Genome-wide analysis of parasitic fitness traits in a non-model tree pathogen

References

• Andrivon D. 1993. Nomenclature for pathogenicity and virulence: the need for precision. Phytopathology. 83:889–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoun M, Jacobi V, Boyle B, Bernier L. 2010. Identification and monitoring of Ulmus americana transcripts during in vitro interactions with the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 74:254–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandara HMHN, Lam OLT, Jin LJ, Samaranayake L. 2012. Microbial chemical signaling: a current perspective. Crit Rev Microbiol. 38:217–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier L, Aoun M, Bouvet GF, Comeau A, Dufour J, Naruzawa ES, Nigg M, Plourde KV. 2015. Genomics of the Dutch elm disease pathosystem: are we there yet? iForest. 8:149–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier L, Jeng RS, Hubbes M. 1983. Differentiation of aggressive and non-aggressive strains of Ceratocystis ulmi by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of intramycelial enzymes. Mycotaxon. 17:456–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrocal A, Navarrete J, Oviedo C, Nickerson KW. 2012. Quorum sensing activity in Ophiostoma ulmi: effects of fusel oils and branched chain amino acids on yeast-mycelial dimorphism. J Appl Microbiol. 113:126–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz T, Canevascini G. 1996. Xylanases from the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 49:159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz T, Canevascini G. 1997. Purification and partial characterization of the extracellular laccase from Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Curr Microbiol. 35:278–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenstein K, Macaya-Sanz D, Martín JA, Albrectsen BR, Witzell J. 2015. Phenotype MicroArrays as a complementary tool to next generation sequencing for characterization of tree endophytes. Front Microbiol. 6:1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvet GF, Jacobi V, Bernier L. 2007. Characterization of three DNA transposons in the Dutch elm disease fungi and evidence of repeat-induced point (RIP) mutations. Fungal Genet Biol. 44:430–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvet GF, Jacobi V, Plourde KV, Bernier L. 2008. Stress-induced mobility of OPHIO1 and OPHIO2, DNA transposons of the Dutch elm disease fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 45:565–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden CG, Smalley E, Guries RP, Hubbes M, Temple B, Horgen PA. 1996. Lack of association between cerato-ulmin production and virulence in Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 9:556–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasier CM. 1991. Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia. 115:151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasier CM, Gibbs JN. 1976. Inheritance of pathogenicity and cultural characters in Ceratocystis ulmi: hybridization of aggressive and non-aggressive strains. Ann Appl Biol. 83:31–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasier CM, Kirk SA. 2001. Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi as subspecies. Mycol Res. 105:547–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasier CM, Kirk SA. 2010. Rapid emergence of hybrids between the two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. Plant Pathol. 59:186–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasier CM, Kirk SA, Pipe ND, Buck KW. 1998. Rare interspecific hybrids in natural populations of the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi. Mycol Res. 102:45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasier CM, Mehrotra MD. 1995. Ophiostoma himal-ulmi sp. nov., a new species of Dutch elm disease fungus endemic to the Himalayas. Mycol Res. 99:205–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton AH, Gadd GM. 1989. The effect of exogenously-supplied nucleosides and nucleotides and the involvement of adenosine 3ʹ:5ʹ-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP) in the yeast mycelium transition of Ceratocystis (= Ophiostoma) ulmi. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 60:49–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisman CJ. 1932. Ceratostomella ulmi, de geslachtelijke vorm van Graphium ulmi Schwarz [Ceratostomella ulmi, the sexual form of Graphium ulmi Schwarz]. Tijdschr PlZiekt. 38:1–8. Dutch.
   Google Scholar
• Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. 2009. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D233–D238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro JS, de la Bastide PY, Chabot M, Lerch L, Hintz WE. 2010. Suppression of polygalacturonasegene expression in the phytopathogenic fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi by RNA interference. Fungal Genet Biol. 47:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro JS, de la Bastide PY, Hintz WE. 2013. Regulated gene silencing in the fungal pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 82:28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comeau AM, Dufour J, Bouvet GF, Nigg M, Jacobi V, Henrissat B, Laroche J, Levesque RC, Bernier L. 2015. Functional annotation of the Ophiostoma novo-ulmi genome: insights into the phytopathogenicity of the fungal agent of Dutch elm disease. Genome Biol Evol. 7:410–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, Li Z, Yu J, Ma M, Zhang R, Chen H, Pham T. 2015. The CYP51F1 gene of Leptographium qinlingensis: sequence characteristic, phylogeny and transcript levels. Int J Mol Sci. 16:12014–12034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalpé Y. 1983. L’influence de la carence en pyridoxine sur la morphologie et l’ultrastructure cellulaire de Ceratocystis ulmi [Influence of pyridoxine deficiency on the morphology and cellular ultrastructure of Ceratocystis ulmi]. Can J Bot. 61:2079–2084. French.
   Google Scholar
• de Hoog GS, Scheffer RJ. 1984. Ceratocystis versus Ophiostoma: a reappraisal. Mycologia. 76:292–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Salas F, Martínez MJ, Barriuso J. 2015. Quorum-sensing mechanisms mediated by farnesol in Ophiostoma piceae: effect on secretion of sterol esterase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 81:4351–4357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar K, Bernier L. 1993. Electrophoretic karyotypes of the elm tree pathogen Ophiostoma ulmi (sensu lato). Mol Gen Genet. 238:43–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewar K, Bernier L. 1995. Inheritance patterns of nonhomologous chromosomes in Ophiostoma ulmi sensu lato. Curr Genet. 27:541–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar K, Bousquet J, Dufour J, Bernier L. 1997. A meiotically reproducible chromosome length polymorphism in the ascomycete fungus Ophiostoma ulmi (sensu lato). Mol Gen Genet. 255:38–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DiGuistini S, Wang Y, Liao NY, Taylor G, Tanguay P, Feau N, Henrissat B, Chan SK, Hesse-Orce U, Massoumi Alamouti S, et al. 2011. Genome and transcriptome analyses of the mountain pine beetle-fungal symbiont Grosmannia clavigera, a lodgepole pine pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:2504–2509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Et-Touil A, Brasier CM, Bernier L. 1999. Localization of a pathogenicity gene in Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and evidence that it may be introgressed from O. ulmi. Mol Plant-Microbe Inter. 12:6–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. 1998. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caernorhabditis elegans. Nature. 391:806–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgetta V, Leveque G, Dias J, Grove D, Lyons Jr R, Genik S, Wright C, Singh S, Peterson N, Zianni M, et al. 2013. Comparison of multiple genome sequencing centers and analysis of the Dutch elm disease fungus genome using the Roche/454 GS-FLX titanium system. J Biomol Tech. 24:39–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fulbright DW. 1984. Effect of eliminating ds-RNA in hypovirulent Endothia parasitica. Phytopathology. 74:722–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier GM. 2015. Dimorphism in fungal pathogens of mammals, plants, and insects. PLoS Pathog. 11:e1004608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs JN, Brasier CM. 1973. Correlation between cultural characters and pathogenicity in Ceratocystis ulmi from Britain, Europe and America. Nature. 241:381–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haridas S, Wang Y, Lim L, Massoumi Alamouti S, Jackman S, Docking R, Robertson G, Birol I, Bohlmann J, Breuil C. 2013. The genome and transcriptome of the pine saprophyte Ophiostoma piceae, and a comparison with the bark beetle-associated pine pathogen Grosmannia clavigera. BMC Genomics. 14:373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz W, Pinchback M, De La Bastide P, Burgess S, Jacobi V, Hamelin R, Breuil C, Bernier L. 2011. Functional categorization of unique expressed sequence tags obtained from the yeast-like growth phase of the elm pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. BMC Genomics. 12:431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintz WE, Jeng RS, Hubbes M, Horgen PA. 1991. Identification of three populations of Ophiostoma ulmi (aggressive subgroup) by mitochondrial DNA restriction-site mapping and nuclear DNA fingerprinting. Exp Mycol. 15:316–325.
   Google Scholar
• Hoegger PJ, Binz T, Heiniger U. 1996. Detection of genetic variation between Ophiostoma ulmi and the NAN and EAN races of O. novo-ulmi in Switzerland using RAPD markers. Eur J For Pathol. 26:57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby JM, Jacobitz-Kizzier SM, McNeel DJ, Jensen EC, Treves DS, Nickerson KW. 2004. Inoculum size effect in dimorphic fungi: extracellular control of yeast-mycelium dimorphism in Ceratocystis ulmi. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70:1356–1359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudler GW, Banik MT, Miller SG. 1987. Unusual epidemic of tar spot on Norway maple in upstate New York. Plant Dis. 71:65–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi V, Dufour J, Bouvet GF, Aoun M, Bernier L. 2010. Identification of transcripts upregulated in asexual and sexual fruiting bodies of the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Can J Microbiol. 56:697–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng RS, Hubbes M. 1983. Identification of aggressive and non-aggressive strains of Ceratocystis ulmi by polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis of intramycelial proteins. Mycotaxon. 17:445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen EC, Ogg C, Nickerson KW. 1992. Lipoxygenase inhibitors shift the yeast/mycelium dimorphism in Ceratocystis ulmi. Appl Environ Microbiol. 58:2505–2508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. 2012. A programmable dual-RNA guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 337:816–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshraftar S, Hung S, Khan S, Gong Y, Tyagi V, Parkinson J, Sain M, Moses AM, Christendat D. 2013. Sequencing and annotation of the Ophiostoma ulmi genome. BMC Genomics. 14:162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug L, Daum G. 2014. Yeast lipid metabolism at a glance. FEMS Yeast Res. 14:369–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni RK, Nickerson KW. 1981. Nutritional control of dimorphism in Ceratocystis ulmi. Exp Mycol. 5:148–154.
   Google Scholar
• Muthukumar G, Nickerson KW. 1984. Ca(II)-calmodulin regulation of fungal dimorphism in Ceratocystis ulmi. J Bacteriol. 159:390–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagalakshmi U, Wang Z, Waern K, Shou C, Raha D, Gerstein M, Snyder M. 2008. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science. 320:1344–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naruzawa ES 2015. Bases moléculaires du dimorphisme levure-mycélium chez le champignon phytopathogène Ophiostoma novo-ulmi [Molecular bases of yeast-mycelium dimorphism in the plant pathogenic fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi] [dissertation]. Quebec City (QC): Université Laval. French.
   Google Scholar
• Naruzawa ES, Bernier L. 2014. Control of yeast-mycelium dimorphism in vitro in Dutch elm disease fungi by manipulation of specific external stimuli. Fungal Biol. 118:872–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naruzawa ES, Malagnac F, Bernier L. 2016. Effect of linoleic acid on reproduction and yeast-mycelium dimorphism in the Dutch elm disease pathogens. Botany. 94:31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson DR. 2009. The cytochrome P450 homepage. Hum Genomics. 4:59–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nigg M, Laroche J, Landry CR, Bernier L. 2015. RNAseq analysis highlights specific transcriptome signatures of yeast and mycelial growth phases in the Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. G3 (Bethesda). 5:2487–2495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ninomiya Y, Suzuki K, Ishii C, Inoue H. 2004. Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:12248–12253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nødvig CS, Nielsen JB, Kogle ME, Mortensen UH. 2015. A CRISPR-Cas9 system for genetic engineering of filamentous Fungi. PLoS One. 10:e0133085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paoletti M, Buck KW, Brasier CM. 2006. Selective acquisition of novel mating type and vegetative incompatibility genes via interspecies gene transfer in the globally invading eukaryote Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Mol Ecol. 15:249–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdiguero P, Venturas M, Cervera MT, Gil L, Collada C. 2015. Massive sequencing of Ulmus minor’s transcriptome provides new molecular tools for a genus under the constant threat of Dutch elm disease. Front Plant Sci. 6:541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira V, Royer JC, Hintz WE, Field D, Bowden C, Kokurewicz K, Hubbes M, Horgen PA. 2000. A gene associated with filamentous growth in Ophiostoma novo-ulmi has RNA-binding motifs and is similar to a yeast gene involved in mRNA splicing. Curr Genet. 37:94–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde KV, Bernier L. 2014. Inoculation of apple (Malus x domestica ‘Golden Delicious’) fruits provides a rapid virulence assay for the Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Plant Pathol. 63:1078–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plourde KV, Jacobi V, Bernier L. 2008. Use of insertional mutagenesis to tag putative parasitic fitness genes in the Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subsp. novo-ulmi. Can J Microbiol. 54:797–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor RH, Guries RP, Smalley EB. 1994. Lack of association between tolerance to the elm phytoalexin mansonone E and virulence in Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Can J Bot. 72:1355–1364.
   Google Scholar
• Richards WC. 1994. Nonsporulation in the Dutch elm disease fungus Ophiostoma ulmi: evidence for control by a single nuclear gene. Can J Bot. 72:461–467.
   Google Scholar
• Royer JC, Dewar K, Hubbes M, Horgen PA. 1991. Analysis of a high frequency transformation system for Ophiostoma ulmi, the causal agent of Dutch elm disease. Mol Gen Genet. 225:168–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scheffer RJ, Liem JI, Elgersma DM. 1987. Production in vitro of phytotoxic compounds by non-aggressive and aggressive isolates of Ophiostoma ulmi, the Dutch elm disease pathogen. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 30:321–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz MB. 1922. Das zweigensterben der olmen, trauerweiden und pfirschbäume [The twig dying of the elms, willows, and peach trees]. Meded phytopath Lab Willie Commelin Scholten. 5:1–73. Dutch.
   Google Scholar
• Solla A, Dacasa MC, Nasmith C, Hubbes M, Gil L. 2008. Analysis of Spanish populations of Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi using phenotypic characteristics and RAPD markers. Plant Pathol. 57:33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svaldi R, Elgersma DM. 1982. Further studies on the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes of aggressive and non-aggressive isolates of Ophiostoma ulmi. Eur J For Pathol. 12:29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadesse Y, Bernier L, Hintz WE, Horgen PA. 2003. Real time RT-PCR quantification and Northern analysis of Cerato ulmin (CU) gene transcription in different strains of the phytopathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo ulmi. Mol Genet Gen. 269:789–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple B, Bernier L, Hintz WE. 2009. Characterization of the polygalacturonase gene of the Dutch elm disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. N Z J For Sci. 39:29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Temple B, Horgen PA, Bernier L, Hintz WE. 1997. Cerato-ulmin, a hydrophobin secreted by the causal agents of Dutch elm disease, is a parasitic fitness factor. Fungal Genet Biol. 22:39–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban M, Pant R, Raghunath A, Irvine AG, Pedro H, Hammond-Kosack K. 2015. The pathogen-host interactions database: additons and future developments. Nucl Acids Res. 43:D645–D655.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. 2009. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 10:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedge ME, Naruzawa ES, Nigg M, Bernier L. 2016. Diversity in yeast-mycelium dimorphism response of the Dutch elm disease pathogens: the inoculum size effect. Can J Microbiol. (In Press). doi:10.1139/cjm-2015-0795
   PubMedGoogle Scholar