Country Concept Before the Greek Asylum Appeals Committees”.” Movements. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies 3 (2): 213–224.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gruszczak, A. 2021. “Refugees as a Misnomer: The Parochial Politics and Official Discourse of the Visegrad Four.” Politics & Governance 9 (4): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürkan, S., and R. Coman. 2021. “The EU–Turkey Deal in the 2015 ‘Refugee Crisis’: When Intergovernmentalism Cast a Shadow on the Eu’s Normative Power.” Acta Politica 56 (2): 276–305. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00184-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. 2010. “More Barbwire or More Immigration, or Both-EU Migration Policy in the Nexus of Border Security Management and Neoliberal Economic Growth.” Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 11 (1): 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, G., and S. Hess. 2017. “”Tracing the Effects of the EU-Turkey Deal. Movements”.” Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies 3 (2): 35–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, R. 2012. “No Friend of Democratisation: Europe’s Role in the Genesis of the ‘Arab Spring.” International Affairs 88 (1): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01058.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, D., M. Kerrou, A. and Nouira, and M. C. Paciello 2017. The Eu’s Democracy, Human Rights and Resilience Discourse and Its Contestation Methodology and Concept. Papers No. 4 (MedReset).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch 2020. World Report: Events of 2019, Accessed June 13, 2020 https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/european-union.
   Google Scholar
• Jurgen, J. 2019. “Rethinking Europe Through Refugees, Populism, and “Crisis”.” Accessed June 7, 2020. https://www.europenowjournal.org/2019/03/04/rethinking-europe-through-refugees-populism-and-crisis/.
   Google Scholar
• Kıvılcım, Z. 2009. “İnsan hakları ve Karşı Hegemonya.” Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 13 (1): 217–240.
   Google Scholar
• Law on Foreigners and International Protection of Turkey. 2013. Accessed June 7, 2020. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5a1d828f4.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lehner, R. 2019. “The EU‐Turkey‐’Deal’: Legal Challenges and Pitfalls.” International Migration 57 (2): 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., and M. Kalaitzake. 2020. “Affective and Calculative Solidarity: The Impact of Individualism and Neoliberal Capitalism.” European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2): 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018786379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N. 2019. “From Containment to Realpolitik and Back Again: A Realist Constructivist Analysis of Turkey–EU Relations and the Migration Issue.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (6): 1349–1365. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, P. 2016. “Hegemony, Migration, and Misplaced Alliances Lessons from Gramsci.” In Solidarity without Borders: Gramscian Perspectives on Migration and Civil Society Alliances, 135–149. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, K. 2019. “The Cultural Politics of Human Rights and Neoliberalism.” Journal of Human Rights 18 (5): 490–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2019.1653174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, O., and R. De Zoysa. 2001. The Promise of the Third Way. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Official Journal of the EU. 2013. Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. Accessed June 19, 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013L0032&from=en.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeek, H. 1995. “Towards a New International Migration Regime: Globalization, Migration and the Internationalization of the State.” In Migration and European Integration: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion, edited by R. Miles and D. Thränhardt, 15–36. British Columbia: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paçacı-Elitok, S. 2019. “Three Years On: An Evaluation of the EU-Turkey Refugee Deal.” MiRekoc Working Papers 4 (8): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Panebianco, S. 2022. “The EU and Migration in the Mediterranean: EU borders’ Control by Proxy.” Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies 48 (6): 1398–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, O., and B. Rosamond. 2013. “‘Normative Power Europe’ Meets Economic Liberalism: Complicating Cosmopolitanism Inside/Outside the EU.” Cooperation and Conflict 48 (2): 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713485388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestrova, K. 1995. “The Evolution of International Refugee Law: A Review of Provisions and Implementation.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 9 (2): 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557579508400115.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, J. 2016. “EU-Turkey Deal: Violation Of, or Consistency With, International Law?” Insight 1 (3): 1195–1203.
   Google Scholar
• Rygiel, K., F. Baban, and S. Ilcan. 2016. “The Syrian Refugee Crisis: The EU–Turkey ‘Deal’ and Temporary Protection.” Global Social Policy 16 (3): 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018116666153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siapera, E. 2019. “Refugee Solidarity in Europe: Shifting the Discourse.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 22 (2): 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418823068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thessaloniki European Council Presidency Conclusions. 2003. Accessed June 19, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/DOC_03_3.
   Google Scholar
• Trauner, F. 2016. “Asylum Policy: The Eu’s ‘Crises’ and the Looming Policy Regime Failure.” Journal of European Integration 38 (3): 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1140756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 2012. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326/47–390. Accessed June 22, 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=en.
   Google Scholar
• Tupala, M. 2019. “Applying Quantitative Appraisal Analysis to the Study of Institutional Discourse: The Case of EU Migration Documents Functional Linguistics.” 6 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0067-7.
   Google Scholar
• Türkeş, M. 2017. “A Deal Between EU and Turkey on Matters of the Refugee, Readmission and Visa Liberalisation.” The Journal of Research Institute for the History of Global Arms Transfer, (3): 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2016. “UNHCR Redefines Role in Greece as EU-Turkey Deal Comes into Effect.” Accessed June 25, 2020. https://www.unhcr.org/news/briefing/2016/3/56f10d049/unhcr-redefines-role-greece-eu-turkey-deal-comes-effect.html.
   Google Scholar
• Van Apeldoorn, B. 2014. “The European Capitalist Class and the Crisis of Its Hegemonic Project.” Socialist Register 50 (50): 189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. 2019. The Morals of the Market: Human Rights and Rise of Neoliberalism. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz-Elmas, F. 2020. “AB’nin Sorgulanan Küresel Aktörlüğü: AB-Türkiye Göç Mutabakatı Üzerine Bir Tartışma.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 17 (68): 161–177. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.856887.
   Google Scholar