Basic and Applied Research: Application of Disciplinary Theory and Methods in the Field of Leisure Studies

References

• Banks, J., & Carson, J. (1984). Discrete-Event System Simulation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. ( Ed.) (1999). Special Issue: The Theory and Practice of Interdisciplinary Work. Policy Sciences. 32 (4): 315–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdge, R. (1983). Making Leisure and Recreation Research a Scholarly Topic: Views of a Journal Editor, 1972–1982. Leisure Sciences, 6 (1): 99–126.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, D. (1998). Analyzing Public Inputs to Multiple Objective Decisions on National Forests Using Conjoint Analysis. Forest Science, 44 (3): 421–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, M., Vaske, J., & Shelby, B. (1992). Measuring Backcountry Standards in Visitor Surveys. Defining Wilderness Quality: The Role of Standards in Wilderness Management – A Workshop Proceedings. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PWW – 305, 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Godbey, G. (2000). The Future of Leisure Studies. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1): 37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, C. ( ed.). (1973). Dictionary of Education. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Graefe, A., Kuss, F., & Vaske, J. (1990). Visitor Impact Management: The Planning Framework. Washington, D.C.: National Parks and Conservation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, G., & Hawes, L. (1982). The Concise Dictionary of Education. New York: Van Nastrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T., Alfano, G., & Ervin, L. (1986). Using a Social Carrying Capacity Model to Estimate the Effects of Marina Development at the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. Leisure Sciences, 8: 257–274.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (1965). Standard Characteristics of Norms. Current Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kockelmans, J. ( Ed.)(1979). Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, A, & Kelton, W. (1991). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2000a). Crowding versus access at Delicate Arch, Arches National Park: An indifference curve analysis. In I. Schneider, D. Chavez, B. Borrie, & K. James (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Social Aspects and Recreation Research (p. 135–143). Tempe: Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2000b). Evaluating multiple dimensions of visitors’ Tradeoffs between access and crowding at Arches National Park using indifference curve analysis. Proceedings of the 2000 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-276.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2001a). Crossing experiential boundaries: Visitor preferences regarding trade-offs among social, resource, and managerial attributes of the Denali wilderness experience. The George Wright Forum, 18, 10–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2001b). Solitude versus access: A study of trade-offs in outdoor recreation using indifference curve analysis. Leisure Sciences, 23, 179–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2002a). Integrating multiple wilderness values into a decision-making model for Denali National Park and Preserve. In A. Arnberger, C. Brandenburg, & A. Muhar (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas (p. 136–142). Vienna: Bodenkultur University.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2002b). Trade-offs among social, resource, and Management attributes of the Denali wilderness experience: A contextual Approach to normative research. Leisure Sciences, 24, 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, S. & Manning, R. Valliere, W., Wang, B., & Budruk, M. (2002). Using Simulation Modeling to Facilitate Proactive Monitoring and Adaptive Management of Social Carrying Capacity in Arches National Park, Utah, USA. Proceedings of the International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Park Areas. Vienna, Austria: Bodenkultur University, p. 205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Louviere, J., & Timmermans, H. (1990). Stated Preference and Choice Models Applied to Recreation Research: A Review. Leisure Sciences, 12, 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Maccrimmon, K., & Toda, M. (1969). The Experimental Determination of Indifference Curves. Review of Economic Studies, 36, 433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, J. (1993). A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 593–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (1999). Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for Satisfaction. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R. (2001). Visitor Experience and Resource Protection: A Framework for Managing the Carrying Capacity of National Parks. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19 (1): 93–108.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., & Lawson, S. (2002). Carrying Capacity or “Informed Judgement”: The Values of Science and the Science of Values. Environmental Management, 30: 157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., & Potter, F. (1984). Computer Simulation as a Tool in Teaching Park and Wilderness Management. Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., & Valliere, W. (2002). Coping in Outdoor Recreation: Causes and Consequences of Crowding and Conflict Among Community Residents. Journal of Leisure Research, 33: 410–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Lime, D, & Hof, M. (1996b). Social Carrying Capacity of Natural Areas: Theory and Application in the U.S. National Parks. Natural Areas Journal, 16: 118–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Lime, D., Freimund, W., & Pitt, D. (1996a). Crowding Norms at Frontcountry Sites: A Visual Approach to Setting Standards of Quality. Leisure Sciences, 19: 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Newman, P., Valliere, W., Wang, B., & Lawson, S. (2001). Respondent Self-Assessment of Research on Crowding Norms in Outdoor Recreation. Journal of Leisure Research, 33 (3): 251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Valliere, W., Minteer, B., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (2000). Crowding in Parks and Outdoor Recreation: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Managerial Analysis. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18 (4): 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Valliere, W., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (1999). Crowding Norms: Alternative Measurement Approaches. Leisure Sciences, 21 (2): 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Valliere, W., Wang, B., Lawson, S., & Newman, P. ( In Press). Estimating Day Use Social Carrying Capacity in Yosemite National Park. Leisure: The Journal of the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, R., Wang, B., Valliere, W., Lawson, S., & Newman, P. (2002). Research to Estimate and Manage Carrying Capacity of a Tourist Attraction: A Study of Alcatraz Island. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10: 388–404.
   Google Scholar
• Mccool, S., Lime, D., & Anderson, D. (1977). Simulation Modeling as a Tool for Managing River Recreation. In River Recreation Management and Research Symposium Proceedings (p. 202–209). USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. NC-28.
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. (1997). VERP: The Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) Framework – A Handbook for Planners and Managers. Denver, CO: Denver Service Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, W. (1995). Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions (6th ed.). Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Opaluch, J., Swallow, S., Weaver, T., Wessells, C., & Wichelns, D. (1993). Evaluating Impacts from Noxious Facilities: Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. ( Ed.). (1984). McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Science and Technical Terms. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, M., & Hammitt, W. (1990). Backcountry Encounter Norms, Actual Reported Encounters, and Their Relationship to Wilderness Solitude. Journal of Leisure Research, 22: 259–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidd, M. (1992). Computer Simulation in Management Science. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pindyck, R., & Rubinfeld, D. (1995). Microeconomics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, F., & Manning, R. (1984). Application of the Wilderness Travel Simulation Model to the Appalachian Trail in Vermont. Environmental Management, 8, 543–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter, M., & Lucas, R. (1978). Simulation of Recreational Use for Park and Wilderness Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, M. (2000). Is Leisure Theory Needed for Leisure Studies? Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1): 138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiden, E. (1954). On the Problem of Construction of Orthogonal Arrays. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, B. (1981). Encounter Norms in Backcountry Settings: Studies of Three Rivers. Journal of Leisure Research, 13: 129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. (1986). Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., Vaske, J., & Harris, R. (1988). User Standards for Ecological Impacts at Wilderness Campsites. Journal of Leisure Research, 20: 245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., & Vaske, J. (1991). Using Normative Data to Develop Evaluative Standards for Resource Management: A Comment on Three Papers. Journal of Leisure Research, 23: 173–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., & Whittaker, D. (1995). Flows and Recreation Quality on the Delores River: Integrating Overall and Specific Evaluations. Rivers, 5: 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelby, B., Vaske, J., & Donnelly, M. (1996). Norms, Standards, and Natural Resources. Leisure Sciences, 18: 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Headly, R. (1975). The Use of Computer Simulation Models in Wilderness Management. In S. Ladany ( Ed.), Management Science Applications to Leisure Time. North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., & Krutilla, J. (1976). Structure and Properties of a Wilderness Travel Simulator. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G., Cole, D., Lucas, R., Peterson, M., Frissel, S., & Washburne, R. (1985). The Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) System for Wilderness Planning. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT – 176.
   Google Scholar
• Stankey, G., & Manning, R. (1986). Carrying Capacity of Recreation Settings. A Literature Review: The President’s Commission on Americans Outdoors. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing office, M-47M-57.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J., Graefe, A., Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. (1986). Backcountry Encounter Norms: Theory, Method, and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 18: 137–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaske, J., & Donnelly, M. (1988). Normative Evaluations of Wildlife Management. Paper presented at the Annual Congress of the National Recreation and Park Association, Indianapolis, ID.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J., Donnelly, M., & Ptruzzi, J. (1996). Country of Origin, Encounter Norms, and Crowding in a Frontcountry Setting. Leisure Sciences, 18: 161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, P., & Stehr, N. (2000). Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, D., & Shelby, B. (1988). Types of Norms for Recreation Impact: Extending the Social Norm Concept. Journal of Leisure Research, 20: 261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Roggenbuck, J., & Bange, S. (1991). The Effect of Norm-Encounter Compatibility on Crowding Perceptions, Experience, and Behavior in River Recreation Settings. Journal of Leisure Research, 23: 154–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar