Neural Networks, Multitemporal Landsat Thematic Mapper Data and Topographic Data to Classify Forest Damages in the Czech Republic

References

• Aldrich, J. H. and Nelson, F. D., 1984. Linear probability, Logit, and probit models. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E., E., Roach, J. T., and Witmer, R. E., 1976. “A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data”, U. S. G. S, Washington U S Geological Service Professional Paper 964.
   Google Scholar
• Ardö, J. 1994, “Coniferous forest damage assessment in the Krusne Hory, the Czech Republic using Landsat Thematic Mapper reflectance and logit regressions”. 7th Australasian Remote Sensing Conference. Proceedings: Poster and Post-Deadline. Melbourne, March 1994. pp 171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Ardö, J., Lambert, N., Henzlik, V. and Rock, B.N. 1997. “Satellite-based Estimations of coniferous forest cover changes: Krusne Hory, Czech Republic 1972 – 1989”, Ambio. Vol. 26, pp. 158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale, R. and Jackson, T., 1991. Neural Computing: an introduction. Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK, 240 p.
   Google Scholar
• Benediktsson, J. A., Swain, P. H. and Ersoy, O. K., 1990. “Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of MultiSource Remote Sensing data”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol 28, pp. 540–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benediktsson, J. A., Sveinsson, J. R. and Arnason, K., 1995. “Classification and Feature Extraction of AVRIS data”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol 33, pp. 1194–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, H., Schneider, W. and Pinz, A. J., 1992. “Multispectral classification of Landsat-images using neural networks”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Vol. 30, pp. 482–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockhaus, J. A., Khorram, S., Bruck, R. I., Campbell, M. V. and Stallings, C., 1992. “A comparison of Landsat TM and SPOT HRV data for use in the development of forest defoliation models”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol 13, pp. 3235–3240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, F. W., 1985. “Pollution problems in post war Czechoslovakia”, Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. N.S. 10, 17–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civco, D. L., 1993. “Artificial neural networks for land cover classification and mapping”, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems Vol. 7, pp. 173–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton, R. G., 1991. “A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 37, pp. 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, S., 1993 Assessment of forest damage using Landsat TM, elevation models and digital forest maps. Ph. D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrand, S., 1994. “Assessment of forest damage with Landsat TM: Correction for varying forest stand Characteristics”; Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 47, pp. 291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epema, G.F., 1990. “Determination of planetary reflectance for Landsat-5 Thematic-Mapper tapes processed by Earthnet (Italy)”, ESA Journal Vol. 14, pp. 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R. W. and Lees, B.G. 1992. “The application of neural networks to the floristic classification of remote sensing and GIS data in complex terrain”, In: Proceedings of the XVII ISPRS Congress in Washington, U.S.A., August 2 – 14, 1992. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
   Google Scholar
• Foody, G. M., McCulloch, M. B. and Yates, W. B., 1995. “The effect of training set size and composition on artificial neural network classification”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 16, pp. 1707–1723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, R., 1984. Expert Systems: Principles and Case Studies. Chapman and Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H., 1990. Econometric analysis. MacMillan: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, P., 1982. “The tyranny of taxonomy”, The Sciences, Vol. May/June 1982, p. 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Halounová, L., 1994, “Comparison of neural network and maximum likelihood classification in an urban area”. Proceedings of the EARSeL 14th Symposium, Sensors and Environmental applications. Göteborg, Sweden, 6–8 June, pp. 463–468.
   Google Scholar
• Hepner, G.F., Logan, T., Rittner, N. and Bryant, N., 1989. “Artificial neural network classification using a minimal training set: comparison to conventional supervised classification”, Photogrammetric Engineering And Remote Sensing, Vol. 56, pp. 469–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer, R.M., Fleming, M.D., Bartolucci, L.A., Davis, S.M., and Nelson, R.F., 1979, Digital processing of Landsat MSS and topographic data to improve capabilities for computerized mapping of forest cover types. Laboratory of Remote Sensing, Technical Note 011579, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907. 169 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kanellopoulos, I., Varfis, G., Wilkinson, G. G. and Megeir, J., 1992. “Land-cover discrimination in SPOT HRV imagery using an artificial neural network - a 20 class experiment”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 13, pp.917–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klasterska, I., 1991. “Bohemian problem bared”, ACID NEWS March 1991, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Klimont, Z., Amann, M., Cofala,J., Gyarfas, Klaassen,G. and Schöpp, W., 1993. Emission of Air pollutants in the region of the central European Iniative-1988. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, SR-9303.
   Google Scholar
• Kubelka, L., Karasek, A., Rybar, V., Baldalik, V., and Slodicak, M. 1993. Forest regeneration in the heavily polluted NE Krušné Hory Mountains. Czech Ministry of Agriculture, Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Kubikova, J., 1991. “Forest dieback in Czechoslovakia”, Vegetatio, Vol. 93, pp. 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, N. J., Ardö, J., Rock, B.N. and Vogelmann, J.E. 1995. “Spectral Characterization and regression based estimates of forest damage in Norway Spruce stands in the Czech Republic using Landsat Thematic Mapper data”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 16, pp. 1261–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippman, R. P., 1987. “An introduction to Computing with Neural Nets”, IEEE ASSP Magazine April 1987, pp 4–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lochman, V., 1986. “The contemporary state of forest soils in the Ore Mountains”, Prace Vulhm, VOL. 68, pp. 9–48. (In Czech, summary in English).
   Google Scholar
• Materna, J., 1985. “Results of the research into air pollutants impact on forests in Czechoslovakia”. In Symposium on the effects of air pollution on forest and water ecosystems, pp. 127–138. The foundation for research of natural resources in Finland, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Parikh, J. A., DaPonte, J. S., Damodaran, M., Karageorgiou, A. and Podaras, P., 1991. “Comparison of backpropagation neural networks and statistical techniques for analysis of geological features in Landsat imagery”. SPIE - Application of neural network II 1469. pp. 526–538.
   Google Scholar
• Pechala, F. and Böhme, W., (eds.) 1975. Podnebi a Pocasi V Krusnych Horach (Climate of Krusné hory). Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Prague, p. 106. (In Czech, Summary in English).
   Google Scholar
• Peddle, D. R., Foody, G. M., Zhang, A., Franklin, S. and Ellsworth, F. L., 1994. “Multi-source image classification II: an empirical comparison of evidential reasoning and neural network approaches”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 20, pp. 396–407.
   Google Scholar
• Pokorny, P., 1984. “To the problem of forest soils acidification in mountain regions of the CSR (Czech Socialist Republic)”. In: Proceedings: Air pollution and stability of coniferous forest ecosystems. Klimo, E. and Saly, R. (eds.). University of Agriculture, Brno, p. 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Prusa, E. 1990. Natural forest of the Czech Republic. Czech Ministry of Agriculture, Prague. (In Czech with English summary). 243 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, H., Martinetz, T. and Schulten, K, 1991. Neural computing and Self-Organizing Maps. Addison-Wesley: Reading Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, B. N., Hoshizaki, T. and Miller, J. R., 1988. “Comparison of In Situ and Airborne Spectral Measurements of the Blue Shift Associated with Forest decline”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 24, pp. 109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart D. E. and McClelland, J. L.,1986. Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 1. MIT Bradford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlyter, P. 1993. Operational aerial forest damage surveys. Environmental and energy systems studies, Licenciate thesis, Lund University, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. and Wilk, M. B., 1965. “An analysis of variance test for normality”, Biometrika, Vol. 52, pp. 591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, A. K., W. Brinkhof and J. Delaney, 1994. “Using neural networks to analyse spatial data”. 7th Australasian Remote Sensing Conference Proceedings: Poster and Post-Deadline, Melbourne, March 1994, pp. 235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, A.K., Forbes, G.W., Carpenter, D. J., 1988. “Non-parametric test of overlap in multispectral classification”, International Journal of GIS, Vol. 9, pp. 777–785.
   Google Scholar
• Skidmore, A.K., 1989. “An expert system classifies eucalypt forest types using Landsat Thematic Mapper data and a digital terrain model”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing Vol. 55, pp. 1449–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, A.K., B.J. Turner, W. Brinkhof and E. Knowles. 1997. “Performance of neural networks: Mapping forests using GIS and remotely sensed data”, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. LXIII, pp. 501–514.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. and Richards, J. A., 1990. “Knowledge-based techniques for multi-source classification”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 11, pp. 505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. H., Estes, J. E., Maynard, P. F., Mertz, F. C., and Stow, D. A., 1980. “Incorporating collateral data in Landsat classification and modelling procedures”. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, San Jose, Costa Rica, Vol. 2, pp. 1009–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D.Z., 1994. “Recent applications of neural networks for spatial data handling”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 20, pp. 368–380.
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda, J., (ed.) 1966. Regional Geology of Czechoslovakia. Czech Geological Survey, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 668 p.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelmann, J. E., 1988, “Detection of forest change in the Green mountains of Vermont using Multispectral Scanner data”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 9, pp. 1187–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R.B.G. 1984. Introduction to statistics for Geographers and Earth scientists. MACMILLAN LTD, London.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, T. and Omatu, S., 1994. “Neural Network Approach to Land Cover Mapping”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Rensing, Vol. 32, pp. 1103–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar