Detection of Peatland Vegetation Types Using Digitized Aerial Photographs

References

• Biging, G.S., Congalton, R.G. and Murphy, E.C. 1991. “A Comparison of Photointerpretation and Ground Measurements of Forest Structure”. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Baltimore, MD, March 1991. Vol. 3, pp. 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cajander, A.K. 1909. “Über Waldtypen,” Acta Forestalia Fennica, 1 (1): 1–175.
   Google Scholar
• Cajander, A.K. 1913. “Studien über die Moore Finnlands,” Acta Forestalia Fennica, 2(3): 1–208.
   Google Scholar
• Cajander, A.K. 1949. “Forest Types and Their Significance.” Acta Forestalia Fennica, 56:1–71.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.B. 1996. “Introduction to Remote Sensing”. Second Edition. pp. 499–501. Taylor & Francis, London. ISBN 0–7484–0663–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, W.L., J.J. Honaker, and P.J. Weisberg. 1995. “Using Aerial Photography and GIS to Map the Forest-Tundra Ecotone in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, for Global Change Research,” Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61(3):313–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deering, D.W., E.M. Middleton, and T.F. Eck. 1994. “Reflectance Anisotropy for a Spruce-Hemlock Forest Canopy,” Remote Sensing of Environment. 47:242–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurola, S., S.E. Hicks, and E. Kaakinen. 1984. “Key to Finnish Mire Types,” In: Moore P.D. (ed), European Mires. Academic Press, London, pp. 11–117.
   Google Scholar
• Heikurainen, L. 1979. “Peatland Classification in Finland and its Utilisation for Forestry,” Classification of Peat and Peatlands. International Peatland Society, Helsinki, pp. 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Heikurainen, L. 1986. “Suo-opas,” Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki. (in Finnish). 51 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Holopainen, M. 1992. “Digitaalisen Väri-Infraortokuvan Käyttökelpoisuus Metsätalouden Suunnittelussa Ja Veroluokituksessa,” M.Sc. Thesis, University of Helsinki. (in Finnish). 100 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Holopainen, M. and E. Lukkarinen. 1994. “The Use of Digital Aerial Photographs in a Forest Inventory. Digitaalisten Ilmakuvien Käyttö Metsävarojen Inventoinnissa,” University of Helsinki. Department of Forest Resource Management. Publication 4. (in Finnish, summary in English). 33 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Holopainen, M. and G. Wang. 1998. “Calibration of Digitized Aerial Photographs for Forest Stratification.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19:677–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X. 1996. “Possibilities to Classify Peatland Ecosystems by Remote Sensing,” M.Sc. Thesis. University of Helsinki. Department of Forest Resource Management. 61 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hyppänen, H. 1996. “Spatial Autocorrelation and Optimal Spatial Resolution of Optical Remote Sensing Data in Boreal Forest Environment.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(17):3441–3452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häme, T. 1988. “Interpretation of Forest Changes from Satellite Scanner Imagery,” University of Helsinki. Department of Forest Mensuration and Management. Research Notes. 21:119–133.
   Google Scholar
• Harne, T. 1991. “Spectral Interpretation of Changes in Forest Using Satellite Scanner Images.” Acta Forestalia Fennica, 222:1–111.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, S. 1993. “GPS i återvàxtplaneringen.” Skogforskning resultat. 6:1993. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Kellomäki, S. 1969. “Ilmakuvien Käyttömahdollisuuksista Soiden Hyvyysluokituksessa”. M.Sc.Thesis, University of Helsinki. (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Kimes, D.S., J.A. Smith, and K.J. Ranson. 1980. “Vegetation Reflectance Measurements as a Function of Solar Zenith Angle.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46:1563–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. 1995. “Airborne Multispectral Digital Camera and Video Sensors: A Critical Review of System Designs and Applications,” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 21:245–273.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. and Vlcek, J. 1990. “Development of a Multispectral Video System and its Application in Forestry,” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 57:1571–1577.
   Google Scholar
• Kleman, J. 1987. “Directional Reflectance Factor Distributions for Two Forest Canopies.” Remote Sensing of Environment, 23:83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laasasenaho, J. 1982. “Taper Curve and Volume Functions for Pine. Spruce and Birch,” Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 108. 74 pp. Helsinki. ISBN 951–40–0589–9.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, J. 1983. “Usability of Air Photo Interpretation in Drained Peatland Forest Surveys,” Suo, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1–7. Finnish Peatland Society.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, J. and H. Vasander. 1990. “Suotyypit.” Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki. 80 pp. ISBN 951–26–3396–5.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, J., J. Päivänen, H. Schneider, and H. Vasander. 1986. “Site Types at Lakkasuo Mire Complex. Field Guide.” Publications from the Department of Peatland Forestry. University of Helsinki 8. 35 pp. ISBN 951–45–3950–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lauhanen, R., P. Pietiläinen, M. Saarinen, and E. Heikkinen. 1995. “Usability of Infra Red Imagery in the Planning of Ditch Network Maintance” Suo, 46(1):21–30. Finnish Peatland Society.
   Google Scholar
• Leckie, G.D. 1987. “Factors Affecting Defoliation Assessment Using Airborne Multispectral Scanner Data,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53:1665–1674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. and A.H. Strahler. 1986. “Geometric-Optical Bidirectional Reflectance Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30:276–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marceau, D.J., D.J. Gratton, R.A. Fournier, and J.P. Fortin. 1994. “Remote Sensing and The Measurement of Geographical Entities in a Forested Environment,” 2. The Optimal Spatial Resolution. Remote Sensing of Environment, 49:105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Land Survey of Finland. 1996. “Digital Elevation Models,” Available from http://www.nls.fi/kartta/maps/elev.html. Updated October 29, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, T.D. and J.L. Smith. 1987. “Stem Count Accuracy and Species Determination in Loblolly Pine Plantations Using 35-mm Aerial Photography,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53(12): 1675–1678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, H. 1991. “Jämförelse Av Regressionsfunktioner För Relativ Kalibrering Av Landsat TM Data Över Skog. Summary: Comparison of Regression Functions for Multitemporal Image Normalization of Landsat TM Data Over Forest,” Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Forest Survey, Report 6, pp. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Paavilainen, E. and J. Päivänen. 1995. “Peatland Forestry. Ecology and Principles,” Springer, Ecological Studies 111.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkonen, T. 1991. “Topos Manual,” Tmi Timo Pekkonen. Helsinki. (in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Pellikka, P. 1996. “Illumination Compensation for Aerial Video Images to Increase Land Cover Classification Accuracy in Mountains,” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 22:368–381.
   Google Scholar
• Pellikka, P. 1998. ‘Development of Correction Chain for Multispectral Airborne Video Camera Data for Natural Resource Assessment.’ FENNIA, 176:1–110. Geographical Society of Finland. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Poso, S. 1972. “A Method of Combining Photo and Field Samples in Forest Inventory,” Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae. Dissertation. IFBN 951–40–0012–0.
   Google Scholar
• Poso, S., M. Karlsson, T. Pekkonen, and P. Härmä. 1990. “A System for Combining Data from Remote Sensing, Maps and Field Measurements for Forest Planning Purposes,” University of Helsinki. Department of Forest Mensuration and Management. Research Notes, 23:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ranson K.J., J.R. Irons, and D.L. Williams. 1994. “Multispectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Northern Forest Canopies with the Advanced Solid-State Array Spectroradiometer (ASAS),” Remote Sensing of Environment, 47:276–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A. 1989. “Digital Change Detection Techniques Using Remotely-Sensed Data,” Review Article. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6):989–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varjo, J. 1993. “Controlling Continuously Updated Forest Data by Satellite Remote Sensing,” Thesis for the Licenciate Degree in Forest Management Planning. University of Joensuu. Faculty of Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G. 1996. “An Expert System for Forest Resource Inventory and Monitoring in the Frame of Multi-Source Data,” University of Helsinki. Deparment of Forest Resource Management. Publications 10 pp. 32–33. ISBN 951–45–7289–0.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, X. and D.G. Leckie. 1992. “An Investigation of Correction Techniques for View-Angle Effects on High Resolution MEIS Data of Forested Terrain,” Proceedings, 15th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Toronto, Ontario, pp. 462–467.
   Google Scholar