Surveillance d'indicateurs d'aménagement forestier écoviable à l'aide d'images Landsat-TM

Bibliographie

• Ahern, F.J. et D.G. Leckie. 1987. “Digital Remote Sensing for Forestry: Requirements and Capabilities, Today and Tomorrow.” Geocarto International. 2(3): 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ahern, F.J. et J. Sirois. 1989. “Reflectance Enhancements for the Thematic Mapper: An Efficient Way to Produce Images of Consistently High Quality.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 55(1): 61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern, F.J.; Erdle, T.; Maclean, D.A. et I.D. Kneppeck. 1991. “A Quantitative Relationship Between Forest Growth Rates and Thematic Mapper Reflectance Measurements.” International Journal of Remote Sensing. 12(3):387–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.E.; T.E. Burk; A.R. Ek; P.L. Coppin; S.D. Lime; T.A. Walsh; D.K. Walters; W. Befort et D.F. Heinzen. 1994. “Satellite Inventory of Minnesota Forest Resources.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 60(3): 287–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaubien, J. 1987. “Méthodologies d'accentuation des images TM pour une meilleure discrimination des couverts forestiers.” Actes du 11e Symposium canadien sur la télédétection, Waterloo, Ontario, pp. 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Beaubien, J. 1994. “Landsat TM Satellite Images of Forests: From Enhancement to Classification” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 20(1): 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Botkin, D.B. 1993. “Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model.” Oxford University Press, New York, 309 p.
   Google Scholar
• Caselles, V. et M.J. Lopez Garcia. 1989. “An Alternative Simple Approach to Estimate Atmospheric Correction in Multitemporal Studies.” International Journal of Remote Sensing. 10(6): 1127–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez, P.S. Jr. 1988. “An Improved Dark-Object Subtraction Technique for Atmospheric Scattering Correction of Multispectral Data.” Remote Sensing of Environment. 24: 459–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission mondiale sur l'environnement et le développement. 1987. “Notre avenir à tous.” Éditions du Fleuve, Les publications du Québec, 454 p.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil canadien des ministres des forêts. 1992. “Durabilité des forêts: un engagement canadien.” Service canadien des forêts, 51 p.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil canadien des ministres des forêts. 1997. “Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management in Canada: Progress to Date.” Service canadien des forêts, 47 p.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil canadien des ministres des forêts. 1995. “Critères et indicateurs de la gestion durable des forêts: la méthode canadienne.” 15 p.
   Google Scholar
• Coulombe, S. et K. Lowell. 1994. “Ground-truth Verification of Relations Between Forest Basal Area and Certain Ecophysiographic Factors Using a Geographic Information System.” Landscape and Urban Planning. 32: 127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EOSAT. 1993. “Fast Format Document for TM Digital Product.” Lanham, Maryland, 9 p.
   Google Scholar
• ERDAS. 1991. “ERDAS Field Guide.” ERDAS Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Forêts Canada. 1994. “L'état des forêts au Canada 1994.” Ministère des approvisionnements et services, Ottawa, 112p.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, J. 1986. “Thematic Mapper Analysis of Coniferous Forest Structure and Composition.” International Journal of Remote Sensing. 7(10): 1287–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S.E. et A.G. Raske. 1994. “Satellite Remote Sensing of Spruce Budworm Forest Defoliation in Western Newfoundland.” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 20(1): 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Green, K.; D. Kempa et L. Lackey. 1994. “Using Remote Sensing to Detect and Monitor Land-Cover and Land-Use Change.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 60(3): 331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyot, G. 1989. “Signatures spectrales des surfaces naturelles.” Paradigme, 178 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, F.G.; D.B. Botkin; D.E. Strebel; K.D. Woods et S.J. Goetz. 1991. “Large-Scale Patterns of Forest Succession as Determined by Remote Sensing.” Ecology. 72(2): 628–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. And B. Sturm. 1991. “Radiometric Correction of Multitemporal Thematic Mapper Data for Use in Agricultural Land-Cover Classification and Vegetation Monitoring.” International Journal of Remote Sensing. 12(7): 1471–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horler, D.N.H. et F.J. Ahern. 1986. “Forestry Information Content of Thematic Mapper Data” International Journal of Remote Sensing. 7(3): 405–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubauskas, M.E.; K.P. Lulla et P.W. Mausel. 1990. “Assessment of Vegetation Change in a Fire-Altered Forest Landscape.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 56(3): 371–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmins, H. 1987. “Forest Ecology.” McMillan, 531 p.
   Google Scholar
• Leckie, D.G.; D.P. Ostaff; P.M. Teillet et G. Fedosjevs. 1989. “Spectral Characteristics of Tree Components of Balsam Fir and Spruce Damaged by Spruce Budworm.” Forest Science. 35(2), pp.592–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leprieur, C.E.; J.M. Durand et J.L. Peyron. 1988. “Influence of Topography on Forest Reflectance Using Landsat Thematic Mapper and Digital Terrain Data.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 54(4): 491–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Létourneau, J.P. et A. Guimond. 1984. “La télédétection par satellite et son intégration au système d'inventaire forestier du Québec.” Actes du 9e Symposium canadien de télédétection, St-John, Newfoudland, pp. 595–599.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, B.L. and J.L. Barker. 1986. “Landsat MSS and TM Post-Calibration Dynamics Ranges, Exoamospheric Reflectances and At-Satellite Temperatures.” EOSAT Landsat Technical Notes. 1: 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Maini, J.S. 1994. “Le développement durable des forêts- Définition systématique des notions de critère, de ligne directrice et d'indicateur.” Conférence sur la sécurité et la coopération en Europe, 11 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère de l'Énergie et des Ressources. 1989. “Normes d'inventaire forestier.” Les publications du Québec, 177 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Ressources naturelles. 1994a. “Ressources et industries forestières.” Portrait statistique, édition 1994. Direction des relations publiques, 115 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Ressources naturelles. 1994b. “Une stratégie: aménager pour mieux protéger les forêts.” Direction des relations publiques, 197 p.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R.K. 1992. “Community Structure and Ecosystem Function”. In Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction, Glenn-Lewin, D.C.; Peet, R.K. and T.T. Veblen, editors, Chapman & Hall, London, 352 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, J. 1995. Communication personnelle.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J.A. 1993. “Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction.” Second Edition, Springer-Verlag, 340 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sabins, F.F. 1986. “Remote Sensing: Principles and Interpretation.” Second Edition. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 449 p.
   Google Scholar
• Service Canadien des Forêts. 1995a. “Critères et indicateurs pour l'aménagement durable des forêts: le processus canadien.” Secrétariat des critères et des indicateurs, Hull, 7 p.
   Google Scholar
• Seuthé, C. 1993. “Quinze ans de télédétection en foresterie.” Numérimage. 2(2): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, H.H. 1984. “A Theory of Forest Dynamics: The Ecological Implications of Forest Succession Models.” Springer-Verlag, New York, 278 p.
   Google Scholar
• Thibault, M. 1985. “Les régions écologiques du Québec méridional. Deuxième approximation.” Gouvernement du Québec, ministère de l'Énergie et des Ressources, carte couleur. 1 250 000.
   Google Scholar